mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2024-11-27 20:04:41 +08:00
645 lines
28 KiB
ReStructuredText
645 lines
28 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. highlightlang:: c
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-intro:
|
|
|
|
************
|
|
Introduction
|
|
************
|
|
|
|
The Application Programmer's Interface to Python gives C and C++ programmers
|
|
access to the Python interpreter at a variety of levels. The API is equally
|
|
usable from C++, but for brevity it is generally referred to as the Python/C
|
|
API. There are two fundamentally different reasons for using the Python/C API.
|
|
The first reason is to write *extension modules* for specific purposes; these
|
|
are C modules that extend the Python interpreter. This is probably the most
|
|
common use. The second reason is to use Python as a component in a larger
|
|
application; this technique is generally referred to as :dfn:`embedding` Python
|
|
in an application.
|
|
|
|
Writing an extension module is a relatively well-understood process, where a
|
|
"cookbook" approach works well. There are several tools that automate the
|
|
process to some extent. While people have embedded Python in other
|
|
applications since its early existence, the process of embedding Python is less
|
|
straightforward than writing an extension.
|
|
|
|
Many API functions are useful independent of whether you're embedding or
|
|
extending Python; moreover, most applications that embed Python will need to
|
|
provide a custom extension as well, so it's probably a good idea to become
|
|
familiar with writing an extension before attempting to embed Python in a real
|
|
application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-includes:
|
|
|
|
Include Files
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
All function, type and macro definitions needed to use the Python/C API are
|
|
included in your code by the following line::
|
|
|
|
#include "Python.h"
|
|
|
|
This implies inclusion of the following standard headers: ``<stdio.h>``,
|
|
``<string.h>``, ``<errno.h>``, ``<limits.h>``, ``<assert.h>`` and ``<stdlib.h>``
|
|
(if available).
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Since Python may define some pre-processor definitions which affect the standard
|
|
headers on some systems, you *must* include :file:`Python.h` before any standard
|
|
headers are included.
|
|
|
|
All user visible names defined by Python.h (except those defined by the included
|
|
standard headers) have one of the prefixes ``Py`` or ``_Py``. Names beginning
|
|
with ``_Py`` are for internal use by the Python implementation and should not be
|
|
used by extension writers. Structure member names do not have a reserved prefix.
|
|
|
|
**Important:** user code should never define names that begin with ``Py`` or
|
|
``_Py``. This confuses the reader, and jeopardizes the portability of the user
|
|
code to future Python versions, which may define additional names beginning with
|
|
one of these prefixes.
|
|
|
|
The header files are typically installed with Python. On Unix, these are
|
|
located in the directories :file:`{prefix}/include/pythonversion/` and
|
|
:file:`{exec_prefix}/include/pythonversion/`, where :envvar:`prefix` and
|
|
:envvar:`exec_prefix` are defined by the corresponding parameters to Python's
|
|
:program:`configure` script and *version* is ``sys.version[:3]``. On Windows,
|
|
the headers are installed in :file:`{prefix}/include`, where :envvar:`prefix` is
|
|
the installation directory specified to the installer.
|
|
|
|
To include the headers, place both directories (if different) on your compiler's
|
|
search path for includes. Do *not* place the parent directories on the search
|
|
path and then use ``#include <pythonX.Y/Python.h>``; this will break on
|
|
multi-platform builds since the platform independent headers under
|
|
:envvar:`prefix` include the platform specific headers from
|
|
:envvar:`exec_prefix`.
|
|
|
|
C++ users should note that though the API is defined entirely using C, the
|
|
header files do properly declare the entry points to be ``extern "C"``, so there
|
|
is no need to do anything special to use the API from C++.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-objects:
|
|
|
|
Objects, Types and Reference Counts
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
.. index:: object: type
|
|
|
|
Most Python/C API functions have one or more arguments as well as a return value
|
|
of type :c:type:`PyObject\*`. This type is a pointer to an opaque data type
|
|
representing an arbitrary Python object. Since all Python object types are
|
|
treated the same way by the Python language in most situations (e.g.,
|
|
assignments, scope rules, and argument passing), it is only fitting that they
|
|
should be represented by a single C type. Almost all Python objects live on the
|
|
heap: you never declare an automatic or static variable of type
|
|
:c:type:`PyObject`, only pointer variables of type :c:type:`PyObject\*` can be
|
|
declared. The sole exception are the type objects; since these must never be
|
|
deallocated, they are typically static :c:type:`PyTypeObject` objects.
