cpython/Lib/test/test_setcomps.py
Guido van Rossum 805365ee39 Merged revisions 55007-55179 via svnmerge from
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/p3yk

........
  r55077 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-05-02 11:54:37 -0700 (Wed, 02 May 2007) | 2 lines

  Use the new print syntax, at least.
........
  r55142 | fred.drake | 2007-05-04 21:27:30 -0700 (Fri, 04 May 2007) | 1 line

  remove old cruftiness
........
  r55143 | fred.drake | 2007-05-04 21:52:16 -0700 (Fri, 04 May 2007) | 1 line

  make this work with the new Python
........
  r55162 | neal.norwitz | 2007-05-06 22:29:18 -0700 (Sun, 06 May 2007) | 1 line

  Get asdl code gen working with Python 2.3.  Should continue to work with 3.0
........
  r55164 | neal.norwitz | 2007-05-07 00:00:38 -0700 (Mon, 07 May 2007) | 1 line

  Verify checkins to p3yk (sic) branch go to 3000 list.
........
  r55166 | neal.norwitz | 2007-05-07 00:12:35 -0700 (Mon, 07 May 2007) | 1 line

  Fix this test so it runs again by importing warnings_test properly.
........
  r55167 | neal.norwitz | 2007-05-07 01:03:22 -0700 (Mon, 07 May 2007) | 8 lines

  So long xrange.  range() now supports values that are outside
  -sys.maxint to sys.maxint.  floats raise a TypeError.

  This has been sitting for a long time.  It probably has some problems and
  needs cleanup.  Objects/rangeobject.c now uses 4-space indents since
  it is almost completely new.
........
  r55171 | guido.van.rossum | 2007-05-07 10:21:26 -0700 (Mon, 07 May 2007) | 4 lines

  Fix two tests that were previously depending on significant spaces
  at the end of a line (and before that on Python 2.x print behavior
  that has no exact equivalent in 3.0).
........
2007-05-07 22:24:25 +00:00

