git/bloom.h

113 lines
3.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#ifndef BLOOM_H
#define BLOOM_H
struct commit;
struct repository;
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
struct bloom_filter_settings {
/*
* The version of the hashing technique being used.
* We currently only support version = 1 which is
* the seeded murmur3 hashing technique implemented
* in bloom.c.
*/
uint32_t hash_version;
/*
* The number of times a path is hashed, i.e. the
* number of bit positions tht cumulatively
* determine whether a path is present in the
* Bloom filter.
*/
uint32_t num_hashes;
/*
* The minimum number of bits per entry in the Bloom
* filter. If the filter contains 'n' entries, then
* filter size is the minimum number of 8-bit words
* that contain n*b bits.
*/
uint32_t bits_per_entry;
/*
* The maximum number of changed paths per commit
* before declaring a Bloom filter to be too-large.
*
* Not written to the commit-graph file.
*/
uint32_t max_changed_paths;
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
};
#define DEFAULT_BLOOM_MAX_CHANGES 512
#define DEFAULT_BLOOM_FILTER_SETTINGS { 1, 7, 10, DEFAULT_BLOOM_MAX_CHANGES }
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
#define BITS_PER_WORD 8
#define BLOOMDATA_CHUNK_HEADER_SIZE 3 * sizeof(uint32_t)
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
/*
* A bloom_filter struct represents a data segment to
* use when testing hash values. The 'len' member
* dictates how many entries are stored in
* 'data'.
*/
struct bloom_filter {
unsigned char *data;
size_t len;
};
/*
* A bloom_key represents the k hash values for a
* given string. These can be precomputed and
* stored in a bloom_key for re-use when testing
* against a bloom_filter. The number of hashes is
* given by the Bloom filter settings and is the same
* for all Bloom filters and keys interacting with
* the loaded version of the commit graph file and
* the Bloom data chunks.
*/
struct bloom_key {
uint32_t *hashes;
};
/*
* Calculate the murmur3 32-bit hash value for the given data
* using the given seed.
* Produces a uniformly distributed hash value.
* Not considered to be cryptographically secure.
* Implemented as described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MurmurHash#Algorithm
*/
uint32_t murmur3_seeded(uint32_t seed, const char *data, size_t len);
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
void fill_bloom_key(const char *data,
size_t len,
struct bloom_key *key,
const struct bloom_filter_settings *settings);
line-log: integrate with changed-path Bloom filters The previous changes to the line-log machinery focused on making the first result appear faster. This was achieved by no longer walking the entire commit history before returning the early results. There is still another way to improve the performance: walk most commits much faster. Let's use the changed-path Bloom filters to reduce time spent computing diffs. Since the line-log computation requires opening blobs and checking the content-diff, there is still a lot of necessary computation that cannot be replaced with changed-path Bloom filters. The part that we can reduce is most effective when checking the history of a file that is deep in several directories and those directories are modified frequently. In this case, the computation to check if a commit is TREESAME to its first parent takes a large fraction of the time. That is ripe for improvement with changed-path Bloom filters. We must ensure that prepare_to_use_bloom_filters() is called in revision.c so that the bloom_filter_settings are loaded into the struct rev_info from the commit-graph. Of course, some cases are still forbidden, but in the line-log case the pathspec is provided in a different way than normal. Since multiple paths and segments could be requested, we compute the struct bloom_key data dynamically during the commit walk. This could likely be improved, but adds code complexity that is not valuable at this time. There are two cases to care about: merge commits and "ordinary" commits. Merge commits have multiple parents, but if we are TREESAME to our first parent in every range, then pass the blame for all ranges to the first parent. Ordinary commits have the same condition, but each is done slightly differently in the process_ranges_[merge|ordinary]_commit() methods. By checking if the changed-path Bloom filter can guarantee TREESAME, we can avoid that tree-diff cost. If the filter says "probably changed", then we need to run the tree-diff and then the blob-diff if there was a real edit. The Linux kernel repository is a good testing ground for the performance improvements claimed here. There are two different cases to test. The first is the "entire history" case, where we output the entire history to /dev/null to see how long it would take to compute the full line-log history. The second is the "first result" case, where we find how long it takes to show the first value, which is an indicator of how quickly a user would see responses when waiting at a terminal. To test, I selected the paths that were changed most frequently in the top 10,000 commits using this command (stolen from StackOverflow [1]): git log --pretty=format: --name-only -n 10000 | sort | \ uniq -c | sort -rg | head -10 which results in 121 MAINTAINERS 63 fs/namei.c 60 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c 59 fs/io_uring.c 58 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c 51 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c 45 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c 42 