mirrors/git
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-28 12:34:08 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
8aed4a5e38
git/builtin/merge-recursive.c

92 lines
2.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
#include "cache.h"
#include "commit.h"
#include "tag.h"
Build-in merge-recursive This makes write_tree_from_memory(), which writes the active cache as a tree and returns the struct tree for it, available to other code. It also makes available merge_trees(), which does the internal merge of two trees with a known base, and merge_recursive(), which does the recursive internal merge of two commits with a list of common ancestors. The first two of these will be used by checkout -m, and the third is presumably useful in general, although the implementation of checkout -m which entirely matches the behavior of the shell version does not use it (since it ignores the difference of ancestry between the old branch and the new branch). Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
2008-02-08 00:40:05 +08:00
#include "merge-recursive.h"
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
builtin/merge_recursive.c: Add an usage string and make use of it. This improves the usage output by adding builtin_merge_recursive_usage string that follows the same pattern used by the other builtin commands. The previous output for git merger-recursive was: usage: merge-recursive <base>... -- <head> <remote> ... Now the output is: usage: git merge-recursive <base>... -- <head> <remote> ... Since cmd_merge_recursive is used to handle four different commands we need the %s in the usage string, so the following example: $ git merge-subtree -h Will output: usage: git merge-subtree <base>... -- <head> <remote> ... Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-30 11:30:22 +08:00
static const char builtin_merge_recursive_usage[] =
"git %s <base>... -- <head> <remote> ...";
Move better_branch_name above get_ref in merge-recursive. To permit the get_ref function to use the static better_branch_name function to generate a string on demand I'm moving it up earlier. The actual logic was not affected in this change. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-28 15:35:20 +08:00
static const char *better_branch_name(const char *branch)
{
static char githead_env[8 + 40 + 1];
char *name;
if (strlen(branch) != 40)
return branch;
sprintf(githead_env, "GITHEAD_%s", branch);
name = getenv(githead_env);
return name ? name : branch;
}
Build-in merge-recursive This makes write_tree_from_memory(), which writes the active cache as a tree and returns the struct tree for it, available to other code. It also makes available merge_trees(), which does the internal merge of two trees with a known base, and merge_recursive(), which does the recursive internal merge of two commits with a list of common ancestors. The first two of these will be used by checkout -m, and the third is presumably useful in general, although the implementation of checkout -m which entirely matches the behavior of the shell version does not use it (since it ignores the difference of ancestry between the old branch and the new branch). Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
2008-02-08 00:40:05 +08:00
int cmd_merge_recursive(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
{
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
const unsigned char *bases[21];
merge-recursive.c: Add more generic merge_recursive_generic() merge_recursive_generic() takes, in comparison to to merge_recursive(), no commit ("struct commit *") arguments but SHA ids ("unsigned char *"), and no commit list of bases but an array of refs ("const char **"). This makes it more generic in the case that it can also take the SHA of a tree to merge trees without commits, for the bases, the head and the remote. merge_recursive_generic() also handles locking and updating of the index, which is a common use case of merge_recursive(). This patch also rewrites builtin-merge-recursive.c to make use of merge_recursive_generic(). By doing this, I stumbled over the limitation of 20 bases and I've added a warning if this limitation is exceeded. This patch qualifies make_virtual_commit() as static again because this function is not needed anymore outside merge-recursive.c. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-13 04:13:59 +08:00
unsigned bases_count = 0;
int i, failed;
unsigned char h1[20], h2[20];
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
struct merge_options o;
struct commit *result;
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
init_merge_options(&o);
Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive. This makes "subtree" more orthogonal to the rest of recursive merge, so that you can use subtree and ours/theirs features at the same time. For example, you can now say: git merge -s subtree -Xtheirs other to merge with "other" branch while shifting it up or down to match the shape of the tree of the current branch, and resolving conflicts favoring the changes "other" branch made over changes made in the current branch. It also allows the prefix used to shift the trees to be specified using the "-Xsubtree=$prefix" option. Giving an empty prefix tells the command to figure out how much to shift trees automatically as we have always done. "merge -s subtree" is the same as "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree=" (or "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree"). Based on an old patch done back in the days when git-merge was a script; Avery ported the script part to builtin-merge.c. Bugs in shift_tree() is mine. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-01 13:18:57 +08:00
