From 30cc554051588c971f2dab52e75e3aed5abcb615 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joseph Myers Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:01:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 13450.cc: Do not test long double in IBM long double case. * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc: Do not test long double in IBM long double case. From-SVN: r118814 --- libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog index 12c49bbb74a3..2118ba1bcc90 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog +++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2006-11-14 Joseph Myers + + * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc: Do not test long double + in IBM long double case. + 2006-11-13 Daniel Jacobowitz * configure: Regenerated. diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc index f5640dec879b..22bdb5eed446 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ void test01() d2 = 1.4; test01_do(d1, d2); +#if __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ != 106 + /* For IBM long double, epsilon is too small (since 1.0 plus any + double is representable) to be able to expect results within + epsilon * 100 (which may be much less than 1ulp for a particular + long double value). */ long double ld1 = -1.0l; long double ld2 = 0.5l; test01_do(ld1, ld2); @@ -68,6 +73,7 @@ void test01() ld1 = -3.2l; ld2 = 1.4l; test01_do(ld1, ld2); +#endif } int main()