mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2024-12-11 18:53:56 +08:00
723 lines
29 KiB
TeX
723 lines
29 KiB
TeX
\chapter{The Python Profilers \label{profile}}
|
|
|
|
\sectionauthor{James Roskind}{}
|
|
|
|
Copyright \copyright{} 1994, by InfoSeek Corporation, all rights reserved.
|
|
\index{InfoSeek Corporation}
|
|
|
|
Written by James Roskind.\footnote{
|
|
Updated and converted to \LaTeX\ by Guido van Rossum.
|
|
Further updated by Armin Rigo to integrate the documentation for the new
|
|
\module{cProfile} module of Python 2.5.}
|
|
|
|
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this Python software
|
|
and its associated documentation for any purpose (subject to the
|
|
restriction in the following sentence) without fee is hereby granted,
|
|
provided that the above copyright notice appears in all copies, and
|
|
that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
|
|
supporting documentation, and that the name of InfoSeek not be used in
|
|
advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software
|
|
without specific, written prior permission. This permission is
|
|
explicitly restricted to the copying and modification of the software
|
|
to remain in Python, compiled Python, or other languages (such as C)
|
|
wherein the modified or derived code is exclusively imported into a
|
|
Python module.
|
|
|
|
INFOSEEK CORPORATION DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS
|
|
SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
|
|
FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL INFOSEEK CORPORATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY
|
|
SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER
|
|
RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF
|
|
CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
|
|
CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The profiler was written after only programming in Python for 3 weeks.
|
|
As a result, it is probably clumsy code, but I don't know for sure yet
|
|
'cause I'm a beginner :-). I did work hard to make the code run fast,
|
|
so that profiling would be a reasonable thing to do. I tried not to
|
|
repeat code fragments, but I'm sure I did some stuff in really awkward
|
|
ways at times. Please send suggestions for improvements to:
|
|
\email{jar@netscape.com}. I won't promise \emph{any} support. ...but
|
|
I'd appreciate the feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Introduction to the profilers}
|
|
\nodename{Profiler Introduction}
|
|
|
|
A \dfn{profiler} is a program that describes the run time performance
|
|
of a program, providing a variety of statistics. This documentation
|
|
describes the profiler functionality provided in the modules
|
|
\module{profile} and \module{pstats}. This profiler provides
|
|
\dfn{deterministic profiling} of any Python programs. It also
|
|
provides a series of report generation tools to allow users to rapidly
|
|
examine the results of a profile operation.
|
|
\index{deterministic profiling}
|
|
\index{profiling, deterministic}
|
|
|
|
The Python standard library provides three different profilers:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \module{profile}, a pure Python module, described in the sequel.
|
|
Copyright \copyright{} 1994, by InfoSeek Corporation.
|
|
\versionchanged[also reports the time spent in calls to built-in
|
|
functions and methods]{2.4}
|
|
|
|
\item \module{cProfile}, a module written in C, with a reasonable
|
|
overhead that makes it suitable for profiling long-running programs.
|
|
Based on \module{lsprof}, contributed by Brett Rosen and Ted Czotter.
|
|
\versionadded{2.5}
|
|
|
|
\item \module{hotshot}, a C module focusing on minimizing the overhead
|
|
while profiling, at the expense of long data post-processing times.
|
|
\versionchanged[the results should be more meaningful than in the
|
|
past: the timing core contained a critical bug]{2.5}
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
The \module{profile} and \module{cProfile} modules export the same
|
|
interface, so they are mostly interchangeables; \module{cProfile} has a
|
|
much lower overhead but is not so far as well-tested and might not be
|
|
available on all systems. \module{cProfile} is really a compatibility
|
|
layer on top of the internal \module{_lsprof} module. The
|
|
\module{hotshot} module is reserved to specialized usages.
|
|
|
|
%\section{How Is This Profiler Different From The Old Profiler?}
|
|
%\nodename{Profiler Changes}
|
|
%
|
|
%(This section is of historical importance only; the old profiler
|
|
%discussed here was last seen in Python 1.1.)
|
|
%
|
|
%The big changes from old profiling module are that you get more
|
|
%information, and you pay less CPU time. It's not a trade-off, it's a
|
|
%trade-up.
