mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2024-11-24 18:34:43 +08:00
Update a "Programmer's note" about lambda forms and scoping to reflect
the availability of nested scoping in Python 2.1 and 2.2.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d993c87918
commit
88382696f4
@ -869,17 +869,31 @@ that functions created with lambda forms cannot contain statements.
|
||||
\indexii{lambda}{form}
|
||||
\indexii{anonmymous}{function}
|
||||
|
||||
\strong{Programmer's note:} a lambda form defined inside a function
|
||||
has no access to names defined in the function's namespace. This is
|
||||
because Python has only two scopes: local and global. A common
|
||||
work-around is to use default argument values to pass selected
|
||||
variables into the lambda's namespace, e.g.:
|
||||
\strong{Programmer's note:} Prior to Python 2.1, a lambda form defined
|
||||
inside a function has no access to names defined in the function's
|
||||
namespace. This is because Python had only two scopes: local and
|
||||
global. A common work-around was to use default argument values to
|
||||
pass selected variables into the lambda's namespace, e.g.:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||||
def make_incrementor(increment):
|
||||
return lambda x, n=increment: x+n
|
||||
\end{verbatim}
|
||||
|
||||
As of Python 2.1, nested scopes were introduced, and this work-around
|
||||
has not been necessary. Python 2.1 supports nested scopes in modules
|
||||
which include the statement \samp{from __future__ import
|
||||
nested_scopes}, and more recent versions of Python enable nested
|
||||
scopes by default. This version works starting with Python 2.1:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||||
from __future__ import nested_scopes
|
||||
|
||||
def make_incrementor(increment):
|
||||
return lambda x: x+increment
|
||||
\end{verbatim}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Expression lists\label{exprlists}}
|
||||
\indexii{expression}{list}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user