mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2024-11-30 05:15:14 +08:00
cd16bf6404
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/p3yk ................ r55837 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-08 16:04:42 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 2 lines PEP 3119 -- the abc module. ................ r55838 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-08 17:38:55 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Implement part of PEP 3119 -- One Trick Ponies. ................ r55847 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-09 08:28:06 -0700 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Different way to do one trick ponies, allowing registration (per PEP strawman). ................ r55849 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-09 18:06:38 -0700 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Make sure that the magic looking for __hash__ (etc.) doesn't apply to real subclasses of Hashable. ................ r55852 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-10 08:29:51 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Add some more examples, e.g. generators and dict views. ................ r55853 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-10 08:31:59 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines keys() and items() *are* containers -- just values() isn't. ................ r55864 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-10 15:29:40 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines PEP 3127: new octal literals, binary literals. ................ r55865 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-10 15:31:37 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Some octal literal fixes in Tools. ................ r55866 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-10 15:37:43 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Tokenizer changes for PEP 3127. ................ r55867 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-10 15:37:55 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Some docs for PEP 3127. ................ r55868 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-10 15:44:39 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Missed a place in intobject.c. Is that used anymore anyway? ................ r55871 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 18:31:49 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 182 lines Merged revisions 55729-55868 via svnmerge from svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk ........ r55731 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-01 00:29:12 -0700 (Fri, 01 Jun 2007) | 7 lines SF 1668596/1720897: distutils now copies data files even if package_dir is empty. This needs to be backported. I'm too tired tonight. It would be great if someone backports this if the buildbots are ok with it. Otherwise, I will try to get to it tomorrow. ........ r55732 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-01 04:33:33 -0700 (Fri, 01 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Bug #1722484: remove docstrings again when running with -OO. ........ r55735 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-01 12:20:27 -0700 (Fri, 01 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Fix wrong issue number. ........ r55739 | brett.cannon | 2007-06-01 20:02:29 -0700 (Fri, 01 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Have configure raise an error when building on AtheOS. Code specific to AtheOS will be removed in Python 2.7. ........ r55746 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-02 11:33:53 -0700 (Sat, 02 Jun 2007) | 1 line Update expected birthday of 2.6 ........ r55751 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-03 13:32:50 -0700 (Sun, 03 Jun 2007) | 10 lines Backout the original 'fix' to 1721309 which had no effect. Different versions of Berkeley DB handle this differently. The comments and bug report should have the details. Memory is allocated in 4.4 (and presumably earlier), but not in 4.5. Thus 4.5 has the free error, but not earlier versions. Mostly update comments, plus make the free conditional. This fix was already applied to the 2.5 branch. ........ r55752 | brett.cannon | 2007-06-03 16:13:41 -0700 (Sun, 03 Jun 2007) | 6 lines Make _strptime.TimeRE().pattern() use ``\s+`` for matching whitespace instead of ``\s*``. This prevents patterns from "stealing" bits from other patterns in order to make a match work. Closes bug #1730389. Will be backported. ........ r55766 | hyeshik.chang | 2007-06-05 11:16:52 -0700 (Tue, 05 Jun 2007) | 4 lines Fix build on FreeBSD. Bluetooth HCI API in FreeBSD is quite different from Linux's. Just fix the build for now but the code doesn't support the complete capability of HCI on FreeBSD yet. ........ r55770 | hyeshik.chang | 2007-06-05 11:58:51 -0700 (Tue, 05 Jun 2007) | 4 lines Bug #1728403: Fix a bug that CJKCodecs StreamReader hangs when it reads a file that ends with incomplete sequence and sizehint argument for .read() is specified. ........ r55775 | hyeshik.chang | 2007-06-05 12:28:15 -0700 (Tue, 05 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Fix for Windows: close a temporary file before trying to delete it. ........ r55783 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-05 14:24:47 -0700 (Tue, 05 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Patch by Tim Delany (missing DECREF). SF #1731330. ........ r55785 | collin.winter | 2007-06-05 17:17:35 -0700 (Tue, 05 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Patch #1731049: make threading.py use a proper "raise" when checking internal state, rather than assert statements (which get stripped out by -O). ........ r55786 | facundo.batista | 2007-06-06 08:13:37 -0700 (Wed, 06 Jun 2007) | 4 lines FTP.ntransfercmd method now uses create_connection when passive, using the timeout received in connection time. ........ r55792 | facundo.batista | 2007-06-06 10:15:23 -0700 (Wed, 06 Jun 2007) | 7 lines Added an optional timeout parameter to function urllib2.urlopen, with tests in test_urllib2net.py (must have network resource enabled to execute them). Also modified test_urllib2.py because testing mock classes must take it into acount. Docs are also updated. ........ r55793 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-06 13:19:19 -0700 (Wed, 06 Jun 2007) | 1 line Build _ctypes and _ctypes_test in the ReleaseAMD64 configuration. ........ r55802 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-07 06:23:24 -0700 (Thu, 07 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Disallow function calls like foo(None=1). Backport from py3k rev. 55708 by Guido. ........ r55804 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-07 06:30:24 -0700 (Thu, 07 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Make reindent.py executable. ........ r55805 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-07 06:34:10 -0700 (Thu, 07 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Patch #1667860: Fix UnboundLocalError in urllib2. ........ r55821 | kristjan.jonsson | 2007-06-07 16:53:49 -0700 (Thu, 07 Jun 2007) | 1 line Fixing changes to getbuildinfo.c that broke linux builds ........ r55828 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-08 09:10:27 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 1 line Make this test work with older Python releases where struct has no 't' format character. ........ r55829 | martin.v.loewis | 2007-06-08 10:29:20 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Bug #1733488: Fix compilation of bufferobject.c on AIX. Will backport to 2.5. ........ r55831 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-08 11:20:09 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 2 lines [ 1715718 ] x64 clean compile patch for _ctypes, by Kristj?n Valur with small modifications. ........ r55832 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-08 12:01:06 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 1 line Fix gcc warnings intruduced by passing Py_ssize_t to PyErr_Format calls. ........ r55833 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-08 12:08:31 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Fix wrong documentation, and correct the punktuation. Closes [1700455]. ........ r55834 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-08 12:14:23 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 1 line Fix warnings by using proper function prototype. ........ r55839 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-08 20:36:34 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 7 lines Prevent expandtabs() on string and unicode objects from causing a segfault when a large width is passed on 32-bit platforms. Found by Google. It would be good for people to review this especially carefully and verify I don't have an off by one error and there is no other way to cause overflow. ........ r55841 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-08 21:48:22 -0700 (Fri, 08 Jun 2007) | 1 line Use macro version of GET_SIZE to avoid Coverity warning (#150) about a possible error. ........ r55842 | martin.v.loewis | 2007-06-09 00:42:52 -0700 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Patch #1733960: Allow T_LONGLONG to accept ints. Will backport to 2.5. ........ r55843 | martin.v.loewis | 2007-06-09 00:58:05 -0700 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Fix Windows build. ........ r55845 | martin.v.loewis | 2007-06-09 03:10:26 -0700 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Provide LLONG_MAX for S390. ........ r55854 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-10 08:59:17 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 4 lines First version of build scripts for Windows/AMD64 (no external components are built yet, and 'kill_python' is disabled). ........ r55855 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-10 10:55:51 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 3 lines For now, disable the _bsddb, _sqlite3, _ssl, _testcapi, _tkinter modules in the ReleaseAMD64 configuration because they do not compile. ........ r55856 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-10 11:27:54 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line Need to set the environment variables, otherwise devenv.com is not found. ........ r55860 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-10 14:01:17 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line Revert commit 55855. ........ ................ r55880 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 22:07:36 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 5 lines Fix the refleak counter on test_collections. The ABC metaclass creates a registry which must be cleared on each run. Otherwise, there *seem* to be refleaks when there really aren't any. (The class is held within the registry even though it's no longer needed.) ................ r55884 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 22:46:33 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line These tests have been removed, so they are no longer needed here ................ r55886 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-11 00:26:37 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Optimize access to True and False in the compiler (if True) and the peepholer (LOAD_NAME True). ................ r55905 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-11 10:02:26 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 5 lines Remove __oct__ and __hex__ and use __index__ for converting non-ints before formatting in a base. Add a bin() builtin. ................ r55906 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-11 10:04:44 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 2 lines int(x, 0) does not "guess". ................ r55907 | georg.brandl | 2007-06-11 10:05:47 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Add a comment to explain that nb_oct and nb_hex are nonfunctional. ................ r55908 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 10:49:18 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Get rid of unused imports and comment. ................ r55910 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 13:05:17 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 2 lines _Abstract.__new__ now requires either no arguments or __init__ overridden. ................ r55911 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 13:07:49 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 7 lines Move the collections ABCs to a separate file, _abcoll.py, in order to avoid needing to import _collections.so during the bootstrap (this will become apparent in the next submit of os.py). Add (plain and mutable) ABCs for Set, Mapping, Sequence. ................ r55912 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 13:09:31 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Rewrite the _Environ class to use the new collections ABCs. ................ r55913 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 13:59:45 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 72 lines Merged revisions 55869-55912 via svnmerge from svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk ........ r55869 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 17:42:11 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line Add Atul Varma for patch # 1667860 ........ r55870 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 18:22:03 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line Ignore valgrind problems on Ubuntu from ld ........ r55872 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 18:48:46 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Ignore config.status.lineno which seems new (new autoconf?) ........ r55873 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 19:14:39 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line Prevent these tests from running on Win64 since they don\'t apply there either ........ r55874 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 19:16:10 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 5 lines Fix a bug when there was a newline in the string expandtabs was called on. This also catches another condition that can overflow. Will backport. ........ r55879 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 21:52:37 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 1 line Prevent hang if the port cannot be opened. ........ r55881 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 22:28:45 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 4 lines Add all of the distuils modules that don't seem to have explicit tests. :-( Move an import in mworkscompiler so that this module can be imported on any platform. Hopefully this works on all platforms. ........ r55882 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 22:35:10 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 4 lines SF #1734732, lower case the module names per PEP 8. Will backport. ........ r55885 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-10 23:16:48 -0700 (Sun, 10 Jun 2007) | 4 lines Not sure why this only fails sometimes on Unix machines. Better to disable it and only import msvccompiler on Windows since that's the only place it can work anyways. ........ r55887 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-11 00:29:43 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 4 lines Bug #1734723: Fix repr.Repr() so it doesn't ignore the maxtuple attribute. Will backport ........ r55889 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-11 00:36:24 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 1 line Reflow long line ........ r55896 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-11 08:58:33 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Use "O&" in calls to PyArg_Parse when we need a 'void*' instead of "k" or "K" codes. ........ r55901 | facundo.batista | 2007-06-11 09:27:08 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 5 lines Added versionchanged flag to all the methods which received a new optional timeout parameter, and a versionadded flag to the socket.create_connection function. ........ ................ r55914 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 14:19:50 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 3 lines New super() implementation, for PEP 3135 (though the PEP is not yet updated to this design, and small tweaks may still be made later). ................ r55923 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 21:15:24 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 4 lines I'm guessing this module broke when Neal ripped out the types module -- it used 'list' both as a local variable and as the built-in list type. Renamed the local variable since that was easier. ................ r55924 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-11 21:20:05 -0700 (Mon, 11 Jun 2007) | 5 lines Change all occurrences of super(<thisclass>, <firstarg>) to super(). Seems to have worked, all the tests still pass. Exception: test_descr and test_descrtut, which have tons of these and are there to test the various usages. ................ r55939 | collin.winter | 2007-06-12 13:57:33 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 1 line Patch #1735485: remove StandardError from the exception hierarchy. ................ r55954 | neal.norwitz | 2007-06-12 21:56:32 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 51 lines Merged revisions 55913-55950 via svnmerge from svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk ........ r55926 | marc-andre.lemburg | 2007-06-12 02:09:58 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Apply patch #1734945 to support TurboLinux as distribution. ........ r55927 | marc-andre.lemburg | 2007-06-12 02:26:49 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Add patch #1726668: Windows Vista support. ........ r55929 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-12 08:36:22 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 1 line Checkout, but do not yet try to build, exernal sources. ........ r55930 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-12 09:08:27 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 6 lines Add bufferoverflowU.lib to the libraries needed by _ssl (is this the right thing to do?). Set the /XP64 /RETAIL build enviroment in the makefile when building ReleaseAMD64. ........ r55931 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-12 09:23:19 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 5 lines Revert this change, since it breaks the win32 build: Add bufferoverflowU.lib to the libraries needed by _ssl (is this the right thing to do?). ........ r55934 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-12 10:28:31 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Specify the bufferoverflowU.lib to the makefile on the command line (for ReleaseAMD64 builds). ........ r55937 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-12 12:02:59 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Add bufferoverflowU.lib to PCBuild\_bsddb.vcproj. Build sqlite3.dll and bsddb. ........ r55938 | thomas.heller | 2007-06-12 12:56:12 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Don't rebuild Berkeley DB if not needed (this was committed by accident). ........ r55948 | martin.v.loewis | 2007-06-12 20:42:19 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jun 2007) | 3 lines Provide PY_LLONG_MAX on all systems having long long. Will backport to 2.5. ........ ................ r55959 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-06-13 09:22:41 -0700 (Wed, 13 Jun 2007) | 2 lines Fix a compilation warning. ................
5897 lines
207 KiB
TeX
5897 lines
207 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{manual}
|
||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||
\usepackage{textcomp}
|
||
|
||
% Things to do:
|
||
% Should really move the Python startup file info to an appendix
|
||
|
||
\title{Python Tutorial}
|
||
|
||
\input{boilerplate}
|
||
|
||
\makeindex
|
||
|
||
\begin{document}
|
||
|
||
\maketitle
|
||
|
||
\ifhtml
|
||
\chapter*{Front Matter\label{front}}
|
||
\fi
|
||
|
||
\input{copyright}
|
||
|
||
\begin{abstract}
|
||
|
||
\noindent
|
||
Python is an easy to learn, powerful programming language. It has
|
||
efficient high-level data structures and a simple but effective
|
||
approach to object-oriented programming. Python's elegant syntax and
|
||
dynamic typing, together with its interpreted nature, make it an ideal
|
||
language for scripting and rapid application development in many areas
|
||
on most platforms.
|
||
|
||
The Python interpreter and the extensive standard library are freely
|
||
available in source or binary form for all major platforms from the
|
||
Python Web site, \url{http://www.python.org/}, and may be freely
|
||
distributed. The same site also contains distributions of and
|
||
pointers to many free third party Python modules, programs and tools,
|
||
and additional documentation.
|
||
|
||
The Python interpreter is easily extended with new functions and data
|
||
types implemented in C or \Cpp{} (or other languages callable from C).
|
||
Python is also suitable as an extension language for customizable
|
||
applications.
|
||
|
||
This tutorial introduces the reader informally to the basic concepts
|
||
and features of the Python language and system. It helps to have a
|
||
Python interpreter handy for hands-on experience, but all examples are
|
||
self-contained, so the tutorial can be read off-line as well.
|
||
|
||
For a description of standard objects and modules, see the
|
||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference} document. The
|
||
\citetitle[../ref/ref.html]{Python Reference Manual} gives a more
|
||
formal definition of the language. To write extensions in C or
|
||
\Cpp, read \citetitle[../ext/ext.html]{Extending and Embedding the
|
||
Python Interpreter} and \citetitle[../api/api.html]{Python/C API
|
||
Reference}. There are also several books covering Python in depth.
|
||
|
||
This tutorial does not attempt to be comprehensive and cover every
|
||
single feature, or even every commonly used feature. Instead, it
|
||
introduces many of Python's most noteworthy features, and will give
|
||
you a good idea of the language's flavor and style. After reading it,
|
||
you will be able to read and write Python modules and programs, and
|
||
you will be ready to learn more about the various Python library
|
||
modules described in the \citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library
|
||
Reference}.
|
||
|
||
\end{abstract}
|
||
|
||
\tableofcontents
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Whetting Your Appetite \label{intro}}
|
||
|
||
If you do much work on computers, eventually you find that there's
|
||
some task you'd like to automate. For example, you may wish to
|
||
perform a search-and-replace over a large number of text files, or
|
||
rename and rearrange a bunch of photo files in a complicated way.
|
||
Perhaps you'd like to write a small custom database, or a specialized
|
||
GUI application, or a simple game.
|
||
|
||
If you're a professional software developer, you may have to work with
|
||
several C/\Cpp/Java libraries but find the usual
|
||
write/compile/test/re-compile cycle is too slow. Perhaps you're
|
||
writing a test suite for such a library and find writing the testing
|
||
code a tedious task. Or maybe you've written a program that could use
|
||
an extension language, and you don't want to design and implement a
|
||
whole new language for your application.
|
||
|
||
Python is just the language for you.
|
||
|
||
You could write a {\UNIX} shell script or Windows batch files for some
|
||
of these tasks, but shell scripts are best at moving around files and
|
||
changing text data, not well-suited for GUI applications or games.
|
||
You could write a C/{\Cpp}/Java program, but it can take a lot of
|
||
development time to get even a first-draft program. Python is simpler
|
||
to use, available on Windows, MacOS X, and {\UNIX} operating systems,
|
||
and will help you get the job done more quickly.
|
||
|
||
Python is simple to use, but it is a real programming language,
|
||
offering much more structure and support for large programs than shell
|
||
scripts or batch files can offer. On the other hand, Python also
|
||
offers much more error checking than C, and, being a
|
||
\emph{very-high-level language}, it has high-level data types built
|
||
in, such as flexible arrays and dictionaries. Because of its more
|
||
general data types Python is applicable to a much larger problem
|
||
domain than Awk or even Perl, yet many things are at
|
||
least as easy in Python as in those languages.
|
||
|
||
Python allows you to split your program into modules that can be
|
||
reused in other Python programs. It comes with a large collection of
|
||
standard modules that you can use as the basis of your programs --- or
|
||
as examples to start learning to program in Python. Some of these
|
||
modules provide things like file I/O, system calls,
|
||
sockets, and even interfaces to graphical user interface toolkits like Tk.
|
||
|
||
Python is an interpreted language, which can save you considerable time
|
||
during program development because no compilation and linking is
|
||
necessary. The interpreter can be used interactively, which makes it
|
||
easy to experiment with features of the language, to write throw-away
|
||
programs, or to test functions during bottom-up program development.
|
||
It is also a handy desk calculator.
|
||
|
||
Python enables programs to be written compactly and readably. Programs
|
||
written in Python are typically much shorter than equivalent C,
|
||
\Cpp{}, or Java programs, for several reasons:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item
|
||
the high-level data types allow you to express complex operations in a
|
||
single statement;
|
||
\item
|
||
statement grouping is done by indentation instead of beginning and ending
|
||
brackets;
|
||
\item
|
||
no variable or argument declarations are necessary.
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
Python is \emph{extensible}: if you know how to program in C it is easy
|
||
to add a new built-in function or module to the interpreter, either to
|
||
perform critical operations at maximum speed, or to link Python
|
||
programs to libraries that may only be available in binary form (such
|
||
as a vendor-specific graphics library). Once you are really hooked,
|
||
you can link the Python interpreter into an application written in C
|
||
and use it as an extension or command language for that application.
|
||
|
||
By the way, the language is named after the BBC show ``Monty Python's
|
||
Flying Circus'' and has nothing to do with nasty reptiles. Making
|
||
references to Monty Python skits in documentation is not only allowed,
|
||
it is encouraged!
|
||
|
||
%\section{Where From Here \label{where}}
|
||
|
||
Now that you are all excited about Python, you'll want to examine it
|
||
in some more detail. Since the best way to learn a language is
|
||
to use it, the tutorial invites you to play with the Python interpreter
|
||
as you read.
|
||
|
||
In the next chapter, the mechanics of using the interpreter are
|
||
explained. This is rather mundane information, but essential for
|
||
trying out the examples shown later.
|
||
|
||
The rest of the tutorial introduces various features of the Python
|
||
language and system through examples, beginning with simple
|
||
expressions, statements and data types, through functions and modules,
|
||
and finally touching upon advanced concepts like exceptions
|
||
and user-defined classes.
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Using the Python Interpreter \label{using}}
|
||
|
||
\section{Invoking the Interpreter \label{invoking}}
|
||
|
||
The Python interpreter is usually installed as
|
||
\file{/usr/local/bin/python} on those machines where it is available;
|
||
putting \file{/usr/local/bin} in your \UNIX{} shell's search path
|
||
makes it possible to start it by typing the command
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
python
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
to the shell. Since the choice of the directory where the interpreter
|
||
lives is an installation option, other places are possible; check with
|
||
your local Python guru or system administrator. (E.g.,
|
||
\file{/usr/local/python} is a popular alternative location.)
|
||
|
||
On Windows machines, the Python installation is usually placed in
|
||
\file{C:\e Python30}, though you can change this when you're running
|
||
the installer. To add this directory to your path,
|
||
you can type the following command into the command prompt in a DOS box:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
set path=%path%;C:\python30
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
Typing an end-of-file character (\kbd{Control-D} on \UNIX,
|
||
\kbd{Control-Z} on Windows) at the primary prompt causes the
|
||
interpreter to exit with a zero exit status. If that doesn't work,
|
||
you can exit the interpreter by typing the following commands:
|
||
\samp{import sys; sys.exit()}.
|
||
|
||
The interpreter's line-editing features usually aren't very
|
||
sophisticated. On \UNIX, whoever installed the interpreter may have
|
||
enabled support for the GNU readline library, which adds more
|
||
elaborate interactive editing and history features. Perhaps the
|
||
quickest check to see whether command line editing is supported is
|
||
typing Control-P to the first Python prompt you get. If it beeps, you
|
||
have command line editing; see Appendix \ref{interacting} for an
|
||
introduction to the keys. If nothing appears to happen, or if
|
||
\code{\^P} is echoed, command line editing isn't available; you'll
|
||
only be able to use backspace to remove characters from the current
|
||
line.
|
||
|
||
The interpreter operates somewhat like the \UNIX{} shell: when called
|
||
with standard input connected to a tty device, it reads and executes
|
||
commands interactively; when called with a file name argument or with
|
||
a file as standard input, it reads and executes a \emph{script} from
|
||
that file.
|
||
|
||
A second way of starting the interpreter is
|
||
\samp{\program{python} \programopt{-c} \var{command} [arg] ...}, which
|
||
executes the statement(s) in \var{command}, analogous to the shell's
|
||
\programopt{-c} option. Since Python statements often contain spaces
|
||
or other characters that are special to the shell, it is best to quote
|
||
\var{command} in its entirety with double quotes.
|
||
|
||
Some Python modules are also useful as scripts. These can be invoked using
|
||
\samp{\program{python} \programopt{-m} \var{module} [arg] ...}, which
|
||
executes the source file for \var{module} as if you had spelled out its
|
||
full name on the command line.
|
||
|
||
Note that there is a difference between \samp{python file} and
|
||
\samp{python <file}. In the latter case, input requests from the
|
||
program, such as calling \code{sys.stdin.read()}, are
|
||
satisfied from \emph{file}. Since this file has already been read
|
||
until the end by the parser before the program starts executing, the
|
||
program will encounter end-of-file immediately. In the former case
|
||
(which is usually what you want) they are satisfied from whatever file
|
||
or device is connected to standard input of the Python interpreter.
|
||
|
||
When a script file is used, it is sometimes useful to be able to run
|
||
the script and enter interactive mode afterwards. This can be done by
|
||
passing \programopt{-i} before the script. (This does not work if the
|
||
script is read from standard input, for the same reason as explained
|
||
in the previous paragraph.)
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Argument Passing \label{argPassing}}
|
||
|
||
When known to the interpreter, the script name and additional
|
||
arguments thereafter are passed to the script in the variable
|
||
\code{sys.argv}, which is a list of strings. Its length is at least
|
||
one; when no script and no arguments are given, \code{sys.argv[0]} is
|
||
an empty string. When the script name is given as \code{'-'} (meaning
|
||
standard input), \code{sys.argv[0]} is set to \code{'-'}. When
|
||
\programopt{-c} \var{command} is used, \code{sys.argv[0]} is set to
|
||
\code{'-c'}. When \programopt{-m} \var{module} is used, \code{sys.argv[0]}
|
||
is set to the full name of the located module. Options found after
|
||
\programopt{-c} \var{command} or \programopt{-m} \var{module} are not consumed
|
||
by the Python interpreter's option processing but left in \code{sys.argv} for
|
||
the command or module to handle.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Interactive Mode \label{interactive}}
|
||
|
||
When commands are read from a tty, the interpreter is said to be in
|
||
\emph{interactive mode}. In this mode it prompts for the next command
|
||
with the \emph{primary prompt}, usually three greater-than signs
|
||
(\samp{>>>~}); for continuation lines it prompts with the
|
||
\emph{secondary prompt}, by default three dots (\samp{...~}).
|
||
The interpreter prints a welcome message stating its version number
|
||
and a copyright notice before printing the first prompt:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
python
|
||
Python 1.5.2b2 (#1, Feb 28 1999, 00:02:06) [GCC 2.8.1] on sunos5
|
||
Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam
|
||
>>>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Continuation lines are needed when entering a multi-line construct.
|
||
As an example, take a look at this \keyword{if} statement:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> the_world_is_flat = 1
|
||
>>> if the_world_is_flat:
|
||
... print "Be careful not to fall off!"
|
||
...
|
||
Be careful not to fall off!