|
|
%
|
|
%To be specific:
|
|
%
|
|
%\begin{description}
|
|
%
|
|
%\item[Bugs removed:]
|
|
%Local stack frame is no longer molested, execution time is now charged
|
|
%to correct functions.
|
|
%
|
|
%\item[Accuracy increased:]
|
|
%Profiler execution time is no longer charged to user's code,
|
|
%calibration for platform is supported, file reads are not done \emph{by}
|
|
%profiler \emph{during} profiling (and charged to user's code!).
|
|
%
|
|
%\item[Speed increased:]
|
|
%Overhead CPU cost was reduced by more than a factor of two (perhaps a
|
|
%factor of five), lightweight profiler module is all that must be
|
|
%loaded, and the report generating module (\module{pstats}) is not needed
|
|
%during profiling.
|
|
%
|
|
%\item[Recursive functions support:]
|
|
%Cumulative times in recursive functions are correctly calculated;
|
|
%recursive entries are counted.
|
|
%
|
|
%\item[Large growth in report generating UI:]
|
|
%Distinct profiles runs can be added together forming a comprehensive
|
|
%report; functions that import statistics take arbitrary lists of
|
|
%files; sorting criteria is now based on keywords (instead of 4 integer
|
|
%options); reports shows what functions were profiled as well as what
|
|
%profile file was referenced; output format has been improved.
|
|
%
|
|
%\end{description}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Instant User's Manual \label{profile-instant}}
|
|
|
|
This section is provided for users that ``don't want to read the
|
|
manual.'' It provides a very brief overview, and allows a user to
|
|
rapidly perform profiling on an existing application.
|
|
|
|
To profile an application with a main entry point of \function{foo()},
|
|
you would add the following to your module:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import cProfile
|
|
cProfile.run('foo()')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
(Use \module{profile} instead of \module{cProfile} if the latter is not
|
|
available on your system.)
|
|
|
|
The above action would cause \function{foo()} to be run, and a series of
|
|
informative lines (the profile) to be printed. The above approach is
|
|
most useful when working with the interpreter. If you would like to
|
|
save the results of a profile into a file for later examination, you
|
|
can supply a file name as the second argument to the \function{run()}
|
|
function:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import cProfile
|
|
cProfile.run('foo()', 'fooprof')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The file \file{cProfile.py} can also be invoked as
|
|
a script to profile another script. For example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
python -m cProfile myscript.py
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\file{cProfile.py} accepts two optional arguments on the command line:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
cProfile.py [-o output_file] [-s sort_order]
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\programopt{-s} only applies to standard output (\programopt{-o} is
|
|
not supplied). Look in the \class{Stats} documentation for valid sort
|
|
values.
|
|
|
|
When you wish to review the profile, you should use the methods in the
|
|
\module{pstats} module. Typically you would load the statistics data as
|
|
follows:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import pstats
|
|
p = pstats.Stats('fooprof')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The class \class{Stats} (the above code just created an instance of
|
|
this class) has a variety of methods for manipulating and printing the
|
|
data that was just read into \code{p}. When you ran
|
|
\function{cProfile.run()} above, what was printed was the result of three
|
|
method calls:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.strip_dirs().sort_stats(-1).print_stats()
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The first method removed the extraneous path from all the module
|
|
names. The second method sorted all the entries according to the
|
|
standard module/line/name string that is printed.
|
|
%(this is to comply with the semantics of the old profiler).
|
|
The third method printed out
|
|
all the statistics. You might try the following sort calls:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.sort_stats('name')
|
|
p.print_stats()
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The first call will actually sort the list by function name, and the
|
|
second call will print out the statistics. The following are some
|
|
interesting calls to experiment with:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.sort_stats('cumulative').print_stats(10)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
This sorts the profile by cumulative time in a function, and then only
|
|
prints the ten most significant lines. If you want to understand what
|
|
algorithms are taking time, the above line is what you would use.
|
|
|
|
If you were looking to see what functions were looping a lot, and
|
|
taking a lot of time, you would do:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.sort_stats('time').print_stats(10)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
to sort according to time spent within each function, and then print
|
|
the statistics for the top ten functions.
