mirrors/gcc
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git synced 2024-12-25 03:55:32 +08:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

libstdc++: Use double for unordered container load factors [PR 96958]

Browse Source 
My previous commit for this PR changed the types from long double to
double, but didn't change the uses of __builtin_ceill and
__builtin_floorl. It also failed to change the non-inline functions in
src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc. This should fix it properly now.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

	PR libstdc++/96958
	* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Prime_rehash_policy)
	(_Power2_rehash_policy): Use ceil and floor instead of ceill and
	floorl.
	* src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc (_Prime_rehash_policy): Likewise.
	Use double instead of long double.
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Wakely 2020-10-31 00:52:57 +00:00
parent afb8da7faa
commit 943cc2a1b7
2 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
libstdc++-v3/include/bits/hashtable_policy.h
View File

@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ namespace __detail
// Return a bucket count appropriate for n elements
std::size_t
_M_bkt_for_elements(std::size_t __n) const
{ return __builtin_ceill(__n / (double)_M_max_load_factor); }
{ return __builtin_ceil(__n / (double)_M_max_load_factor); }
// __n_bkt is current bucket count, __n_elt is current element count,
// and __n_ins is number of elements to be inserted. Do we need to
@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ namespace __detail
_M_next_resize = size_t(-1);
else
_M_next_resize
= __builtin_floorl(__res * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
= __builtin_floor(__res * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
return __res;
}
@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ namespace __detail
// Return a bucket count appropriate for n elements
std::size_t
_M_bkt_for_elements(std::size_t __n) const noexcept
{ return __builtin_ceill(__n / (double)_M_max_load_factor); }
{ return __builtin_ceil(__n / (double)_M_max_load_factor); }
// __n_bkt is current bucket count, __n_elt is current element count,
// and __n_ins is number of elements to be inserted. Do we need to
@ -587,11 +587,11 @@ namespace __detail
/ (double)_M_max_load_factor;
if (__min_bkts >= __n_bkt)
return { true,
_M_next_bkt(std::max<std::size_t>(__builtin_floorl(__min_bkts) + 1,
_M_next_bkt(std::max<std::size_t>(__builtin_floor(__min_bkts) + 1,
__n_bkt * _S_growth_factor)) };
_M_next_resize
= __builtin_floorl(__n_bkt * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
= __builtin_floor(__n_bkt * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
return { false, 0 };
}
else

12
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc
View File

@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ namespace __detail
return 1;
_M_next_resize =
__builtin_floorl(__fast_bkt[__n] * (long double)_M_max_load_factor);
__builtin_floor(__fast_bkt[__n] * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
return __fast_bkt[__n];
}
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ namespace __detail
_M_next_resize = size_t(-1);
else
_M_next_resize =
__builtin_floorl(*__next_bkt * (long double)_M_max_load_factor);
__builtin_floor(*__next_bkt * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
return *__next_bkt;
}
@ -105,16 +105,16 @@ namespace __detail
// If _M_next_resize is 0 it means that we have nothing allocated so
// far and that we start inserting elements. In this case we start
// with an initial bucket size of 11.
long double __min_bkts
double __min_bkts
= std::max<std::size_t>(__n_elt + __n_ins, _M_next_resize ? 0 : 11)
/ (long double)_M_max_load_factor;
/ (double)_M_max_load_factor;
if (__min_bkts >= __n_bkt)
return { true,
_M_next_bkt(std::max<std::size_t>(__builtin_floorl(__min_bkts) + 1,
_M_next_bkt(std::max<std::size_t>(__builtin_floor(__min_bkts) + 1,
__n_bkt * _S_growth_factor)) };
_M_next_resize
= __builtin_floorl(__n_bkt * (long double)_M_max_load_factor);
= __builtin_floor(__n_bkt * (double)_M_max_load_factor);
return { false, 0 };
}
else