|
|
|
|
All Python objects (even Python integers) have a :dfn:`type` and a
|
|
:dfn:`reference count`. An object's type determines what kind of object it is
|
|
(e.g., an integer, a list, or a user-defined function; there are many more as
|
|
explained in :ref:`types`). For each of the well-known types there is a macro
|
|
to check whether an object is of that type; for instance, ``PyList_Check(a)`` is
|
|
true if (and only if) the object pointed to by *a* is a Python list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-refcounts:
|
|
|
|
Reference Counts
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
The reference count is important because today's computers have a finite (and
|
|
often severely limited) memory size; it counts how many different places there
|
|
are that have a reference to an object. Such a place could be another object,
|
|
or a global (or static) C variable, or a local variable in some C function.
|
|
When an object's reference count becomes zero, the object is deallocated. If
|
|
it contains references to other objects, their reference count is decremented.
|
|
Those other objects may be deallocated in turn, if this decrement makes their
|
|
reference count become zero, and so on. (There's an obvious problem with
|
|
objects that reference each other here; for now, the solution is "don't do
|
|
that.")
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: Py_INCREF()
|
|
single: Py_DECREF()
|
|
|
|
Reference counts are always manipulated explicitly. The normal way is to use
|
|
the macro :c:func:`Py_INCREF` to increment an object's reference count by one,
|
|
and :c:func:`Py_DECREF` to decrement it by one. The :c:func:`Py_DECREF` macro
|
|
is considerably more complex than the incref one, since it must check whether
|
|
the reference count becomes zero and then cause the object's deallocator to be
|
|
called. The deallocator is a function pointer contained in the object's type
|
|
structure. The type-specific deallocator takes care of decrementing the
|
|
reference counts for other objects contained in the object if this is a compound
|
|
object type, such as a list, as well as performing any additional finalization
|
|
that's needed. There's no chance that the reference count can overflow; at
|
|
least as many bits are used to hold the reference count as there are distinct
|
|
memory locations in virtual memory (assuming ``sizeof(Py_ssize_t) >= sizeof(void*)``).
|
|
Thus, the reference count increment is a simple operation.
|
|
|
|
It is not necessary to increment an object's reference count for every local
|
|
variable that contains a pointer to an object. In theory, the object's
|
|
reference count goes up by one when the variable is made to point to it and it
|
|
goes down by one when the variable goes out of scope. However, these two
|
|
cancel each other out, so at the end the reference count hasn't changed. The
|
|
only real reason to use the reference count is to prevent the object from being
|
|
deallocated as long as our variable is pointing to it. If we know that there
|
|
is at least one other reference to the object that lives at least as long as
|
|
our variable, there is no need to increment the reference count temporarily.
|
|
An important situation where this arises is in objects that are passed as
|
|
arguments to C functions in an extension module that are called from Python;
|
|
the call mechanism guarantees to hold a reference to every argument for the
|
|
duration of the call.
|
|
|
|
However, a common pitfall is to extract an object from a list and hold on to it
|
|
for a while without incrementing its reference count. Some other operation might
|
|
conceivably remove the object from the list, decrementing its reference count
|
|
and possible deallocating it. The real danger is that innocent-looking
|
|
operations may invoke arbitrary Python code which could do this; there is a code
|
|
path which allows control to flow back to the user from a :c:func:`Py_DECREF`, so
|
|
almost any operation is potentially dangerous.
|
|
|
|
A safe approach is to always use the generic operations (functions whose name
|
|
begins with ``PyObject_``, ``PyNumber_``, ``PySequence_`` or ``PyMapping_``).
|
|
These operations always increment the reference count of the object they return.