|
|
|
|
You might also try:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.sort_stats('file').print_stats('__init__')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
This will sort all the statistics by file name, and then print out
|
|
statistics for only the class init methods (since they are spelled
|
|
with \code{__init__} in them). As one final example, you could try:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.sort_stats('time', 'cum').print_stats(.5, 'init')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
This line sorts statistics with a primary key of time, and a secondary
|
|
key of cumulative time, and then prints out some of the statistics.
|
|
To be specific, the list is first culled down to 50\% (re: \samp{.5})
|
|
of its original size, then only lines containing \code{init} are
|
|
maintained, and that sub-sub-list is printed.
|
|
|
|
If you wondered what functions called the above functions, you could
|
|
now (\code{p} is still sorted according to the last criteria) do:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.print_callers(.5, 'init')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
and you would get a list of callers for each of the listed functions.
|
|
|
|
If you want more functionality, you're going to have to read the
|
|
manual, or guess what the following functions do:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
p.print_callees()
|
|
p.add('fooprof')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Invoked as a script, the \module{pstats} module is a statistics
|
|
browser for reading and examining profile dumps. It has a simple
|
|
line-oriented interface (implemented using \refmodule{cmd}) and
|
|
interactive help.
|
|
|
|
\section{What Is Deterministic Profiling?}
|
|
\nodename{Deterministic Profiling}
|
|
|
|
\dfn{Deterministic profiling} is meant to reflect the fact that all
|
|
\emph{function call}, \emph{function return}, and \emph{exception} events
|
|
are monitored, and precise timings are made for the intervals between
|
|
these events (during which time the user's code is executing). In
|
|
contrast, \dfn{statistical profiling} (which is not done by this
|
|
module) randomly samples the effective instruction pointer, and
|
|
deduces where time is being spent. The latter technique traditionally
|
|
involves less overhead (as the code does not need to be instrumented),
|
|
but provides only relative indications of where time is being spent.
|
|
|
|
In Python, since there is an interpreter active during execution, the
|
|
presence of instrumented code is not required to do deterministic
|
|
profiling. Python automatically provides a \dfn{hook} (optional
|
|
callback) for each event. In addition, the interpreted nature of
|
|
Python tends to add so much overhead to execution, that deterministic
|
|
profiling tends to only add small processing overhead in typical
|
|
applications. The result is that deterministic profiling is not that
|
|
expensive, yet provides extensive run time statistics about the
|
|
execution of a Python program.
|
|
|
|
Call count statistics can be used to identify bugs in code (surprising
|
|
counts), and to identify possible inline-expansion points (high call
|
|
counts). Internal time statistics can be used to identify ``hot
|
|
loops'' that should be carefully optimized. Cumulative time
|
|
statistics should be used to identify high level errors in the
|
|
selection of algorithms. Note that the unusual handling of cumulative
|
|
times in this profiler allows statistics for recursive implementations
|
|
of algorithms to be directly compared to iterative implementations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Reference Manual -- \module{profile} and \module{cProfile}}
|
|
|
|
\declaremodule{standard}{profile}
|
|
\declaremodule{standard}{cProfile}
|
|
\modulesynopsis{Python profiler}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary entry point for the profiler is the global function
|
|
\function{profile.run()} (resp. \function{cProfile.run()}).
|
|
It is typically used to create any profile
|
|
information. The reports are formatted and printed using methods of
|
|
the class \class{pstats.Stats}. The following is a description of all
|
|
of these standard entry points and functions. For a more in-depth
|
|
view of some of the code, consider reading the later section on
|
|
Profiler Extensions, which includes discussion of how to derive
|
|
``better'' profilers from the classes presented, or reading the source
|
|
code for these modules.
|
|
|
|
\begin{funcdesc}{run}{command\optional{, filename}}
|
|
|
|
This function takes a single argument that can be passed to the
|
|
\function{exec()} function, and an optional file name. In all cases this
|
|
routine attempts to \function{exec()} its first argument, and gather profiling
|
|
statistics from the execution. If no file name is present, then this
|
|
function automatically prints a simple profiling report, sorted by the
|
|
standard name string (file/line/function-name) that is presented in
|
|
each line. The following is a typical output from such a call:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
2706 function calls (2004 primitive calls) in 4.504 CPU seconds
|
|
|
|
Ordered by: standard name
|
|
|
|
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
|
|
2 0.006 0.003 0.953 0.477 pobject.py:75(save_objects)
|
|
43/3 0.533 0.012 0.749 0.250 pobject.py:99(evaluate)
|
|
...