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{The Interpreter and Its Environment \label{interp}}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Error Handling \label{error}}
|
||
|
||
When an error occurs, the interpreter prints an error
|
||
message and a stack trace. In interactive mode, it then returns to
|
||
the primary prompt; when input came from a file, it exits with a
|
||
nonzero exit status after printing
|
||
the stack trace. (Exceptions handled by an \keyword{except} clause in a
|
||
\keyword{try} statement are not errors in this context.) Some errors are
|
||
unconditionally fatal and cause an exit with a nonzero exit; this
|
||
applies to internal inconsistencies and some cases of running out of
|
||
memory. All error messages are written to the standard error stream;
|
||
normal output from executed commands is written to standard
|
||
output.
|
||
|
||
Typing the interrupt character (usually Control-C or DEL) to the
|
||
primary or secondary prompt cancels the input and returns to the
|
||
primary prompt.\footnote{
|
||
A problem with the GNU Readline package may prevent this.
|
||
}
|
||
Typing an interrupt while a command is executing raises the
|
||
\exception{KeyboardInterrupt} exception, which may be handled by a
|
||
\keyword{try} statement.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Executable Python Scripts \label{scripts}}
|
||
|
||
On BSD'ish \UNIX{} systems, Python scripts can be made directly
|
||
executable, like shell scripts, by putting the line
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
#! /usr/bin/env python
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
(assuming that the interpreter is on the user's \envvar{PATH}) at the
|
||
beginning of the script and giving the file an executable mode. The
|
||
\samp{\#!} must be the first two characters of the file. On some
|
||
platforms, this first line must end with a \UNIX-style line ending
|
||
(\character{\e n}), not a Mac OS (\character{\e r}) or Windows
|
||
(\character{\e r\e n}) line ending. Note that
|
||
the hash, or pound, character, \character{\#}, is used to start a
|
||
comment in Python.
|
||
|
||
The script can be given an executable mode, or permission, using the
|
||
\program{chmod} command:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
$ chmod +x myscript.py
|
||
\end{verbatim} % $ <-- bow to font-lock
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Source Code Encoding}
|
||
|
||
It is possible to use encodings different than \ASCII{} in Python source
|
||
files. The best way to do it is to put one more special comment line
|
||
right after the \code{\#!} line to define the source file encoding:
|
||
|
||
\begin{alltt}
|
||
# -*- coding: \var{encoding} -*-
|
||
\end{alltt}
|
||
|
||
With that declaration, all characters in the source file will be treated as
|
||
having the encoding \var{encoding}, and it will be
|
||
possible to directly write Unicode string literals in the selected
|
||
encoding. The list of possible encodings can be found in the
|
||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}, in the section
|
||
on \ulink{\module{codecs}}{../lib/module-codecs.html}.
|
||
|
||
For example, to write Unicode literals including the Euro currency
|
||
symbol, the ISO-8859-15 encoding can be used, with the Euro symbol
|
||
having the ordinal value 164. This script will print the value 8364
|
||
(the Unicode codepoint corresponding to the Euro symbol) and then
|
||
exit:
|
||
|
||
\begin{alltt}
|
||
# -*- coding: iso-8859-15 -*-
|
||
|
||
currency = u"\texteuro"
|
||
print ord(currency)
|
||
\end{alltt}
|
||
|
||
If your editor supports saving files as \code{UTF-8} with a UTF-8
|
||
\emph{byte order mark} (aka BOM), you can use that instead of an
|
||
encoding declaration. IDLE supports this capability if
|
||
\code{Options/General/Default Source Encoding/UTF-8} is set. Notice
|
||
that this signature is not understood in older Python releases (2.2
|
||
and earlier), and also not understood by the operating system for
|
||
script files with \code{\#!} lines (only used on \UNIX{} systems).
|
||
|
||
By using UTF-8 (either through the signature or an encoding
|
||
declaration), characters of most languages in the world can be used
|
||
simultaneously in string literals and comments. Using non-\ASCII{}
|
||
characters in identifiers is not supported. To display all these
|
||
characters properly, your editor must recognize that the file is
|
||
UTF-8, and it must use a font that supports all the characters in the
|
||
file.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{The Interactive Startup File \label{startup}}
|
||
|
||
% XXX This should probably be dumped in an appendix, since most people
|
||
% don't use Python interactively in non-trivial ways.
|
||
|
||
When you use Python interactively, it is frequently handy to have some
|
||
standard commands executed every time the interpreter is started. You
|
||
can do this by setting an environment variable named
|
||
\envvar{PYTHONSTARTUP} to the name of a file containing your start-up
|
||
commands. This is similar to the \file{.profile} feature of the
|
||
\UNIX{} shells.
|
||
|
||
This file is only read in interactive sessions, not when Python reads
|
||
commands from a script, and not when \file{/dev/tty} is given as the
|
||
explicit source of commands (which otherwise behaves like an
|
||
interactive session). It is executed in the same namespace where
|
||
interactive commands are executed, so that objects that it defines or
|
||
imports can be used without qualification in the interactive session.
|
||
You can also change the prompts \code{sys.ps1} and \code{sys.ps2} in
|
||
this file.
|
||
|
||
If you want to read an additional start-up file from the current
|
||
directory, you can program this in the global start-up file using code
|
||
like \samp{if os.path.isfile('.pythonrc.py'):
|
||
execfile('.pythonrc.py')}. If you want to use the startup file in a
|
||
script, you must do this explicitly in the script:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import os
|
||
filename = os.environ.get('PYTHONSTARTUP')
|
||
if filename and os.path.isfile(filename):
|
||
execfile(filename)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{An Informal Introduction to Python \label{informal}}
|
||
|
||
In the following examples, input and output are distinguished by the
|
||
presence or absence of prompts (\samp{>>>~} and \samp{...~}): to repeat
|
||
the example, you must type everything after the prompt, when the
|
||
prompt appears; lines that do not begin with a prompt are output from
|
||
the interpreter. %
|
||
%\footnote{
|
||
% I'd prefer to use different fonts to distinguish input
|
||
% from output, but the amount of LaTeX hacking that would require
|
||
% is currently beyond my ability.
|
||
%}
|
||
Note that a secondary prompt on a line by itself in an example means
|
||
you must type a blank line; this is used to end a multi-line command.
|
||
|
||
Many of the examples in this manual, even those entered at the
|
||
interactive prompt, include comments. Comments in Python start with
|
||
the hash character, \character{\#}, and extend to the end of the
|
||
physical line. A comment may appear at the start of a line or
|
||
following whitespace or code, but not within a string literal. A hash
|
||
character within a string literal is just a hash character.
|
||
|
||
Some examples:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
# this is the first comment
|
||
SPAM = 1 # and this is the second comment
|
||
# ... and now a third!
|
||
STRING = "# This is not a comment."
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Using Python as a Calculator \label{calculator}}
|
||
|
||
Let's try some simple Python commands. Start the interpreter and wait
|
||
for the primary prompt, \samp{>>>~}. (It shouldn't take long.)
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Numbers \label{numbers}}
|
||
|
||
The interpreter acts as a simple calculator: you can type an
|
||
expression at it and it will write the value. Expression syntax is
|
||
straightforward: the operators \code{+}, \code{-}, \code{*} and
|
||
\code{/} work just like in most other languages (for example, Pascal
|
||
or C); parentheses can be used for grouping. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 2+2
|
||
4
|
||
>>> # This is a comment
|
||
... 2+2
|
||
4
|
||
>>> 2+2 # and a comment on the same line as code
|
||
4
|
||
>>> (50-5*6)/4
|
||
5
|
||
>>> # Integer division returns the floor:
|
||
... 7/3
|
||
2
|
||
>>> 7/-3
|
||
-3
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The equal sign (\character{=}) is used to assign a value to a variable.
|
||
Afterwards, no result is displayed before the next interactive prompt:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> width = 20
|
||
>>> height = 5*9
|
||
>>> width * height
|
||
900
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
A value can be assigned to several variables simultaneously:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> x = y = z = 0 # Zero x, y and z
|
||
>>> x
|
||
0
|
||
>>> y
|
||
0
|
||
>>> z
|
||
0
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
There is full support for floating point; operators with mixed type
|
||
operands convert the integer operand to floating point:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 3 * 3.75 / 1.5
|
||
7.5
|
||
>>> 7.0 / 2
|
||
3.5
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Complex numbers are also supported; imaginary numbers are written with
|
||
a suffix of \samp{j} or \samp{J}. Complex numbers with a nonzero
|
||
real component are written as \samp{(\var{real}+\var{imag}j)}, or can
|
||
be created with the \samp{complex(\var{real}, \var{imag})} function.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 1j * 1J
|
||
(-1+0j)
|
||
>>> 1j * complex(0,1)
|
||
(-1+0j)
|
||
>>> 3+1j*3
|
||
(3+3j)
|
||
>>> (3+1j)*3
|
||
(9+3j)
|
||
>>> (1+2j)/(1+1j)
|
||
(1.5+0.5j)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Complex numbers are always represented as two floating point numbers,
|
||
the real and imaginary part. To extract these parts from a complex
|
||
number \var{z}, use \code{\var{z}.real} and \code{\var{z}.imag}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a=1.5+0.5j
|
||
>>> a.real
|
||
1.5
|
||
>>> a.imag
|
||
0.5
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The conversion functions to floating point and integer
|
||
(\function{float()}, \function{int()} and \function{long()}) don't
|
||
work for complex numbers --- there is no one correct way to convert a
|
||
complex number to a real number. Use \code{abs(\var{z})} to get its
|
||
magnitude (as a float) or \code{z.real} to get its real part.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a=3.0+4.0j
|
||
>>> float(a)
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
TypeError: can't convert complex to float; use abs(z)
|
||
>>> a.real
|
||
3.0
|
||
>>> a.imag
|
||
4.0
|
||
>>> abs(a) # sqrt(a.real**2 + a.imag**2)
|
||
5.0
|
||
>>>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In interactive mode, the last printed expression is assigned to the
|
||
variable \code{_}. This means that when you are using Python as a
|
||
desk calculator, it is somewhat easier to continue calculations, for
|
||
example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> tax = 12.5 / 100
|
||
>>> price = 100.50
|
||
>>> price * tax
|
||
12.5625
|
||
>>> price + _
|
||
113.0625
|
||
>>> round(_, 2)
|
||
113.06
|
||
>>>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This variable should be treated as read-only by the user. Don't
|
||
explicitly assign a value to it --- you would create an independent
|
||
local variable with the same name masking the built-in variable with
|
||
its magic behavior.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Strings \label{strings}}
|
||
|
||
Besides numbers, Python can also manipulate strings, which can be
|
||
expressed in several ways. They can be enclosed in single quotes or
|
||
double quotes:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 'spam eggs'
|
||
'spam eggs'
|
||
>>> 'doesn\'t'
|
||
"doesn't"
|
||
>>> "doesn't"
|
||
"doesn't"
|
||
>>> '"Yes," he said.'
|
||
'"Yes," he said.'
|
||
>>> "\"Yes,\" he said."
|
||
'"Yes," he said.'
|
||
>>> '"Isn\'t," she said.'
|
||
'"Isn\'t," she said.'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
String literals can span multiple lines in several ways. Continuation
|
||
lines can be used, with a backslash as the last character on the line
|
||
indicating that the next line is a logical continuation of the line:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
hello = "This is a rather long string containing\n\
|
||
several lines of text just as you would do in C.\n\
|
||
Note that whitespace at the beginning of the line is\
|
||
significant."
|
||
|
||
print hello
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that newlines still need to be embedded in the string using
|
||
\code{\e n}; the newline following the trailing backslash is
|
||
discarded. This example would print the following:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
This is a rather long string containing
|
||
several lines of text just as you would do in C.
|
||
Note that whitespace at the beginning of the line is significant.
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If we make the string literal a ``raw'' string, however, the
|
||
\code{\e n} sequences are not converted to newlines, but the backslash
|
||
at the end of the line, and the newline character in the source, are
|
||
both included in the string as data. Thus, the example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
hello = r"This is a rather long string containing\n\
|
||
several lines of text much as you would do in C."
|
||
|
||
print hello
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
would print:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
This is a rather long string containing\n\
|
||
several lines of text much as you would do in C.
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Or, strings can be surrounded in a pair of matching triple-quotes:
|
||
\code{"""} or \code{'\code{'}'}. End of lines do not need to be escaped
|
||
when using triple-quotes, but they will be included in the string.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
print """
|
||
Usage: thingy [OPTIONS]
|
||
-h Display this usage message
|
||
-H hostname Hostname to connect to
|
||
"""
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
produces the following output:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
Usage: thingy [OPTIONS]
|
||
-h Display this usage message
|
||
-H hostname Hostname to connect to
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The interpreter prints the result of string operations in the same way
|
||
as they are typed for input: inside quotes, and with quotes and other
|
||
funny characters escaped by backslashes, to show the precise
|
||
value. The string is enclosed in double quotes if the string contains
|
||
a single quote and no double quotes, else it's enclosed in single
|
||
quotes. (The \keyword{print} statement, described later, can be used
|
||
to write strings without quotes or escapes.)
|
||
|
||
Strings can be concatenated (glued together) with the
|
||
\code{+} operator, and repeated with \code{*}:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word = 'Help' + 'A'
|
||
>>> word
|
||
'HelpA'
|
||
>>> '<' + word*5 + '>'
|
||
'<HelpAHelpAHelpAHelpAHelpA>'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Two string literals next to each other are automatically concatenated;
|
||
the first line above could also have been written \samp{word = 'Help'
|
||
'A'}; this only works with two literals, not with arbitrary string
|
||
expressions:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 'str' 'ing' # <- This is ok
|
||
'string'
|
||
>>> 'str'.strip() + 'ing' # <- This is ok
|
||
'string'
|
||
>>> 'str'.strip() 'ing' # <- This is invalid
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
'str'.strip() 'ing'
|
||
^
|
||
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Strings can be subscripted (indexed); like in C, the first character
|
||
of a string has subscript (index) 0. There is no separate character
|
||
type; a character is simply a string of size one. Like in Icon,
|
||
substrings can be specified with the \emph{slice notation}: two indices
|
||
separated by a colon.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[4]
|
||
'A'
|
||
>>> word[0:2]
|
||
'He'
|
||
>>> word[2:4]
|
||
'lp'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Slice indices have useful defaults; an omitted first index defaults to
|
||
zero, an omitted second index defaults to the size of the string being
|
||
sliced.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[:2] # The first two characters
|
||
'He'
|
||
>>> word[2:] # Everything except the first two characters
|
||
'lpA'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Unlike a C string, Python strings cannot be changed. Assigning to an
|
||
indexed position in the string results in an error:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[0] = 'x'
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
TypeError: object doesn't support item assignment
|
||
>>> word[:1] = 'Splat'
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
TypeError: object doesn't support slice assignment
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
However, creating a new string with the combined content is easy and
|
||
efficient:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 'x' + word[1:]
|
||
'xelpA'
|
||
>>> 'Splat' + word[4]
|
||
'SplatA'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Here's a useful invariant of slice operations:
|
||
\code{s[:i] + s[i:]} equals \code{s}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[:2] + word[2:]
|
||
'HelpA'
|
||
>>> word[:3] + word[3:]
|
||
'HelpA'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Degenerate slice indices are handled gracefully: an index that is too
|
||
large is replaced by the string size, an upper bound smaller than the
|
||
lower bound returns an empty string.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[1:100]
|
||
'elpA'
|
||
>>> word[10:]
|
||
''
|
||
>>> word[2:1]
|
||
''
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Indices may be negative numbers, to start counting from the right.
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[-1] # The last character
|
||
'A'
|
||
>>> word[-2] # The last-but-one character
|
||
'p'
|
||
>>> word[-2:] # The last two characters
|
||
'pA'
|
||
>>> word[:-2] # Everything except the last two characters
|
||
'Hel'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
But note that -0 is really the same as 0, so it does not count from
|
||
the right!
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[-0] # (since -0 equals 0)
|
||
'H'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Out-of-range negative slice indices are truncated, but don't try this
|
||
for single-element (non-slice) indices:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> word[-100:]
|
||
'HelpA'
|
||
>>> word[-10] # error
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
IndexError: string index out of range
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
One way to remember how slices work is to think of the indices as
|
||
pointing \emph{between} characters, with the left edge of the first
|
||
character numbered 0. Then the right edge of the last character of a
|
||
string of \var{n} characters has index \var{n}, for example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
+---+---+---+---+---+
|
||
| H | e | l | p | A |
|
||
+---+---+---+---+---+
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5
|
||
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The first row of numbers gives the position of the indices 0...5 in
|
||
the string; the second row gives the corresponding negative indices.
|
||
The slice from \var{i} to \var{j} consists of all characters between
|
||
the edges labeled \var{i} and \var{j}, respectively.
|
||
|
||
For non-negative indices, the length of a slice is the difference of
|
||
the indices, if both are within bounds. For example, the length of
|
||
\code{word[1:3]} is 2.
|
||
|
||
The built-in function \function{len()} returns the length of a string:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> s = 'supercalifragilisticexpialidocious'
|
||
>>> len(s)
|
||
34
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\begin{seealso}
|
||
\seetitle[../lib/typesseq.html]{Sequence Types}%
|
||
{Strings, and the Unicode strings described in the next
|
||
section, are examples of \emph{sequence types}, and
|
||
support the common operations supported by such types.}
|
||
\seetitle[../lib/string-methods.html]{String Methods}%
|
||
{Both strings and Unicode strings support a large number of
|
||
methods for basic transformations and searching.}
|
||
\seetitle[../lib/typesseq-strings.html]{String Formatting Operations}%
|
||
{The formatting operations invoked when strings and Unicode
|
||
strings are the left operand of the \code{\%} operator are
|
||
described in more detail here.}
|
||
\end{seealso}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Unicode Strings \label{unicodeStrings}}
|
||
\sectionauthor{Marc-Andre Lemburg}{mal@lemburg.com}
|
||
|
||
Starting with Python 2.0 a new data type for storing text data is
|
||
available to the programmer: the Unicode object. It can be used to
|
||
store and manipulate Unicode data (see \url{http://www.unicode.org/})
|
||
and integrates well with the existing string objects, providing
|
||
auto-conversions where necessary.
|
||
|
||
Unicode has the advantage of providing one ordinal for every character
|
||
in every script used in modern and ancient texts. Previously, there
|
||
were only 256 possible ordinals for script characters. Texts were
|
||
typically bound to a code page which mapped the ordinals to script
|
||
characters. This lead to very much confusion especially with respect
|
||
to internationalization (usually written as \samp{i18n} ---
|
||
\character{i} + 18 characters + \character{n}) of software. Unicode
|
||
solves these problems by defining one code page for all scripts.
|
||
|
||
Creating Unicode strings in Python is just as simple as creating
|
||
normal strings:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> u'Hello World !'
|
||
u'Hello World !'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The small \character{u} in front of the quote indicates that a
|
||
Unicode string is supposed to be created. If you want to include
|
||
special characters in the string, you can do so by using the Python
|
||
\emph{Unicode-Escape} encoding. The following example shows how:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> u'Hello\u0020World !'
|
||
u'Hello World !'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The escape sequence \code{\e u0020} indicates to insert the Unicode
|
||
character with the ordinal value 0x0020 (the space character) at the
|
||
given position.
|
||
|
||
Other characters are interpreted by using their respective ordinal
|
||
values directly as Unicode ordinals. If you have literal strings
|
||
in the standard Latin-1 encoding that is used in many Western countries,
|
||
you will find it convenient that the lower 256 characters
|
||
of Unicode are the same as the 256 characters of Latin-1.
|
||
|
||
For experts, there is also a raw mode just like the one for normal
|
||
strings. You have to prefix the opening quote with 'ur' to have
|
||
Python use the \emph{Raw-Unicode-Escape} encoding. It will only apply
|
||
the above \code{\e uXXXX} conversion if there is an uneven number of
|
||
backslashes in front of the small 'u'.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> ur'Hello\u0020World !'
|
||
u'Hello World !'
|
||
>>> ur'Hello\\u0020World !'
|
||
u'Hello\\\\u0020World !'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The raw mode is most useful when you have to enter lots of
|
||
backslashes, as can be necessary in regular expressions.
|
||
|
||
Apart from these standard encodings, Python provides a whole set of
|
||
other ways of creating Unicode strings on the basis of a known
|
||
encoding.
|
||
|
||
The built-in function \function{unicode()}\bifuncindex{unicode} provides
|
||
access to all registered Unicode codecs (COders and DECoders). Some of
|
||
the more well known encodings which these codecs can convert are
|
||
\emph{Latin-1}, \emph{ASCII}, \emph{UTF-8}, and \emph{UTF-16}.
|
||
The latter two are variable-length encodings that store each Unicode
|
||
character in one or more bytes. The default encoding is
|
||
normally set to \ASCII, which passes through characters in the range
|
||
0 to 127 and rejects any other characters with an error.
|
||
When a Unicode string is printed, written to a file, or converted
|
||
with \function{str()}, conversion takes place using this default encoding.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> u"abc"
|
||
u'abc'
|
||
>>> str(u"abc")
|
||
'abc'
|
||
>>> u"<22><><EFBFBD>"
|
||
u'\xe4\xf6\xfc'
|
||
>>> str(u"<22><><EFBFBD>")
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-2: ordinal not in range(128)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To convert a Unicode string into an 8-bit string using a specific
|
||
encoding, Unicode objects provide an \function{encode()} method
|
||
that takes one argument, the name of the encoding. Lowercase names
|
||
for encodings are preferred.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> u"<22><><EFBFBD>".encode('utf-8')
|
||
'\xc3\xa4\xc3\xb6\xc3\xbc'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If you have data in a specific encoding and want to produce a
|
||
corresponding Unicode string from it, you can use the
|
||
\function{unicode()} function with the encoding name as the second
|
||
argument.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> unicode('\xc3\xa4\xc3\xb6\xc3\xbc', 'utf-8')
|
||
u'\xe4\xf6\xfc'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Lists \label{lists}}
|
||
|
||
Python knows a number of \emph{compound} data types, used to group
|
||
together other values. The most versatile is the \emph{list}, which
|
||
can be written as a list of comma-separated values (items) between
|
||
square brackets. List items need not all have the same type.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a = ['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234]
|
||
>>> a
|
||
['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Like string indices, list indices start at 0, and lists can be sliced,
|
||
concatenated and so on:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a[0]
|
||
'spam'
|
||
>>> a[3]
|
||
1234
|
||
>>> a[-2]
|
||
100
|
||
>>> a[1:-1]
|
||
['eggs', 100]
|
||
>>> a[:2] + ['bacon', 2*2]
|
||
['spam', 'eggs', 'bacon', 4]
|
||
>>> 3*a[:3] + ['Boo!']
|
||
['spam', 'eggs', 100, 'spam', 'eggs', 100, 'spam', 'eggs', 100, 'Boo!']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Unlike strings, which are \emph{immutable}, it is possible to change
|
||
individual elements of a list:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a
|
||
['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234]
|
||
>>> a[2] = a[2] + 23
|
||
>>> a
|
||
['spam', 'eggs', 123, 1234]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Assignment to slices is also possible, and this can even change the size
|
||
of the list or clear it entirely:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> # Replace some items:
|
||
... a[0:2] = [1, 12]
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[1, 12, 123, 1234]
|
||
>>> # Remove some:
|
||
... a[0:2] = []
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[123, 1234]
|
||
>>> # Insert some:
|
||
... a[1:1] = ['bletch', 'xyzzy']
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[123, 'bletch', 'xyzzy', 1234]
|
||
>>> # Insert (a copy of) itself at the beginning
|
||
>>> a[:0] = a
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[123, 'bletch', 'xyzzy', 1234, 123, 'bletch', 'xyzzy', 1234]
|
||
>>> # Clear the list: replace all items with an empty list
|
||
>>> a[:] = []
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The built-in function \function{len()} also applies to lists:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> len(a)
|
||
8
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
It is possible to nest lists (create lists containing other lists),
|
||
for example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> q = [2, 3]
|
||
>>> p = [1, q, 4]
|
||
>>> len(p)
|
||
3
|
||
>>> p[1]
|
||
[2, 3]
|
||
>>> p[1][0]
|
||
2
|
||
>>> p[1].append('xtra') # See section 5.1
|
||
>>> p
|
||
[1, [2, 3, 'xtra'], 4]
|
||
>>> q
|
||
[2, 3, 'xtra']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that in the last example, \code{p[1]} and \code{q} really refer to
|
||
the same object! We'll come back to \emph{object semantics} later.
|
||
|
||
\section{First Steps Towards Programming \label{firstSteps}}
|
||
|
||
Of course, we can use Python for more complicated tasks than adding
|
||
two and two together. For instance, we can write an initial
|
||
sub-sequence of the \emph{Fibonacci} series as follows:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> # Fibonacci series:
|
||
... # the sum of two elements defines the next
|
||
... a, b = 0, 1
|
||
>>> while b < 10:
|
||
... print b
|
||
... a, b = b, a+b
|
||
...
|
||
1
|
||
1
|
||
2
|
||
3
|
||
5
|
||
8
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This example introduces several new features.
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The first line contains a \emph{multiple assignment}: the variables
|
||
\code{a} and \code{b} simultaneously get the new values 0 and 1. On the
|
||
last line this is used again, demonstrating that the expressions on
|
||
the right-hand side are all evaluated first before any of the
|
||
assignments take place. The right-hand side expressions are evaluated
|
||
from the left to the right.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The \keyword{while} loop executes as long as the condition (here:
|
||
\code{b < 10}) remains true. In Python, like in C, any non-zero
|
||
integer value is true; zero is false. The condition may also be a
|
||
string or list value, in fact any sequence; anything with a non-zero
|
||
length is true, empty sequences are false. The test used in the
|
||
example is a simple comparison. The standard comparison operators are
|
||
written the same as in C: \code{<} (less than), \code{>} (greater than),
|
||
\code{==} (equal to), \code{<=} (less than or equal to),
|
||
\code{>=} (greater than or equal to) and \code{!=} (not equal to).
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The \emph{body} of the loop is \emph{indented}: indentation is Python's
|
||
way of grouping statements. Python does not (yet!) provide an
|
||
intelligent input line editing facility, so you have to type a tab or
|
||
space(s) for each indented line. In practice you will prepare more
|
||
complicated input for Python with a text editor; most text editors have
|
||
an auto-indent facility. When a compound statement is entered
|
||
interactively, it must be followed by a blank line to indicate
|
||
completion (since the parser cannot guess when you have typed the last
|
||
line). Note that each line within a basic block must be indented by
|
||
the same amount.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The \keyword{print} statement writes the value of the expression(s) it is
|
||
given. It differs from just writing the expression you want to write
|
||
(as we did earlier in the calculator examples) in the way it handles
|
||
multiple expressions and strings. Strings are printed without quotes,
|
||
and a space is inserted between items, so you can format things nicely,
|
||
like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> i = 256*256
|
||
>>> print 'The value of i is', i
|
||
The value of i is 65536
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
A trailing comma avoids the newline after the output:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a, b = 0, 1
|
||
>>> while b < 1000:
|
||
... print b,
|
||
... a, b = b, a+b
|
||
...
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that the interpreter inserts a newline before it prints the next
|
||
prompt if the last line was not completed.
|
||
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{More Control Flow Tools \label{moreControl}}
|
||
|
||
Besides the \keyword{while} statement just introduced, Python knows
|
||
the usual control flow statements known from other languages, with
|
||
some twists.
|
||
|
||
\section{\keyword{if} Statements \label{if}}
|
||
|
||
Perhaps the most well-known statement type is the
|
||
\keyword{if} statement. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def raw_input(prompt):
|
||
... import sys
|
||
... sys.stdout.write(prompt)
|
||
... sys.stdout.flush()
|
||
... return sys.stdin.readline()
|
||
...
|
||
>>> x = int(raw_input("Please enter an integer: "))
|
||
>>> if x < 0:
|
||
... x = 0
|
||
... print 'Negative changed to zero'
|
||
... elif x == 0:
|
||
... print 'Zero'
|
||
... elif x == 1:
|
||
... print 'Single'
|
||
... else:
|
||
... print 'More'
|
||
...