|
|
This leaves the caller with the responsibility to call :c:func:`Py_DECREF` when
|
|
they are done with the result; this soon becomes second nature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-refcountdetails:
|
|
|
|
Reference Count Details
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
The reference count behavior of functions in the Python/C API is best explained
|
|
in terms of *ownership of references*. Ownership pertains to references, never
|
|
to objects (objects are not owned: they are always shared). "Owning a
|
|
reference" means being responsible for calling Py_DECREF on it when the
|
|
reference is no longer needed. Ownership can also be transferred, meaning that
|
|
the code that receives ownership of the reference then becomes responsible for
|
|
eventually decref'ing it by calling :c:func:`Py_DECREF` or :c:func:`Py_XDECREF`
|
|
when it's no longer needed---or passing on this responsibility (usually to its
|
|
caller). When a function passes ownership of a reference on to its caller, the
|
|
caller is said to receive a *new* reference. When no ownership is transferred,
|
|
the caller is said to *borrow* the reference. Nothing needs to be done for a
|
|
borrowed reference.
|
|
|
|
Conversely, when a calling function passes in a reference to an object, there
|
|
are two possibilities: the function *steals* a reference to the object, or it
|
|
does not. *Stealing a reference* means that when you pass a reference to a
|
|
function, that function assumes that it now owns that reference, and you are not
|
|
responsible for it any longer.
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: PyList_SetItem()
|
|
single: PyTuple_SetItem()
|
|
|
|
Few functions steal references; the two notable exceptions are
|
|
:c:func:`PyList_SetItem` and :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem`, which steal a reference
|
|
to the item (but not to the tuple or list into which the item is put!). These
|
|
functions were designed to steal a reference because of a common idiom for
|
|
populating a tuple or list with newly created objects; for example, the code to
|
|
create the tuple ``(1, 2, "three")`` could look like this (forgetting about
|
|
error handling for the moment; a better way to code this is shown below)::
|
|
|
|
PyObject *t;
|
|
|
|
t = PyTuple_New(3);
|
|
PyTuple_SetItem(t, 0, PyLong_FromLong(1L));
|
|
PyTuple_SetItem(t, 1, PyLong_FromLong(2L));
|
|
PyTuple_SetItem(t, 2, PyUnicode_FromString("three"));
|
|
|
|
Here, :c:func:`PyLong_FromLong` returns a new reference which is immediately
|
|
stolen by :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem`. When you want to keep using an object
|
|
although the reference to it will be stolen, use :c:func:`Py_INCREF` to grab
|
|
another reference before calling the reference-stealing function.
|
|
|
|
Incidentally, :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem` is the *only* way to set tuple items;
|
|
:c:func:`PySequence_SetItem` and :c:func:`PyObject_SetItem` refuse to do this
|
|
since tuples are an immutable data type. You should only use
|
|
:c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem` for tuples that you are creating yourself.
|
|
|
|
Equivalent code for populating a list can be written using :c:func:`PyList_New`
|
|
and :c:func:`PyList_SetItem`.
|
|
|
|
However, in practice, you will rarely use these ways of creating and populating
|
|
a tuple or list. There's a generic function, :c:func:`Py_BuildValue`, that can
|
|
create most common objects from C values, directed by a :dfn:`format string`.