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The first line indicates that 2706 calls were
|
|
monitored. Of those calls, 2004 were \dfn{primitive}. We define
|
|
\dfn{primitive} to mean that the call was not induced via recursion.
|
|
The next line: \code{Ordered by:\ standard name}, indicates that
|
|
the text string in the far right column was used to sort the output.
|
|
The column headings include:
|
|
|
|
\begin{description}
|
|
|
|
\item[ncalls ]
|
|
for the number of calls,
|
|
|
|
\item[tottime ]
|
|
for the total time spent in the given function (and excluding time
|
|
made in calls to sub-functions),
|
|
|
|
\item[percall ]
|
|
is the quotient of \code{tottime} divided by \code{ncalls}
|
|
|
|
\item[cumtime ]
|
|
is the total time spent in this and all subfunctions (from invocation
|
|
till exit). This figure is accurate \emph{even} for recursive
|
|
functions.
|
|
|
|
\item[percall ]
|
|
is the quotient of \code{cumtime} divided by primitive calls
|
|
|
|
\item[filename:lineno(function) ]
|
|
provides the respective data of each function
|
|
|
|
\end{description}
|
|
|
|
When there are two numbers in the first column (for example,
|
|
\samp{43/3}), then the latter is the number of primitive calls, and
|
|
the former is the actual number of calls. Note that when the function
|
|
does not recurse, these two values are the same, and only the single
|
|
figure is printed.
|
|
|
|
\end{funcdesc}
|
|
|
|
\begin{funcdesc}{runctx}{command, globals, locals\optional{, filename}}
|
|
This function is similar to \function{run()}, with added
|
|
arguments to supply the globals and locals dictionaries for the
|
|
\var{command} string.
|
|
\end{funcdesc}
|
|
|
|
Analysis of the profiler data is done using the \class{Stats} class.
|
|
|
|
\note{The \class{Stats} class is defined in the \module{pstats} module.}
|
|
|
|
% now switch modules....
|
|
% (This \stmodindex use may be hard to change ;-( )
|
|
\stmodindex{pstats}
|
|
|
|
\begin{classdesc}{Stats}{filename\optional{, stream=sys.stdout\optional{, \moreargs}}}
|
|
This class constructor creates an instance of a ``statistics object''
|
|
from a \var{filename} (or set of filenames). \class{Stats} objects are
|
|
manipulated by methods, in order to print useful reports. You may specify
|
|
an alternate output stream by giving the keyword argument, \code{stream}.
|
|
|
|
The file selected by the above constructor must have been created by the
|
|
corresponding version of \module{profile} or \module{cProfile}. To be
|
|
specific, there is \emph{no} file compatibility guaranteed with future
|
|
versions of this profiler, and there is no compatibility with files produced
|
|
by other profilers.
|
|
%(such as the old system profiler).
|
|
|
|
If several files are provided, all the statistics for identical
|
|
functions will be coalesced, so that an overall view of several
|
|
processes can be considered in a single report. If additional files
|
|
need to be combined with data in an existing \class{Stats} object, the
|
|
\method{add()} method can be used.
|
|
|
|
\versionchanged[The \var{stream} parameter was added]{2.5}
|
|
\end{classdesc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{The \class{Stats} Class \label{profile-stats}}
|
|
|
|
\class{Stats} objects have the following methods:
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{strip_dirs}{}
|
|
This method for the \class{Stats} class removes all leading path
|
|
information from file names. It is very useful in reducing the size
|
|
of the printout to fit within (close to) 80 columns. This method
|
|
modifies the object, and the stripped information is lost. After
|
|
performing a strip operation, the object is considered to have its
|
|
entries in a ``random'' order, as it was just after object
|
|
initialization and loading. If \method{strip_dirs()} causes two
|
|
function names to be indistinguishable (they are on the same
|
|
line of the same filename, and have the same function name), then the
|
|
statistics for these two entries are accumulated into a single entry.