454 lines
11 KiB
Python

doctests = """
########### Tests mostly copied from test_listcomps.py ############
Test simple loop with conditional
>>> sum({i*i for i in range(100) if i&1 == 1})
166650
Test simple case
>>> {2*y + x + 1 for x in (0,) for y in (1,)}
{3}
Test simple nesting
>>> list(sorted({(i,j) for i in range(3) for j in range(4)}))
[(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3)]
Test nesting with the inner expression dependent on the outer
>>> list(sorted({(i,j) for i in range(4) for j in range(i)}))
[(1, 0), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 2)]
Make sure the induction variable is not exposed
>>> i = 20
>>> sum({i*i for i in range(100)})
328350
>>> i
20
Verify that syntax error's are raised for setcomps used as lvalues
>>> {y for y in (1,2)} = 10 # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
SyntaxError: ...
>>> {y for y in (1,2)} += 10 # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
SyntaxError: ...
Make a nested set comprehension that acts like set(range())
>>> def srange(n):
... return {i for i in range(n)}
>>> list(sorted(srange(10)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Same again, only as a lambda expression instead of a function definition
>>> lrange = lambda n: {i for i in range(n)}
>>> list(sorted(lrange(10)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Generators can call other generators:
>>> def grange(n):
... for x in {i for i in range(n)}:
... yield x
>>> list(sorted(grange(5)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Make sure that None is a valid return value
>>> {None for i in range(10)}
{None}
########### Tests for various scoping corner cases ############
Return lambdas that use the iteration variable as a default argument
>>> items = {(lambda i=i: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> {x() for x in items} == set(range(5))
True
Same again, only this time as a closure variable
>>> items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> {x() for x in items}
{4}
Another way to test that the iteration variable is local to the list comp
>>> items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> i = 20
>>> {x() for x in items}
{4}
And confirm that a closure can jump over the list comp scope
>>> items = {(lambda: y) for i in range(5)}
>>> y = 2
>>> {x() for x in items}
{2}
We also repeat each of the above scoping tests inside a function
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda i=i: i) for i in range(5)}
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func() == set(range(5))
True
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{4}
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
... i = 20
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{4}
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: y) for i in range(5)}
... y = 2
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{2}
"""
__test__ = {'doctests' : doctests}
def test_main(verbose=None):
import sys
from test import test_support
from test import test_listcomps
test_support.run_doctest(test_listcomps, verbose)
# verify reference counting
if verbose and hasattr(sys, "gettotalrefcount"):
import gc
counts = [None] * 5
for i in range(len(counts)):
test_support.run_doctest(test_genexps, verbose)
gc.collect()
counts[i] = sys.gettotalrefcount()
print(counts)
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_main(verbose=True)
doctests = """
########### Tests mostly copied from test_listcomps.py ############
Test simple loop with conditional
>>> sum({i*i for i in range(100) if i&1 == 1})
166650
Test simple case
>>> {2*y + x + 1 for x in (0,) for y in (1,)}
{3}
Test simple nesting
>>> list(sorted({(i,j) for i in range(3) for j in range(4)}))
[(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3)]
Test nesting with the inner expression dependent on the outer
>>> list(sorted({(i,j) for i in range(4) for j in range(i)}))
[(1, 0), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 2)]
Make sure the induction variable is not exposed
>>> i = 20
>>> sum({i*i for i in range(100)})
328350
>>> i
20
Verify that syntax error's are raised for setcomps used as lvalues
>>> {y for y in (1,2)} = 10 # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
SyntaxError: ...
>>> {y for y in (1,2)} += 10 # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
SyntaxError: ...
Make a nested set comprehension that acts like set(range())
>>> def srange(n):
... return {i for i in range(n)}
>>> list(sorted(srange(10)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Same again, only as a lambda expression instead of a function definition
>>> lrange = lambda n: {i for i in range(n)}
>>> list(sorted(lrange(10)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Generators can call other generators:
>>> def grange(n):
... for x in {i for i in range(n)}:
... yield x
>>> list(sorted(grange(5)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Make sure that None is a valid return value
>>> {None for i in range(10)}
{None}
########### Tests for various scoping corner cases ############
Return lambdas that use the iteration variable as a default argument
>>> items = {(lambda i=i: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> {x() for x in items} == set(range(5))
True
Same again, only this time as a closure variable
>>> items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> {x() for x in items}
{4}
Another way to test that the iteration variable is local to the list comp
>>> items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> i = 20
>>> {x() for x in items}
{4}
And confirm that a closure can jump over the list comp scope
>>> items = {(lambda: y) for i in range(5)}
>>> y = 2
>>> {x() for x in items}
{2}
We also repeat each of the above scoping tests inside a function
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda i=i: i) for i in range(5)}
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func() == set(range(5))
True
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{4}
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
... i = 20
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{4}
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: y) for i in range(5)}
... y = 2
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{2}
"""
__test__ = {'doctests' : doctests}
def test_main(verbose=None):
import sys
from test import test_support
from test import test_listcomps
test_support.run_doctest(test_listcomps, verbose)
# verify reference counting
if verbose and hasattr(sys, "gettotalrefcount"):
import gc
counts = [None] * 5
for i in range(len(counts)):
test_support.run_doctest(test_genexps, verbose)
gc.collect()
counts[i] = sys.gettotalrefcount()
print(counts)
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_main(verbose=True)
doctests = """
########### Tests mostly copied from test_listcomps.py ############
Test simple loop with conditional
>>> sum({i*i for i in range(100) if i&1 == 1})
166650
Test simple case
>>> {2*y + x + 1 for x in (0,) for y in (1,)}
{3}
Test simple nesting
>>> list(sorted({(i,j) for i in range(3) for j in range(4)}))
[(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3)]
Test nesting with the inner expression dependent on the outer
>>> list(sorted({(i,j) for i in range(4) for j in range(i)}))
[(1, 0), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 2)]
Make sure the induction variable is not exposed
>>> i = 20
>>> sum({i*i for i in range(100)})
328350
>>> i
20
Verify that syntax error's are raised for setcomps used as lvalues
>>> {y for y in (1,2)} = 10 # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
SyntaxError: ...
>>> {y for y in (1,2)} += 10 # doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
SyntaxError: ...
Make a nested set comprehension that acts like set(range())
>>> def srange(n):
... return {i for i in range(n)}
>>> list(sorted(srange(10)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Same again, only as a lambda expression instead of a function definition
>>> lrange = lambda n: {i for i in range(n)}
>>> list(sorted(lrange(10)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Generators can call other generators:
>>> def grange(n):
... for x in {i for i in range(n)}:
... yield x
>>> list(sorted(grange(5)))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Make sure that None is a valid return value
>>> {None for i in range(10)}
{None}
########### Tests for various scoping corner cases ############
Return lambdas that use the iteration variable as a default argument
>>> items = {(lambda i=i: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> {x() for x in items} == set(range(5))
True
Same again, only this time as a closure variable
>>> items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> {x() for x in items}
{4}
Another way to test that the iteration variable is local to the list comp
>>> items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
>>> i = 20
>>> {x() for x in items}
{4}
And confirm that a closure can jump over the list comp scope
>>> items = {(lambda: y) for i in range(5)}
>>> y = 2
>>> {x() for x in items}
{2}
We also repeat each of the above scoping tests inside a function
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda i=i: i) for i in range(5)}
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func() == set(range(5))
True
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{4}
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: i) for i in range(5)}
... i = 20
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{4}
>>> def test_func():
... items = {(lambda: y) for i in range(5)}
... y = 2
... return {x() for x in items}
>>> test_func()
{2}
"""
__test__ = {'doctests' : doctests}
def test_main(verbose=None):
import sys
from test import test_support
from test import test_listcomps
test_support.run_doctest(test_listcomps, verbose)
# verify reference counting
if verbose and hasattr(sys, "gettotalrefcount"):
import gc
counts = [None] * 5
for i in range(len(counts)):
test_support.run_doctest(test_genexps, verbose)
gc.collect()
counts[i] = sys.gettotalrefcount()
print(counts)
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_main(verbose=True)