|
|
For example, the above two blocks of code could be replaced by the following
|
|
(which also takes care of the error checking)::
|
|
|
|
PyObject *tuple, *list;
|
|
|
|
tuple = Py_BuildValue("(iis)", 1, 2, "three");
|
|
list = Py_BuildValue("[iis]", 1, 2, "three");
|
|
|
|
It is much more common to use :c:func:`PyObject_SetItem` and friends with items
|
|
whose references you are only borrowing, like arguments that were passed in to
|
|
the function you are writing. In that case, their behaviour regarding reference
|
|
counts is much saner, since you don't have to increment a reference count so you
|
|
can give a reference away ("have it be stolen"). For example, this function
|
|
sets all items of a list (actually, any mutable sequence) to a given item::
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
set_all(PyObject *target, PyObject *item)
|
|
{
|
|
Py_ssize_t i, n;
|
|
|
|
n = PyObject_Length(target);
|
|
if (n < 0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
PyObject *index = PyLong_FromSsize_t(i);
|
|
if (!index)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
if (PyObject_SetItem(target, index, item) < 0) {
|
|
Py_DECREF(index);
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
Py_DECREF(index);
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: set_all()
|
|
|
|
The situation is slightly different for function return values. While passing
|
|
a reference to most functions does not change your ownership responsibilities
|
|
for that reference, many functions that return a reference to an object give
|
|
you ownership of the reference. The reason is simple: in many cases, the
|
|
returned object is created on the fly, and the reference you get is the only
|
|
reference to the object. Therefore, the generic functions that return object
|
|
references, like :c:func:`PyObject_GetItem` and :c:func:`PySequence_GetItem`,
|
|
always return a new reference (the caller becomes the owner of the reference).
|
|
|
|
It is important to realize that whether you own a reference returned by a
|
|
function depends on which function you call only --- *the plumage* (the type of
|
|
the object passed as an argument to the function) *doesn't enter into it!*
|
|
Thus, if you extract an item from a list using :c:func:`PyList_GetItem`, you
|
|
don't own the reference --- but if you obtain the same item from the same list
|
|
using :c:func:`PySequence_GetItem` (which happens to take exactly the same
|
|
arguments), you do own a reference to the returned object.
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: PyList_GetItem()
|
|
single: PySequence_GetItem()
|
|
|
|
Here is an example of how you could write a function that computes the sum of
|
|
the items in a list of integers; once using :c:func:`PyList_GetItem`, and once
|
|
using :c:func:`PySequence_GetItem`. ::
|
|
|
|
long
|
|
sum_list(PyObject *list)
|
|
{
|
|
Py_ssize_t i, n;
|
|
long total = 0, value;
|
|
PyObject *item;
|
|
|
|
n = PyList_Size(list);
|
|
if (n < 0)
|
|
return -1; /* Not a list */
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
item = PyList_GetItem(list, i); /* Can't fail */
|
|
if (!PyLong_Check(item)) continue; /* Skip non-integers */
|
|
value = PyLong_AsLong(item);
|
|
if (value == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
|
|
/* Integer too big to fit in a C long, bail out */
|
|
return -1;
|
|
total += value;
|
|
}
|
|
return total;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: sum_list()
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
long
|
|
sum_sequence(PyObject *sequence)
|
|
{
|
|
Py_ssize_t i, n;
|
|
long total = 0, value;
|
|
PyObject *item;
|
|
n = PySequence_Length(sequence);
|
|
if (n < 0)
|
|
return -1; /* Has no length */
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
item = PySequence_GetItem(sequence, i);
|
|
if (item == NULL)
|
|
return -1; /* Not a sequence, or other failure */
|
|
if (PyLong_Check(item)) {
|
|
value = PyLong_AsLong(item);
|
|
Py_DECREF(item);
|
|
if (value == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
|
|
/* Integer too big to fit in a C long, bail out */
|
|
return -1;
|
|
total += value;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
Py_DECREF(item); /* Discard reference ownership */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return total;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: sum_sequence()
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-types:
|
|
|
|
Types
|
|
-----
|
|
|
|
There are few other data types that play a significant role in the Python/C
|
|
API; most are simple C types such as :c:type:`int`, :c:type:`long`,
|
|
:c:type:`double` and :c:type:`char\*`. A few structure types are used to
|
|
describe static tables used to list the functions exported by a module or the
|
|
data attributes of a new object type, and another is used to describe the value
|
|
of a complex number. These will be discussed together with the functions that
|
|
use them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-exceptions:
|
|
|
|
Exceptions
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The Python programmer only needs to deal with exceptions if specific error
|
|
handling is required; unhandled exceptions are automatically propagated to the
|
|
caller, then to the caller's caller, and so on, until they reach the top-level
|
|
interpreter, where they are reported to the user accompanied by a stack
|
|
traceback.