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{add}{filename\optional{, \moreargs}}
|
|
This method of the \class{Stats} class accumulates additional
|
|
profiling information into the current profiling object. Its
|
|
arguments should refer to filenames created by the corresponding
|
|
version of \function{profile.run()} or \function{cProfile.run()}.
|
|
Statistics for identically named
|
|
(re: file, line, name) functions are automatically accumulated into
|
|
single function statistics.
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{dump_stats}{filename}
|
|
Save the data loaded into the \class{Stats} object to a file named
|
|
\var{filename}. The file is created if it does not exist, and is
|
|
overwritten if it already exists. This is equivalent to the method of
|
|
the same name on the \class{profile.Profile} and
|
|
\class{cProfile.Profile} classes.
|
|
\versionadded{2.3}
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{sort_stats}{key\optional{, \moreargs}}
|
|
This method modifies the \class{Stats} object by sorting it according
|
|
to the supplied criteria. The argument is typically a string
|
|
identifying the basis of a sort (example: \code{'time'} or
|
|
\code{'name'}).
|
|
|
|
When more than one key is provided, then additional keys are used as
|
|
secondary criteria when there is equality in all keys selected
|
|
before them. For example, \code{sort_stats('name', 'file')} will sort
|
|
all the entries according to their function name, and resolve all ties
|
|
(identical function names) by sorting by file name.
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations can be used for any key names, as long as the
|
|
abbreviation is unambiguous. The following are the keys currently
|
|
defined:
|
|
|
|
\begin{tableii}{l|l}{code}{Valid Arg}{Meaning}
|
|
\lineii{'calls'}{call count}
|
|
\lineii{'cumulative'}{cumulative time}
|
|
\lineii{'file'}{file name}
|
|
\lineii{'module'}{file name}
|
|
\lineii{'pcalls'}{primitive call count}
|
|
\lineii{'line'}{line number}
|
|
\lineii{'name'}{function name}
|
|
\lineii{'nfl'}{name/file/line}
|
|
\lineii{'stdname'}{standard name}
|
|
\lineii{'time'}{internal time}
|
|
\end{tableii}
|
|
|
|
Note that all sorts on statistics are in descending order (placing
|
|
most time consuming items first), where as name, file, and line number
|
|
searches are in ascending order (alphabetical). The subtle
|
|
distinction between \code{'nfl'} and \code{'stdname'} is that the
|
|
standard name is a sort of the name as printed, which means that the
|
|
embedded line numbers get compared in an odd way. For example, lines
|
|
3, 20, and 40 would (if the file names were the same) appear in the
|
|
string order 20, 3 and 40. In contrast, \code{'nfl'} does a numeric
|
|
compare of the line numbers. In fact, \code{sort_stats('nfl')} is the
|
|
same as \code{sort_stats('name', 'file', 'line')}.
|
|
|
|
%For compatibility with the old profiler,
|
|
For backward-compatibility reasons, the numeric arguments
|
|
\code{-1}, \code{0}, \code{1}, and \code{2} are permitted. They are
|
|
interpreted as \code{'stdname'}, \code{'calls'}, \code{'time'}, and
|
|
\code{'cumulative'} respectively. If this old style format (numeric)
|
|
is used, only one sort key (the numeric key) will be used, and
|
|
additional arguments will be silently ignored.
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{reverse_order}{}
|
|
This method for the \class{Stats} class reverses the ordering of the basic
|
|
list within the object. %This method is provided primarily for
|
|
%compatibility with the old profiler.
|
|
Note that by default ascending vs descending order is properly selected
|
|
based on the sort key of choice.