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c 42 Documentation/scsi/index.rst (along with a bogus first result). It appears that the path arch/x86/kvm/svm.c was renamed, so we ignore that entry. This leaves the following results for the real command time: | | Entire History | First Result | | Path | Before | After | Before | After | |------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------| | MAINTAINERS | 4.26 s | 3.87 s | 0.41 s | 0.39 s | | fs/namei.c | 1.99 s | 0.99 s | 0.42 s | 0.21 s | | arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5.28 s | 1.12 s | 0.16 s | 0.09 s | | fs/io_uring.c | 4.34 s | 0.99 s | 0.94 s | 0.27 s | | arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 5.01 s | 1.34 s | 0.21 s | 0.12 s | | arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2.24 s | 1.18 s | 0.21 s | 0.14 s | | fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1.82 s | 1.01 s | 0.06 s | 0.05 s | | Documentation/scsi/index.rst | 3.30 s | 0.89 s | 1.46 s | 0.03 s | It is worth noting that the least speedup comes for the MAINTAINERS file which is * edited frequently, * low in the directory heirarchy, and * quite a large file. All of those points lead to spending more time doing the blob diff and less time doing the tree diff. Still, we see some improvement in that case and significant improvement in other cases. A 2-4x speedup is likely the more typical case as opposed to the small 5% change for that file. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-11 19:56:19 +08:00
void clear_bloom_key(struct bloom_key *key);
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
void add_key_to_filter(const struct bloom_key *key,
struct bloom_filter *filter,
const struct bloom_filter_settings *settings);
bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs Introduce the constructs for Bloom filters, Bloom filter keys and Bloom filter settings. For details on what Bloom filters are and how they work, refer to Dr. Derrick Stolee's blog post [1]. It provides a concise explanation of the adoption of Bloom filters as described in [2] and [3]. Implementation specifics: 1. We currently use 7 and 10 for the number of hashes and the size of each entry respectively. They served as great starting values, the mathematical details behind this choice are described in [1] and [4]. The implementation, while not completely open to it at the moment, is flexible enough to allow for tweaking these settings in the future. Note: The performance gains we have observed with these values are significant enough that we did not need to tweak these settings. The performance numbers are included in the cover letter of this series and in the commit message of the subsequent commit where we use Bloom filters to speed up `git log -- path`. 2. As described in [1] and [3], we do not need 7 independent hashing functions. We use the Murmur3 hashing scheme, seed it twice and then combine those to procure an arbitrary number of hash values. 3. The filters will be sized according to the number of changes in each commit, in multiples of 8 bit words. [1] Derrick Stolee "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph IV: Bloom Filters" https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/super-charging-the-git-commit-graph-iv-Bloom-filters/ [2] Flavio Bonomi, Michael Mitzenmacher, Rina Panigrahy, Sushil Singh, George Varghese "An Improved Construction for Counting Bloom Filters" http://theory.stanford.edu/~rinap/papers/esa2006b.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_61 [3] Peter C. Dillinger and Panagiotis Manolios "Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification" http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/pub/Bloom-filters-verification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30494-4_26 [4] Thomas Mueller Graf, Daniel Lemire "Xor Filters: Faster and Smaller Than Bloom and Cuckoo Filters" https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30 08:31:25 +08:00
void init_bloom_filters(void);
enum bloom_filter_computed {
BLOOM_NOT_COMPUTED = (1 << 0),
BLOOM_COMPUTED = (1 << 1),
BLOOM_TRUNC_LARGE = (1 << 2),
bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-empty When a changed-path Bloom filter has either zero, or more than a certain number (commonly 512) of entries, the commit-graph machinery encodes it as "missing". More specifically, it sets the indices adjacent in the BIDX chunk as equal to each other to indicate a "length 0" filter; that is, that the filter occupies zero bytes on disk. This has heretofore been fine, since the commit-graph machinery has no need to care about these filters with too few or too many changed paths. Both cases act like no filter has been generated at all, and so there is no need to store them. In a subsequent commit, however, the commit-graph machinery will learn to only compute Bloom filters for some commits in the current commit-graph layer. This is a change from the current implementation which computes Bloom filters for all commits that are in the layer being written. Critically for this patch, only computing some of the Bloom filters means adding a third state for length 0 Bloom filters: zero entries, too many entries, or "hasn't been computed". It will be important for that future patch to distinguish between "not representable" (i.e., zero or too-many changed paths), and "hasn't been computed". In particular, we don't want to waste time recomputing filters that have already been computed. To that end, change how we store Bloom filters in the "computed but not representable" category: - Bloom filters with no entries are stored as a single byte with all bits low (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return "definitely not") - Bloom filters with too many entries are stored as a single byte with all bits set high (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return "maybe"). These rules are sufficient to not incur a behavior change by changing the on-disk representation of these two classes. Likewise, no specification changes are necessary for the commit-graph format, either: - Filters that were previously empty will be recomputed and stored according to the new rules, and - old clients reading filters generated by new clients will interpret the filters correctly and be none the wiser to how they were generated. Clients will invoke the Bloom machinery in more cases than before, but this can be addressed by returning a NULL filter when all bits are set high. This can be addressed in a future patch. Note that this does increase the size of on-disk commit-graphs, but far less than other proposals. In particular, this is generally more efficient than storing a bitmap for which commits haven't computed their Bloom filters. Storing a bitmap incurs a penalty of one bit per commit, whereas storing explicit filters as above incurs a penalty of one byte per too-large or empty commit. In practice, these boundary commits likely occupy a small proportion of the overall number of commits, and so the size penalty is likely smaller than storing a bitmap for all commits. See, for example, these relative proportions of such boundary commits (collected by SZEDER Gábor): | Percentage of | commit-graph | | | commits modifying | file size | | ├────────┬──────────────┼───────────────────┤ pct. | | 0 path | >= 512 paths | before | after | change | ┌────────────────┼────────┼──────────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───────────┤ | android-base | 13.20% | 0.13% | 37.468M | 37.534M | +0.1741 % | | cmssw | 0.15% | 0.23% | 17.118M | 17.119M | +0.0091 % | | cpython | 3.07% | 0.01% | 7.967M | 7.971M | +0.0423 % | | elasticsearch | 0.70% | 1.00% | 8.833M | 8.835M | +0.0128 % | | gcc | 0.00% | 0.08% | 16.073M | 16.074M | +0.0030 % | | gecko-dev | 0.14% | 0.64% | 59.868M | 59.874M | +0.0105 % | | git | 0.11% | 0.02% | 3.895M | 3.895M | +0.0020 % | | glibc | 0.02% | 0.10% | 3.555M | 3.555M | +0.0021 % | | go | 0.00% | 0.07% | 3.186M | 3.186M | +0.0018 % | | homebrew-cask | 0.40% | 0.02% | 7.035M | 7.035M | +0.0065 % | | homebrew-core | 0.01% | 0.01% | 11.611M | 11.611M | +0.0002 % | | jdk | 0.26% | 5.64% | 5.537M | 5.540M | +0.0590 % | | linux | 0.01% | 0.51% | 63.735M | 63.740M | +0.0073 % | | llvm-project | 0.12% | 0.03% | 25.515M | 25.516M | +0.0050 % | | rails | 0.10% | 0.10% | 6.252M | 6.252M | +0.0027 % | | rust | 0.07% | 0.17% | 9.364M | 9.364M | +0.0033 % | | tensorflow | 0.09% | 1.02% | 7.009M | 7.010M | +0.0158 % | | webkit | 0.05% | 0.31% | 17.405M | 17.406M | +0.0047 % | (where the above increase is determined by computing a non-split commit-graph before and after this patch). Given that these projects are all "large" by commit count, the storage cost by writing these filters explicitly is negligible. In the most extreme example, android-base (which has 494,848 commits at the time of writing) would have its commit-graph increase by a modest 68.4 KB. Finally, a test to exercise filters which contain too many changed path entries will be introduced in a subsequent patch. Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-18 10:59:44 +08:00
BLOOM_TRUNC_EMPTY = (1 << 3),
};
struct bloom_filter *get_or_compute_bloom_filter(struct repository *r,
struct commit *c,
int compute_if_not_present,
const struct bloom_filter_settings *settings,
enum bloom_filter_computed *computed);
#define get_bloom_filter(r, c) get_or_compute_bloom_filter( \
(r), (c), 0, NULL, NULL)
revision.c: use Bloom filters to speed up path based revision walks Revision walk will now use Bloom filters for commits to speed up revision walks for a particular path (for computing history for that path), if they are present in the commit-graph file. We load the Bloom filters during the prepare_revision_walk step, currently only when dealing with a single pathspec. Extending it to work with multiple pathspecs can be explored and built on top of this series in the future. While comparing trees in rev_compare_trees(), if the Bloom filter says that the file is not different between the two trees, we don't need to compute the expensive diff. This is where we get our performance gains. The other response of the Bloom filter is '`:maybe', in which case we fall back to the full diff calculation to determine if the path was changed in the commit. We do not try to use Bloom filters when the '--walk-reflogs' option is specified. The '--walk-reflogs' option does not walk the commit ancestry chain like the rest of the options. Incorporating the performance gains when walking reflog entries would add more complexity, and can be explored in a later series. Performance Gains: We tested the performance of `git log -- <path>` on the git repo, the linux and some internal large repos, with a variety of paths of varying depths. On the git and linux repos: - we observed a 2x to 5x speed up. On a large internal repo with files seated 6-10 levels deep in the tree: - we observed 10x to 20x speed ups, with some paths going up to 28 times faster. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-07 00:59:52 +08:00
int bloom_filter_contains(const struct bloom_filter *filter,
const struct bloom_key *key,
const struct bloom_filter_settings *settings);
#endif