cpython/Include/pyatomic.h
2011-12-05 16:45:02 -05:00

185 lines
5.8 KiB
C

#ifndef Py_LIMITED_API
#ifndef Py_ATOMIC_H
#define Py_ATOMIC_H
/* XXX: When compilers start offering a stdatomic.h with lock-free
atomic_int and atomic_address types, include that here and rewrite
the atomic operations in terms of it. */
#include "dynamic_annotations.h"
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
/* This is modeled after the atomics interface from C1x, according to
* the draft at
* http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/wg14/www/docs/n1425.pdf.
* Operations and types are named the same except with a _Py_ prefix
* and have the same semantics.
*
* Beware, the implementations here are deep magic.
*/
typedef enum _Py_memory_order {
_Py_memory_order_relaxed,
_Py_memory_order_acquire,
_Py_memory_order_release,
_Py_memory_order_acq_rel,
_Py_memory_order_seq_cst
} _Py_memory_order;
typedef struct _Py_atomic_address {
void *_value;
} _Py_atomic_address;
typedef struct _Py_atomic_int {
int _value;
} _Py_atomic_int;
/* Only support GCC (for expression statements) and x86 (for simple
* atomic semantics) for now */
#if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__i386__) || defined(__amd64))
static __inline__ void
_Py_atomic_signal_fence(_Py_memory_order order)
{
if (order != _Py_memory_order_relaxed)
__asm__ volatile("":::"memory");
}
static __inline__ void
_Py_atomic_thread_fence(_Py_memory_order order)
{
if (order != _Py_memory_order_relaxed)
__asm__ volatile("mfence":::"memory");
}
/* Tell the race checker about this operation's effects. */
static __inline__ void
_Py_ANNOTATE_MEMORY_ORDER(const volatile void *address, _Py_memory_order order)
{
(void)address; /* shut up -Wunused-parameter */
switch(order) {
case _Py_memory_order_release:
case _Py_memory_order_acq_rel:
case _Py_memory_order_seq_cst:
_Py_ANNOTATE_HAPPENS_BEFORE(address);
break;
case _Py_memory_order_relaxed:
case _Py_memory_order_acquire:
break;
}
switch(order) {
case _Py_memory_order_acquire:
case _Py_memory_order_acq_rel:
case _Py_memory_order_seq_cst:
_Py_ANNOTATE_HAPPENS_AFTER(address);
break;
case _Py_memory_order_relaxed:
case _Py_memory_order_release:
break;
}
}
#define _Py_atomic_store_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, NEW_VAL, ORDER) \
__extension__ ({ \
__typeof__(ATOMIC_VAL) atomic_val = ATOMIC_VAL; \
__typeof__(atomic_val->_value) new_val = NEW_VAL;\
volatile __typeof__(new_val) *volatile_data = &atomic_val->_value; \
_Py_memory_order order = ORDER; \
_Py_ANNOTATE_MEMORY_ORDER(atomic_val, order); \
\
/* Perform the operation. */ \
_Py_ANNOTATE_IGNORE_WRITES_BEGIN(); \
switch(order) { \
case _Py_memory_order_release: \
_Py_atomic_signal_fence(_Py_memory_order_release); \
/* fallthrough */ \
case _Py_memory_order_relaxed: \
*volatile_data = new_val; \
break; \
\
case _Py_memory_order_acquire: \
case _Py_memory_order_acq_rel: \
case _Py_memory_order_seq_cst: \
__asm__ volatile("xchg %0, %1" \
: "+r"(new_val) \
: "m"(atomic_val->_value) \
: "memory"); \
break; \
} \
_Py_ANNOTATE_IGNORE_WRITES_END(); \
})
#define _Py_atomic_load_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, ORDER) \
__extension__ ({ \
__typeof__(ATOMIC_VAL) atomic_val = ATOMIC_VAL; \
__typeof__(atomic_val->_value) result; \
volatile __typeof__(result) *volatile_data = &atomic_val->_value; \
_Py_memory_order order = ORDER; \
_Py_ANNOTATE_MEMORY_ORDER(atomic_val, order); \
\
/* Perform the operation. */ \
_Py_ANNOTATE_IGNORE_READS_BEGIN(); \
switch(order) { \
case _Py_memory_order_release: \
case _Py_memory_order_acq_rel: \
case _Py_memory_order_seq_cst: \
/* Loads on x86 are not releases by default, so need a */ \
/* thread fence. */ \
_Py_atomic_thread_fence(_Py_memory_order_release); \
break; \
default: \
/* No fence */ \
break; \
} \
result = *volatile_data; \
switch(order) { \
case _Py_memory_order_acquire: \
case _Py_memory_order_acq_rel: \
case _Py_memory_order_seq_cst: \
/* Loads on x86 are automatically acquire operations so */ \
/* can get by with just a compiler fence. */ \
_Py_atomic_signal_fence(_Py_memory_order_acquire); \
break; \
default: \
/* No fence */ \
break; \
} \
_Py_ANNOTATE_IGNORE_READS_END(); \
result; \
})
#else /* !gcc x86 */
/* Fall back to other compilers and processors by assuming that simple
volatile accesses are atomic. This is false, so people should port
this. */
#define _Py_atomic_signal_fence(/*memory_order*/ ORDER) ((void)0)
#define _Py_atomic_thread_fence(/*memory_order*/ ORDER) ((void)0)
#define _Py_atomic_store_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, NEW_VAL, ORDER) \
((ATOMIC_VAL)->_value = NEW_VAL)
#define _Py_atomic_load_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, ORDER) \
((ATOMIC_VAL)->_value)
#endif /* !gcc x86 */
/* Standardized shortcuts. */
#define _Py_atomic_store(ATOMIC_VAL, NEW_VAL) \
_Py_atomic_store_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, NEW_VAL, _Py_memory_order_seq_cst)
#define _Py_atomic_load(ATOMIC_VAL) \
_Py_atomic_load_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, _Py_memory_order_seq_cst)
/* Python-local extensions */
#define _Py_atomic_store_relaxed(ATOMIC_VAL, NEW_VAL) \
_Py_atomic_store_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, NEW_VAL, _Py_memory_order_relaxed)
#define _Py_atomic_load_relaxed(ATOMIC_VAL) \
_Py_atomic_load_explicit(ATOMIC_VAL, _Py_memory_order_relaxed)
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
#endif /* Py_ATOMIC_H */
#endif /* Py_LIMITED_API */