mirrors/git
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-12-01 05:54:16 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
8745db63ca
git/t/t5515/fetch.br-branches-one-octopus

10 lines
623 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

t/t5515-fetch-merge-logic.sh: Added tests for the merge login in git-fetch Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-05 16:09:39 +08:00
# br-branches-one-octopus
8e32a6d901327a23ef831511badce7bf3bf46689 branch 'one' of ../
Correct handling of branch.$name.merge in builtin-fetch My prior bug fix for git-push titled "Don't configure remote "." to fetch everything to itself" actually broke t5520 as we were unable to evaluate a branch configuration of: [branch "copy"] remote = . merge = refs/heads/master as remote "." did not have a "remote...fetch" configuration entry to offer up refs/heads/master as a possible candidate available to be fetched and merged. In shell script git-fetch and prior to the above mentioned commit this was hardcoded for a url of "." to be the set of local branches. Chasing down this bug led me to the conclusion that our prior behavior with regards to branch.$name.merge was incorrect. In the shell script based git-fetch implementation we only fetched and merged a branch if it appeared both in branch.$name.merge *and* in remote.$r.fetch, where $r = branch.$name.remote. In other words in the following config file: [remote "origin"] url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git fetch = refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master [branch "master"] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/master [branch "pu"] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/pu Attempting to run `git pull` while on branch "pu" would always give the user "Already up-to-date" as git-fetch did not fetch pu and thus did not mark it for merge in .git/FETCH_HEAD. The configured merge would always be ignored and the user would be left scratching her confused head wondering why merge did not work on "pu" but worked fine on "master". If we are using the "default fetch" specification for the current branch and the current branch has a branch.$name.merge configured we now union it with the list of refs in remote.$r.fetch. This way the above configuration does what the user expects it to do, which is to fetch only "master" by default but when on "pu" to fetch both "master" and "pu". This uncovered some breakage in the test suite where old-style Cogito branches (.git/branches/$r) did not fetch the branches listed in .git/config for merging and thus did not actually merge them if the user tried to use `git pull` on that branch. Junio and I discussed it on list and felt that the union approach here makes more sense to DWIM for the end-user than silently ignoring their configured request so the test vectors for t5515 have been updated to include for-merge lines in .git/FETCH_HEAD where they have been configured for-merge in .git/config. Since we are now performing a union of the fetch specification and the merge specification and we cannot allow a branch to be listed twice (otherwise it comes out twice in .git/FETCH_HEAD) we need to perform a double loop here over all of the branch.$name.merge lines and try to set their merge flag if we have already schedule that branch for fetching by remote.$r.fetch. If no match is found then we must add new specifications to fetch the branch but not store it as no local tracking branch has been designated. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-09-18 16:54:53 +08:00
6134ee8f857693b96ff1cc98d3e2fd62b199e5a8 branch 'two' of ../
fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does "git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD. The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind. [jc: the test adjustment is to update for the new expectation] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-03 10:19:34 +08:00
6c9dec2b923228c9ff994c6cfe4ae16c12408dc5 not-for-merge tag 'tag-master' of ../
t/t5515-fetch-merge-logic.sh: Added tests for the merge login in git-fetch Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-05 16:09:39 +08:00
8e32a6d901327a23ef831511badce7bf3bf46689 not-for-merge tag 'tag-one' of ../
22feea448b023a2d864ef94b013735af34d238ba not-for-merge tag 'tag-one-tree' of ../
fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does "git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD. The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind. [jc: the test adjustment is to update for the new expectation] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-03 10:19:34 +08:00
c61a82b60967180544e3c19f819ddbd0c9f89899 not-for-merge tag 'tag-three' of ../
t/t5515-fetch-merge-logic.sh: Added tests for the merge login in git-fetch Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-05 16:09:39 +08:00
0e3b14047d3ee365f4f2a1b673db059c3972589c not-for-merge tag 'tag-three-file' of ../
fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does "git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD. The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind. [jc: the test adjustment is to update for the new expectation] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-03 10:19:34 +08:00
525b7fb068d59950d185a8779dc957c77eed73ba not-for-merge tag 'tag-two' of ../
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink