From e41b988cc5af34e9c1a3d37b717fbfcc52d7ff90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerald Pfeifer Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:03:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update/streamline Valgrind references * doc/xml/faq.xml: Adjust Valgrind reference and remove another. * doc/html/faq.html: Regenerate. --- libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html | 4 ++-- libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html index 18407225d7a..967e5f5f348 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ of a few dozen kilobytes on startup. This pool is used to ensure it's possible to throw exceptions (such as bad_alloc) even when malloc is unable to allocate any more memory. - With some versions of valgrind + With some versions of valgrind this pool will be shown as "still reachable" when the process exits, e.g. still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks. This memory is not a leak, because it's still in use by libstdc++, @@ -710,7 +710,7 @@

In the past, a few people reported that the standard containers appear to leak memory when tested with memory checkers such as - valgrind. + valgrind. Under some (non-default) configurations the library's allocators keep free memory in a pool for later reuse, rather than deallocating it with delete diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml index cf8684e1cea..e419d3c22a0 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml @@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ of a few dozen kilobytes on startup. This pool is used to ensure it's possible to throw exceptions (such as bad_alloc) even when malloc is unable to allocate any more memory. - With some versions of valgrind + With some versions of valgrind this pool will be shown as "still reachable" when the process exits, e.g. still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks. This memory is not a leak, because it's still in use by libstdc++, @@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ In the past, a few people reported that the standard containers appear to leak memory when tested with memory checkers such as - valgrind. + valgrind. Under some (non-default) configurations the library's allocators keep free memory in a pool for later reuse, rather than deallocating it with delete