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{print_stats}{\optional{restriction, \moreargs}}
|
|
This method for the \class{Stats} class prints out a report as described
|
|
in the \function{profile.run()} definition.
|
|
|
|
The order of the printing is based on the last \method{sort_stats()}
|
|
operation done on the object (subject to caveats in \method{add()} and
|
|
\method{strip_dirs()}).
|
|
|
|
The arguments provided (if any) can be used to limit the list down to
|
|
the significant entries. Initially, the list is taken to be the
|
|
complete set of profiled functions. Each restriction is either an
|
|
integer (to select a count of lines), or a decimal fraction between
|
|
0.0 and 1.0 inclusive (to select a percentage of lines), or a regular
|
|
expression (to pattern match the standard name that is printed; as of
|
|
Python 1.5b1, this uses the Perl-style regular expression syntax
|
|
defined by the \refmodule{re} module). If several restrictions are
|
|
provided, then they are applied sequentially. For example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
print_stats(.1, 'foo:')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
would first limit the printing to first 10\% of list, and then only
|
|
print functions that were part of filename \file{.*foo:}. In
|
|
contrast, the command:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
print_stats('foo:', .1)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
would limit the list to all functions having file names \file{.*foo:},
|
|
and then proceed to only print the first 10\% of them.
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{print_callers}{\optional{restriction, \moreargs}}
|
|
This method for the \class{Stats} class prints a list of all functions
|
|
that called each function in the profiled database. The ordering is
|
|
identical to that provided by \method{print_stats()}, and the definition
|
|
of the restricting argument is also identical. Each caller is reported on
|
|
its own line. The format differs slightly depending on the profiler that
|
|
produced the stats:
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item With \module{profile}, a number is shown in parentheses after each
|
|
caller to show how many times this specific call was made. For
|
|
convenience, a second non-parenthesized number repeats the cumulative
|
|
time spent in the function at the right.
|
|
|
|
\item With \module{cProfile}, each caller is preceeded by three numbers:
|
|
the number of times this specific call was made, and the total and
|
|
cumulative times spent in the current function while it was invoked by
|
|
this specific caller.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
\begin{methoddesc}[Stats]{print_callees}{\optional{restriction, \moreargs}}
|
|
This method for the \class{Stats} class prints a list of all function
|
|
that were called by the indicated function. Aside from this reversal
|
|
of direction of calls (re: called vs was called by), the arguments and
|
|
ordering are identical to the \method{print_callers()} method.
|
|
\end{methoddesc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Limitations \label{profile-limits}}
|
|
|
|
One limitation has to do with accuracy of timing information.
|
|
There is a fundamental problem with deterministic profilers involving
|
|
accuracy. The most obvious restriction is that the underlying ``clock''
|
|
is only ticking at a rate (typically) of about .001 seconds. Hence no
|
|
measurements will be more accurate than the underlying clock. If
|
|
enough measurements are taken, then the ``error'' will tend to average
|
|
out. Unfortunately, removing this first error induces a second source
|
|
of error.
|
|
|
|
The second problem is that it ``takes a while'' from when an event is
|
|
dispatched until the profiler's call to get the time actually
|
|
\emph{gets} the state of the clock. Similarly, there is a certain lag
|
|
when exiting the profiler event handler from the time that the clock's
|
|
value was obtained (and then squirreled away), until the user's code
|
|
is once again executing. As a result, functions that are called many
|
|
times, or call many functions, will typically accumulate this error.
|
|
The error that accumulates in this fashion is typically less than the
|
|
accuracy of the clock (less than one clock tick), but it
|
|
\emph{can} accumulate and become very significant.
|
|
|
|
The problem is more important with \module{profile} than with the
|
|
lower-overhead \module{cProfile}. For this reason, \module{profile}
|
|
provides a means of calibrating itself for a given platform so that
|
|
this error can be probabilistically (on the average) removed.
|
|
After the profiler is calibrated, it will be more accurate (in a least
|
|
square sense), but it will sometimes produce negative numbers (when
|
|
call counts are exceptionally low, and the gods of probability work
|
|
against you :-). ) Do \emph{not} be alarmed by negative numbers in
|
|
the profile. They should \emph{only} appear if you have calibrated
|
|
your profiler, and the results are actually better than without
|
|
calibration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Calibration \label{profile-calibration}}
|
|
|
|
The profiler of the \module{profile} module subtracts a constant from each
|
|
event handling time to compensate for the overhead of calling the time
|
|
function, and socking away the results. By default, the constant is 0.
|
|
The following procedure can
|
|
be used to obtain a better constant for a given platform (see discussion
|
|
in section Limitations above).