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
There can be zero or more \keyword{elif} parts, and the
|
||
\keyword{else} part is optional. The keyword `\keyword{elif}' is
|
||
short for `else if', and is useful to avoid excessive indentation. An
|
||
\keyword{if} \ldots\ \keyword{elif} \ldots\ \keyword{elif} \ldots\ sequence
|
||
% Weird spacings happen here if the wrapping of the source text
|
||
% gets changed in the wrong way.
|
||
is a substitute for the \keyword{switch} or
|
||
\keyword{case} statements found in other languages.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{\keyword{for} Statements \label{for}}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{for}\stindex{for} statement in Python differs a bit from
|
||
what you may be used to in C or Pascal. Rather than always
|
||
iterating over an arithmetic progression of numbers (like in Pascal),
|
||
or giving the user the ability to define both the iteration step and
|
||
halting condition (as C), Python's
|
||
\keyword{for}\stindex{for} statement iterates over the items of any
|
||
sequence (a list or a string), in the order that they appear in
|
||
the sequence. For example (no pun intended):
|
||
% One suggestion was to give a real C example here, but that may only
|
||
% serve to confuse non-C programmers.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> # Measure some strings:
|
||
... a = ['cat', 'window', 'defenestrate']
|
||
>>> for x in a:
|
||
... print x, len(x)
|
||
...
|
||
cat 3
|
||
window 6
|
||
defenestrate 12
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
It is not safe to modify the sequence being iterated over in the loop
|
||
(this can only happen for mutable sequence types, such as lists). If
|
||
you need to modify the list you are iterating over (for example, to
|
||
duplicate selected items) you must iterate over a copy. The slice
|
||
notation makes this particularly convenient:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> for x in a[:]: # make a slice copy of the entire list
|
||
... if len(x) > 6: a.insert(0, x)
|
||
...
|
||
>>> a
|
||
['defenestrate', 'cat', 'window', 'defenestrate']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{The \function{range()} Function \label{range}}
|
||
|
||
If you do need to iterate over a sequence of numbers, the built-in
|
||
function \function{range()} comes in handy. It generates lists
|
||
containing arithmetic progressions:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> range(10)
|
||
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The given end point is never part of the generated list;
|
||
\code{range(10)} generates a list of 10 values, the legal
|
||
indices for items of a sequence of length 10. It is possible to let
|
||
the range start at another number, or to specify a different increment
|
||
(even negative; sometimes this is called the `step'):
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> range(5, 10)
|
||
[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
|
||
>>> range(0, 10, 3)
|
||
[0, 3, 6, 9]
|
||
>>> range(-10, -100, -30)
|
||
[-10, -40, -70]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To iterate over the indices of a sequence, combine
|
||
\function{range()} and \function{len()} as follows:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a = ['Mary', 'had', 'a', 'little', 'lamb']
|
||
>>> for i in range(len(a)):
|
||
... print i, a[i]
|
||
...
|
||
0 Mary
|
||
1 had
|
||
2 a
|
||
3 little
|
||
4 lamb
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{\keyword{break} and \keyword{continue} Statements, and
|
||
\keyword{else} Clauses on Loops
|
||
\label{break}}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{break} statement, like in C, breaks out of the smallest
|
||
enclosing \keyword{for} or \keyword{while} loop.
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{continue} statement, also borrowed from C, continues
|
||
with the next iteration of the loop.
|
||
|
||
Loop statements may have an \code{else} clause; it is executed when
|
||
the loop terminates through exhaustion of the list (with
|
||
\keyword{for}) or when the condition becomes false (with
|
||
\keyword{while}), but not when the loop is terminated by a
|
||
\keyword{break} statement. This is exemplified by the following loop,
|
||
which searches for prime numbers:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> for n in range(2, 10):
|
||
... for x in range(2, n):
|
||
... if n % x == 0:
|
||
... print n, 'equals', x, '*', n/x
|
||
... break
|
||
... else:
|
||
... # loop fell through without finding a factor
|
||
... print n, 'is a prime number'
|
||
...
|
||
2 is a prime number
|
||
3 is a prime number
|
||
4 equals 2 * 2
|
||
5 is a prime number
|
||
6 equals 2 * 3
|
||
7 is a prime number
|
||
8 equals 2 * 4
|
||
9 equals 3 * 3
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{\keyword{pass} Statements \label{pass}}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{pass} statement does nothing.
|
||
It can be used when a statement is required syntactically but the
|
||
program requires no action.
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> while True:
|
||
... pass # Busy-wait for keyboard interrupt
|
||
...
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Defining Functions \label{functions}}
|
||
|
||
We can create a function that writes the Fibonacci series to an
|
||
arbitrary boundary:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def fib(n): # write Fibonacci series up to n
|
||
... """Print a Fibonacci series up to n."""
|
||
... a, b = 0, 1
|
||
... while b < n:
|
||
... print b,
|
||
... a, b = b, a+b
|
||
...
|
||
>>> # Now call the function we just defined:
|
||
... fib(2000)
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The keyword \keyword{def} introduces a function \emph{definition}. It
|
||
must be followed by the function name and the parenthesized list of
|
||
formal parameters. The statements that form the body of the function
|
||
start at the next line, and must be indented. The first statement of
|
||
the function body can optionally be a string literal; this string
|
||
literal is the function's \index{documentation strings}documentation
|
||
string, or \dfn{docstring}.\index{docstrings}\index{strings, documentation}
|
||
|
||
There are tools which use docstrings to automatically produce online
|
||
or printed documentation, or to let the user interactively browse
|
||
through code; it's good practice to include docstrings in code that
|
||
you write, so try to make a habit of it.
|
||
|
||
The \emph{execution} of a function introduces a new symbol table used
|
||
for the local variables of the function. More precisely, all variable
|
||
assignments in a function store the value in the local symbol table;
|
||
whereas variable references first look in the local symbol table, then
|
||
in the global symbol table, and then in the table of built-in names.
|
||
Thus, global variables cannot be directly assigned a value within a
|
||
function (unless named in a \keyword{global} statement), although
|
||
they may be referenced.
|
||
|
||
The actual parameters (arguments) to a function call are introduced in
|
||
the local symbol table of the called function when it is called; thus,
|
||
arguments are passed using \emph{call by value} (where the
|
||
\emph{value} is always an object \emph{reference}, not the value of
|
||
the object).\footnote{
|
||
Actually, \emph{call by object reference} would be a better
|
||
description, since if a mutable object is passed, the caller
|
||
will see any changes the callee makes to it (items
|
||
inserted into a list).
|
||
} When a function calls another function, a new local symbol table is
|
||
created for that call.
|
||
|
||
A function definition introduces the function name in the current
|
||
symbol table. The value of the function name
|
||
has a type that is recognized by the interpreter as a user-defined
|
||
function. This value can be assigned to another name which can then
|
||
also be used as a function. This serves as a general renaming
|
||
mechanism:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> fib
|
||
<function fib at 10042ed0>
|
||
>>> f = fib
|
||
>>> f(100)
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
You might object that \code{fib} is not a function but a procedure. In
|
||
Python, like in C, procedures are just functions that don't return a
|
||
value. In fact, technically speaking, procedures do return a value,
|
||
albeit a rather boring one. This value is called \code{None} (it's a
|
||
built-in name). Writing the value \code{None} is normally suppressed by
|
||
the interpreter if it would be the only value written. You can see it
|
||
if you really want to:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> print fib(0)
|
||
None
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
It is simple to write a function that returns a list of the numbers of
|
||
the Fibonacci series, instead of printing it:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def fib2(n): # return Fibonacci series up to n
|
||
... """Return a list containing the Fibonacci series up to n."""
|
||
... result = []
|
||
... a, b = 0, 1
|
||
... while b < n:
|
||
... result.append(b) # see below
|
||
... a, b = b, a+b
|
||
... return result
|
||
...
|
||
>>> f100 = fib2(100) # call it
|
||
>>> f100 # write the result
|
||
[1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This example, as usual, demonstrates some new Python features:
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The \keyword{return} statement returns with a value from a function.
|
||
\keyword{return} without an expression argument returns \code{None}.
|
||
Falling off the end of a procedure also returns \code{None}.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The statement \code{result.append(b)} calls a \emph{method} of the list
|
||
object \code{result}. A method is a function that `belongs' to an
|
||
object and is named \code{obj.methodname}, where \code{obj} is some
|
||
object (this may be an expression), and \code{methodname} is the name
|
||
of a method that is defined by the object's type. Different types
|
||
define different methods. Methods of different types may have the
|
||
same name without causing ambiguity. (It is possible to define your
|
||
own object types and methods, using \emph{classes}, as discussed later
|
||
in this tutorial.)
|
||
The method \method{append()} shown in the example is defined for
|
||
list objects; it adds a new element at the end of the list. In this
|
||
example it is equivalent to \samp{result = result + [b]}, but more
|
||
efficient.
|
||
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\section{More on Defining Functions \label{defining}}
|
||
|
||
It is also possible to define functions with a variable number of
|
||
arguments. There are three forms, which can be combined.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Default Argument Values \label{defaultArgs}}
|
||
|
||
The most useful form is to specify a default value for one or more
|
||
arguments. This creates a function that can be called with fewer
|
||
arguments than it is defined to allow. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def raw_input(prompt):
|
||
import sys
|
||
sys.stdout.write(prompt)
|
||
sys.stdout.flush()
|
||
return sys.stdin.readline()
|
||
|
||
def ask_ok(prompt, retries=4, complaint='Yes or no, please!'):
|
||
while True:
|
||
ok = raw_input(prompt)
|
||
if ok in ('y', 'ye', 'yes'): return True
|
||
if ok in ('n', 'no', 'nop', 'nope'): return False
|
||
retries = retries - 1
|
||
if retries < 0: raise IOError, 'refusenik user'
|
||
print complaint
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This function can be called either like this:
|
||
\code{ask_ok('Do you really want to quit?')} or like this:
|
||
\code{ask_ok('OK to overwrite the file?', 2)}.
|
||
|
||
This example also introduces the \keyword{in} keyword. This tests
|
||
whether or not a sequence contains a certain value.
|
||
|
||
The default values are evaluated at the point of function definition
|
||
in the \emph{defining} scope, so that
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
i = 5
|
||
|
||
def f(arg=i):
|
||
print arg
|
||
|
||
i = 6
|
||
f()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
will print \code{5}.
|
||
|
||
\strong{Important warning:} The default value is evaluated only once.
|
||
This makes a difference when the default is a mutable object such as a
|
||
list, dictionary, or instances of most classes. For example, the
|
||
following function accumulates the arguments passed to it on
|
||
subsequent calls:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def f(a, L=[]):
|
||
L.append(a)
|
||
return L
|
||
|
||
print f(1)
|
||
print f(2)
|
||
print f(3)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This will print
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
[1]
|
||
[1, 2]
|
||
[1, 2, 3]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If you don't want the default to be shared between subsequent calls,
|
||
you can write the function like this instead:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def f(a, L=None):
|
||
if L is None:
|
||
L = []
|
||
L.append(a)
|
||
return L
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Keyword Arguments \label{keywordArgs}}
|
||
|
||
Functions can also be called using
|
||
keyword arguments of the form \samp{\var{keyword} = \var{value}}. For
|
||
instance, the following function:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def parrot(voltage, state='a stiff', action='voom', type='Norwegian Blue'):
|
||
print "-- This parrot wouldn't", action,
|
||
print "if you put", voltage, "volts through it."
|
||
print "-- Lovely plumage, the", type
|
||
print "-- It's", state, "!"
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
could be called in any of the following ways:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
parrot(1000)
|
||
parrot(action = 'VOOOOOM', voltage = 1000000)
|
||
parrot('a thousand', state = 'pushing up the daisies')
|
||
parrot('a million', 'bereft of life', 'jump')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
but the following calls would all be invalid:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
parrot() # required argument missing
|
||
parrot(voltage=5.0, 'dead') # non-keyword argument following keyword
|
||
parrot(110, voltage=220) # duplicate value for argument
|
||
parrot(actor='John Cleese') # unknown keyword
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In general, an argument list must have any positional arguments
|
||
followed by any keyword arguments, where the keywords must be chosen
|
||
from the formal parameter names. It's not important whether a formal
|
||
parameter has a default value or not. No argument may receive a
|
||
value more than once --- formal parameter names corresponding to
|
||
positional arguments cannot be used as keywords in the same calls.
|
||
Here's an example that fails due to this restriction:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def function(a):
|
||
... pass
|
||
...
|
||
>>> function(0, a=0)
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
TypeError: function() got multiple values for keyword argument 'a'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
When a final formal parameter of the form \code{**\var{name}} is
|
||
present, it receives a \ulink{dictionary}{../lib/typesmapping.html}
|
||
containing all keyword arguments except for those corresponding to
|
||
a formal parameter. This may be
|
||
combined with a formal parameter of the form
|
||
\code{*\var{name}} (described in the next subsection) which receives a
|
||
tuple containing the positional arguments beyond the formal parameter
|
||
list. (\code{*\var{name}} must occur before \code{**\var{name}}.)
|
||
For example, if we define a function like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def cheeseshop(kind, *arguments, **keywords):
|
||
print "-- Do you have any", kind, '?'
|
||
print "-- I'm sorry, we're all out of", kind
|
||
for arg in arguments: print arg
|
||
print '-'*40
|
||
keys = keywords.keys()
|
||
keys.sort()
|
||
for kw in keys: print kw, ':', keywords[kw]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
It could be called like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
cheeseshop('Limburger', "It's very runny, sir.",
|
||
"It's really very, VERY runny, sir.",
|
||
client='John Cleese',
|
||
shopkeeper='Michael Palin',
|
||
sketch='Cheese Shop Sketch')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
and of course it would print:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
-- Do you have any Limburger ?
|
||
-- I'm sorry, we're all out of Limburger
|
||
It's very runny, sir.
|
||
It's really very, VERY runny, sir.
|
||
----------------------------------------
|
||
client : John Cleese
|
||
shopkeeper : Michael Palin
|
||
sketch : Cheese Shop Sketch
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that the \method{sort()} method of the list of keyword argument
|
||
names is called before printing the contents of the \code{keywords}
|
||
dictionary; if this is not done, the order in which the arguments are
|
||
printed is undefined.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Arbitrary Argument Lists \label{arbitraryArgs}}
|
||
|
||
Finally, the least frequently used option is to specify that a
|
||
function can be called with an arbitrary number of arguments. These
|
||
arguments will be wrapped up in a tuple. Before the variable number
|
||
of arguments, zero or more normal arguments may occur.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def fprintf(file, format, *args):
|
||
file.write(format % args)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Unpacking Argument Lists \label{unpacking-arguments}}
|
||
|
||
The reverse situation occurs when the arguments are already in a list
|
||
or tuple but need to be unpacked for a function call requiring separate
|
||
positional arguments. For instance, the built-in \function{range()}
|
||
function expects separate \var{start} and \var{stop} arguments. If they
|
||
are not available separately, write the function call with the
|
||
\code{*}-operator to unpack the arguments out of a list or tuple:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> range(3, 6) # normal call with separate arguments
|
||
[3, 4, 5]
|
||
>>> args = [3, 6]
|
||
>>> range(*args) # call with arguments unpacked from a list
|
||
[3, 4, 5]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In the same fashion, dictionaries can deliver keyword arguments with the
|
||
\code{**}-operator:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def parrot(voltage, state='a stiff', action='voom'):
|
||
... print "-- This parrot wouldn't", action,
|
||
... print "if you put", voltage, "volts through it.",
|
||
... print "E's", state, "!"
|
||
...
|
||
>>> d = {"voltage": "four million", "state": "bleedin' demised", "action": "VOOM"}
|
||
>>> parrot(**d)
|
||
-- This parrot wouldn't VOOM if you put four million volts through it. E's bleedin' demised !
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Lambda Forms \label{lambda}}
|
||
|
||
By popular demand, a few features commonly found in functional
|
||
programming languages like Lisp have been added to Python. With the
|
||
\keyword{lambda} keyword, small anonymous functions can be created.
|
||
Here's a function that returns the sum of its two arguments:
|
||
\samp{lambda a, b: a+b}. Lambda forms can be used wherever function
|
||
objects are required. They are syntactically restricted to a single
|
||
expression. Semantically, they are just syntactic sugar for a normal
|
||
function definition. Like nested function definitions, lambda forms
|
||
can reference variables from the containing scope:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def make_incrementor(n):
|
||
... return lambda x: x + n
|
||
...
|
||
>>> f = make_incrementor(42)
|
||
>>> f(0)
|
||
42
|
||
>>> f(1)
|
||
43
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Documentation Strings \label{docstrings}}
|
||
|
||
There are emerging conventions about the content and formatting of
|
||
documentation strings.
|
||
\index{docstrings}\index{documentation strings}
|
||
\index{strings, documentation}
|
||
|
||
The first line should always be a short, concise summary of the
|
||
object's purpose. For brevity, it should not explicitly state the
|
||
object's name or type, since these are available by other means
|
||
(except if the name happens to be a verb describing a function's
|
||
operation). This line should begin with a capital letter and end with
|
||
a period.
|
||
|
||
If there are more lines in the documentation string, the second line
|
||
should be blank, visually separating the summary from the rest of the
|
||
description. The following lines should be one or more paragraphs
|
||
describing the object's calling conventions, its side effects, etc.
|
||
|
||
The Python parser does not strip indentation from multi-line string
|
||
literals in Python, so tools that process documentation have to strip
|
||
indentation if desired. This is done using the following convention.
|
||
The first non-blank line \emph{after} the first line of the string
|
||
determines the amount of indentation for the entire documentation
|
||
string. (We can't use the first line since it is generally adjacent
|
||
to the string's opening quotes so its indentation is not apparent in
|
||
the string literal.) Whitespace ``equivalent'' to this indentation is
|
||
then stripped from the start of all lines of the string. Lines that
|
||
are indented less should not occur, but if they occur all their
|
||
leading whitespace should be stripped. Equivalence of whitespace
|
||
should be tested after expansion of tabs (to 8 spaces, normally).
|
||
|
||
Here is an example of a multi-line docstring:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def my_function():
|
||
... """Do nothing, but document it.
|
||
...
|
||
... No, really, it doesn't do anything.
|
||
... """
|
||
... pass
|
||
...
|
||
>>> print my_function.__doc__
|
||
Do nothing, but document it.
|
||
|
||
No, really, it doesn't do anything.
|
||
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Data Structures \label{structures}}
|
||
|
||
This chapter describes some things you've learned about already in
|
||
more detail, and adds some new things as well.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{More on Lists \label{moreLists}}
|
||
|
||
The list data type has some more methods. Here are all of the methods
|
||
of list objects:
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{append}{x}
|
||
Add an item to the end of the list;
|
||
equivalent to \code{a[len(a):] = [\var{x}]}.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{extend}{L}
|
||
Extend the list by appending all the items in the given list;
|
||
equivalent to \code{a[len(a):] = \var{L}}.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{insert}{i, x}
|
||
Insert an item at a given position. The first argument is the index
|
||
of the element before which to insert, so \code{a.insert(0, \var{x})}
|
||
inserts at the front of the list, and \code{a.insert(len(a), \var{x})}
|
||
is equivalent to \code{a.append(\var{x})}.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{remove}{x}
|
||
Remove the first item from the list whose value is \var{x}.
|
||
It is an error if there is no such item.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{pop}{\optional{i}}
|
||
Remove the item at the given position in the list, and return it. If
|
||
no index is specified, \code{a.pop()} removes and returns the last item
|
||
in the list. (The square brackets
|
||
around the \var{i} in the method signature denote that the parameter
|
||
is optional, not that you should type square brackets at that
|
||
position. You will see this notation frequently in the
|
||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}.)
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{index}{x}
|
||
Return the index in the list of the first item whose value is \var{x}.
|
||
It is an error if there is no such item.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{count}{x}
|
||
Return the number of times \var{x} appears in the list.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{sort}{}
|
||
Sort the items of the list, in place.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{reverse}{}
|
||
Reverse the elements of the list, in place.
|
||
\end{methoddesc}
|
||
|
||
An example that uses most of the list methods:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a = [66.25, 333, 333, 1, 1234.5]
|
||
>>> print a.count(333), a.count(66.25), a.count('x')
|
||
2 1 0
|
||
>>> a.insert(2, -1)
|
||
>>> a.append(333)
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[66.25, 333, -1, 333, 1, 1234.5, 333]
|
||
>>> a.index(333)
|
||
1
|
||
>>> a.remove(333)
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[66.25, -1, 333, 1, 1234.5, 333]
|
||
>>> a.reverse()
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[333, 1234.5, 1, 333, -1, 66.25]
|
||
>>> a.sort()
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[-1, 1, 66.25, 333, 333, 1234.5]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Using Lists as Stacks \label{lists-as-stacks}}
|
||
\sectionauthor{Ka-Ping Yee}{ping@lfw.org}
|
||
|
||
The list methods make it very easy to use a list as a stack, where the
|
||
last element added is the first element retrieved (``last-in,
|
||
first-out''). To add an item to the top of the stack, use
|
||
\method{append()}. To retrieve an item from the top of the stack, use
|
||
\method{pop()} without an explicit index. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> stack = [3, 4, 5]
|
||
>>> stack.append(6)
|
||
>>> stack.append(7)
|
||
>>> stack
|
||
[3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
|
||
>>> stack.pop()
|
||
7
|
||
>>> stack
|
||
[3, 4, 5, 6]
|
||
>>> stack.pop()
|
||
6
|
||
>>> stack.pop()
|
||
5
|
||
>>> stack
|
||
[3, 4]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Using Lists as Queues \label{lists-as-queues}}
|
||
\sectionauthor{Ka-Ping Yee}{ping@lfw.org}
|
||
|
||
You can also use a list conveniently as a queue, where the first
|
||
element added is the first element retrieved (``first-in,
|
||
first-out''). To add an item to the back of the queue, use
|
||
\method{append()}. To retrieve an item from the front of the queue,
|
||
use \method{pop()} with \code{0} as the index. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> queue = ["Eric", "John", "Michael"]
|
||
>>> queue.append("Terry") # Terry arrives
|
||
>>> queue.append("Graham") # Graham arrives
|
||
>>> queue.pop(0)
|
||
'Eric'
|
||
>>> queue.pop(0)
|
||
'John'
|
||
>>> queue
|
||
['Michael', 'Terry', 'Graham']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Functional Programming Tools \label{functional}}
|
||
|
||
There are two built-in functions that are very useful when used with
|
||
lists: \function{filter()} and \function{map()}.
|
||
|
||
\samp{filter(\var{function}, \var{sequence})} returns a sequence
|
||
consisting of those items from the
|
||
sequence for which \code{\var{function}(\var{item})} is true.
|
||
If \var{sequence} is a \class{string} or \class{tuple}, the result will
|
||
be of the same type; otherwise, it is always a \class{list}.
|
||
For example, to compute some primes:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def f(x): return x % 2 != 0 and x % 3 != 0
|
||
...
|
||
>>> filter(f, range(2, 25))
|
||
[5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\samp{map(\var{function}, \var{sequence})} calls
|
||
\code{\var{function}(\var{item})} for each of the sequence's items and
|
||
returns a list of the return values. For example, to compute some
|
||
cubes:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def cube(x): return x*x*x
|
||
...
|
||
>>> map(cube, range(1, 11))
|
||
[1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
More than one sequence may be passed; the function must then have as
|
||
many arguments as there are sequences and is called with the
|
||
corresponding item from each sequence (or \code{None} if some sequence
|
||
is shorter than another). For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> seq = range(8)
|
||
>>> def add(x, y): return x+y
|
||
...
|
||
>>> map(add, seq, seq)
|
||
[0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
\versionadded{2.3}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{List Comprehensions}
|
||
|
||
List comprehensions provide a concise way to create lists without resorting
|
||
to use of \function{map()}, \function{filter()} and/or \keyword{lambda}.
|
||
The resulting list definition tends often to be clearer than lists built
|
||
using those constructs. Each list comprehension consists of an expression
|
||
followed by a \keyword{for} clause, then zero or more \keyword{for} or
|
||
\keyword{if} clauses. The result will be a list resulting from evaluating
|
||
the expression in the context of the \keyword{for} and \keyword{if} clauses
|
||
which follow it. If the expression would evaluate to a tuple, it must be
|
||
parenthesized.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> freshfruit = [' banana', ' loganberry ', 'passion fruit ']
|
||
>>> [weapon.strip() for weapon in freshfruit]
|
||
['banana', 'loganberry', 'passion fruit']
|
||
>>> vec = [2, 4, 6]
|
||
>>> [3*x for x in vec]
|
||
[6, 12, 18]
|
||
>>> [3*x for x in vec if x > 3]
|
||
[12, 18]
|
||
>>> [3*x for x in vec if x < 2]
|
||
[]
|
||
>>> [[x,x**2] for x in vec]
|
||
[[2, 4], [4, 16], [6, 36]]
|
||
>>> [x, x**2 for x in vec] # error - parens required for tuples
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
[x, x**2 for x in vec]
|
||
^
|
||
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
|
||
>>> [(x, x**2) for x in vec]
|
||
[(2, 4), (4, 16), (6, 36)]
|
||
>>> vec1 = [2, 4, 6]
|
||
>>> vec2 = [4, 3, -9]
|
||
>>> [x*y for x in vec1 for y in vec2]
|
||
[8, 6, -18, 16, 12, -36, 24, 18, -54]
|
||
>>> [x+y for x in vec1 for y in vec2]
|
||
[6, 5, -7, 8, 7, -5, 10, 9, -3]
|
||
>>> [vec1[i]*vec2[i] for i in range(len(vec1))]
|
||
[8, 12, -54]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
List comprehensions are much more flexible than \function{map()} and can be
|
||
applied to complex expressions and nested functions:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> [str(round(355/113.0, i)) for i in range(1,6)]
|
||
['3.1', '3.14', '3.142', '3.1416', '3.14159']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{The \keyword{del} statement \label{del}}
|
||
|
||
There is a way to remove an item from a list given its index instead
|
||
of its value: the \keyword{del} statement. This differs from the
|
||
\method{pop()} method which returns a value. The \keyword{del}
|
||
statement can also be used to remove slices from a list or clear the
|
||
entire list (which we did earlier by assignment of an empty list to
|
||
the slice). For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a = [-1, 1, 66.25, 333, 333, 1234.5]
|
||
>>> del a[0]
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[1, 66.25, 333, 333, 1234.5]
|
||
>>> del a[2:4]
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[1, 66.25, 1234.5]
|
||
>>> del a[:]
|
||
>>> a
|
||
[]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\keyword{del} can also be used to delete entire variables:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> del a
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Referencing the name \code{a} hereafter is an error (at least until
|
||
another value is assigned to it). We'll find other uses for
|
||
\keyword{del} later.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Tuples and Sequences \label{tuples}}
|
||
|
||
We saw that lists and strings have many common properties, such as
|
||
indexing and slicing operations. They are two examples of
|
||
\ulink{\emph{sequence} data types}{../lib/typesseq.html}. Since
|
||
Python is an evolving language, other sequence data types may be
|
||
added. There is also another standard sequence data type: the
|
||
\emph{tuple}.
|
||
|
||
A tuple consists of a number of values separated by commas, for
|
||
instance:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> t = 12345, 54321, 'hello!'
|
||
>>> t[0]
|
||
12345
|
||
>>> t
|
||
(12345, 54321, 'hello!')
|
||
>>> # Tuples may be nested:
|
||
... u = t, (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
|
||
>>> u
|
||
((12345, 54321, 'hello!'), (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
As you see, on output tuples are always enclosed in parentheses, so
|
||
that nested tuples are interpreted correctly; they may be input with
|
||
or without surrounding parentheses, although often parentheses are
|
||
necessary anyway (if the tuple is part of a larger expression).
|
||
|
||
Tuples have many uses. For example: (x, y) coordinate pairs, employee
|
||
records from a database, etc. Tuples, like strings, are immutable: it
|
||
is not possible to assign to the individual items of a tuple (you can
|
||
simulate much of the same effect with slicing and concatenation,
|
||
though). It is also possible to create tuples which contain mutable
|
||
objects, such as lists.
|
||
|
||
A special problem is the construction of tuples containing 0 or 1
|
||
items: the syntax has some extra quirks to accommodate these. Empty
|
||
tuples are constructed by an empty pair of parentheses; a tuple with
|
||
one item is constructed by following a value with a comma
|
||
(it is not sufficient to enclose a single value in parentheses).
|
||
Ugly, but effective. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> empty = ()
|
||
>>> singleton = 'hello', # <-- note trailing comma
|
||
>>> len(empty)
|
||
0
|
||
>>> len(singleton)
|
||
1
|
||
>>> singleton
|
||
('hello',)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The statement \code{t = 12345, 54321, 'hello!'} is an example of
|
||
\emph{tuple packing}: the values \code{12345}, \code{54321} and
|
||
\code{'hello!'} are packed together in a tuple. The reverse operation
|
||
is also possible:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> x, y, z = t
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This is called, appropriately enough, \emph{sequence unpacking}.
|
||
Sequence unpacking requires the list of variables on the left to
|
||
have the same number of elements as the length of the sequence. Note
|
||
that multiple assignment is really just a combination of tuple packing
|
||
and sequence unpacking!
|
||
|
||
There is a small bit of asymmetry here: packing multiple values
|
||
always creates a tuple, and unpacking works for any sequence.
|
||
|
||
% XXX Add a bit on the difference between tuples and lists.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Sets \label{sets}}
|
||
|
||
Python also includes a data type for \emph{sets}. A set is an unordered
|
||
collection with no duplicate elements. Basic uses include membership
|
||
testing and eliminating duplicate entries. Set objects also support
|
||
mathematical operations like union, intersection, difference, and
|
||
symmetric difference.
|
||
|
||
Here is a brief demonstration:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> basket = ['apple', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'orange', 'banana']
|
||
>>> fruit = set(basket) # create a set without duplicates
|
||
>>> fruit
|
||
set(['orange', 'pear', 'apple', 'banana'])
|
||
>>> 'orange' in fruit # fast membership testing
|
||
True
|
||
>>> 'crabgrass' in fruit
|
||
False
|
||
|
||
>>> # Demonstrate set operations on unique letters from two words
|
||
...
|
||
>>> a = set('abracadabra')
|
||
>>> b = set('alacazam')
|
||
>>> a # unique letters in a
|
||
set(['a', 'r', 'b', 'c', 'd'])
|
||
>>> a - b # letters in a but not in b
|
||
set(['r', 'd', 'b'])
|
||
>>> a | b # letters in either a or b
|
||
set(['a', 'c', 'r', 'd', 'b', 'm', 'z', 'l'])
|
||
>>> a & b # letters in both a and b
|
||
set(['a', 'c'])
|
||
>>> a ^ b # letters in a or b but not both
|
||
set(['r', 'd', 'b', 'm', 'z', 'l'])
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Dictionaries \label{dictionaries}}
|
||
|
||
Another useful data type built into Python is the
|
||
\ulink{\emph{dictionary}}{../lib/typesmapping.html}.
|
||
Dictionaries are sometimes found in other languages as ``associative
|
||
memories'' or ``associative arrays''. Unlike sequences, which are
|
||
indexed by a range of numbers, dictionaries are indexed by \emph{keys},
|
||
which can be any immutable type; strings and numbers can always be
|
||
keys. Tuples can be used as keys if they contain only strings,
|
||
numbers, or tuples; if a tuple contains any mutable object either
|
||
directly or indirectly, it cannot be used as a key. You can't use
|
||
lists as keys, since lists can be modified in place using
|
||
index assignments, slice assignments, or methods like
|
||
\method{append()} and \method{extend()}.
|
||
|
||
It is best to think of a dictionary as an unordered set of
|
||
\emph{key: value} pairs, with the requirement that the keys are unique
|
||
(within one dictionary).
|
||
A pair of braces creates an empty dictionary: \code{\{\}}.
|
||
Placing a comma-separated list of key:value pairs within the
|
||
braces adds initial key:value pairs to the dictionary; this is also the
|
||
way dictionaries are written on output.
|
||
|
||
The main operations on a dictionary are storing a value with some key
|
||
and extracting the value given the key. It is also possible to delete
|
||
a key:value pair
|
||
with \code{del}.
|
||
If you store using a key that is already in use, the old value
|
||
associated with that key is forgotten. It is an error to extract a
|
||
value using a non-existent key.
|
||
|
||
The \method{keys()} method of a dictionary object returns a list of all
|
||
the keys used in the dictionary, in arbitrary order (if you want it
|
||
sorted, just apply the \method{sort()} method to the list of keys). To
|
||
check whether a single key is in the dictionary, either use the dictionary's
|
||
\method{has_key()} method or the \keyword{in} keyword.
|
||
|
||
Here is a small example using a dictionary:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> tel = {'jack': 4098, 'sape': 4139}
|
||
>>> tel['guido'] = 4127
|
||
>>> tel
|
||
{'sape': 4139, 'guido': 4127, 'jack': 4098}
|
||
>>> tel['jack']
|
||
4098
|
||
>>> del tel['sape']
|
||
>>> tel['irv'] = 4127
|
||
>>> tel
|
||
{'guido': 4127, 'irv': 4127, 'jack': 4098}
|
||
>>> tel.keys()
|
||
['guido', 'irv', 'jack']
|
||
>>> tel.has_key('guido')
|
||
True
|
||
>>> 'guido' in tel
|
||
True
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \function{dict()} constructor builds dictionaries directly from
|
||
lists of key-value pairs stored as tuples. When the pairs form a
|
||
pattern, list comprehensions can compactly specify the key-value list.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> dict([('sape', 4139), ('guido', 4127), ('jack', 4098)])
|
||
{'sape': 4139, 'jack': 4098, 'guido': 4127}
|
||
>>> dict([(x, x**2) for x in (2, 4, 6)]) # use a list comprehension
|
||
{2: 4, 4: 16, 6: 36}
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Later in the tutorial, we will learn about Generator Expressions
|
||
which are even better suited for the task of supplying key-values pairs to
|
||
the \function{dict()} constructor.
|
||
|
||
When the keys are simple strings, it is sometimes easier to specify
|
||
pairs using keyword arguments:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> dict(sape=4139, guido=4127, jack=4098)
|
||
{'sape': 4139, 'jack': 4098, 'guido': 4127}
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Looping Techniques \label{loopidioms}}
|
||
|
||
When looping through dictionaries, the key and corresponding value can
|
||
be retrieved at the same time using the \method{iteritems()} method.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> knights = {'gallahad': 'the pure', 'robin': 'the brave'}
|
||
>>> for k, v in knights.iteritems():
|
||
... print k, v
|
||
...
|
||
gallahad the pure
|
||
robin the brave
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
When looping through a sequence, the position index and corresponding
|
||
value can be retrieved at the same time using the
|
||
\function{enumerate()} function.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> for i, v in enumerate(['tic', 'tac', 'toe']):
|
||
... print i, v
|
||
...
|
||
0 tic
|
||
1 tac
|
||
2 toe
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To loop over two or more sequences at the same time, the entries
|
||
can be paired with the \function{zip()} function.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> questions = ['name', 'quest', 'favorite color']
|
||
>>> answers = ['lancelot', 'the holy grail', 'blue']
|
||
>>> for q, a in zip(questions, answers):
|
||
... print 'What is your %s? It is %s.' % (q, a)
|
||
...
|
||
What is your name? It is lancelot.
|
||
What is your quest? It is the holy grail.
|
||
What is your favorite color? It is blue.
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To loop over a sequence in reverse, first specify the sequence
|
||
in a forward direction and then call the \function{reversed()}
|
||
function.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> for i in reversed(range(1,10,2)):
|
||
... print i
|
||
...
|
||
9
|
||
7
|
||
5
|
||
3
|
||
1
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To loop over a sequence in sorted order, use the \function{sorted()}
|
||
function which returns a new sorted list while leaving the source
|
||
unaltered.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> basket = ['apple', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'orange', 'banana']
|
||
>>> for f in sorted(set(basket)):
|
||
... print f
|
||
...
|
||
apple
|
||
banana
|
||
orange
|
||
pear
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\section{More on Conditions \label{conditions}}
|
||
|
||
The conditions used in \code{while} and \code{if} statements can
|
||
contain any operators, not just comparisons.
|
||
|
||
The comparison operators \code{in} and \code{not in} check whether a value
|
||
occurs (does not occur) in a sequence. The operators \code{is} and
|
||
\code{is not} compare whether two objects are really the same object; this
|
||
only matters for mutable objects like lists. All comparison operators
|
||
have the same priority, which is lower than that of all numerical
|
||
operators.
|
||
|
||
Comparisons can be chained. For example, \code{a < b == c} tests
|
||
whether \code{a} is less than \code{b} and moreover \code{b} equals
|
||
\code{c}.
|
||
|
||
Comparisons may be combined using the Boolean operators \code{and} and
|
||
\code{or}, and the outcome of a comparison (or of any other Boolean
|
||
expression) may be negated with \code{not}. These have lower
|
||
priorities than comparison operators; between them, \code{not} has
|
||
the highest priority and \code{or} the lowest, so that
|
||
\code{A and not B or C} is equivalent to \code{(A and (not B)) or C}.
|
||
As always, parentheses can be used to express the desired composition.
|
||
|
||
The Boolean operators \code{and} and \code{or} are so-called
|
||
\emph{short-circuit} operators: their arguments are evaluated from
|
||
left to right, and evaluation stops as soon as the outcome is
|
||
determined. For example, if \code{A} and \code{C} are true but
|
||
\code{B} is false, \code{A and B and C} does not evaluate the
|
||
expression \code{C}. When used as a general value and not as a
|
||
Boolean, the return value of a short-circuit operator is the last
|
||
evaluated argument.
|
||
|
||
It is possible to assign the result of a comparison or other Boolean
|
||
expression to a variable. For example,
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> string1, string2, string3 = '', 'Trondheim', 'Hammer Dance'
|
||
>>> non_null = string1 or string2 or string3
|
||
>>> non_null
|
||
'Trondheim'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that in Python, unlike C, assignment cannot occur inside expressions.
|
||
C programmers may grumble about this, but it avoids a common class of
|
||
problems encountered in C programs: typing \code{=} in an expression when
|
||
\code{==} was intended.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Comparing Sequences and Other Types \label{comparing}}
|
||
|
||
Sequence objects may be compared to other objects with the same
|
||
sequence type. The comparison uses \emph{lexicographical} ordering:
|
||
first the first two items are compared, and if they differ this
|
||
determines the outcome of the comparison; if they are equal, the next
|
||
two items are compared, and so on, until either sequence is exhausted.
|
||
If two items to be compared are themselves sequences of the same type,
|
||
the lexicographical comparison is carried out recursively. If all
|
||
items of two sequences compare equal, the sequences are considered
|
||
equal. If one sequence is an initial sub-sequence of the other, the
|
||
shorter sequence is the smaller (lesser) one. Lexicographical
|
||
ordering for strings uses the \ASCII{} ordering for individual
|
||
characters. Some examples of comparisons between sequences of the
|
||
same type:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
(1, 2, 3) < (1, 2, 4)
|
||
[1, 2, 3] < [1, 2, 4]
|
||
'ABC' < 'C' < 'Pascal' < 'Python'
|
||
(1, 2, 3, 4) < (1, 2, 4)
|
||
(1, 2) < (1, 2, -1)
|
||
(1, 2, 3) == (1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
|
||
(1, 2, ('aa', 'ab')) < (1, 2, ('abc', 'a'), 4)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that comparing objects of different types is legal. The outcome
|
||
is deterministic but arbitrary: the types are ordered by their name.
|
||
Thus, a list is always smaller than a string, a string is always
|
||
smaller than a tuple, etc. \footnote{
|
||
The rules for comparing objects of different types should
|
||
not be relied upon; they may change in a future version of
|
||
the language.
|
||
} Mixed numeric types are compared according to their numeric value, so
|
||
0 equals 0.0, etc.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Modules \label{modules}}
|
||
|
||
If you quit from the Python interpreter and enter it again, the
|
||
definitions you have made (functions and variables) are lost.
|
||
Therefore, if you want to write a somewhat longer program, you are
|
||
better off using a text editor to prepare the input for the interpreter
|
||
and running it with that file as input instead. This is known as creating a
|
||
\emph{script}. As your program gets longer, you may want to split it
|
||
into several files for easier maintenance. You may also want to use a
|
||
handy function that you've written in several programs without copying
|
||
its definition into each program.
|
||
|
||
To support this, Python has a way to put definitions in a file and use
|
||
them in a script or in an interactive instance of the interpreter.
|
||
Such a file is called a \emph{module}; definitions from a module can be
|
||
\emph{imported} into other modules or into the \emph{main} module (the
|
||
collection of variables that you have access to in a script
|
||
executed at the top level
|
||
and in calculator mode).
|
||
|
||
A module is a file containing Python definitions and statements. The
|
||
file name is the module name with the suffix \file{.py} appended. Within
|
||
a module, the module's name (as a string) is available as the value of
|
||
the global variable \code{__name__}. For instance, use your favorite text
|
||
editor to create a file called \file{fibo.py} in the current directory
|
||
with the following contents:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
# Fibonacci numbers module
|
||
|
||
def fib(n): # write Fibonacci series up to n
|
||
a, b = 0, 1
|
||
while b < n:
|
||
print b,
|
||
a, b = b, a+b
|
||
|
||
def fib2(n): # return Fibonacci series up to n
|
||
result = []
|
||
a, b = 0, 1
|
||
while b < n:
|
||
result.append(b)
|
||
a, b = b, a+b
|
||
return result
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Now enter the Python interpreter and import this module with the
|
||
following command:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import fibo
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This does not enter the names of the functions defined in \code{fibo}
|
||
directly in the current symbol table; it only enters the module name
|
||
\code{fibo} there.
|
||
Using the module name you can access the functions:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> fibo.fib(1000)
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987
|
||
>>> fibo.fib2(100)
|
||
[1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89]
|
||
>>> fibo.__name__
|
||
'fibo'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If you intend to use a function often you can assign it to a local name:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> fib = fibo.fib
|
||
>>> fib(500)
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{More on Modules \label{moreModules}}
|
||
|
||
A module can contain executable statements as well as function
|
||
definitions.
|
||
These statements are intended to initialize the module.
|
||
They are executed only the
|
||
\emph{first} time the module is imported somewhere.\footnote{
|
||
In fact function definitions are also `statements' that are
|
||
`executed'; the execution enters the function name in the
|
||
module's global symbol table.
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
Each module has its own private symbol table, which is used as the
|
||
global symbol table by all functions defined in the module.
|
||
Thus, the author of a module can use global variables in the module
|
||
without worrying about accidental clashes with a user's global
|
||
variables.
|
||
On the other hand, if you know what you are doing you can touch a
|
||
module's global variables with the same notation used to refer to its
|
||
functions,
|
||
\code{modname.itemname}.
|
||
|
||
Modules can import other modules. It is customary but not required to
|
||
place all \keyword{import} statements at the beginning of a module (or
|
||
script, for that matter). The imported module names are placed in the
|
||
importing module's global symbol table.
|
||
|
||
There is a variant of the \keyword{import} statement that imports
|
||
names from a module directly into the importing module's symbol
|
||
table. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from fibo import fib, fib2
|
||
>>> fib(500)
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This does not introduce the module name from which the imports are taken
|
||
in the local symbol table (so in the example, \code{fibo} is not
|
||
defined).
|
||
|
||
There is even a variant to import all names that a module defines:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from fibo import *
|
||
>>> fib(500)
|
||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This imports all names except those beginning with an underscore
|
||
(\code{_}).
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{The Module Search Path \label{searchPath}}
|
||
|
||
\indexiii{module}{search}{path}
|
||
When a module named \module{spam} is imported, the interpreter searches
|
||
for a file named \file{spam.py} in the current directory,
|
||
and then in the list of directories specified by
|
||
the environment variable \envvar{PYTHONPATH}. This has the same syntax as
|
||
the shell variable \envvar{PATH}, that is, a list of
|
||
directory names. When \envvar{PYTHONPATH} is not set, or when the file
|
||
is not found there, the search continues in an installation-dependent
|
||
default path; on \UNIX, this is usually \file{.:/usr/local/lib/python}.
|
||
|
||
Actually, modules are searched in the list of directories given by the
|
||
variable \code{sys.path} which is initialized from the directory
|
||
containing the input script (or the current directory),
|
||
\envvar{PYTHONPATH} and the installation-dependent default. This allows
|
||
Python programs that know what they're doing to modify or replace the
|
||
module search path. Note that because the directory containing the
|
||
script being run is on the search path, it is important that the
|
||
script not have the same name as a standard module, or Python will
|
||
attempt to load the script as a module when that module is imported.
|
||
This will generally be an error. See section~\ref{standardModules},
|
||
``Standard Modules,'' for more information.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{``Compiled'' Python files}
|
||
|
||
As an important speed-up of the start-up time for short programs that
|
||
use a lot of standard modules, if a file called \file{spam.pyc} exists
|
||
in the directory where \file{spam.py} is found, this is assumed to
|
||
contain an already-``byte-compiled'' version of the module \module{spam}.
|
||
The modification time of the version of \file{spam.py} used to create
|
||
\file{spam.pyc} is recorded in \file{spam.pyc}, and the
|
||
\file{.pyc} file is ignored if these don't match.
|
||
|
||
Normally, you don't need to do anything to create the
|
||
\file{spam.pyc} file. Whenever \file{spam.py} is successfully
|
||
compiled, an attempt is made to write the compiled version to
|
||
\file{spam.pyc}. It is not an error if this attempt fails; if for any
|
||
reason the file is not written completely, the resulting
|
||
\file{spam.pyc} file will be recognized as invalid and thus ignored
|
||
later. The contents of the \file{spam.pyc} file are platform
|
||
independent, so a Python module directory can be shared by machines of
|
||
different architectures.
|
||
|
||
Some tips for experts:
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
When the Python interpreter is invoked with the \programopt{-O} flag,
|
||
optimized code is generated and stored in \file{.pyo} files. The
|
||
optimizer currently doesn't help much; it only removes
|
||
\keyword{assert} statements. When \programopt{-O} is used, \emph{all}
|
||
bytecode is optimized; \code{.pyc} files are ignored and \code{.py}
|
||
files are compiled to optimized bytecode.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
Passing two \programopt{-O} flags to the Python interpreter
|
||
(\programopt{-OO}) will cause the bytecode compiler to perform
|
||
optimizations that could in some rare cases result in malfunctioning
|
||
programs. Currently only \code{__doc__} strings are removed from the
|
||
bytecode, resulting in more compact \file{.pyo} files. Since some
|
||
programs may rely on having these available, you should only use this
|
||
option if you know what you're doing.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
A program doesn't run any faster when it is read from a \file{.pyc} or
|
||
\file{.pyo} file than when it is read from a \file{.py} file; the only
|
||
thing that's faster about \file{.pyc} or \file{.pyo} files is the
|
||
speed with which they are loaded.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
When a script is run by giving its name on the command line, the
|
||
bytecode for the script is never written to a \file{.pyc} or
|
||
\file{.pyo} file. Thus, the startup time of a script may be reduced
|
||
by moving most of its code to a module and having a small bootstrap
|
||
script that imports that module. It is also possible to name a
|
||
\file{.pyc} or \file{.pyo} file directly on the command line.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
It is possible to have a file called \file{spam.pyc} (or
|
||
\file{spam.pyo} when \programopt{-O} is used) without a file
|
||
\file{spam.py} for the same module. This can be used to distribute a
|
||
library of Python code in a form that is moderately hard to reverse
|
||
engineer.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
The module \ulink{\module{compileall}}{../lib/module-compileall.html}%
|
||
{} \refstmodindex{compileall} can create \file{.pyc} files (or
|
||
\file{.pyo} files when \programopt{-O} is used) for all modules in a
|
||
directory.
|
||
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Standard Modules \label{standardModules}}
|
||
|
||
Python comes with a library of standard modules, described in a separate
|
||
document, the \citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}
|
||
(``Library Reference'' hereafter). Some modules are built into the
|
||
interpreter; these provide access to operations that are not part of
|
||
the core of the language but are nevertheless built in, either for
|
||
efficiency or to provide access to operating system primitives such as
|
||
system calls. The set of such modules is a configuration option which
|
||
also depends on the underlying platform For example,
|
||
the \module{winreg} module is only provided on Windows systems.
|
||
One particular module deserves some
|
||
attention: \ulink{\module{sys}}{../lib/module-sys.html}%
|
||
\refstmodindex{sys}, which is built into every
|
||
Python interpreter. The variables \code{sys.ps1} and
|
||
\code{sys.ps2} define the strings used as primary and secondary
|
||
prompts:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import sys
|
||
>>> sys.ps1
|
||
'>>> '
|
||
>>> sys.ps2
|
||
'... '
|
||
>>> sys.ps1 = 'C> '
|
||
C> print 'Yuck!'
|
||
Yuck!
|
||
C>
|
||
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
These two variables are only defined if the interpreter is in
|
||
interactive mode.
|
||
|
||
The variable \code{sys.path} is a list of strings that determines the
|
||
interpreter's search path for modules. It is initialized to a default
|
||
path taken from the environment variable \envvar{PYTHONPATH}, or from
|
||
a built-in default if \envvar{PYTHONPATH} is not set. You can modify
|
||
it using standard list operations:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import sys
|
||
>>> sys.path.append('/ufs/guido/lib/python')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\section{The \function{dir()} Function \label{dir}}
|
||
|
||
The built-in function \function{dir()} is used to find out which names
|
||
a module defines. It returns a sorted list of strings:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import fibo, sys
|
||
>>> dir(fibo)
|
||
['__name__', 'fib', 'fib2']
|
||
>>> dir(sys)
|
||
['__displayhook__', '__doc__', '__excepthook__', '__name__', '__stderr__',
|
||
'__stdin__', '__stdout__', '_getframe', 'api_version', 'argv',
|
||
'builtin_module_names', 'byteorder', 'callstats', 'copyright',
|
||
'displayhook', 'exc_info', 'excepthook',
|
||
'exec_prefix', 'executable', 'exit', 'getdefaultencoding', 'getdlopenflags',
|
||
'getrecursionlimit', 'getrefcount', 'hexversion', 'maxint', 'maxunicode',
|
||
'meta_path', 'modules', 'path', 'path_hooks', 'path_importer_cache',
|
||
'platform', 'prefix', 'ps1', 'ps2', 'setcheckinterval', 'setdlopenflags',
|
||
'setprofile', 'setrecursionlimit', 'settrace', 'stderr', 'stdin', 'stdout',
|
||
'version', 'version_info', 'warnoptions']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Without arguments, \function{dir()} lists the names you have defined
|
||
currently:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
|
||
>>> import fibo
|
||
>>> fib = fibo.fib
|
||
>>> dir()
|
||
['__builtins__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__name__', 'a', 'fib', 'fibo', 'sys']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that it lists all types of names: variables, modules, functions, etc.
|
||
|
||
\function{dir()} does not list the names of built-in functions and
|
||
variables. If you want a list of those, they are defined in the
|
||
standard module \module{__builtin__}\refbimodindex{__builtin__}:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import __builtin__
|
||
>>> dir(__builtin__)
|
||
['ArithmeticError', 'AssertionError', 'AttributeError', 'DeprecationWarning',
|
||
'EOFError', 'Ellipsis', 'EnvironmentError', 'Exception', 'False',
|
||
'FloatingPointError', 'FutureWarning', 'IOError', 'ImportError',
|
||
'IndentationError', 'IndexError', 'KeyError', 'KeyboardInterrupt',
|
||
'LookupError', 'MemoryError', 'NameError', 'None', 'NotImplemented',
|
||
'NotImplementedError', 'OSError', 'OverflowError',
|
||
'PendingDeprecationWarning', 'ReferenceError', 'RuntimeError',
|
||
'RuntimeWarning', 'StopIteration', 'SyntaxError',
|
||
'SyntaxWarning', 'SystemError', 'SystemExit', 'TabError', 'True',
|
||
'TypeError', 'UnboundLocalError', 'UnicodeDecodeError',
|
||
'UnicodeEncodeError', 'UnicodeError', 'UnicodeTranslateError',
|
||
'UserWarning', 'ValueError', 'Warning', 'WindowsError',
|
||
'ZeroDivisionError', '_', '__debug__', '__doc__', '__import__',
|
||
'__name__', 'abs', 'basestring', 'bool', 'buffer',
|
||
'chr', 'classmethod', 'cmp', 'compile',
|
||
'complex', 'copyright', 'credits', 'delattr', 'dict', 'dir', 'divmod',
|
||
'enumerate', 'eval', 'execfile', 'exit', 'file', 'filter', 'float',
|
||
'frozenset', 'getattr', 'globals', 'hasattr', 'hash', 'help', 'hex',
|
||
'id', 'input', 'int', 'isinstance', 'issubclass', 'iter',
|
||
'len', 'license', 'list', 'locals', 'long', 'map', 'max', 'min',
|
||
'object', 'oct', 'open', 'ord', 'pow', 'property', 'quit', 'range',
|
||
'repr', 'reversed', 'round', 'set',
|
||
'setattr', 'slice', 'sorted', 'staticmethod', 'str', 'sum', 'super',
|
||
'tuple', 'type', 'unichr', 'unicode', 'vars', 'zip']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Packages \label{packages}}
|
||
|
||
Packages are a way of structuring Python's module namespace
|
||
by using ``dotted module names''. For example, the module name
|
||
\module{A.B} designates a submodule named \samp{B} in a package named
|
||
\samp{A}. Just like the use of modules saves the authors of different
|
||
modules from having to worry about each other's global variable names,
|
||
the use of dotted module names saves the authors of multi-module
|
||
packages like NumPy or the Python Imaging Library from having to worry
|
||
about each other's module names.
|
||
|
||
Suppose you want to design a collection of modules (a ``package'') for
|
||
the uniform handling of sound files and sound data. There are many
|
||
different sound file formats (usually recognized by their extension,
|
||
for example: \file{.wav}, \file{.aiff}, \file{.au}), so you may need
|
||
to create and maintain a growing collection of modules for the
|
||
conversion between the various file formats. There are also many
|
||
different operations you might want to perform on sound data (such as
|
||
mixing, adding echo, applying an equalizer function, creating an
|
||
artificial stereo effect), so in addition you will be writing a
|
||
never-ending stream of modules to perform these operations. Here's a
|
||
possible structure for your package (expressed in terms of a
|
||
hierarchical filesystem):
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
sound/ Top-level package
|
||
__init__.py Initialize the sound package
|
||
formats/ Subpackage for file format conversions
|
||
__init__.py
|
||
wavread.py
|
||
wavwrite.py
|
||
aiffread.py
|
||
aiffwrite.py
|
||
auread.py
|
||
auwrite.py
|
||
...
|
||
effects/ Subpackage for sound effects
|
||
__init__.py
|
||
echo.py
|
||
surround.py
|
||
reverse.py
|
||
...
|
||
filters/ Subpackage for filters
|
||
__init__.py
|
||
equalizer.py
|
||
vocoder.py
|
||
karaoke.py
|
||
...
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
When importing the package, Python searches through the directories
|
||
on \code{sys.path} looking for the package subdirectory.
|
||
|
||
The \file{__init__.py} files are required to make Python treat the
|
||
directories as containing packages; this is done to prevent
|
||
directories with a common name, such as \samp{string}, from
|
||
unintentionally hiding valid modules that occur later on the module
|
||
search path. In the simplest case, \file{__init__.py} can just be an
|
||
empty file, but it can also execute initialization code for the
|
||
package or set the \code{__all__} variable, described later.
|
||
|
||
Users of the package can import individual modules from the
|
||
package, for example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import sound.effects.echo
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This loads the submodule \module{sound.effects.echo}. It must be referenced
|
||
with its full name.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
sound.effects.echo.echofilter(input, output, delay=0.7, atten=4)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
An alternative way of importing the submodule is:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
from sound.effects import echo
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This also loads the submodule \module{echo}, and makes it available without
|
||
its package prefix, so it can be used as follows:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
echo.echofilter(input, output, delay=0.7, atten=4)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Yet another variation is to import the desired function or variable directly:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
from sound.effects.echo import echofilter
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Again, this loads the submodule \module{echo}, but this makes its function
|
||
\function{echofilter()} directly available:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
echofilter(input, output, delay=0.7, atten=4)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that when using \code{from \var{package} import \var{item}}, the
|
||
item can be either a submodule (or subpackage) of the package, or some
|
||
other name defined in the package, like a function, class or
|
||
variable. The \code{import} statement first tests whether the item is
|
||
defined in the package; if not, it assumes it is a module and attempts
|
||
to load it. If it fails to find it, an
|
||
\exception{ImportError} exception is raised.
|
||
|
||
Contrarily, when using syntax like \code{import
|
||
\var{item.subitem.subsubitem}}, each item except for the last must be
|
||
a package; the last item can be a module or a package but can't be a
|
||
class or function or variable defined in the previous item.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Importing * From a Package \label{pkg-import-star}}
|
||
%The \code{__all__} Attribute
|
||
|
||
\ttindex{__all__}
|
||
Now what happens when the user writes \code{from sound.effects import
|
||
*}? Ideally, one would hope that this somehow goes out to the
|
||
filesystem, finds which submodules are present in the package, and
|
||
imports them all. Unfortunately, this operation does not work very
|
||
well on Windows platforms, where the filesystem does not
|
||
always have accurate information about the case of a filename! On
|
||
these platforms, there is no guaranteed way to know whether a file
|
||
\file{ECHO.PY} should be imported as a module \module{echo},
|
||
\module{Echo} or \module{ECHO}. (For example, Windows 95 has the
|
||
annoying practice of showing all file names with a capitalized first
|
||
letter.) The DOS 8+3 filename restriction adds another interesting
|
||
problem for long module names.
|
||
|
||
The only solution is for the package author to provide an explicit
|
||
index of the package. The import statement uses the following
|
||
convention: if a package's \file{__init__.py} code defines a list
|
||
named \code{__all__}, it is taken to be the list of module names that
|
||
should be imported when \code{from \var{package} import *} is
|
||
encountered. It is up to the package author to keep this list
|
||
up-to-date when a new version of the package is released. Package
|
||
authors may also decide not to support it, if they don't see a use for
|
||
importing * from their package. For example, the file
|
||
\file{sounds/effects/__init__.py} could contain the following code:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
__all__ = ["echo", "surround", "reverse"]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This would mean that \code{from sound.effects import *} would
|
||
import the three named submodules of the \module{sound} package.
|
||
|
||
If \code{__all__} is not defined, the statement \code{from sound.effects
|
||
import *} does \emph{not} import all submodules from the package
|
||
\module{sound.effects} into the current namespace; it only ensures that the
|
||
package \module{sound.effects} has been imported (possibly running any
|
||
initialization code in \file{__init__.py}) and then imports whatever names are
|
||
defined in the package. This includes any names defined (and
|
||
submodules explicitly loaded) by \file{__init__.py}. It also includes any
|
||
submodules of the package that were explicitly loaded by previous
|
||
import statements. Consider this code:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import sound.effects.echo
|
||
import sound.effects.surround
|
||
from sound.effects import *
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In this example, the echo and surround modules are imported in the
|
||
current namespace because they are defined in the
|
||
\module{sound.effects} package when the \code{from...import} statement
|
||
is executed. (This also works when \code{__all__} is defined.)
|
||
|
||
Note that in general the practice of importing \code{*} from a module or
|
||
package is frowned upon, since it often causes poorly readable code.
|
||
However, it is okay to use it to save typing in interactive sessions,
|
||
and certain modules are designed to export only names that follow
|
||
certain patterns.
|
||
|
||
Remember, there is nothing wrong with using \code{from Package
|
||
import specific_submodule}! In fact, this is the
|
||
recommended notation unless the importing module needs to use
|
||
submodules with the same name from different packages.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Intra-package References}
|
||
|
||
The submodules often need to refer to each other. For example, the
|
||
\module{surround} module might use the \module{echo} module. In fact,
|
||
such references are so common that the \keyword{import} statement
|
||
first looks in the containing package before looking in the standard
|
||
module search path. Thus, the \module{surround} module can simply use
|
||
\code{import echo} or \code{from echo import echofilter}. If the
|
||
imported module is not found in the current package (the package of
|
||
which the current module is a submodule), the \keyword{import}
|
||
statement looks for a top-level module with the given name.
|
||
|
||
When packages are structured into subpackages (as with the
|
||
\module{sound} package in the example), there's no shortcut to refer
|
||
to submodules of sibling packages - the full name of the subpackage
|
||
must be used. For example, if the module
|
||
\module{sound.filters.vocoder} needs to use the \module{echo} module
|
||
in the \module{sound.effects} package, it can use \code{from
|
||
sound.effects import echo}.
|
||
|
||
Starting with Python 2.5, in addition to the implicit relative imports
|
||
described above, you can write explicit relative imports with the
|
||
\code{from module import name} form of import statement. These explicit
|
||
relative imports use leading dots to indicate the current and parent
|
||
packages involved in the relative import. From the \module{surround}
|
||
module for example, you might use:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
from . import echo
|
||
from .. import formats
|
||
from ..filters import equalizer
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that both explicit and implicit relative imports are based on the
|
||
name of the current module. Since the name of the main module is always
|
||
\code{"__main__"}, modules intended for use as the main module of a
|
||
Python application should always use absolute imports.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Packages in Multiple Directories}
|
||
|
||
Packages support one more special attribute, \member{__path__}. This
|
||
is initialized to be a list containing the name of the directory
|
||
holding the package's \file{__init__.py} before the code in that file
|
||
is executed. This variable can be modified; doing so affects future
|
||
searches for modules and subpackages contained in the package.
|
||
|
||
While this feature is not often needed, it can be used to extend the
|
||
set of modules found in a package.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Input and Output \label{io}}
|
||
|
||
There are several ways to present the output of a program; data can be
|
||
printed in a human-readable form, or written to a file for future use.
|
||
This chapter will discuss some of the possibilities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Fancier Output Formatting \label{formatting}}
|
||
|
||
So far we've encountered two ways of writing values: \emph{expression
|
||
statements} and the \keyword{print} statement. (A third way is using
|
||
the \method{write()} method of file objects; the standard output file
|
||
can be referenced as \code{sys.stdout}. See the Library Reference for
|
||
more information on this.)
|
||
|
||
Often you'll want more control over the formatting of your output than
|
||
simply printing space-separated values. There are two ways to format
|
||
your output; the first way is to do all the string handling yourself;
|
||
using string slicing and concatenation operations you can create any
|
||
layout you can imagine. The standard module
|
||
\module{string}\refstmodindex{string} contains some useful operations
|
||
for padding strings to a given column width; these will be discussed
|
||
shortly. The second way is to use the \code{\%} operator with a
|
||
string as the left argument. The \code{\%} operator interprets the
|
||
left argument much like a \cfunction{sprintf()}-style format
|
||
string to be applied to the right argument, and returns the string
|
||
resulting from this formatting operation.
|
||
|
||
One question remains, of course: how do you convert values to strings?
|
||
Luckily, Python has ways to convert any value to a string: pass it to
|
||
the \function{repr()} or \function{str()} functions. Reverse quotes
|
||
(\code{``}) are equivalent to \function{repr()}, but they are no
|
||
longer used in modern Python code and will likely not be in future
|
||
versions of the language.
|
||
|
||
The \function{str()} function is meant to return representations of
|
||
values which are fairly human-readable, while \function{repr()} is
|
||
meant to generate representations which can be read by the interpreter
|
||
(or will force a \exception{SyntaxError} if there is not equivalent
|
||
syntax). For objects which don't have a particular representation for
|
||
human consumption, \function{str()} will return the same value as
|
||
\function{repr()}. Many values, such as numbers or structures like
|
||
lists and dictionaries, have the same representation using either
|
||
function. Strings and floating point numbers, in particular, have two
|
||
distinct representations.
|
||
|
||
Some examples:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> s = 'Hello, world.'
|
||
>>> str(s)
|
||
'Hello, world.'
|
||
>>> repr(s)
|
||
"'Hello, world.'"
|
||
>>> str(0.1)
|
||
'0.1'
|
||
>>> repr(0.1)
|
||
'0.10000000000000001'
|
||
>>> x = 10 * 3.25
|
||
>>> y = 200 * 200
|
||
>>> s = 'The value of x is ' + repr(x) + ', and y is ' + repr(y) + '...'
|
||
>>> print s
|
||
The value of x is 32.5, and y is 40000...
|
||
>>> # The repr() of a string adds string quotes and backslashes:
|
||
... hello = 'hello, world\n'
|
||
>>> hellos = repr(hello)
|
||
>>> print hellos
|
||
'hello, world\n'
|
||
>>> # The argument to repr() may be any Python object:
|
||
... repr((x, y, ('spam', 'eggs')))
|
||
"(32.5, 40000, ('spam', 'eggs'))"
|
||
>>> # reverse quotes are convenient in interactive sessions:
|
||
... `x, y, ('spam', 'eggs')`
|
||
"(32.5, 40000, ('spam', 'eggs'))"
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Here are two ways to write a table of squares and cubes:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> for x in range(1, 11):
|
||
... print repr(x).rjust(2), repr(x*x).rjust(3),
|
||
... # Note trailing comma on previous line
|
||
... print repr(x*x*x).rjust(4)
|
||
...
|
||
1 1 1
|
||
2 4 8
|
||
3 9 27
|
||
4 16 64
|
||
5 25 125
|
||
6 36 216
|
||
7 49 343
|
||
8 64 512
|
||
9 81 729
|
||
10 100 1000
|
||
|
||
>>> for x in range(1,11):
|
||
... print '%2d %3d %4d' % (x, x*x, x*x*x)
|
||
...
|
||
1 1 1
|
||
2 4 8
|
||
3 9 27
|
||
4 16 64
|
||
5 25 125
|
||
6 36 216
|
||
7 49 343
|
||
8 64 512
|
||
9 81 729
|
||
10 100 1000
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
(Note that in the first example, one space between each column was
|
||
added by the way \keyword{print} works: it always adds spaces between
|
||
its arguments.)
|
||
|
||
This example demonstrates the \method{rjust()} method of string objects,
|
||
which right-justifies a string in a field of a given width by padding
|
||
it with spaces on the left. There are similar methods
|
||
\method{ljust()} and \method{center()}. These
|
||
methods do not write anything, they just return a new string. If
|
||
the input string is too long, they don't truncate it, but return it
|
||
unchanged; this will mess up your column lay-out but that's usually
|
||
better than the alternative, which would be lying about a value. (If
|
||
you really want truncation you can always add a slice operation, as in
|
||
\samp{x.ljust(n)[:n]}.)
|
||
|
||
There is another method, \method{zfill()}, which pads a
|
||
numeric string on the left with zeros. It understands about plus and
|
||
minus signs:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> '12'.zfill(5)
|
||
'00012'
|
||
>>> '-3.14'.zfill(7)
|
||
'-003.14'
|
||
>>> '3.14159265359'.zfill(5)
|
||
'3.14159265359'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Using the \code{\%} operator looks like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import math
|
||
>>> print 'The value of PI is approximately %5.3f.' % math.pi
|
||
The value of PI is approximately 3.142.
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If there is more than one format in the string, you need to pass a
|
||
tuple as right operand, as in this example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> table = {'Sjoerd': 4127, 'Jack': 4098, 'Dcab': 7678}
|
||
>>> for name, phone in table.items():
|
||
... print '%-10s ==> %10d' % (name, phone)
|
||
...
|
||
Jack ==> 4098
|
||
Dcab ==> 7678
|
||
Sjoerd ==> 4127
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Most formats work exactly as in C and require that you pass the proper
|
||
type; however, if you don't you get an exception, not a core dump.
|
||
The \code{\%s} format is more relaxed: if the corresponding argument is
|
||
not a string object, it is converted to string using the
|
||
\function{str()} built-in function. Using \code{*} to pass the width
|
||
or precision in as a separate (integer) argument is supported. The
|
||
C formats \code{\%n} and \code{\%p} are not supported.
|
||
|
||
If you have a really long format string that you don't want to split
|
||
up, it would be nice if you could reference the variables to be
|
||
formatted by name instead of by position. This can be done by using
|
||
form \code{\%(name)format}, as shown here:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> table = {'Sjoerd': 4127, 'Jack': 4098, 'Dcab': 8637678}
|
||
>>> print 'Jack: %(Jack)d; Sjoerd: %(Sjoerd)d; Dcab: %(Dcab)d' % table
|
||
Jack: 4098; Sjoerd: 4127; Dcab: 8637678
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This is particularly useful in combination with the new built-in
|
||
\function{vars()} function, which returns a dictionary containing all
|
||
local variables.
|
||
|
||
\section{Reading and Writing Files \label{files}}
|
||
|
||
% Opening files
|
||
\function{open()}\bifuncindex{open} returns a file
|
||
object\obindex{file}, and is most commonly used with two arguments:
|
||
\samp{open(\var{filename}, \var{mode})}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f=open('/tmp/workfile', 'w')
|
||
>>> print f
|
||
<open file '/tmp/workfile', mode 'w' at 80a0960>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The first argument is a string containing the filename. The second
|
||
argument is another string containing a few characters describing the
|
||
way in which the file will be used. \var{mode} can be \code{'r'} when
|
||
the file will only be read, \code{'w'} for only writing (an existing
|
||
file with the same name will be erased), and \code{'a'} opens the file
|
||
for appending; any data written to the file is automatically added to
|
||
the end. \code{'r+'} opens the file for both reading and writing.
|
||
The \var{mode} argument is optional; \code{'r'} will be assumed if
|
||
it's omitted.
|
||
|
||
On Windows and the Macintosh, \code{'b'} appended to the
|
||
mode opens the file in binary mode, so there are also modes like
|
||
\code{'rb'}, \code{'wb'}, and \code{'r+b'}. Windows makes a
|
||
distinction between text and binary files; the end-of-line characters
|
||
in text files are automatically altered slightly when data is read or
|
||
written. This behind-the-scenes modification to file data is fine for
|
||
\ASCII{} text files, but it'll corrupt binary data like that in \file{JPEG} or
|
||
\file{EXE} files. Be very careful to use binary mode when reading and
|
||
writing such files.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Methods of File Objects \label{fileMethods}}
|
||
|
||
The rest of the examples in this section will assume that a file
|
||
object called \code{f} has already been created.
|
||
|
||
To read a file's contents, call \code{f.read(\var{size})}, which reads
|
||
some quantity of data and returns it as a string. \var{size} is an
|
||
optional numeric argument. When \var{size} is omitted or negative,
|
||
the entire contents of the file will be read and returned; it's your
|
||
problem if the file is twice as large as your machine's memory.
|
||
Otherwise, at most \var{size} bytes are read and returned. If the end
|
||
of the file has been reached, \code{f.read()} will return an empty
|
||
string (\code {""}).
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f.read()
|
||
'This is the entire file.\n'
|
||
>>> f.read()
|
||
''
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\code{f.readline()} reads a single line from the file; a newline
|
||
character (\code{\e n}) is left at the end of the string, and is only
|
||
omitted on the last line of the file if the file doesn't end in a
|
||
newline. This makes the return value unambiguous; if
|
||
\code{f.readline()} returns an empty string, the end of the file has
|
||
been reached, while a blank line is represented by \code{'\e n'}, a
|
||
string containing only a single newline.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f.readline()
|
||
'This is the first line of the file.\n'
|
||
>>> f.readline()
|
||
'Second line of the file\n'
|
||
>>> f.readline()
|
||
''
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\code{f.readlines()} returns a list containing all the lines of data
|
||
in the file. If given an optional parameter \var{sizehint}, it reads
|
||
that many bytes from the file and enough more to complete a line, and
|
||
returns the lines from that. This is often used to allow efficient
|
||
reading of a large file by lines, but without having to load the
|
||
entire file in memory. Only complete lines will be returned.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f.readlines()
|
||
['This is the first line of the file.\n', 'Second line of the file\n']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
An alternate approach to reading lines is to loop over the file object.
|
||
This is memory efficient, fast, and leads to simpler code:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> for line in f:
|
||
print line,
|
||
|
||
This is the first line of the file.
|
||
Second line of the file
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The alternative approach is simpler but does not provide as fine-grained
|
||
control. Since the two approaches manage line buffering differently,
|
||
they should not be mixed.
|
||
|
||
\code{f.write(\var{string})} writes the contents of \var{string} to
|
||
the file, returning \code{None}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f.write('This is a test\n')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To write something other than a string, it needs to be converted to a
|
||
string first:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> value = ('the answer', 42)
|
||
>>> s = str(value)
|
||
>>> f.write(s)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\code{f.tell()} returns an integer giving the file object's current
|
||
position in the file, measured in bytes from the beginning of the
|
||
file. To change the file object's position, use
|
||
\samp{f.seek(\var{offset}, \var{from_what})}. The position is
|
||
computed from adding \var{offset} to a reference point; the reference
|
||
point is selected by the \var{from_what} argument. A
|
||
\var{from_what} value of 0 measures from the beginning of the file, 1
|
||
uses the current file position, and 2 uses the end of the file as the
|
||
reference point. \var{from_what} can be omitted and defaults to 0,
|
||
using the beginning of the file as the reference point.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f = open('/tmp/workfile', 'r+')
|
||
>>> f.write('0123456789abcdef')
|
||
>>> f.seek(5) # Go to the 6th byte in the file
|
||
>>> f.read(1)
|
||
'5'
|
||
>>> f.seek(-3, 2) # Go to the 3rd byte before the end
|
||
>>> f.read(1)
|
||
'd'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
When you're done with a file, call \code{f.close()} to close it and
|
||
free up any system resources taken up by the open file. After calling
|
||
\code{f.close()}, attempts to use the file object will automatically fail.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> f.close()
|
||
>>> f.read()
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
File objects have some additional methods, such as
|
||
\method{isatty()} and \method{truncate()} which are less frequently
|
||
used; consult the Library Reference for a complete guide to file
|
||
objects.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{The \module{pickle} Module \label{pickle}}
|
||
\refstmodindex{pickle}
|
||
|
||
Strings can easily be written to and read from a file. Numbers take a
|
||
bit more effort, since the \method{read()} method only returns
|
||
strings, which will have to be passed to a function like
|
||
\function{int()}, which takes a string like \code{'123'} and
|
||
returns its numeric value 123. However, when you want to save more
|
||
complex data types like lists, dictionaries, or class instances,
|
||
things get a lot more complicated.
|
||
|
||
Rather than have users be constantly writing and debugging code to
|
||
save complicated data types, Python provides a standard module called
|
||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html}. This is an
|
||
amazing module that can take almost
|
||
any Python object (even some forms of Python code!), and convert it to
|
||
a string representation; this process is called \dfn{pickling}.
|
||
Reconstructing the object from the string representation is called
|
||
\dfn{unpickling}. Between pickling and unpickling, the string
|
||
representing the object may have been stored in a file or data, or
|
||
sent over a network connection to some distant machine.
|
||
|
||
If you have an object \code{x}, and a file object \code{f} that's been
|
||
opened for writing, the simplest way to pickle the object takes only
|
||
one line of code:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
pickle.dump(x, f)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
To unpickle the object again, if \code{f} is a file object which has
|
||
been opened for reading:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
x = pickle.load(f)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
(There are other variants of this, used when pickling many objects or
|
||
when you don't want to write the pickled data to a file; consult the
|
||
complete documentation for
|
||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html} in the
|
||
\citetitle[../lib/]{Python Library Reference}.)
|
||
|
||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html} is the standard way
|
||
to make Python objects which can be stored and reused by other
|
||
programs or by a future invocation of the same program; the technical
|
||
term for this is a \dfn{persistent} object. Because
|
||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html} is so widely used,
|
||
many authors who write Python extensions take care to ensure that new
|
||
data types such as matrices can be properly pickled and unpickled.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Errors and Exceptions \label{errors}}
|
||
|
||
Until now error messages haven't been more than mentioned, but if you
|
||
have tried out the examples you have probably seen some. There are
|
||
(at least) two distinguishable kinds of errors:
|
||
\emph{syntax errors} and \emph{exceptions}.
|
||
|
||
\section{Syntax Errors \label{syntaxErrors}}
|
||
|
||
Syntax errors, also known as parsing errors, are perhaps the most common
|
||
kind of complaint you get while you are still learning Python:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> while True print 'Hello world'
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
while True print 'Hello world'
|
||
^
|
||
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The parser repeats the offending line and displays a little `arrow'
|
||
pointing at the earliest point in the line where the error was
|
||
detected. The error is caused by (or at least detected at) the token
|
||
\emph{preceding} the arrow: in the example, the error is detected at
|
||
the keyword \keyword{print}, since a colon (\character{:}) is missing
|
||
before it. File name and line number are printed so you know where to
|
||
look in case the input came from a script.
|
||
|
||
\section{Exceptions \label{exceptions}}
|
||
|
||
Even if a statement or expression is syntactically correct, it may
|
||
cause an error when an attempt is made to execute it.
|
||
Errors detected during execution are called \emph{exceptions} and are
|
||
not unconditionally fatal: you will soon learn how to handle them in
|
||
Python programs. Most exceptions are not handled by programs,
|
||
however, and result in error messages as shown here:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 10 * (1/0)
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
ZeroDivisionError: integer division or modulo by zero
|
||
>>> 4 + spam*3
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
NameError: name 'spam' is not defined
|
||
>>> '2' + 2
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'int' objects
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The last line of the error message indicates what happened.
|
||
Exceptions come in different types, and the type is printed as part of
|
||
the message: the types in the example are
|
||
\exception{ZeroDivisionError}, \exception{NameError} and
|
||
\exception{TypeError}.
|
||
The string printed as the exception type is the name of the built-in
|
||
exception that occurred. This is true for all built-in
|
||
exceptions, but need not be true for user-defined exceptions (although
|
||
it is a useful convention).
|
||
Standard exception names are built-in identifiers (not reserved
|
||
keywords).
|
||
|
||
The rest of the line provides detail based on the type of exception
|
||
and what caused it.
|
||
|
||
The preceding part of the error message shows the context where the
|
||
exception happened, in the form of a stack traceback.
|
||
In general it contains a stack traceback listing source lines; however,
|
||
it will not display lines read from standard input.
|
||
|
||
The \citetitle[../lib/module-exceptions.html]{Python Library
|
||
Reference} lists the built-in exceptions and their meanings.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Handling Exceptions \label{handling}}
|
||
|
||
It is possible to write programs that handle selected exceptions.
|
||
Look at the following example, which asks the user for input until a
|
||
valid integer has been entered, but allows the user to interrupt the
|
||
program (using \kbd{Control-C} or whatever the operating system
|
||
supports); note that a user-generated interruption is signalled by
|
||
raising the \exception{KeyboardInterrupt} exception.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def raw_input(prompt):
|
||
... import sys
|
||
... sys.stdout.write(prompt)
|
||
... sys.stdout.flush()
|
||
... return sys.stdin.readline()
|
||
...
|
||
>>> while True:
|
||
... try:
|
||
... x = int(raw_input("Please enter a number: "))
|
||
... break
|
||
... except ValueError:
|
||
... print "Oops! That was no valid number. Try again..."
|
||
...
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{try} statement works as follows.
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item
|
||
First, the \emph{try clause} (the statement(s) between the
|
||
\keyword{try} and \keyword{except} keywords) is executed.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
If no exception occurs, the \emph{except\ clause} is skipped and
|
||
execution of the \keyword{try} statement is finished.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
If an exception occurs during execution of the try clause, the rest of
|
||
the clause is skipped. Then if its type matches the exception named
|
||
after the \keyword{except} keyword, the except clause is executed, and
|
||
then execution continues after the \keyword{try} statement.
|
||
|
||
\item
|
||
If an exception occurs which does not match the exception named in the
|
||
except clause, it is passed on to outer \keyword{try} statements; if
|
||
no handler is found, it is an \emph{unhandled exception} and execution
|
||
stops with a message as shown above.
|
||
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
A \keyword{try} statement may have more than one except clause, to
|
||
specify handlers for different exceptions. At most one handler will
|
||
be executed. Handlers only handle exceptions that occur in the
|
||
corresponding try clause, not in other handlers of the same
|
||
\keyword{try} statement. An except clause may name multiple exceptions
|
||
as a parenthesized tuple, for example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
... except (RuntimeError, TypeError, NameError):
|
||
... pass
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The last except clause may omit the exception name(s), to serve as a
|
||
wildcard. Use this with extreme caution, since it is easy to mask a
|
||
real programming error in this way! It can also be used to print an
|
||
error message and then re-raise the exception (allowing a caller to
|
||
handle the exception as well):
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import sys
|
||
|
||
try:
|
||
f = open('myfile.txt')
|
||
s = f.readline()
|
||
i = int(s.strip())
|
||
except IOError as e:
|
||
(errno, strerror) = e
|
||
print "I/O error(%s): %s" % (e.errno, e.strerror)
|
||
except ValueError:
|
||
print "Could not convert data to an integer."
|
||
except:
|
||
print "Unexpected error:", sys.exc_info()[0]
|
||
raise
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{try} \ldots\ \keyword{except} statement has an optional
|
||
\emph{else clause}, which, when present, must follow all except
|
||
clauses. It is useful for code that must be executed if the try
|
||
clause does not raise an exception. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
for arg in sys.argv[1:]:
|
||
try:
|
||
f = open(arg, 'r')
|
||
except IOError:
|
||
print 'cannot open', arg
|
||
else:
|
||
print arg, 'has', len(f.readlines()), 'lines'
|
||
f.close()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The use of the \keyword{else} clause is better than adding additional
|
||
code to the \keyword{try} clause because it avoids accidentally
|
||
catching an exception that wasn't raised by the code being protected
|
||
by the \keyword{try} \ldots\ \keyword{except} statement.
|
||
|
||
|
||
When an exception occurs, it may have an associated value, also known as
|
||
the exception's \emph{argument}.
|
||
The presence and type of the argument depend on the exception type.
|
||
|
||
The except clause may specify a variable after the exception name (or tuple).
|
||
The variable is bound to an exception instance with the arguments stored
|
||
in \code{instance.args}. For convenience, the exception instance
|
||
defines \method{__getitem__} and \method{__str__} so the arguments can
|
||
be accessed or printed directly without having to reference \code{.args}.
|
||
|
||
But use of \code{.args} is discouraged. Instead, the preferred use is to pass
|
||
a single argument to an exception (which can be a tuple if multiple arguments
|
||
are needed) and have it bound to the \code{message} attribute. One may also
|
||
instantiate an exception first before raising it and add any attributes to it
|
||
as desired.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> try:
|
||
... raise Exception('spam', 'eggs')
|
||
... except Exception as inst:
|
||
... print type(inst) # the exception instance
|
||
... print inst.args # arguments stored in .args
|
||
... print inst # __str__ allows args to printed directly
|
||
... x, y = inst # __getitem__ allows args to be unpacked directly
|
||
... print 'x =', x
|
||
... print 'y =', y
|
||
...
|
||
<type 'Exception'>
|
||
('spam', 'eggs')
|
||
('spam', 'eggs')
|
||
x = spam
|
||
y = eggs
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If an exception has an argument, it is printed as the last part
|
||
(`detail') of the message for unhandled exceptions.
|
||
|
||
Exception handlers don't just handle exceptions if they occur
|
||
immediately in the try clause, but also if they occur inside functions
|
||
that are called (even indirectly) in the try clause.
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def this_fails():
|
||
... x = 1/0
|
||
...
|
||
>>> try:
|
||
... this_fails()
|
||
... except ZeroDivisionError as detail:
|
||
... print 'Handling run-time error:', detail
|
||
...
|
||
Handling run-time error: integer division or modulo by zero
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Raising Exceptions \label{raising}}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{raise} statement allows the programmer to force a
|
||
specified exception to occur.
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> raise NameError, 'HiThere'
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
NameError: HiThere
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The first argument to \keyword{raise} names the exception to be
|
||
raised. The optional second argument specifies the exception's
|
||
argument. Alternatively, the above could be written as
|
||
\code{raise NameError('HiThere')}. Either form works fine, but there
|
||
seems to be a growing stylistic preference for the latter.
|
||
|
||
If you need to determine whether an exception was raised but don't
|
||
intend to handle it, a simpler form of the \keyword{raise} statement
|
||
allows you to re-raise the exception:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> try:
|
||
... raise NameError, 'HiThere'
|
||
... except NameError:
|
||
... print 'An exception flew by!'
|
||
... raise
|
||
...
|
||
An exception flew by!
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 2, in ?
|
||
NameError: HiThere
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{User-defined Exceptions \label{userExceptions}}
|
||
|
||
Programs may name their own exceptions by creating a new exception
|
||
class. Exceptions should typically be derived from the
|
||
\exception{Exception} class, either directly or indirectly. For
|
||
example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> class MyError(Exception):
|
||
... def __init__(self, value):
|
||
... self.value = value
|
||
... def __str__(self):
|
||
... return repr(self.value)
|
||
...
|
||
>>> try:
|
||
... raise MyError(2*2)
|
||
... except MyError as e:
|
||
... print 'My exception occurred, value:', e.value
|
||
...
|
||
My exception occurred, value: 4
|
||
>>> raise MyError, 'oops!'
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
__main__.MyError: 'oops!'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In this example, the default \method{__init__} of \class{Exception}
|
||
has been overridden. The new behavior simply creates the \var{value}
|
||
attribute. This replaces the default behavior of creating the
|
||
\var{args} attribute.
|
||
|
||
Exception classes can be defined which do anything any other class can
|
||
do, but are usually kept simple, often only offering a number of
|
||
attributes that allow information about the error to be extracted by
|
||
handlers for the exception. When creating a module that can raise
|
||
several distinct errors, a common practice is to create a base class
|
||
for exceptions defined by that module, and subclass that to create
|
||
specific exception classes for different error conditions:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class Error(Exception):
|
||
"""Base class for exceptions in this module."""
|
||
pass
|
||
|
||
class InputError(Error):
|
||
"""Exception raised for errors in the input.
|
||
|
||
Attributes:
|
||
expression -- input expression in which the error occurred
|
||
message -- explanation of the error
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
def __init__(self, expression, message):
|
||
self.expression = expression
|
||
self.message = message
|
||
|
||
class TransitionError(Error):
|
||
"""Raised when an operation attempts a state transition that's not
|
||
allowed.
|
||
|
||
Attributes:
|
||
previous -- state at beginning of transition
|
||
next -- attempted new state
|
||
message -- explanation of why the specific transition is not allowed
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
def __init__(self, previous, next, message):
|
||
self.previous = previous
|
||
self.next = next
|
||
self.message = message
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Most exceptions are defined with names that end in ``Error,'' similar
|
||
to the naming of the standard exceptions.
|
||
|
||
Many standard modules define their own exceptions to report errors
|
||
that may occur in functions they define. More information on classes
|
||
is presented in chapter \ref{classes}, ``Classes.''
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Defining Clean-up Actions \label{cleanup}}
|
||
|
||
The \keyword{try} statement has another optional clause which is
|
||
intended to define clean-up actions that must be executed under all
|
||
circumstances. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> try:
|
||
... raise KeyboardInterrupt
|
||
... finally:
|
||
... print 'Goodbye, world!'
|
||
...
|
||
Goodbye, world!
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 2, in ?
|
||
KeyboardInterrupt
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
A \emph{finally clause} is always executed before leaving the
|
||
\keyword{try} statement, whether an exception has occurred or not.
|
||
When an exception has occurred in the \keyword{try} clause and has not
|
||
been handled by an \keyword{except} clause (or it has occurred in a
|
||
\keyword{except} or \keyword{else} clause), it is re-raised after the
|
||
\keyword{finally} clause has been executed. The \keyword{finally} clause
|
||
is also executed ``on the way out'' when any other clause of the
|
||
\keyword{try} statement is left via a \keyword{break}, \keyword{continue}
|
||
or \keyword{return} statement. A more complicated example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> def divide(x, y):
|
||
... try:
|
||
... result = x / y
|
||
... except ZeroDivisionError:
|
||
... print "division by zero!"
|
||
... else:
|
||
... print "result is", result
|
||
... finally:
|
||
... print "executing finally clause"
|
||
...
|
||
>>> divide(2, 1)
|
||
result is 2
|
||
executing finally clause
|
||
>>> divide(2, 0)
|
||
division by zero!
|
||
executing finally clause
|
||
>>> divide("2", "1")
|
||
executing finally clause
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 3, in divide
|
||
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for /: 'str' and 'str'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
As you can see, the \keyword{finally} clause is executed in any
|
||
event. The \exception{TypeError} raised by dividing two strings
|
||
is not handled by the \keyword{except} clause and therefore
|
||
re-raised after the \keyword{finally} clauses has been executed.
|
||
|
||
In real world applications, the \keyword{finally} clause is useful
|
||
for releasing external resources (such as files or network connections),
|
||
regardless of whether the use of the resource was successful.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Predefined Clean-up Actions \label{cleanup-with}}
|
||
|
||
Some objects define standard clean-up actions to be undertaken when
|
||
the object is no longer needed, regardless of whether or not the
|
||
operation using the object succeeded or failed.
|
||
Look at the following example, which tries to open a file and print
|
||
its contents to the screen.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
for line in open("myfile.txt"):
|
||
print line
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The problem with this code is that it leaves the file open for an
|
||
indeterminate amount of time after the code has finished executing.
|
||
This is not an issue in simple scripts, but can be a problem for
|
||
larger applications. The \keyword{with} statement allows
|
||
objects like files to be used in a way that ensures they are
|
||
always cleaned up promptly and correctly.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
with open("myfile.txt") as f:
|
||
for line in f:
|
||
print line
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
After the statement is executed, the file \var{f} is always closed,
|
||
even if a problem was encountered while processing the lines. Other
|
||
objects which provide predefined clean-up actions will indicate
|
||
this in their documentation.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Classes \label{classes}}
|
||
|
||
Python's class mechanism adds classes to the language with a minimum
|
||
of new syntax and semantics. It is a mixture of the class mechanisms
|
||
found in \Cpp{} and Modula-3. As is true for modules, classes in Python
|
||
do not put an absolute barrier between definition and user, but rather
|
||
rely on the politeness of the user not to ``break into the
|
||
definition.'' The most important features of classes are retained
|
||
with full power, however: the class inheritance mechanism allows
|
||
multiple base classes, a derived class can override any methods of its
|
||
base class or classes, and a method can call the method of a base class with the
|
||
same name. Objects can contain an arbitrary amount of private data.
|
||
|
||
In \Cpp{} terminology, all class members (including the data members) are
|
||
\emph{public}, and all member functions are \emph{virtual}. There are
|
||
no special constructors or destructors. As in Modula-3, there are no
|
||
shorthands for referencing the object's members from its methods: the
|
||
method function is declared with an explicit first argument
|
||
representing the object, which is provided implicitly by the call. As
|
||
in Smalltalk, classes themselves are objects, albeit in the wider
|
||
sense of the word: in Python, all data types are objects. This
|
||
provides semantics for importing and renaming. Unlike
|
||
\Cpp{} and Modula-3, built-in types can be used as base classes for
|
||
extension by the user. Also, like in \Cpp{} but unlike in Modula-3, most
|
||
built-in operators with special syntax (arithmetic operators,
|
||
subscripting etc.) can be redefined for class instances.
|
||
|
||
\section{A Word About Terminology \label{terminology}}
|
||
|
||
Lacking universally accepted terminology to talk about classes, I will
|
||
make occasional use of Smalltalk and \Cpp{} terms. (I would use Modula-3
|
||
terms, since its object-oriented semantics are closer to those of
|
||
Python than \Cpp, but I expect that few readers have heard of it.)
|
||
|
||
Objects have individuality, and multiple names (in multiple scopes)
|
||
can be bound to the same object. This is known as aliasing in other
|
||
languages. This is usually not appreciated on a first glance at
|
||
Python, and can be safely ignored when dealing with immutable basic
|
||
types (numbers, strings, tuples). However, aliasing has an
|
||
(intended!) effect on the semantics of Python code involving mutable
|
||
objects such as lists, dictionaries, and most types representing
|
||
entities outside the program (files, windows, etc.). This is usually
|
||
used to the benefit of the program, since aliases behave like pointers
|
||
in some respects. For example, passing an object is cheap since only
|
||
a pointer is passed by the implementation; and if a function modifies
|
||
an object passed as an argument, the caller will see the change --- this
|
||
eliminates the need for two different argument passing mechanisms as in
|
||
Pascal.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Python Scopes and Name Spaces \label{scopes}}
|
||
|
||
Before introducing classes, I first have to tell you something about
|
||
Python's scope rules. Class definitions play some neat tricks with
|
||
namespaces, and you need to know how scopes and namespaces work to
|
||
fully understand what's going on. Incidentally, knowledge about this
|
||
subject is useful for any advanced Python programmer.
|
||
|
||
Let's begin with some definitions.
|
||
|
||
A \emph{namespace} is a mapping from names to objects. Most
|
||
namespaces are currently implemented as Python dictionaries, but
|
||
that's normally not noticeable in any way (except for performance),
|
||
and it may change in the future. Examples of namespaces are: the set
|
||
of built-in names (functions such as \function{abs()}, and built-in
|
||
exception names); the global names in a module; and the local names in
|
||
a function invocation. In a sense the set of attributes of an object
|
||
also form a namespace. The important thing to know about namespaces
|
||
is that there is absolutely no relation between names in different
|
||
namespaces; for instance, two different modules may both define a
|
||
function ``maximize'' without confusion --- users of the modules must
|
||
prefix it with the module name.
|
||
|
||
By the way, I use the word \emph{attribute} for any name following a
|
||
dot --- for example, in the expression \code{z.real}, \code{real} is
|
||
an attribute of the object \code{z}. Strictly speaking, references to
|
||
names in modules are attribute references: in the expression
|
||
\code{modname.funcname}, \code{modname} is a module object and
|
||
\code{funcname} is an attribute of it. In this case there happens to
|
||
be a straightforward mapping between the module's attributes and the
|
||
global names defined in the module: they share the same namespace!
|
||
\footnote{
|
||
Except for one thing. Module objects have a secret read-only
|
||
attribute called \member{__dict__} which returns the dictionary
|
||
used to implement the module's namespace; the name
|
||
\member{__dict__} is an attribute but not a global name.
|
||
Obviously, using this violates the abstraction of namespace
|
||
implementation, and should be restricted to things like
|
||
post-mortem debuggers.
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
Attributes may be read-only or writable. In the latter case,
|
||
assignment to attributes is possible. Module attributes are writable:
|
||
you can write \samp{modname.the_answer = 42}. Writable attributes may
|
||
also be deleted with the \keyword{del} statement. For example,
|
||
\samp{del modname.the_answer} will remove the attribute
|
||
\member{the_answer} from the object named by \code{modname}.
|
||
|
||
Name spaces are created at different moments and have different
|
||
lifetimes. The namespace containing the built-in names is created
|
||
when the Python interpreter starts up, and is never deleted. The
|
||
global namespace for a module is created when the module definition
|
||
is read in; normally, module namespaces also last until the
|
||
interpreter quits. The statements executed by the top-level
|
||
invocation of the interpreter, either read from a script file or
|
||
interactively, are considered part of a module called
|
||
\module{__main__}, so they have their own global namespace. (The
|
||
built-in names actually also live in a module; this is called
|
||
\module{__builtin__}.)
|
||
|
||
The local namespace for a function is created when the function is
|
||
called, and deleted when the function returns or raises an exception
|
||
that is not handled within the function. (Actually, forgetting would
|
||
be a better way to describe what actually happens.) Of course,
|
||
recursive invocations each have their own local namespace.
|
||
|
||
A \emph{scope} is a textual region of a Python program where a
|
||
namespace is directly accessible. ``Directly accessible'' here means
|
||
that an unqualified reference to a name attempts to find the name in
|
||
the namespace.
|
||
|
||
Although scopes are determined statically, they are used dynamically.
|
||
At any time during execution, there are at least three nested scopes whose
|
||
namespaces are directly accessible: the innermost scope, which is searched
|
||
first, contains the local names; the namespaces of any enclosing
|
||
functions, which are searched starting with the nearest enclosing scope;
|
||
the middle scope, searched next, contains the current module's global names;
|
||
and the outermost scope (searched last) is the namespace containing built-in
|
||
names.
|
||
|
||
If a name is declared global, then all references and assignments go
|
||
directly to the middle scope containing the module's global names.
|
||
Otherwise, all variables found outside of the innermost scope are read-only
|
||
(an attempt to write to such a variable will simply create a \emph{new}
|
||
local variable in the innermost scope, leaving the identically named
|
||
outer variable unchanged).
|
||
|
||
Usually, the local scope references the local names of the (textually)
|
||
current function. Outside functions, the local scope references
|
||
the same namespace as the global scope: the module's namespace.
|
||
Class definitions place yet another namespace in the local scope.
|
||
|
||
It is important to realize that scopes are determined textually: the
|
||
global scope of a function defined in a module is that module's
|
||
namespace, no matter from where or by what alias the function is
|
||
called. On the other hand, the actual search for names is done
|
||
dynamically, at run time --- however, the language definition is
|
||
evolving towards static name resolution, at ``compile'' time, so don't
|
||
rely on dynamic name resolution! (In fact, local variables are
|
||
already determined statically.)
|
||
|
||
A special quirk of Python is that assignments always go into the
|
||
innermost scope. Assignments do not copy data --- they just
|
||
bind names to objects. The same is true for deletions: the statement
|
||
\samp{del x} removes the binding of \code{x} from the namespace
|
||
referenced by the local scope. In fact, all operations that introduce
|
||
new names use the local scope: in particular, import statements and
|
||
function definitions bind the module or function name in the local
|
||
scope. (The \keyword{global} statement can be used to indicate that
|
||
particular variables live in the global scope.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{A First Look at Classes \label{firstClasses}}
|
||
|
||
Classes introduce a little bit of new syntax, three new object types,
|
||
and some new semantics.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Class Definition Syntax \label{classDefinition}}
|
||
|
||
The simplest form of class definition looks like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class ClassName:
|
||
<statement-1>
|
||
.
|
||
.
|
||
.
|
||
<statement-N>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Class definitions, like function definitions
|
||
(\keyword{def} statements) must be executed before they have any
|
||
effect. (You could conceivably place a class definition in a branch
|
||
of an \keyword{if} statement, or inside a function.)
|
||
|
||
In practice, the statements inside a class definition will usually be
|
||
function definitions, but other statements are allowed, and sometimes
|
||
useful --- we'll come back to this later. The function definitions
|
||
inside a class normally have a peculiar form of argument list,
|
||
dictated by the calling conventions for methods --- again, this is
|
||
explained later.
|
||
|
||
When a class definition is entered, a new namespace is created, and
|
||
used as the local scope --- thus, all assignments to local variables
|
||
go into this new namespace. In particular, function definitions bind
|
||
the name of the new function here.
|
||
|
||
When a class definition is left normally (via the end), a \emph{class
|
||
object} is created. This is basically a wrapper around the contents
|
||
of the namespace created by the class definition; we'll learn more
|
||
about class objects in the next section. The original local scope
|
||
(the one in effect just before the class definition was entered) is
|
||
reinstated, and the class object is bound here to the class name given
|
||
in the class definition header (\class{ClassName} in the example).
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Class Objects \label{classObjects}}
|
||
|
||
Class objects support two kinds of operations: attribute references
|
||
and instantiation.
|
||
|
||
\emph{Attribute references} use the standard syntax used for all
|
||
attribute references in Python: \code{obj.name}. Valid attribute
|
||
names are all the names that were in the class's namespace when the
|
||
class object was created. So, if the class definition looked like
|
||
this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class MyClass:
|
||
"A simple example class"
|
||
i = 12345
|
||
def f(self):
|
||
return 'hello world'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
then \code{MyClass.i} and \code{MyClass.f} are valid attribute
|
||
references, returning an integer and a function object, respectively.
|
||
Class attributes can also be assigned to, so you can change the value
|
||
of \code{MyClass.i} by assignment. \member{__doc__} is also a valid
|
||
attribute, returning the docstring belonging to the class: \code{"A
|
||
simple example class"}.
|
||
|
||
Class \emph{instantiation} uses function notation. Just pretend that
|
||
the class object is a parameterless function that returns a new
|
||
instance of the class. For example (assuming the above class):
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
x = MyClass()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
creates a new \emph{instance} of the class and assigns this object to
|
||
the local variable \code{x}.
|
||
|
||
The instantiation operation (``calling'' a class object) creates an
|
||
empty object. Many classes like to create objects with instances
|
||
customized to a specific initial state.
|
||
Therefore a class may define a special method named
|
||
\method{__init__()}, like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def __init__(self):
|
||
self.data = []
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
When a class defines an \method{__init__()} method, class
|
||
instantiation automatically invokes \method{__init__()} for the
|
||
newly-created class instance. So in this example, a new, initialized
|
||
instance can be obtained by:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
x = MyClass()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Of course, the \method{__init__()} method may have arguments for
|
||
greater flexibility. In that case, arguments given to the class
|
||
instantiation operator are passed on to \method{__init__()}. For
|
||
example,
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> class Complex:
|
||
... def __init__(self, realpart, imagpart):
|
||
... self.r = realpart
|
||
... self.i = imagpart
|
||
...
|
||
>>> x = Complex(3.0, -4.5)
|
||
>>> x.r, x.i
|
||
(3.0, -4.5)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Instance Objects \label{instanceObjects}}
|
||
|
||
Now what can we do with instance objects? The only operations
|
||
understood by instance objects are attribute references. There are
|
||
two kinds of valid attribute names, data attributes and methods.
|
||
|
||
\emph{data attributes} correspond to
|
||
``instance variables'' in Smalltalk, and to ``data members'' in
|
||
\Cpp. Data attributes need not be declared; like local variables,
|
||
they spring into existence when they are first assigned to. For
|
||
example, if \code{x} is the instance of \class{MyClass} created above,
|
||
the following piece of code will print the value \code{16}, without
|
||
leaving a trace:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
x.counter = 1
|
||
while x.counter < 10:
|
||
x.counter = x.counter * 2
|
||
print x.counter
|
||
del x.counter
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The other kind of instance attribute reference is a \emph{method}.
|
||
A method is a function that ``belongs to'' an
|
||
object. (In Python, the term method is not unique to class instances:
|
||
other object types can have methods as well. For example, list objects have
|
||
methods called append, insert, remove, sort, and so on. However,
|
||
in the following discussion, we'll use the term method exclusively to mean
|
||
methods of class instance objects, unless explicitly stated otherwise.)
|
||
|
||
Valid method names of an instance object depend on its class. By
|
||
definition, all attributes of a class that are function
|
||
objects define corresponding methods of its instances. So in our
|
||
example, \code{x.f} is a valid method reference, since
|
||
\code{MyClass.f} is a function, but \code{x.i} is not, since
|
||
\code{MyClass.i} is not. But \code{x.f} is not the same thing as
|
||
\code{MyClass.f} --- it is a \obindex{method}\emph{method object}, not
|
||
a function object.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Method Objects \label{methodObjects}}
|
||
|
||
Usually, a method is called right after it is bound:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
x.f()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In the \class{MyClass} example, this will return the string \code{'hello world'}.
|
||
However, it is not necessary to call a method right away:
|
||
\code{x.f} is a method object, and can be stored away and called at a
|
||
later time. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
xf = x.f
|
||
while True:
|
||
print xf()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
will continue to print \samp{hello world} until the end of time.
|
||
|
||
What exactly happens when a method is called? You may have noticed
|
||
that \code{x.f()} was called without an argument above, even though
|
||
the function definition for \method{f} specified an argument. What
|
||
happened to the argument? Surely Python raises an exception when a
|
||
function that requires an argument is called without any --- even if
|
||
the argument isn't actually used...
|
||
|
||
Actually, you may have guessed the answer: the special thing about
|
||
methods is that the object is passed as the first argument of the
|
||
function. In our example, the call \code{x.f()} is exactly equivalent
|
||
to \code{MyClass.f(x)}. In general, calling a method with a list of
|
||
\var{n} arguments is equivalent to calling the corresponding function
|
||
with an argument list that is created by inserting the method's object
|
||
before the first argument.
|
||
|
||
If you still don't understand how methods work, a look at the
|
||
implementation can perhaps clarify matters. When an instance
|
||
attribute is referenced that isn't a data attribute, its class is
|
||
searched. If the name denotes a valid class attribute that is a
|
||
function object, a method object is created by packing (pointers to)
|
||
the instance object and the function object just found together in an
|
||
abstract object: this is the method object. When the method object is
|
||
called with an argument list, it is unpacked again, a new argument
|
||
list is constructed from the instance object and the original argument
|
||
list, and the function object is called with this new argument list.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Random Remarks \label{remarks}}
|
||
|
||
% [These should perhaps be placed more carefully...]
|
||
|
||
|
||
Data attributes override method attributes with the same name; to
|
||
avoid accidental name conflicts, which may cause hard-to-find bugs in
|
||
large programs, it is wise to use some kind of convention that
|
||
minimizes the chance of conflicts. Possible conventions include
|
||
capitalizing method names, prefixing data attribute names with a small
|
||
unique string (perhaps just an underscore), or using verbs for methods
|
||
and nouns for data attributes.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Data attributes may be referenced by methods as well as by ordinary
|
||
users (``clients'') of an object. In other words, classes are not
|
||
usable to implement pure abstract data types. In fact, nothing in
|
||
Python makes it possible to enforce data hiding --- it is all based
|
||
upon convention. (On the other hand, the Python implementation,
|
||
written in C, can completely hide implementation details and control
|
||
access to an object if necessary; this can be used by extensions to
|
||
Python written in C.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Clients should use data attributes with care --- clients may mess up
|
||
invariants maintained by the methods by stamping on their data
|
||
attributes. Note that clients may add data attributes of their own to
|
||
an instance object without affecting the validity of the methods, as
|
||
long as name conflicts are avoided --- again, a naming convention can
|
||
save a lot of headaches here.
|
||
|
||
|
||
There is no shorthand for referencing data attributes (or other
|
||
methods!) from within methods. I find that this actually increases
|
||
the readability of methods: there is no chance of confusing local
|
||
variables and instance variables when glancing through a method.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Often, the first argument of a method is called
|
||
\code{self}. This is nothing more than a convention: the name
|
||
\code{self} has absolutely no special meaning to Python. (Note,
|
||
however, that by not following the convention your code may be less
|
||
readable to other Python programmers, and it is also conceivable that
|
||
a \emph{class browser} program might be written that relies upon such a
|
||
convention.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Any function object that is a class attribute defines a method for
|
||
instances of that class. It is not necessary that the function
|
||
definition is textually enclosed in the class definition: assigning a
|
||
function object to a local variable in the class is also ok. For
|
||
example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
# Function defined outside the class
|
||
def f1(self, x, y):
|
||
return min(x, x+y)
|
||
|
||
class C:
|
||
f = f1
|
||
def g(self):
|
||
return 'hello world'
|
||
h = g
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Now \code{f}, \code{g} and \code{h} are all attributes of class
|
||
\class{C} that refer to function objects, and consequently they are all
|
||
methods of instances of \class{C} --- \code{h} being exactly equivalent
|
||
to \code{g}. Note that this practice usually only serves to confuse
|
||
the reader of a program.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Methods may call other methods by using method attributes of the
|
||
\code{self} argument:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class Bag:
|
||
def __init__(self):
|
||
self.data = []
|
||
def add(self, x):
|
||
self.data.append(x)
|
||
def addtwice(self, x):
|
||
self.add(x)
|
||
self.add(x)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Methods may reference global names in the same way as ordinary
|
||
functions. The global scope associated with a method is the module
|
||
containing the class definition. (The class itself is never used as a
|
||
global scope!) While one rarely encounters a good reason for using
|
||
global data in a method, there are many legitimate uses of the global
|
||
scope: for one thing, functions and modules imported into the global
|
||
scope can be used by methods, as well as functions and classes defined
|
||
in it. Usually, the class containing the method is itself defined in
|
||
this global scope, and in the next section we'll find some good
|
||
reasons why a method would want to reference its own class!
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Inheritance \label{inheritance}}
|
||
|
||
Of course, a language feature would not be worthy of the name ``class''
|
||
without supporting inheritance. The syntax for a derived class
|
||
definition looks like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class DerivedClassName(BaseClassName):
|
||
<statement-1>
|
||
.
|
||
.
|
||
.
|
||
<statement-N>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The name \class{BaseClassName} must be defined in a scope containing
|
||
the derived class definition. In place of a base class name, other
|
||
arbitrary expressions are also allowed. This can be useful, for
|
||
example, when the base class is defined in another module:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class DerivedClassName(modname.BaseClassName):
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Execution of a derived class definition proceeds the same as for a
|
||
base class. When the class object is constructed, the base class is
|
||
remembered. This is used for resolving attribute references: if a
|
||
requested attribute is not found in the class, the search proceeds to look in the
|
||
base class. This rule is applied recursively if the base class itself
|
||
is derived from some other class.
|
||
|
||
There's nothing special about instantiation of derived classes:
|
||
\code{DerivedClassName()} creates a new instance of the class. Method
|
||
references are resolved as follows: the corresponding class attribute
|
||
is searched, descending down the chain of base classes if necessary,
|
||
and the method reference is valid if this yields a function object.
|
||
|
||
Derived classes may override methods of their base classes. Because
|
||
methods have no special privileges when calling other methods of the
|
||
same object, a method of a base class that calls another method
|
||
defined in the same base class may end up calling a method of
|
||
a derived class that overrides it. (For \Cpp{} programmers: all methods
|
||
in Python are effectively \keyword{virtual}.)
|
||
|
||
An overriding method in a derived class may in fact want to extend
|
||
rather than simply replace the base class method of the same name.
|
||
There is a simple way to call the base class method directly: just
|
||
call \samp{BaseClassName.methodname(self, arguments)}. This is
|
||
occasionally useful to clients as well. (Note that this only works if
|
||
the base class is defined or imported directly in the global scope.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Multiple Inheritance \label{multiple}}
|
||
|
||
Python supports a limited form of multiple inheritance as well. A
|
||
class definition with multiple base classes looks like this:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class DerivedClassName(Base1, Base2, Base3):
|
||
<statement-1>
|
||
.
|
||
.
|
||
.
|
||
<statement-N>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
For old-style classes, the only rule is depth-first,
|
||
left-to-right. Thus, if an attribute is not found in
|
||
\class{DerivedClassName}, it is searched in \class{Base1}, then
|
||
(recursively) in the base classes of \class{Base1}, and only if it is
|
||
not found there, it is searched in \class{Base2}, and so on.
|
||
|
||
(To some people breadth first --- searching \class{Base2} and
|
||
\class{Base3} before the base classes of \class{Base1} --- looks more
|
||
natural. However, this would require you to know whether a particular
|
||
attribute of \class{Base1} is actually defined in \class{Base1} or in
|
||
one of its base classes before you can figure out the consequences of
|
||
a name conflict with an attribute of \class{Base2}. The depth-first
|
||
rule makes no differences between direct and inherited attributes of
|
||
\class{Base1}.)
|
||
|
||
For new-style classes, the method resolution order changes dynamically
|
||
to support cooperative calls to \function{super()}. This approach
|
||
is known in some other multiple-inheritance languages as call-next-method
|
||
and is more powerful than the super call found in single-inheritance languages.
|
||
|
||
With new-style classes, dynamic ordering is necessary because all
|
||
cases of multiple inheritance exhibit one or more diamond relationships
|
||
(where one at least one of the parent classes can be accessed through
|
||
multiple paths from the bottommost class). For example, all new-style
|
||
classes inherit from \class{object}, so any case of multiple inheritance
|
||
provides more than one path to reach \class{object}. To keep the
|
||
base classes from being accessed more than once, the dynamic algorithm
|
||
linearizes the search order in a way that preserves the left-to-right
|
||
ordering specified in each class, that calls each parent only once, and
|
||
that is monotonic (meaning that a class can be subclassed without affecting
|
||
the precedence order of its parents). Taken together, these properties
|
||
make it possible to design reliable and extensible classes with
|
||
multiple inheritance. For more detail, see
|
||
\url{http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.3/mro/}.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Private Variables \label{private}}
|
||
|
||
There is limited support for class-private
|
||
identifiers. Any identifier of the form \code{__spam} (at least two
|
||
leading underscores, at most one trailing underscore) is textually
|
||
replaced with \code{_classname__spam}, where \code{classname} is the
|
||
current class name with leading underscore(s) stripped. This mangling
|
||
is done without regard to the syntactic position of the identifier, so
|
||
it can be used to define class-private instance and class variables,
|
||
methods, variables stored in globals, and even variables stored in instances.
|
||
private to this class on instances of \emph{other} classes. Truncation
|
||
may occur when the mangled name would be longer than 255 characters.
|
||
Outside classes, or when the class name consists of only underscores,
|
||
no mangling occurs.
|
||
|
||
Name mangling is intended to give classes an easy way to define
|
||
``private'' instance variables and methods, without having to worry
|
||
about instance variables defined by derived classes, or mucking with
|
||
instance variables by code outside the class. Note that the mangling
|
||
rules are designed mostly to avoid accidents; it still is possible for
|
||
a determined soul to access or modify a variable that is considered
|
||
private. This can even be useful in special circumstances, such as in
|
||
the debugger, and that's one reason why this loophole is not closed.
|
||
(Buglet: derivation of a class with the same name as the base class
|
||
makes use of private variables of the base class possible.)
|
||
|
||
Notice that code passed to \code{exec()}, \code{eval()} or
|
||
\code{execfile()} does not consider the classname of the invoking
|
||
class to be the current class; this is similar to the effect of the
|
||
\code{global} statement, the effect of which is likewise restricted to
|
||
code that is byte-compiled together. The same restriction applies to
|
||
\code{getattr()}, \code{setattr()} and \code{delattr()}, as well as
|
||
when referencing \code{__dict__} directly.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Odds and Ends \label{odds}}
|
||
|
||
Sometimes it is useful to have a data type similar to the Pascal
|
||
``record'' or C ``struct'', bundling together a few named data
|
||
items. An empty class definition will do nicely:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class Employee:
|
||
pass
|
||
|
||
john = Employee() # Create an empty employee record
|
||
|
||
# Fill the fields of the record
|
||
john.name = 'John Doe'
|
||
john.dept = 'computer lab'
|
||
john.salary = 1000
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
A piece of Python code that expects a particular abstract data type
|
||
can often be passed a class that emulates the methods of that data
|
||
type instead. For instance, if you have a function that formats some
|
||
data from a file object, you can define a class with methods
|
||
\method{read()} and \method{readline()} that get the data from a string
|
||
buffer instead, and pass it as an argument.% (Unfortunately, this
|
||
%technique has its limitations: a class can't define operations that
|
||
%are accessed by special syntax such as sequence subscripting or
|
||
%arithmetic operators, and assigning such a ``pseudo-file'' to
|
||
%\code{sys.stdin} will not cause the interpreter to read further input
|
||
%from it.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Instance method objects have attributes, too: \code{m.im_self} is the
|
||
instance object with the method \method{m}, and \code{m.im_func} is the
|
||
function object corresponding to the method.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Exceptions Are Classes Too\label{exceptionClasses}}
|
||
|
||
User-defined exceptions are identified by classes as well. Using this
|
||
mechanism it is possible to create extensible hierarchies of exceptions.
|
||
|
||
There are two new valid (semantic) forms for the raise statement:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
raise Class, instance
|
||
|
||
raise instance
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In the first form, \code{instance} must be an instance of
|
||
\class{Class} or of a class derived from it. The second form is a
|
||
shorthand for:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
raise instance.__class__, instance
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
A class in an except clause is compatible with an exception if it is the same
|
||
class or a base class thereof (but not the other way around --- an
|
||
except clause listing a derived class is not compatible with a base
|
||
class). For example, the following code will print B, C, D in that
|
||
order:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class B:
|
||
pass
|
||
class C(B):
|
||
pass
|
||
class D(C):
|
||
pass
|
||
|
||
for c in [B, C, D]:
|
||
try:
|
||
raise c()
|
||
except D:
|
||
print "D"
|
||
except C:
|
||
print "C"
|
||
except B:
|
||
print "B"
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that if the except clauses were reversed (with
|
||
\samp{except B} first), it would have printed B, B, B --- the first
|
||
matching except clause is triggered.
|
||
|
||
When an error message is printed for an unhandled exception, the
|
||
exception's class name is printed, then a colon and a space, and
|
||
finally the instance converted to a string using the built-in function
|
||
\function{str()}.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Iterators\label{iterators}}
|
||
|
||
By now you have probably noticed that most container objects can be looped
|
||
over using a \keyword{for} statement:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
for element in [1, 2, 3]:
|
||
print element
|
||
for element in (1, 2, 3):
|
||
print element
|
||
for key in {'one':1, 'two':2}:
|
||
print key
|
||
for char in "123":
|
||
print char
|
||
for line in open("myfile.txt"):
|
||
print line
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This style of access is clear, concise, and convenient. The use of iterators
|
||
pervades and unifies Python. Behind the scenes, the \keyword{for}
|
||
statement calls \function{iter()} on the container object. The
|
||
function returns an iterator object that defines the method
|
||
\method{__next__()} which accesses elements in the container one at a
|
||
time. When there are no more elements, \method{__next__()} raises a
|
||
\exception{StopIteration} exception which tells the \keyword{for} loop
|
||
to terminate. You can call the \method{__next__()} method using the
|
||
\function{next()} builtin; this example shows how it all works:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> s = 'abc'
|
||
>>> it = iter(s)
|
||
>>> it
|
||
<iterator object at 0x00A1DB50>
|
||
>>> next(it)
|
||
'a'
|
||
>>> next(it)
|
||
'b'
|
||
>>> next(it)
|
||
'c'
|
||
>>> next(it)
|
||
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
|
||
next(it)
|
||
StopIteration
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Having seen the mechanics behind the iterator protocol, it is easy to add
|
||
iterator behavior to your classes. Define a \method{__iter__()} method
|
||
which returns an object with a \method{__next__()} method. If the class defines
|
||
\method{__next__()}, then \method{__iter__()} can just return \code{self}:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
class Reverse:
|
||
"Iterator for looping over a sequence backwards"
|
||
def __init__(self, data):
|
||
self.data = data
|
||
self.index = len(data)
|
||
def __iter__(self):
|
||
return self
|
||
def __next__(self):
|
||
if self.index == 0:
|
||
raise StopIteration
|
||
self.index = self.index - 1
|
||
return self.data[self.index]
|
||
|
||
>>> for char in Reverse('spam'):
|
||
... print char
|
||
...
|
||
m
|
||
a
|
||
p
|
||
s
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Generators\label{generators}}
|
||
|
||
Generators are a simple and powerful tool for creating iterators. They are
|
||
written like regular functions but use the \keyword{yield} statement whenever
|
||
they want to return data. Each time \function{next()} is called on it, the
|
||
generator resumes where it left-off (it remembers all the data values and
|
||
which statement was last executed). An example shows that generators can
|
||
be trivially easy to create:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def reverse(data):
|
||
for index in range(len(data)-1, -1, -1):
|
||
yield data[index]
|
||
|
||
>>> for char in reverse('golf'):
|
||
... print char
|
||
...
|
||
f
|
||
l
|
||
o
|
||
g
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Anything that can be done with generators can also be done with class based
|
||
iterators as described in the previous section. What makes generators so
|
||
compact is that the \method{__iter__()} and \method{__next__()} methods are
|
||
created automatically.
|
||
|
||
Another key feature is that the local variables and execution state
|
||
are automatically saved between calls. This made the function easier to write
|
||
and much more clear than an approach using instance variables like
|
||
\code{self.index} and \code{self.data}.
|
||
|
||
In addition to automatic method creation and saving program state, when
|
||
generators terminate, they automatically raise \exception{StopIteration}.
|
||
In combination, these features make it easy to create iterators with no
|
||
more effort than writing a regular function.
|
||
|
||
\section{Generator Expressions\label{genexps}}
|
||
|
||
Some simple generators can be coded succinctly as expressions using a syntax
|
||
similar to list comprehensions but with parentheses instead of brackets. These
|
||
expressions are designed for situations where the generator is used right
|
||
away by an enclosing function. Generator expressions are more compact but
|
||
less versatile than full generator definitions and tend to be more memory
|
||
friendly than equivalent list comprehensions.
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> sum(i*i for i in range(10)) # sum of squares
|
||
285
|
||
|
||
>>> xvec = [10, 20, 30]
|
||
>>> yvec = [7, 5, 3]
|
||
>>> sum(x*y for x,y in zip(xvec, yvec)) # dot product
|
||
260
|
||
|
||
>>> from math import pi, sin
|
||
>>> sine_table = dict((x, sin(x*pi/180)) for x in range(0, 91))
|
||
|
||
>>> unique_words = set(word for line in page for word in line.split())
|
||
|
||
>>> valedictorian = max((student.gpa, student.name) for student in graduates)
|
||
|
||
>>> data = 'golf'
|
||
>>> list(data[i] for i in range(len(data)-1,-1,-1))
|
||
['f', 'l', 'o', 'g']
|
||
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Brief Tour of the Standard Library \label{briefTour}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Operating System Interface\label{os-interface}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{os}}{../lib/module-os.html}
|
||
module provides dozens of functions for interacting with the
|
||
operating system:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import os
|
||
>>> os.system('time 0:02')
|
||
0
|
||
>>> os.getcwd() # Return the current working directory
|
||
'C:\\Python30'
|
||
>>> os.chdir('/server/accesslogs')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Be sure to use the \samp{import os} style instead of
|
||
\samp{from os import *}. This will keep \function{os.open()} from
|
||
shadowing the builtin \function{open()} function which operates much
|
||
differently.
|
||
|
||
\bifuncindex{help}
|
||
The builtin \function{dir()} and \function{help()} functions are useful
|
||
as interactive aids for working with large modules like \module{os}:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import os
|
||
>>> dir(os)
|
||
<returns a list of all module functions>
|
||
>>> help(os)
|
||
<returns an extensive manual page created from the module's docstrings>
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
For daily file and directory management tasks, the
|
||
\ulink{\module{shutil}}{../lib/module-shutil.html}
|
||
module provides a higher level interface that is easier to use:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import shutil
|
||
>>> shutil.copyfile('data.db', 'archive.db')
|
||
>>> shutil.move('/build/executables', 'installdir')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{File Wildcards\label{file-wildcards}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{glob}}{../lib/module-glob.html}
|
||
module provides a function for making file lists from directory
|
||
wildcard searches:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import glob
|
||
>>> glob.glob('*.py')
|
||
['primes.py', 'random.py', 'quote.py']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Command Line Arguments\label{command-line-arguments}}
|
||
|
||
Common utility scripts often need to process command line arguments.
|
||
These arguments are stored in the
|
||
\ulink{\module{sys}}{../lib/module-sys.html}\ module's \var{argv}
|
||
attribute as a list. For instance the following output results from
|
||
running \samp{python demo.py one two three} at the command line:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import sys
|
||
>>> print sys.argv
|
||
['demo.py', 'one', 'two', 'three']
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{getopt}}{../lib/module-getopt.html}
|
||
module processes \var{sys.argv} using the conventions of the \UNIX{}
|
||
\function{getopt()} function. More powerful and flexible command line
|
||
processing is provided by the
|
||
\ulink{\module{optparse}}{../lib/module-optparse.html} module.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Error Output Redirection and Program Termination\label{stderr}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{sys}}{../lib/module-sys.html}
|
||
module also has attributes for \var{stdin}, \var{stdout}, and
|
||
\var{stderr}. The latter is useful for emitting warnings and error
|
||
messages to make them visible even when \var{stdout} has been redirected:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> sys.stderr.write('Warning, log file not found starting a new one\n')
|
||
Warning, log file not found starting a new one
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The most direct way to terminate a script is to use \samp{sys.exit()}.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{String Pattern Matching\label{string-pattern-matching}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{re}}{../lib/module-re.html}
|
||
module provides regular expression tools for advanced string processing.
|
||
For complex matching and manipulation, regular expressions offer succinct,
|
||
optimized solutions:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import re
|
||
>>> re.findall(r'\bf[a-z]*', 'which foot or hand fell fastest')
|
||
['foot', 'fell', 'fastest']
|
||
>>> re.sub(r'(\b[a-z]+) \1', r'\1', 'cat in the the hat')
|
||
'cat in the hat'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
When only simple capabilities are needed, string methods are preferred
|
||
because they are easier to read and debug:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 'tea for too'.replace('too', 'two')
|
||
'tea for two'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\section{Mathematics\label{mathematics}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{math}}{../lib/module-math.html} module gives
|
||
access to the underlying C library functions for floating point math:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import math
|
||
>>> math.cos(math.pi / 4.0)
|
||
0.70710678118654757
|
||
>>> math.log(1024, 2)
|
||
10.0
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{random}}{../lib/module-random.html}
|
||
module provides tools for making random selections:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import random
|
||
>>> random.choice(['apple', 'pear', 'banana'])
|
||
'apple'
|
||
>>> random.sample(range(100), 10) # sampling without replacement
|
||
[30, 83, 16, 4, 8, 81, 41, 50, 18, 33]
|
||
>>> random.random() # random float
|
||
0.17970987693706186
|
||
>>> random.randrange(6) # random integer chosen from range(6)
|
||
4
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Internet Access\label{internet-access}}
|
||
|
||
There are a number of modules for accessing the internet and processing
|
||
internet protocols. Two of the simplest are
|
||
\ulink{\module{urllib2}}{../lib/module-urllib2.html}
|
||
for retrieving data from urls and
|
||
\ulink{\module{smtplib}}{../lib/module-smtplib.html}
|
||
for sending mail:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import urllib2
|
||
>>> for line in urllib2.urlopen('http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/timer.pl'):
|
||
... if 'EST' in line or 'EDT' in line: # look for Eastern Time
|
||
... print line
|
||
|
||
<BR>Nov. 25, 09:43:32 PM EST
|
||
|
||
>>> import smtplib
|
||
>>> server = smtplib.SMTP('localhost')
|
||
>>> server.sendmail('soothsayer@example.org', 'jcaesar@example.org',
|
||
"""To: jcaesar@example.org
|
||
From: soothsayer@example.org
|
||
|
||
Beware the Ides of March.
|
||
""")
|
||
>>> server.quit()
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Dates and Times\label{dates-and-times}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{datetime}}{../lib/module-datetime.html} module
|
||
supplies classes for manipulating dates and times in both simple
|
||
and complex ways. While date and time arithmetic is supported, the
|
||
focus of the implementation is on efficient member extraction for
|
||
output formatting and manipulation. The module also supports objects
|
||
that are timezone aware.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
# dates are easily constructed and formatted
|
||
>>> from datetime import date
|
||
>>> now = date.today()
|
||
>>> now
|
||
datetime.date(2003, 12, 2)
|
||
>>> now.strftime("%m-%d-%y. %d %b %Y is a %A on the %d day of %B.")
|
||
'12-02-03. 02 Dec 2003 is a Tuesday on the 02 day of December.'
|
||
|
||
# dates support calendar arithmetic
|
||
>>> birthday = date(1964, 7, 31)
|
||
>>> age = now - birthday
|
||
>>> age.days
|
||
14368
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Data Compression\label{data-compression}}
|
||
|
||
Common data archiving and compression formats are directly supported
|
||
by modules including:
|
||
\ulink{\module{zlib}}{../lib/module-zlib.html},
|
||
\ulink{\module{gzip}}{../lib/module-gzip.html},
|
||
\ulink{\module{bz2}}{../lib/module-bz2.html},
|
||
\ulink{\module{zipfile}}{../lib/module-zipfile.html}, and
|
||
\ulink{\module{tarfile}}{../lib/module-tarfile.html}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import zlib
|
||
>>> s = 'witch which has which witches wrist watch'
|
||
>>> len(s)
|
||
41
|
||
>>> t = zlib.compress(s)
|
||
>>> len(t)
|
||
37
|
||
>>> zlib.decompress(t)
|
||
'witch which has which witches wrist watch'
|
||
>>> zlib.crc32(s)
|
||
226805979
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Performance Measurement\label{performance-measurement}}
|
||
|
||
Some Python users develop a deep interest in knowing the relative
|
||
performance of different approaches to the same problem.
|
||
Python provides a measurement tool that answers those questions
|
||
immediately.
|
||
|
||
For example, it may be tempting to use the tuple packing and unpacking
|
||
feature instead of the traditional approach to swapping arguments.
|
||
The \ulink{\module{timeit}}{../lib/module-timeit.html} module
|
||
quickly demonstrates a modest performance advantage:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from timeit import Timer
|
||
>>> Timer('t=a; a=b; b=t', 'a=1; b=2').timeit()
|
||
0.57535828626024577
|
||
>>> Timer('a,b = b,a', 'a=1; b=2').timeit()
|
||
0.54962537085770791
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In contrast to \module{timeit}'s fine level of granularity, the
|
||
\ulink{\module{profile}}{../lib/module-profile.html} and \module{pstats}
|
||
modules provide tools for identifying time critical sections in larger blocks
|
||
of code.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Quality Control\label{quality-control}}
|
||
|
||
One approach for developing high quality software is to write tests for
|
||
each function as it is developed and to run those tests frequently during
|
||
the development process.
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{doctest}}{../lib/module-doctest.html} module provides
|
||
a tool for scanning a module and validating tests embedded in a program's
|
||
docstrings. Test construction is as simple as cutting-and-pasting a
|
||
typical call along with its results into the docstring. This improves
|
||
the documentation by providing the user with an example and it allows the
|
||
doctest module to make sure the code remains true to the documentation:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
def average(values):
|
||
"""Computes the arithmetic mean of a list of numbers.
|
||
|
||
>>> print average([20, 30, 70])
|
||
40.0
|
||
"""
|
||
return sum(values, 0.0) / len(values)
|
||
|
||
import doctest
|
||
doctest.testmod() # automatically validate the embedded tests
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{unittest}}{../lib/module-unittest.html} module is not
|
||
as effortless as the \module{doctest} module, but it allows a more
|
||
comprehensive set of tests to be maintained in a separate file:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import unittest
|
||
|
||
class TestStatisticalFunctions(unittest.TestCase):
|
||
|
||
def test_average(self):
|
||
self.assertEqual(average([20, 30, 70]), 40.0)
|
||
self.assertEqual(round(average([1, 5, 7]), 1), 4.3)
|
||
self.assertRaises(ZeroDivisionError, average, [])
|
||
self.assertRaises(TypeError, average, 20, 30, 70)
|
||
|
||
unittest.main() # Calling from the command line invokes all tests
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\section{Batteries Included\label{batteries-included}}
|
||
|
||
Python has a ``batteries included'' philosophy. This is best seen
|
||
through the sophisticated and robust capabilities of its larger
|
||
packages. For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item The \ulink{\module{xmlrpclib}}{../lib/module-xmlrpclib.html} and
|
||
\ulink{\module{SimpleXMLRPCServer}}{../lib/module-SimpleXMLRPCServer.html}
|
||
modules make implementing remote procedure calls into an almost trivial task.
|
||
Despite the modules names, no direct knowledge or handling of XML is needed.
|
||
\item The \ulink{\module{email}}{../lib/module-email.html} package is a library
|
||
for managing email messages, including MIME and other RFC 2822-based message
|
||
documents. Unlike \module{smtplib} and \module{poplib} which actually send
|
||
and receive messages, the email package has a complete toolset for building
|
||
or decoding complex message structures (including attachments) and for
|
||
implementing internet encoding and header protocols.
|
||
\item The \ulink{\module{xml.dom}}{../lib/module-xml.dom.html} and
|
||
\ulink{\module{xml.sax}}{../lib/module-xml.sax.html} packages provide robust
|
||
support for parsing this popular data interchange format. Likewise, the
|
||
\ulink{\module{csv}}{../lib/module-csv.html} module supports direct reads and
|
||
writes in a common database format. Together, these modules and packages
|
||
greatly simplify data interchange between python applications and other
|
||
tools.
|
||
\item Internationalization is supported by a number of modules including
|
||
\ulink{\module{gettext}}{../lib/module-gettext.html},
|
||
\ulink{\module{locale}}{../lib/module-locale.html}, and the
|
||
\ulink{\module{codecs}}{../lib/module-codecs.html} package.
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Brief Tour of the Standard Library -- Part II\label{briefTourTwo}}
|
||
|
||
This second tour covers more advanced modules that support professional
|
||
programming needs. These modules rarely occur in small scripts.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Output Formatting\label{output-formatting}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{repr}}{../lib/module-repr.html} module provides a
|
||
version of \function{repr()} customized for abbreviated displays of large
|
||
or deeply nested containers:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import repr
|
||
>>> repr.repr(set('supercalifragilisticexpialidocious'))
|
||
"set(['a', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', ...])"
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{pprint}}{../lib/module-pprint.html} module offers
|
||
more sophisticated control over printing both built-in and user defined
|
||
objects in a way that is readable by the interpreter. When the result
|
||
is longer than one line, the ``pretty printer'' adds line breaks and
|
||
indentation to more clearly reveal data structure:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import pprint
|
||
>>> t = [[[['black', 'cyan'], 'white', ['green', 'red']], [['magenta',
|
||
... 'yellow'], 'blue']]]
|
||
...
|
||
>>> pprint.pprint(t, width=30)
|
||
[[[['black', 'cyan'],
|
||
'white',
|
||
['green', 'red']],
|
||
[['magenta', 'yellow'],
|
||
'blue']]]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{textwrap}}{../lib/module-textwrap.html} module
|
||
formats paragraphs of text to fit a given screen width:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import textwrap
|
||
>>> doc = """The wrap() method is just like fill() except that it returns
|
||
... a list of strings instead of one big string with newlines to separate
|
||
... the wrapped lines."""
|
||
...
|
||
>>> print textwrap.fill(doc, width=40)
|
||
The wrap() method is just like fill()
|
||
except that it returns a list of strings
|
||
instead of one big string with newlines
|
||
to separate the wrapped lines.