if (argv[0] && !suffixcmp(argv[0], "-subtree"))
o.subtree_shift = "";
A new merge stragety 'subtree'. This merge strategy largely piggy-backs on git-merge-recursive. When merging trees A and B, if B corresponds to a subtree of A, B is first adjusted to match the tree structure of A, instead of reading the trees at the same level. This adjustment is also done to the common ancestor tree. If you are pulling updates from git-gui repository into git.git repository, the root level of the former corresponds to git-gui/ subdirectory of the latter. The tree object of git-gui's toplevel is wrapped in a fake tree object, whose sole entry has name 'git-gui' and records object name of the true tree, before being used by the 3-way merge code. If you are merging the other way, only the git-gui/ subtree of git.git is extracted and merged into git-gui's toplevel. The detection of corresponding subtree is done by comparing the pathnames and types in the toplevel of the tree. Heuristics galore! That's the git way ;-). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-16 08:32:45 +08:00
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
if (argc < 4)
builtin/merge_recursive.c: Add an usage string and make use of it. This improves the usage output by adding builtin_merge_recursive_usage string that follows the same pattern used by the other builtin commands. The previous output for git merger-recursive was: usage: merge-recursive <base>... -- <head> <remote> ... Now the output is: usage: git merge-recursive <base>... -- <head> <remote> ... Since cmd_merge_recursive is used to handle four different commands we need the %s in the usage string, so the following example: $ git merge-subtree -h Will output: usage: git merge-subtree <base>... -- <head> <remote> ... Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-30 11:30:22 +08:00
usagef(builtin_merge_recursive_usage, argv[0]);
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i) {
git merge -X<option> Teach "-X <option>" command line argument to "git merge" that is passed to strategy implementations. "ours" and "theirs" autoresolution introduced by the previous commit can be asked to the recursive strategy. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-26 10:23:55 +08:00
const char *arg = argv[i];
if (!prefixcmp(arg, "--")) {
if (!arg[2])
break;
if (!strcmp(arg+2, "ours"))
o.recursive_variant = MERGE_RECURSIVE_OURS;
else if (!strcmp(arg+2, "theirs"))
o.recursive_variant = MERGE_RECURSIVE_THEIRS;
else if (!strcmp(arg+2, "subtree"))
Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive. This makes "subtree" more orthogonal to the rest of recursive merge, so that you can use subtree and ours/theirs features at the same time. For example, you can now say: git merge -s subtree -Xtheirs other to merge with "other" branch while shifting it up or down to match the shape of the tree of the current branch, and resolving conflicts favoring the changes "other" branch made over changes made in the current branch. It also allows the prefix used to shift the trees to be specified using the "-Xsubtree=$prefix" option. Giving an empty prefix tells the command to figure out how much to shift trees automatically as we have always done. "merge -s subtree" is the same as "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree=" (or "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree"). Based on an old patch done back in the days when git-merge was a script; Avery ported the script part to builtin-merge.c. Bugs in shift_tree() is mine. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-01 13:18:57 +08:00
o.subtree_shift = "";
else if (!prefixcmp(arg+2, "subtree="))
o.subtree_shift = arg + 10;
merge-recursive --renormalize Teach "git merge-recursive" a --renormalize option to enable the merge.renormalize configuration. The --no-renormalize option can be used to override it in the negative. So in the future, you might be able to, e.g.: git checkout -m -Xrenormalize otherbranch or git revert -Xrenormalize otherpatch or git pull --rebase -Xrenormalize The bad part: merge.renormalize is still not honored for most commands. And it reveals lots of places that -X has not been plumbed in (so we get "git merge -Xrenormalize" but not much else). NEEDSWORK: tests Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 19:32:41 +08:00
else if (!strcmp(arg+2, "renormalize"))
o.renormalize = 1;
else if (!strcmp(arg+2, "no-renormalize"))
o.renormalize = 0;
git merge -X<option> Teach "-X <option>" command line argument to "git merge" that is passed to strategy implementations. "ours" and "theirs" autoresolution introduced by the previous commit can be asked to the recursive strategy. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-26 10:23:55 +08:00
else
die("Unknown option %s", arg);
continue;
}
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
if (bases_count < ARRAY_SIZE(bases)-1) {
unsigned char *sha = xmalloc(20);
if (get_sha1(argv[i], sha))
die("Could not parse object '%s'", argv[i]);
bases[bases_count++] = sha;
