git/t/t6016-rev-list-graph-simplify-history.sh

247 lines
3.7 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
# There's more than one "correct" way to represent the history graphically.
# These tests depend on the current behavior of the graphing code. If the
# graphing code is ever changed to draw the output differently, these tests
# cases will need to be updated to know about the new layout.
test_description='--graph and simplified history'
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch` In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 07:44:19 +08:00
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
. ./test-lib.sh
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-log-graph.sh
check_graph () {
cat >expect &&
lib_test_cmp_graph --format=%s "$@"
}
test_expect_success 'set up rev-list --graph test' '
# 3 commits on branch A
test_commit A1 foo.txt &&
test_commit A2 bar.txt &&
test_commit A3 bar.txt &&
git branch -m main A &&
# 2 commits on branch B, started from A1
git checkout -b B A1 &&
test_commit B1 foo.txt &&
test_commit B2 abc.txt &&
# 2 commits on branch C, started from A2
git checkout -b C A2 &&
test_commit C1 xyz.txt &&
test_commit C2 xyz.txt &&
# Octopus merge B and C into branch A
git checkout A &&
git merge B C -m A4 &&
git tag A4 &&
test_commit A5 bar.txt &&
# More commits on C, then merge C into A
git checkout C &&
test_commit C3 foo.txt &&
test_commit C4 bar.txt &&
git checkout A &&
git merge -s ours C -m A6 &&
git tag A6 &&
test_commit A7 bar.txt
'
test_expect_success '--graph --all' '
check_graph --all <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
| * C3
* | A5
| |
| \
*-. | A4
|\ \|
| | * C2
| | * C1
| * | B2
| * | B1
* | | A3
| |/
|/|
* | A2
|/
* A1
EOF
'
# Make sure the graph_is_interesting() code still realizes
# that undecorated merges are interesting, even with --simplify-by-decoration
test_expect_success '--graph --simplify-by-decoration' '
git tag -d A4 &&
check_graph --all --simplify-by-decoration <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
| * C3
* | A5
| |
| \
*-. | A4
|\ \|
| | * C2
| | * C1
| * | B2
| * | B1
* | | A3
| |/
|/|
* | A2
|/
* A1
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'setup: get rid of decorations on B' '
git tag -d B2 &&
git tag -d B1 &&
git branch -d B
'
# Graph with branch B simplified away
test_expect_success '--graph --simplify-by-decoration prune branch B' '
check_graph --simplify-by-decoration --all <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
| * C3
* | A5
* | A4
|\|
| * C2
| * C1
* | A3
|/
* A2
* A1
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph --full-history -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --full-history --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* | A5
* | A4
|\|
* | A3
|/
* A2
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph --full-history --simplify-merges -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --full-history --simplify-merges --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* | A5
* | A3
|/
* A2
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A5
* A3
| * C4
|/
* A2
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph --sparse -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --sparse --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
* A5
* A4
* A3
| * C4
| * C3
| * C2
| * C1
|/
* A2
* A1
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph ^C4' '
check_graph --all ^C4 <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
* A5
* A4
|\
| * B2
| * B1
* A3
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph ^C3' '
check_graph --all ^C3 <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* A5
* A4
|\
| * B2
| * B1
* A3
EOF
'
# I don't think the ordering of the boundary commits is really
# that important, but this test depends on it. If the ordering ever changes
# in the code, we'll need to update this test.
test_expect_success '--graph --boundary ^C3' '
check_graph --boundary --all ^C3 <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* | A5
| |
| \
*-. \ A4
|\ \ \
| * | | B2
| * | | B1
* | | | A3
o | | | A2
|/ / /
o / / A1
/ /
| o C3
|/
o C2
EOF
'
test_done