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import profile
|
|
pr = profile.Profile()
|
|
for i in range(5):
|
|
print pr.calibrate(10000)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The method executes the number of Python calls given by the argument,
|
|
directly and again under the profiler, measuring the time for both.
|
|
It then computes the hidden overhead per profiler event, and returns
|
|
that as a float. For example, on an 800 MHz Pentium running
|
|
Windows 2000, and using Python's time.clock() as the timer,
|
|
the magical number is about 12.5e-6.
|
|
|
|
The object of this exercise is to get a fairly consistent result.
|
|
If your computer is \emph{very} fast, or your timer function has poor
|
|
resolution, you might have to pass 100000, or even 1000000, to get
|
|
consistent results.
|
|
|
|
When you have a consistent answer,
|
|
there are three ways you can use it:\footnote{Prior to Python 2.2, it
|
|
was necessary to edit the profiler source code to embed the bias as
|
|
a literal number. You still can, but that method is no longer
|
|
described, because no longer needed.}
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import profile
|
|
|
|
# 1. Apply computed bias to all Profile instances created hereafter.
|
|
profile.Profile.bias = your_computed_bias
|
|
|
|
# 2. Apply computed bias to a specific Profile instance.
|
|
pr = profile.Profile()
|
|
pr.bias = your_computed_bias
|
|
|
|
# 3. Specify computed bias in instance constructor.
|
|
pr = profile.Profile(bias=your_computed_bias)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
If you have a choice, you are better off choosing a smaller constant, and
|
|
then your results will ``less often'' show up as negative in profile
|
|
statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Extensions --- Deriving Better Profilers}
|
|
\nodename{Profiler Extensions}
|
|
|
|
The \class{Profile} class of both modules, \module{profile} and
|
|
\module{cProfile}, were written so that
|
|
derived classes could be developed to extend the profiler. The details
|
|
are not described here, as doing this successfully requires an expert
|
|
understanding of how the \class{Profile} class works internally. Study
|
|
the source code of the module carefully if you want to
|
|
pursue this.
|
|
|
|
If all you want to do is change how current time is determined (for
|
|
example, to force use of wall-clock time or elapsed process time),
|
|
pass the timing function you want to the \class{Profile} class
|
|
constructor:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
pr = profile.Profile(your_time_func)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The resulting profiler will then call \function{your_time_func()}.
|
|
|
|
\begin{description}
|
|
\item[\class{profile.Profile}]
|
|
\function{your_time_func()} should return a single number, or a list of
|
|
numbers whose sum is the current time (like what \function{os.times()}
|
|
returns). If the function returns a single time number, or the list of
|
|
returned numbers has length 2, then you will get an especially fast
|
|
version of the dispatch routine.
|
|
|
|
Be warned that you should calibrate the profiler class for the
|
|
timer function that you choose. For most machines, a timer that
|
|
returns a lone integer value will provide the best results in terms of
|
|
low overhead during profiling. (\function{os.times()} is
|
|
\emph{pretty} bad, as it returns a tuple of floating point values). If
|
|
you want to substitute a better timer in the cleanest fashion,
|
|
derive a class and hardwire a replacement dispatch method that best
|
|
handles your timer call, along with the appropriate calibration
|
|
constant.
|
|
|
|
\item[\class{cProfile.Profile}]
|
|
\function{your_time_func()} should return a single number. If it returns
|
|
plain integers, you can also invoke the class constructor with a second
|
|
argument specifying the real duration of one unit of time. For example,
|
|
if \function{your_integer_time_func()} returns times measured in thousands
|
|
of seconds, you would constuct the \class{Profile} instance as follows:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
pr = profile.Profile(your_integer_time_func, 0.001)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
As the \module{cProfile.Profile} class cannot be calibrated, custom
|
|
timer functions should be used with care and should be as fast as
|
|
possible. For the best results with a custom timer, it might be
|
|
necessary to hard-code it in the C source of the internal
|
|
\module{_lsprof} module.
|
|
|
|
\end{description}
|