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{locale}}{../lib/module-locale.html} module accesses
|
||
a database of culture specific data formats. The grouping attribute
|
||
of locale's format function provides a direct way of formatting numbers
|
||
with group separators:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import locale
|
||
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, 'English_United States.1252')
|
||
'English_United States.1252'
|
||
>>> conv = locale.localeconv() # get a mapping of conventions
|
||
>>> x = 1234567.8
|
||
>>> locale.format("%d", x, grouping=True)
|
||
'1,234,567'
|
||
>>> locale.format("%s%.*f", (conv['currency_symbol'],
|
||
... conv['frac_digits'], x), grouping=True)
|
||
'$1,234,567.80'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Templating\label{templating}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{string}}{../lib/module-string.html} module includes a
|
||
versatile \class{Template} class with a simplified syntax suitable for
|
||
editing by end-users. This allows users to customize their applications
|
||
without having to alter the application.
|
||
|
||
The format uses placeholder names formed by \samp{\$} with valid Python
|
||
identifiers (alphanumeric characters and underscores). Surrounding the
|
||
placeholder with braces allows it to be followed by more alphanumeric letters
|
||
with no intervening spaces. Writing \samp{\$\$} creates a single escaped
|
||
\samp{\$}:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from string import Template
|
||
>>> t = Template('${village}folk send $$10 to $cause.')
|
||
>>> t.substitute(village='Nottingham', cause='the ditch fund')
|
||
'Nottinghamfolk send $10 to the ditch fund.'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \method{substitute} method raises a \exception{KeyError} when a
|
||
placeholder is not supplied in a dictionary or a keyword argument. For
|
||
mail-merge style applications, user supplied data may be incomplete and the
|
||
\method{safe_substitute} method may be more appropriate --- it will leave
|
||
placeholders unchanged if data is missing:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> t = Template('Return the $item to $owner.')
|
||
>>> d = dict(item='unladen swallow')
|
||
>>> t.substitute(d)
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
. . .
|
||
KeyError: 'owner'
|
||
>>> t.safe_substitute(d)
|
||
'Return the unladen swallow to $owner.'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Template subclasses can specify a custom delimiter. For example, a batch
|
||
renaming utility for a photo browser may elect to use percent signs for
|
||
placeholders such as the current date, image sequence number, or file format:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import time, os.path, sys
|
||
>>> def raw_input(prompt):
|
||
... sys.stdout.write(prompt)
|
||
... sys.stdout.flush()
|
||
... return sys.stdin.readline()
|
||
...
|
||
>>> photofiles = ['img_1074.jpg', 'img_1076.jpg', 'img_1077.jpg']
|
||
>>> class BatchRename(Template):
|
||
... delimiter = '%'
|
||
>>> fmt = raw_input('Enter rename style (%d-date %n-seqnum %f-format): ')
|
||
Enter rename style (%d-date %n-seqnum %f-format): Ashley_%n%f
|
||
|
||
>>> t = BatchRename(fmt)
|
||
>>> date = time.strftime('%d%b%y')
|
||
>>> for i, filename in enumerate(photofiles):
|
||
... base, ext = os.path.splitext(filename)
|
||
... newname = t.substitute(d=date, n=i, f=ext)
|
||
... print '%s --> %s' % (filename, newname)
|
||
|
||
img_1074.jpg --> Ashley_0.jpg
|
||
img_1076.jpg --> Ashley_1.jpg
|
||
img_1077.jpg --> Ashley_2.jpg
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Another application for templating is separating program logic from the
|
||
details of multiple output formats. This makes it possible to substitute
|
||
custom templates for XML files, plain text reports, and HTML web reports.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Working with Binary Data Record Layouts\label{binary-formats}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{struct}}{../lib/module-struct.html} module provides
|
||
\function{pack()} and \function{unpack()} functions for working with
|
||
variable length binary record formats. The following example shows how
|
||
to loop through header information in a ZIP file (with pack codes
|
||
\code{"H"} and \code{"L"} representing two and four byte unsigned
|
||
numbers respectively):
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import struct
|
||
|
||
data = open('myfile.zip', 'rb').read()
|
||
start = 0
|
||
for i in range(3): # show the first 3 file headers
|
||
start += 14
|
||
fields = struct.unpack('LLLHH', data[start:start+16])
|
||
crc32, comp_size, uncomp_size, filenamesize, extra_size = fields
|
||
|
||
start += 16
|
||
filename = data[start:start+filenamesize]
|
||
start += filenamesize
|
||
extra = data[start:start+extra_size]
|
||
print filename, hex(crc32), comp_size, uncomp_size
|
||
|
||
start += extra_size + comp_size # skip to the next header
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Multi-threading\label{multi-threading}}
|
||
|
||
Threading is a technique for decoupling tasks which are not sequentially
|
||
dependent. Threads can be used to improve the responsiveness of
|
||
applications that accept user input while other tasks run in the
|
||
background. A related use case is running I/O in parallel with
|
||
computations in another thread.
|
||
|
||
The following code shows how the high level
|
||
\ulink{\module{threading}}{../lib/module-threading.html} module can run
|
||
tasks in background while the main program continues to run:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import threading, zipfile
|
||
|
||
class AsyncZip(threading.Thread):
|
||
def __init__(self, infile, outfile):
|
||
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
|
||
self.infile = infile
|
||
self.outfile = outfile
|
||
def run(self):
|
||
f = zipfile.ZipFile(self.outfile, 'w', zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED)
|
||
f.write(self.infile)
|
||
f.close()
|
||
print 'Finished background zip of: ', self.infile
|
||
|
||
background = AsyncZip('mydata.txt', 'myarchive.zip')
|
||
background.start()
|
||
print 'The main program continues to run in foreground.'
|
||
|
||
background.join() # Wait for the background task to finish
|
||
print 'Main program waited until background was done.'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The principal challenge of multi-threaded applications is coordinating
|
||
threads that share data or other resources. To that end, the threading
|
||
module provides a number of synchronization primitives including locks,
|
||
events, condition variables, and semaphores.
|
||
|
||
While those tools are powerful, minor design errors can result in
|
||
problems that are difficult to reproduce. So, the preferred approach
|
||
to task coordination is to concentrate all access to a resource
|
||
in a single thread and then use the
|
||
\ulink{\module{Queue}}{../lib/module-Queue.html} module to feed that
|
||
thread with requests from other threads. Applications using
|
||
\class{Queue} objects for inter-thread communication and coordination
|
||
are easier to design, more readable, and more reliable.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Logging\label{logging}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{logging}}{../lib/module-logging.html} module offers
|
||
a full featured and flexible logging system. At its simplest, log
|
||
messages are sent to a file or to \code{sys.stderr}:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import logging
|
||
logging.debug('Debugging information')
|
||
logging.info('Informational message')
|
||
logging.warning('Warning:config file %s not found', 'server.conf')
|
||
logging.error('Error occurred')
|
||
logging.critical('Critical error -- shutting down')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This produces the following output:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
WARNING:root:Warning:config file server.conf not found
|
||
ERROR:root:Error occurred
|
||
CRITICAL:root:Critical error -- shutting down
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
By default, informational and debugging messages are suppressed and the
|
||
output is sent to standard error. Other output options include routing
|
||
messages through email, datagrams, sockets, or to an HTTP Server. New
|
||
filters can select different routing based on message priority:
|
||
\constant{DEBUG}, \constant{INFO}, \constant{WARNING}, \constant{ERROR},
|
||
and \constant{CRITICAL}.
|
||
|
||
The logging system can be configured directly from Python or can be
|
||
loaded from a user editable configuration file for customized logging
|
||
without altering the application.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Weak References\label{weak-references}}
|
||
|
||
Python does automatic memory management (reference counting for most
|
||
objects and garbage collection to eliminate cycles). The memory is
|
||
freed shortly after the last reference to it has been eliminated.
|
||
|
||
This approach works fine for most applications but occasionally there
|
||
is a need to track objects only as long as they are being used by
|
||
something else. Unfortunately, just tracking them creates a reference
|
||
that makes them permanent. The
|
||
\ulink{\module{weakref}}{../lib/module-weakref.html} module provides
|
||
tools for tracking objects without creating a reference. When the
|
||
object is no longer needed, it is automatically removed from a weakref
|
||
table and a callback is triggered for weakref objects. Typical
|
||
applications include caching objects that are expensive to create:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import weakref, gc
|
||
>>> class A:
|
||
... def __init__(self, value):
|
||
... self.value = value
|
||
... def __repr__(self):
|
||
... return str(self.value)
|
||
...
|
||
>>> a = A(10) # create a reference
|
||
>>> d = weakref.WeakValueDictionary()
|
||
>>> d['primary'] = a # does not create a reference
|
||
>>> d['primary'] # fetch the object if it is still alive
|
||
10
|
||
>>> del a # remove the one reference
|
||
>>> gc.collect() # run garbage collection right away
|
||
0
|
||
>>> d['primary'] # entry was automatically removed
|
||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
File "<pyshell#108>", line 1, in -toplevel-
|
||
d['primary'] # entry was automatically removed
|
||
File "C:/python30/lib/weakref.py", line 46, in __getitem__
|
||
o = self.data[key]()
|
||
KeyError: 'primary'
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\section{Tools for Working with Lists\label{list-tools}}
|
||
|
||
Many data structure needs can be met with the built-in list type.
|
||
However, sometimes there is a need for alternative implementations
|
||
with different performance trade-offs.
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{array}}{../lib/module-array.html} module provides an
|
||
\class{array()} object that is like a list that stores only homogenous
|
||
data and stores it more compactly. The following example shows an array
|
||
of numbers stored as two byte unsigned binary numbers (typecode
|
||
\code{"H"}) rather than the usual 16 bytes per entry for regular lists
|
||
of python int objects:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from array import array
|
||
>>> a = array('H', [4000, 10, 700, 22222])
|
||
>>> sum(a)
|
||
26932
|
||
>>> a[1:3]
|
||
array('H', [10, 700])
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{collections}}{../lib/module-collections.html} module
|
||
provides a \class{deque()} object that is like a list with faster
|
||
appends and pops from the left side but slower lookups in the middle.
|
||
These objects are well suited for implementing queues and breadth first
|
||
tree searches:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from collections import deque
|
||
>>> d = deque(["task1", "task2", "task3"])
|
||
>>> d.append("task4")
|
||
>>> print "Handling", d.popleft()
|
||
Handling task1
|
||
|
||
unsearched = deque([starting_node])
|
||
def breadth_first_search(unsearched):
|
||
node = unsearched.popleft()
|
||
for m in gen_moves(node):
|
||
if is_goal(m):
|
||
return m
|
||
unsearched.append(m)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
In addition to alternative list implementations, the library also offers
|
||
other tools such as the \ulink{\module{bisect}}{../lib/module-bisect.html}
|
||
module with functions for manipulating sorted lists:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> import bisect
|
||
>>> scores = [(100, 'perl'), (200, 'tcl'), (400, 'lua'), (500, 'python')]
|
||
>>> bisect.insort(scores, (300, 'ruby'))
|
||
>>> scores
|
||
[(100, 'perl'), (200, 'tcl'), (300, 'ruby'), (400, 'lua'), (500, 'python')]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{heapq}}{../lib/module-heapq.html} module provides
|
||
functions for implementing heaps based on regular lists. The lowest
|
||
valued entry is always kept at position zero. This is useful for
|
||
applications which repeatedly access the smallest element but do not
|
||
want to run a full list sort:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from heapq import heapify, heappop, heappush
|
||
>>> data = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 4, 6, 8, 0]
|
||
>>> heapify(data) # rearrange the list into heap order
|
||
>>> heappush(data, -5) # add a new entry
|
||
>>> [heappop(data) for i in range(3)] # fetch the three smallest entries
|
||
[-5, 0, 1]
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Decimal Floating Point Arithmetic\label{decimal-fp}}
|
||
|
||
The \ulink{\module{decimal}}{../lib/module-decimal.html} module offers a
|
||
\class{Decimal} datatype for decimal floating point arithmetic. Compared to
|
||
the built-in \class{float} implementation of binary floating point, the new
|
||
class is especially helpful for financial applications and other uses which
|
||
require exact decimal representation, control over precision, control over
|
||
rounding to meet legal or regulatory requirements, tracking of significant
|
||
decimal places, or for applications where the user expects the results to
|
||
match calculations done by hand.
|
||
|
||
For example, calculating a 5\%{} tax on a 70 cent phone charge gives
|
||
different results in decimal floating point and binary floating point.
|
||
The difference becomes significant if the results are rounded to the
|
||
nearest cent:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> from decimal import *
|
||
>>> Decimal('0.70') * Decimal('1.05')
|
||
Decimal("0.7350")
|
||
>>> .70 * 1.05
|
||
0.73499999999999999
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \class{Decimal} result keeps a trailing zero, automatically inferring four
|
||
place significance from multiplicands with two place significance. Decimal reproduces
|
||
mathematics as done by hand and avoids issues that can arise when binary
|
||
floating point cannot exactly represent decimal quantities.
|
||
|
||
Exact representation enables the \class{Decimal} class to perform
|
||
modulo calculations and equality tests that are unsuitable for binary
|
||
floating point:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> Decimal('1.00') % Decimal('.10')
|
||
Decimal("0.00")
|
||
>>> 1.00 % 0.10
|
||
0.09999999999999995
|
||
|
||
>>> sum([Decimal('0.1')]*10) == Decimal('1.0')
|
||
True
|
||
>>> sum([0.1]*10) == 1.0
|
||
False
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The \module{decimal} module provides arithmetic with as much precision as
|
||
needed:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> getcontext().prec = 36
|
||
>>> Decimal(1) / Decimal(7)
|
||
Decimal("0.142857142857142857142857142857142857")
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{What Now? \label{whatNow}}
|
||
|
||
Reading this tutorial has probably reinforced your interest in using
|
||
Python --- you should be eager to apply Python to solving your
|
||
real-world problems. Where should you go to learn more?
|
||
|
||
This tutorial is part of Python's documentation set.
|
||
Some other documents in the set are:
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\item \citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}:
|
||
|
||
You should browse through this manual, which gives complete (though
|
||
terse) reference material about types, functions, and the modules in
|
||
the standard library. The standard Python distribution includes a
|
||
\emph{lot} of additional code. There are modules to read \UNIX{}
|
||
mailboxes, retrieve documents via HTTP, generate random numbers, parse
|
||
command-line options, write CGI programs, compress data, and many other tasks.
|
||
Skimming through the Library Reference will give you an idea of
|
||
what's available.
|
||
|
||
\item \citetitle[../inst/inst.html]{Installing Python Modules}
|
||
explains how to install external modules written by other Python
|
||
users.
|
||
|
||
\item \citetitle[../ref/ref.html]{Language Reference}: A detailed
|
||
explanation of Python's syntax and semantics. It's heavy reading,
|
||
but is useful as a complete guide to the language itself.
|
||
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
More Python resources:
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\item \url{http://www.python.org}: The major Python Web site. It contains
|
||
code, documentation, and pointers to Python-related pages around the
|
||
Web. This Web site is mirrored in various places around the
|
||
world, such as Europe, Japan, and Australia; a mirror may be faster
|
||
than the main site, depending on your geographical location.
|
||
|
||
\item \url{http://docs.python.org}: Fast access to Python's
|
||
documentation.
|
||
|
||
\item \url{http://cheeseshop.python.org}:
|
||
The Python Package Index, nicknamed the Cheese Shop,
|
||
is an index of user-created Python modules that are available for
|
||
download. Once you begin releasing code, you can register it
|
||
here so that others can find it.
|
||
|
||
\item \url{http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Python/Cookbook/}: The
|
||
Python Cookbook is a sizable collection of code examples, larger
|
||
modules, and useful scripts. Particularly notable contributions are
|
||
collected in a book also titled \citetitle{Python Cookbook} (O'Reilly
|
||
\& Associates, ISBN 0-596-00797-3.)
|
||
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
|
||
For Python-related questions and problem reports, you can post to the
|
||
newsgroup \newsgroup{comp.lang.python}, or send them to the mailing
|
||
list at \email{python-list@python.org}. The newsgroup and mailing list
|
||
are gatewayed, so messages posted to one will automatically be
|
||
forwarded to the other. There are around 120 postings a day (with peaks
|
||
up to several hundred),
|
||
% Postings figure based on average of last six months activity as
|
||
% reported by www.egroups.com; Jan. 2000 - June 2000: 21272 msgs / 182
|
||
% days = 116.9 msgs / day and steadily increasing.
|
||
asking (and answering) questions, suggesting new features, and
|
||
announcing new modules. Before posting, be sure to check the list of
|
||
\ulink{Frequently Asked Questions}{http://www.python.org/doc/faq/} (also called the FAQ), or look for it in the
|
||
\file{Misc/} directory of the Python source distribution. Mailing
|
||
list archives are available at \url{http://mail.python.org/pipermail/}.
|
||
The FAQ answers many of the questions that come up again and again,
|
||
and may already contain the solution for your problem.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\appendix
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Interactive Input Editing and History Substitution\label{interacting}}
|
||
|
||
Some versions of the Python interpreter support editing of the current
|
||
input line and history substitution, similar to facilities found in
|
||
the Korn shell and the GNU Bash shell. This is implemented using the
|
||
\emph{GNU Readline} library, which supports Emacs-style and vi-style
|
||
editing. This library has its own documentation which I won't
|
||
duplicate here; however, the basics are easily explained. The
|
||
interactive editing and history described here are optionally
|
||
available in the \UNIX{} and Cygwin versions of the interpreter.
|
||
|
||
This chapter does \emph{not} document the editing facilities of Mark
|
||
Hammond's PythonWin package or the Tk-based environment, IDLE,
|
||
distributed with Python. The command line history recall which
|
||
operates within DOS boxes on NT and some other DOS and Windows flavors
|
||
is yet another beast.
|
||
|
||
\section{Line Editing \label{lineEditing}}
|
||
|
||
If supported, input line editing is active whenever the interpreter
|
||
prints a primary or secondary prompt. The current line can be edited
|
||
using the conventional Emacs control characters. The most important
|
||
of these are: \kbd{C-A} (Control-A) moves the cursor to the beginning
|
||
of the line, \kbd{C-E} to the end, \kbd{C-B} moves it one position to
|
||
the left, \kbd{C-F} to the right. Backspace erases the character to
|
||
the left of the cursor, \kbd{C-D} the character to its right.
|
||
\kbd{C-K} kills (erases) the rest of the line to the right of the
|
||
cursor, \kbd{C-Y} yanks back the last killed string.
|
||
\kbd{C-underscore} undoes the last change you made; it can be repeated
|
||
for cumulative effect.
|
||
|
||
\section{History Substitution \label{history}}
|
||
|
||
History substitution works as follows. All non-empty input lines
|
||
issued are saved in a history buffer, and when a new prompt is given
|
||
you are positioned on a new line at the bottom of this buffer.
|
||
\kbd{C-P} moves one line up (back) in the history buffer,
|
||
\kbd{C-N} moves one down. Any line in the history buffer can be
|
||
edited; an asterisk appears in front of the prompt to mark a line as
|
||
modified. Pressing the \kbd{Return} key passes the current line to
|
||
the interpreter. \kbd{C-R} starts an incremental reverse search;
|
||
\kbd{C-S} starts a forward search.
|
||
|
||
\section{Key Bindings \label{keyBindings}}
|
||
|
||
The key bindings and some other parameters of the Readline library can
|
||
be customized by placing commands in an initialization file called
|
||
\file{\~{}/.inputrc}. Key bindings have the form
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
key-name: function-name
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
or
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
"string": function-name
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
and options can be set with
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
set option-name value
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
# I prefer vi-style editing:
|
||
set editing-mode vi
|
||
|
||
# Edit using a single line:
|
||
set horizontal-scroll-mode On
|
||
|
||
# Rebind some keys:
|
||
Meta-h: backward-kill-word
|
||
"\C-u": universal-argument
|
||
"\C-x\C-r": re-read-init-file
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that the default binding for \kbd{Tab} in Python is to insert a
|
||
\kbd{Tab} character instead of Readline's default filename completion
|
||
function. If you insist, you can override this by putting
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
Tab: complete
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
in your \file{\~{}/.inputrc}. (Of course, this makes it harder to
|
||
type indented continuation lines if you're accustomed to using
|
||
\kbd{Tab} for that purpose.)
|
||
|
||
Automatic completion of variable and module names is optionally
|
||
available. To enable it in the interpreter's interactive mode, add
|
||
the following to your startup file:\footnote{
|
||
Python will execute the contents of a file identified by the
|
||
\envvar{PYTHONSTARTUP} environment variable when you start an
|
||
interactive interpreter.}
|
||
\refstmodindex{rlcompleter}\refbimodindex{readline}
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
import rlcompleter, readline
|
||
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
This binds the \kbd{Tab} key to the completion function, so hitting
|
||
the \kbd{Tab} key twice suggests completions; it looks at Python
|
||
statement names, the current local variables, and the available module
|
||
names. For dotted expressions such as \code{string.a}, it will
|
||
evaluate the expression up to the final \character{.} and then
|
||
suggest completions from the attributes of the resulting object. Note
|
||
that this may execute application-defined code if an object with a
|
||
\method{__getattr__()} method is part of the expression.
|
||
|
||
A more capable startup file might look like this example. Note that
|
||
this deletes the names it creates once they are no longer needed; this
|
||
is done since the startup file is executed in the same namespace as
|
||
the interactive commands, and removing the names avoids creating side
|
||
effects in the interactive environment. You may find it convenient
|
||
to keep some of the imported modules, such as
|
||
\ulink{\module{os}}{../lib/module-os.html}, which turn
|
||
out to be needed in most sessions with the interpreter.
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
# Add auto-completion and a stored history file of commands to your Python
|
||
# interactive interpreter. Requires Python 2.0+, readline. Autocomplete is
|
||
# bound to the Esc key by default (you can change it - see readline docs).
|
||
#
|
||
# Store the file in ~/.pystartup, and set an environment variable to point
|
||
# to it: "export PYTHONSTARTUP=/max/home/itamar/.pystartup" in bash.
|
||
#
|
||
# Note that PYTHONSTARTUP does *not* expand "~", so you have to put in the
|
||
# full path to your home directory.
|
||
|
||
import atexit
|
||
import os
|
||
import readline
|
||
import rlcompleter
|
||
|
||
historyPath = os.path.expanduser("~/.pyhistory")
|
||
|
||
def save_history(historyPath=historyPath):
|
||
import readline
|
||
readline.write_history_file(historyPath)
|
||
|
||
if os.path.exists(historyPath):
|
||
readline.read_history_file(historyPath)
|
||
|
||
atexit.register(save_history)
|
||
del os, atexit, readline, rlcompleter, save_history, historyPath
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Commentary \label{commentary}}
|
||
|
||
This facility is an enormous step forward compared to earlier versions
|
||
of the interpreter; however, some wishes are left: It would be nice if
|
||
the proper indentation were suggested on continuation lines (the
|
||
parser knows if an indent token is required next). The completion
|
||
mechanism might use the interpreter's symbol table. A command to
|
||
check (or even suggest) matching parentheses, quotes, etc., would also
|
||
be useful.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\chapter{Floating Point Arithmetic: Issues and Limitations\label{fp-issues}}
|
||
\sectionauthor{Tim Peters}{tim_one@users.sourceforge.net}
|
||
|
||
Floating-point numbers are represented in computer hardware as
|
||
base 2 (binary) fractions. For example, the decimal fraction
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.125
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
has value 1/10 + 2/100 + 5/1000, and in the same way the binary fraction
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.001
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
has value 0/2 + 0/4 + 1/8. These two fractions have identical values,
|
||
the only real difference being that the first is written in base 10
|
||
fractional notation, and the second in base 2.
|
||
|
||
Unfortunately, most decimal fractions cannot be represented exactly as
|
||
binary fractions. A consequence is that, in general, the decimal
|
||
floating-point numbers you enter are only approximated by the binary
|
||
floating-point numbers actually stored in the machine.
|
||
|
||
The problem is easier to understand at first in base 10. Consider the
|
||
fraction 1/3. You can approximate that as a base 10 fraction:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.3
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
or, better,
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.33
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
or, better,
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.333
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
and so on. No matter how many digits you're willing to write down, the
|
||
result will never be exactly 1/3, but will be an increasingly better
|
||
approximation of 1/3.
|
||
|
||
In the same way, no matter how many base 2 digits you're willing to
|
||
use, the decimal value 0.1 cannot be represented exactly as a base 2
|
||
fraction. In base 2, 1/10 is the infinitely repeating fraction
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.0001100110011001100110011001100110011001100110011...
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Stop at any finite number of bits, and you get an approximation. This
|
||
is why you see things like:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 0.1
|
||
0.10000000000000001
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
On most machines today, that is what you'll see if you enter 0.1 at
|
||
a Python prompt. You may not, though, because the number of bits
|
||
used by the hardware to store floating-point values can vary across
|
||
machines, and Python only prints a decimal approximation to the true
|
||
decimal value of the binary approximation stored by the machine. On
|
||
most machines, if Python were to print the true decimal value of
|
||
the binary approximation stored for 0.1, it would have to display
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 0.1
|
||
0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
instead! The Python prompt uses the builtin
|
||
\function{repr()} function to obtain a string version of everything it
|
||
displays. For floats, \code{repr(\var{float})} rounds the true
|
||
decimal value to 17 significant digits, giving
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
0.10000000000000001
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
\code{repr(\var{float})} produces 17 significant digits because it
|
||
turns out that's enough (on most machines) so that
|
||
\code{eval(repr(\var{x})) == \var{x}} exactly for all finite floats
|
||
\var{x}, but rounding to 16 digits is not enough to make that true.
|
||
|
||
Note that this is in the very nature of binary floating-point: this is
|
||
not a bug in Python, and it is not a bug in your code either. You'll
|
||
see the same kind of thing in all languages that support your
|
||
hardware's floating-point arithmetic (although some languages may
|
||
not \emph{display} the difference by default, or in all output modes).
|
||
|
||
Python's builtin \function{str()} function produces only 12
|
||
significant digits, and you may wish to use that instead. It's
|
||
unusual for \code{eval(str(\var{x}))} to reproduce \var{x}, but the
|
||
output may be more pleasant to look at:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> print str(0.1)
|
||
0.1
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
It's important to realize that this is, in a real sense, an illusion:
|
||
the value in the machine is not exactly 1/10, you're simply rounding
|
||
the \emph{display} of the true machine value.
|
||
|
||
Other surprises follow from this one. For example, after seeing
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 0.1
|
||
0.10000000000000001
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
you may be tempted to use the \function{round()} function to chop it
|
||
back to the single digit you expect. But that makes no difference:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> round(0.1, 1)
|
||
0.10000000000000001
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
The problem is that the binary floating-point value stored for "0.1"
|
||
was already the best possible binary approximation to 1/10, so trying
|
||
to round it again can't make it better: it was already as good as it
|
||
gets.
|
||
|
||
Another consequence is that since 0.1 is not exactly 1/10,
|
||
summing ten values of 0.1 may not yield exactly 1.0, either:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> sum = 0.0
|
||
>>> for i in range(10):
|
||
... sum += 0.1
|
||
...
|
||
>>> sum
|
||
0.99999999999999989
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Binary floating-point arithmetic holds many surprises like this. The
|
||
problem with "0.1" is explained in precise detail below, in the
|
||
"Representation Error" section. See
|
||
\citetitle[http://www.lahey.com/float.htm]{The Perils of Floating
|
||
Point} for a more complete account of other common surprises.
|
||
|
||
As that says near the end, ``there are no easy answers.'' Still,
|
||
don't be unduly wary of floating-point! The errors in Python float
|
||
operations are inherited from the floating-point hardware, and on most
|
||
machines are on the order of no more than 1 part in 2**53 per
|
||
operation. That's more than adequate for most tasks, but you do need
|
||
to keep in mind that it's not decimal arithmetic, and that every float
|
||
operation can suffer a new rounding error.
|
||
|
||
While pathological cases do exist, for most casual use of
|
||
floating-point arithmetic you'll see the result you expect in the end
|
||
if you simply round the display of your final results to the number of
|
||
decimal digits you expect. \function{str()} usually suffices, and for
|
||
finer control see the discussion of Python's \code{\%} format
|
||
operator: the \code{\%g}, \code{\%f} and \code{\%e} format codes
|
||
supply flexible and easy ways to round float results for display.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Representation Error
|
||
\label{fp-error}}
|
||
|
||
This section explains the ``0.1'' example in detail, and shows how
|
||
you can perform an exact analysis of cases like this yourself. Basic
|
||
familiarity with binary floating-point representation is assumed.
|
||
|
||
\dfn{Representation error} refers to the fact that some (most, actually)
|
||
decimal fractions cannot be represented exactly as binary (base 2)
|
||
fractions. This is the chief reason why Python (or Perl, C, \Cpp,
|
||
Java, Fortran, and many others) often won't display the exact decimal
|
||
number you expect:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 0.1
|
||
0.10000000000000001
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Why is that? 1/10 is not exactly representable as a binary fraction.
|
||
Almost all machines today (November 2000) use IEEE-754 floating point
|
||
arithmetic, and almost all platforms map Python floats to IEEE-754
|
||
"double precision". 754 doubles contain 53 bits of precision, so on
|
||
input the computer strives to convert 0.1 to the closest fraction it can
|
||
of the form \var{J}/2**\var{N} where \var{J} is an integer containing
|
||
exactly 53 bits. Rewriting
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
1 / 10 ~= J / (2**N)
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
as
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
J ~= 2**N / 10
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
and recalling that \var{J} has exactly 53 bits (is \code{>= 2**52} but
|
||
\code{< 2**53}), the best value for \var{N} is 56:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 2**52
|
||
4503599627370496L
|
||
>>> 2**53
|
||
9007199254740992L
|
||
>>> 2**56/10
|
||
7205759403792793L
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
That is, 56 is the only value for \var{N} that leaves \var{J} with
|
||
exactly 53 bits. The best possible value for \var{J} is then that
|
||
quotient rounded:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> q, r = divmod(2**56, 10)
|
||
>>> r
|
||
6L
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Since the remainder is more than half of 10, the best approximation is
|
||
obtained by rounding up:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> q+1
|
||
7205759403792794L
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Therefore the best possible approximation to 1/10 in 754 double
|
||
precision is that over 2**56, or
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
7205759403792794 / 72057594037927936
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
Note that since we rounded up, this is actually a little bit larger than
|
||
1/10; if we had not rounded up, the quotient would have been a little
|
||
bit smaller than 1/10. But in no case can it be \emph{exactly} 1/10!
|
||
|
||
So the computer never ``sees'' 1/10: what it sees is the exact
|
||
fraction given above, the best 754 double approximation it can get:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> .1 * 2**56
|
||
7205759403792794.0
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
If we multiply that fraction by 10**30, we can see the (truncated)
|
||
value of its 30 most significant decimal digits:
|
||
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
>>> 7205759403792794 * 10**30 / 2**56
|
||
100000000000000005551115123125L
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
|
||
meaning that the exact number stored in the computer is approximately
|
||
equal to the decimal value 0.100000000000000005551115123125. Rounding
|
||
that to 17 significant digits gives the 0.10000000000000001 that Python
|
||
displays (well, will display on any 754-conforming platform that does
|
||
best-possible input and output conversions in its C library --- yours may
|
||
not!).
|
||
|
||
\chapter{History and License}
|
||
\input{license}
|
||
|
||
\input{glossary}
|
||
|
||
\input{tut.ind}
|
||
|
||
\end{document}
|