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: PyErr_Occurred()
|
|
|
|
For C programmers, however, error checking always has to be explicit. All
|
|
functions in the Python/C API can raise exceptions, unless an explicit claim is
|
|
made otherwise in a function's documentation. In general, when a function
|
|
encounters an error, it sets an exception, discards any object references that
|
|
it owns, and returns an error indicator. If not documented otherwise, this
|
|
indicator is either *NULL* or ``-1``, depending on the function's return type.
|
|
A few functions return a Boolean true/false result, with false indicating an
|
|
error. Very few functions return no explicit error indicator or have an
|
|
ambiguous return value, and require explicit testing for errors with
|
|
:c:func:`PyErr_Occurred`. These exceptions are always explicitly documented.
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: PyErr_SetString()
|
|
single: PyErr_Clear()
|
|
|
|
Exception state is maintained in per-thread storage (this is equivalent to
|
|
using global storage in an unthreaded application). A thread can be in one of
|
|
two states: an exception has occurred, or not. The function
|
|
:c:func:`PyErr_Occurred` can be used to check for this: it returns a borrowed
|
|
reference to the exception type object when an exception has occurred, and
|
|
*NULL* otherwise. There are a number of functions to set the exception state:
|
|
:c:func:`PyErr_SetString` is the most common (though not the most general)
|
|
function to set the exception state, and :c:func:`PyErr_Clear` clears the
|
|
exception state.
|
|
|
|
The full exception state consists of three objects (all of which can be
|
|
*NULL*): the exception type, the corresponding exception value, and the
|
|
traceback. These have the same meanings as the Python result of
|
|
``sys.exc_info()``; however, they are not the same: the Python objects represent
|
|
the last exception being handled by a Python :keyword:`try` ...
|
|
:keyword:`except` statement, while the C level exception state only exists while
|
|
an exception is being passed on between C functions until it reaches the Python
|
|
bytecode interpreter's main loop, which takes care of transferring it to
|
|
``sys.exc_info()`` and friends.
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: exc_info() (in module sys)
|
|
|
|
Note that starting with Python 1.5, the preferred, thread-safe way to access the
|
|
exception state from Python code is to call the function :func:`sys.exc_info`,
|
|
which returns the per-thread exception state for Python code. Also, the
|
|
semantics of both ways to access the exception state have changed so that a
|
|
function which catches an exception will save and restore its thread's exception
|
|
state so as to preserve the exception state of its caller. This prevents common
|
|
bugs in exception handling code caused by an innocent-looking function
|
|
overwriting the exception being handled; it also reduces the often unwanted
|
|
lifetime extension for objects that are referenced by the stack frames in the
|
|
traceback.
|
|
|
|
As a general principle, a function that calls another function to perform some
|
|
task should check whether the called function raised an exception, and if so,
|
|
pass the exception state on to its caller. It should discard any object
|
|
references that it owns, and return an error indicator, but it should *not* set
|
|
another exception --- that would overwrite the exception that was just raised,
|
|
and lose important information about the exact cause of the error.
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: sum_sequence()
|
|
|
|
A simple example of detecting exceptions and passing them on is shown in the
|
|
:c:func:`sum_sequence` example above. It so happens that this example doesn't
|
|
need to clean up any owned references when it detects an error. The following
|
|
example function shows some error cleanup. First, to remind you why you like
|
|
Python, we show the equivalent Python code::
|
|
|
|
def incr_item(dict, key):
|
|
try:
|
|
item = dict[key]
|
|
except KeyError:
|
|
item = 0
|
|
dict[key] = item + 1
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: incr_item()
|
|
|
|
Here is the corresponding C code, in all its glory::
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
incr_item(PyObject *dict, PyObject *key)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Objects all initialized to NULL for Py_XDECREF */
|
|
PyObject *item = NULL, *const_one = NULL, *incremented_item = NULL;
|
|
int rv = -1; /* Return value initialized to -1 (failure) */
|
|
|
|
item = PyObject_GetItem(dict, key);
|
|
if (item == NULL) {
|
|
/* Handle KeyError only: */
|
|
if (!PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_KeyError))
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
/* Clear the error and use zero: */
|
|
PyErr_Clear();
|
|
item = PyLong_FromLong(0L);
|
|
if (item == NULL)
|
|
goto error;
|
|
}
|
|
const_one = PyLong_FromLong(1L);
|
|
if (const_one == NULL)
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
incremented_item = PyNumber_Add(item, const_one);
|
|
if (incremented_item == NULL)
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
if (PyObject_SetItem(dict, key, incremented_item) < 0)
|
|
goto error;
|
|
rv = 0; /* Success */
|
|
/* Continue with cleanup code */
|
|
|
|
error:
|
|
/* Cleanup code, shared by success and failure path */
|
|
|
|
/* Use Py_XDECREF() to ignore NULL references */
|
|
Py_XDECREF(item);
|
|
Py_XDECREF(const_one);
|
|
Py_XDECREF(incremented_item);
|
|
|
|
return rv; /* -1 for error, 0 for success */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: incr_item()
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: PyErr_ExceptionMatches()
|
|
single: PyErr_Clear()
|
|
single: Py_XDECREF()
|
|
|
|
This example represents an endorsed use of the ``goto`` statement in C!
|
|
It illustrates the use of :c:func:`PyErr_ExceptionMatches` and
|
|
:c:func:`PyErr_Clear` to handle specific exceptions, and the use of
|
|
:c:func:`Py_XDECREF` to dispose of owned references that may be *NULL* (note the
|
|
``'X'`` in the name; :c:func:`Py_DECREF` would crash when confronted with a
|
|
*NULL* reference). It is important that the variables used to hold owned
|
|
references are initialized to *NULL* for this to work; likewise, the proposed
|
|
return value is initialized to ``-1`` (failure) and only set to success after
|
|
the final call made is successful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-embedding:
|
|
|
|
Embedding Python
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
The one important task that only embedders (as opposed to extension writers) of
|
|
the Python interpreter have to worry about is the initialization, and possibly
|
|
the finalization, of the Python interpreter. Most functionality of the
|
|
interpreter can only be used after the interpreter has been initialized.
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: Py_Initialize()
|
|
module: builtins
|
|
module: __main__
|
|
module: sys
|
|
triple: module; search; path
|
|
single: path (in module sys)
|
|
|
|
The basic initialization function is :c:func:`Py_Initialize`. This initializes
|
|
the table of loaded modules, and creates the fundamental modules
|
|
:mod:`builtins`, :mod:`__main__`, and :mod:`sys`. It also
|
|
initializes the module search path (``sys.path``).
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: PySys_SetArgvEx()
|
|
|
|
:c:func:`Py_Initialize` does not set the "script argument list" (``sys.argv``).
|
|
If this variable is needed by Python code that will be executed later, it must
|
|
be set explicitly with a call to ``PySys_SetArgvEx(argc, argv, updatepath)``
|
|
after the call to :c:func:`Py_Initialize`.
|
|
|
|
On most systems (in particular, on Unix and Windows, although the details are
|
|
slightly different), :c:func:`Py_Initialize` calculates the module search path
|
|
based upon its best guess for the location of the standard Python interpreter
|
|
executable, assuming that the Python library is found in a fixed location
|
|
relative to the Python interpreter executable. In particular, it looks for a
|
|
directory named :file:`lib/python{X.Y}` relative to the parent directory
|
|
where the executable named :file:`python` is found on the shell command search
|
|
path (the environment variable :envvar:`PATH`).
|
|
|
|
For instance, if the Python executable is found in
|
|
:file:`/usr/local/bin/python`, it will assume that the libraries are in
|
|
:file:`/usr/local/lib/python{X.Y}`. (In fact, this particular path is also
|
|
the "fallback" location, used when no executable file named :file:`python` is
|
|
found along :envvar:`PATH`.) The user can override this behavior by setting the
|
|
environment variable :envvar:`PYTHONHOME`, or insert additional directories in
|
|
front of the standard path by setting :envvar:`PYTHONPATH`.
|
|
|
|
.. index::
|
|
single: Py_SetProgramName()
|
|
single: Py_GetPath()
|
|
single: Py_GetPrefix()
|
|
single: Py_GetExecPrefix()
|
|
single: Py_GetProgramFullPath()
|
|
|
|
The embedding application can steer the search by calling
|
|
``Py_SetProgramName(file)`` *before* calling :c:func:`Py_Initialize`. Note that
|
|
:envvar:`PYTHONHOME` still overrides this and :envvar:`PYTHONPATH` is still
|
|
inserted in front of the standard path. An application that requires total
|
|
control has to provide its own implementation of :c:func:`Py_GetPath`,
|
|
:c:func:`Py_GetPrefix`, :c:func:`Py_GetExecPrefix`, and
|
|
:c:func:`Py_GetProgramFullPath` (all defined in :file:`Modules/getpath.c`).
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: Py_IsInitialized()
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, it is desirable to "uninitialize" Python. For instance, the
|
|
application may want to start over (make another call to
|
|
:c:func:`Py_Initialize`) or the application is simply done with its use of
|
|
Python and wants to free memory allocated by Python. This can be accomplished
|
|
by calling :c:func:`Py_Finalize`. The function :c:func:`Py_IsInitialized` returns
|
|
true if Python is currently in the initialized state. More information about
|
|
these functions is given in a later chapter. Notice that :c:func:`Py_Finalize`
|
|
does *not* free all memory allocated by the Python interpreter, e.g. memory
|
|
allocated by extension modules currently cannot be released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _api-debugging:
|
|
|
|
Debugging Builds
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
Python can be built with several macros to enable extra checks of the
|
|
interpreter and extension modules. These checks tend to add a large amount of
|
|
overhead to the runtime so they are not enabled by default.
|
|
|
|
A full list of the various types of debugging builds is in the file
|
|
:file:`Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt` in the Python source distribution. Builds are
|
|
available that support tracing of reference counts, debugging the memory
|
|
allocator, or low-level profiling of the main interpreter loop. Only the most
|
|
frequently-used builds will be described in the remainder of this section.
|
|
|
|
Compiling the interpreter with the :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG` macro defined produces
|
|
what is generally meant by "a debug build" of Python. :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG` is
|
|
enabled in the Unix build by adding ``--with-pydebug`` to the
|
|
:file:`./configure` command. It is also implied by the presence of the
|
|
not-Python-specific :c:macro:`_DEBUG` macro. When :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG` is enabled
|
|
in the Unix build, compiler optimization is disabled.
|
|
|
|
In addition to the reference count debugging described below, the following
|
|
extra checks are performed:
|
|
|
|
* Extra checks are added to the object allocator.
|
|
|
|
* Extra checks are added to the parser and compiler.
|
|
|
|
* Downcasts from wide types to narrow types are checked for loss of information.
|
|
|
|
* A number of assertions are added to the dictionary and set implementations.
|
|
In addition, the set object acquires a :meth:`test_c_api` method.
|
|
|
|
* Sanity checks of the input arguments are added to frame creation.
|
|
|
|
* The storage for ints is initialized with a known invalid pattern to catch
|
|
reference to uninitialized digits.
|
|
|
|
* Low-level tracing and extra exception checking are added to the runtime
|
|
virtual machine.
|
|
|
|
* Extra checks are added to the memory arena implementation.
|
|
|
|
* Extra debugging is added to the thread module.
|
|
|
|
There may be additional checks not mentioned here.
|
|
|
|
Defining :c:macro:`Py_TRACE_REFS` enables reference tracing. When defined, a
|
|
circular doubly linked list of active objects is maintained by adding two extra
|
|
fields to every :c:type:`PyObject`. Total allocations are tracked as well. Upon
|
|
exit, all existing references are printed. (In interactive mode this happens
|
|
after every statement run by the interpreter.) Implied by :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG`.
|
|
|
|
Please refer to :file:`Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt` in the Python source distribution
|
|
for more detailed information.
|
|
|