merge-recursive.c: Add more generic merge_recursive_generic() merge_recursive_generic() takes, in comparison to to merge_recursive(), no commit ("struct commit *") arguments but SHA ids ("unsigned char *"), and no commit list of bases but an array of refs ("const char **"). This makes it more generic in the case that it can also take the SHA of a tree to merge trees without commits, for the bases, the head and the remote. merge_recursive_generic() also handles locking and updating of the index, which is a common use case of merge_recursive(). This patch also rewrites builtin-merge-recursive.c to make use of merge_recursive_generic(). By doing this, I stumbled over the limitation of 20 bases and I've added a warning if this limitation is exceeded. This patch qualifies make_virtual_commit() as static again because this function is not needed anymore outside merge-recursive.c. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-13 04:13:59 +08:00
}
else
MinGW: Fix compiler warning in merge-recursive GCC 4.4.0 on Windows does not like the format %zu. It is quite unlikely, though, that we need more merge bases than a %d can display, so replace the %zu by a %d. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-23 16:04:51 +08:00
warning("Cannot handle more than %d bases. "
"Ignoring %s.",
(int)ARRAY_SIZE(bases)-1, argv[i]);
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
}
if (argc - i != 3) /* "--" "<head>" "<remote>" */
die("Not handling anything other than two heads merge.");
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
o.branch1 = argv[++i];
o.branch2 = argv[++i];
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
if (get_sha1(o.branch1, h1))
die("Could not resolve ref '%s'", o.branch1);
if (get_sha1(o.branch2, h2))
die("Could not resolve ref '%s'", o.branch2);
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
o.branch1 = better_branch_name(o.branch1);
o.branch2 = better_branch_name(o.branch2);
Display a progress meter during merge-recursive. Because large merges on slow systems can take up to a minute to execute we should try to keep the user entertained with a progress meter to let them know how far we have progressed through the current merge. The progress meter considers each entry in the in-memory index to be a unit, which means a single recursive merge will double the number of units in the progress meter. Files which are unmerged after the 3-way tree merge are also considered a unit within the progress meter. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-14 13:28:58 +08:00
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
if (o.verbosity >= 3)
printf("Merging %s with %s\n", o.branch1, o.branch2);
Display 'theirs' branch name when possible in merge. Displaying the SHA1 of 'their' branch (the branch being merged into the current branch) is not nearly as friendly as just displaying the name of that branch, especially if that branch is already local to this repository. git-merge now sets the environment variable 'GITHEAD_%(sha1)=%(name)' for each argument it gets passed, making the actual input name that resolved to the commit '%(sha1)' easily available to the invoked merge strategy. git-merge-recursive makes use of these environment variables when they are available by using '%(name)' whenever it outputs the commit identification rather than '%(sha1)'. This is most obvious in the conflict hunks created by xdl_merge: $ git mege sideb~1 <<<<<<< HEAD:INSTALL Good! ======= Oops. >>>>>>> sideb~1:INSTALL [jc: adjusted a test script and a minor constness glitch.] Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-23 16:44:47 +08:00
merge-recursive: introduce merge_options This makes it possible to avoid passing the labels of branches as arguments to merge_recursive(), merge_trees() and merge_recursive_generic(). It also takes care of subtree merge, output buffering, verbosity, and rename limits - these were global variables till now in merge-recursive.c. A new function, named init_merge_options(), is introduced as well, it clears the struct merge_info, then initializes with default values, finally updates the default values based on the config and environment variables. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-25 22:25:57 +08:00
failed = merge_recursive_generic(&o, h1, h2, bases_count, bases, &result);
merge-recursive.c: Add more generic merge_recursive_generic() merge_recursive_generic() takes, in comparison to to merge_recursive(), no commit ("struct commit *") arguments but SHA ids ("unsigned char *"), and no commit list of bases but an array of refs ("const char **"). This makes it more generic in the case that it can also take the SHA of a tree to merge trees without commits, for the bases, the head and the remote. merge_recursive_generic() also handles locking and updating of the index, which is a common use case of merge_recursive(). This patch also rewrites builtin-merge-recursive.c to make use of merge_recursive_generic(). By doing this, I stumbled over the limitation of 20 bases and I've added a warning if this limitation is exceeded. This patch qualifies make_virtual_commit() as static again because this function is not needed anymore outside merge-recursive.c. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-13 04:13:59 +08:00
if (failed < 0)
return 128; /* die() error code */
return failed;
Status update on merge-recursive in C This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-09 00:42:41 +08:00
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink