From 77d5781835b6e0a132694ebadc22b1cbdb9913f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Serhiy Storchaka Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:00:11 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] bpo-34318: Convert deprecation warnings to errors in assertRaises() etc. (GH-8623) --- Lib/unittest/case.py | 9 ++------- Lib/unittest/test/test_case.py | 20 ++++++++----------- .../2018-08-02-14-43-42.bpo-34318.GneiXs.rst | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-08-02-14-43-42.bpo-34318.GneiXs.rst diff --git a/Lib/unittest/case.py b/Lib/unittest/case.py index c0170d18257..1faa6b641f2 100644 --- a/Lib/unittest/case.py +++ b/Lib/unittest/case.py @@ -157,16 +157,11 @@ class _AssertRaisesBaseContext(_BaseTestCaseContext): if not _is_subtype(self.expected, self._base_type): raise TypeError('%s() arg 1 must be %s' % (name, self._base_type_str)) - if args and args[0] is None: - warnings.warn("callable is None", - DeprecationWarning, 3) - args = () if not args: self.msg = kwargs.pop('msg', None) if kwargs: - warnings.warn('%r is an invalid keyword argument for ' - 'this function' % next(iter(kwargs)), - DeprecationWarning, 3) + raise TypeError('%r is an invalid keyword argument for ' + 'this function' % (next(iter(kwargs)),)) return self callable_obj, *args = args diff --git a/Lib/unittest/test/test_case.py b/Lib/unittest/test/test_case.py index 6b3439781c9..baabddd06f4 100644 --- a/Lib/unittest/test/test_case.py +++ b/Lib/unittest/test/test_case.py @@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ test case with self.assertRaises(self.failureException): self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, lambda: 0) # Failure when the function is None - with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning): + with self.assertRaises(TypeError): self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, None) # Failure when another exception is raised with self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock): @@ -1253,8 +1253,7 @@ test case with self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, msg='foobar'): pass # Invalid keyword argument - with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \ - self.assertRaises(AssertionError): + with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'): with self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, foobar=42): pass # Failure when another exception is raised @@ -1295,7 +1294,7 @@ test case self.assertRaisesRegex(ExceptionMock, re.compile('expect$'), Stub) self.assertRaisesRegex(ExceptionMock, 'expect$', Stub) - with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning): + with self.assertRaises(TypeError): self.assertRaisesRegex(ExceptionMock, 'expect$', None) def testAssertNotRaisesRegex(self): @@ -1312,8 +1311,7 @@ test case with self.assertRaisesRegex(Exception, 'expect', msg='foobar'): pass # Invalid keyword argument - with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \ - self.assertRaises(AssertionError): + with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'): with self.assertRaisesRegex(Exception, 'expect', foobar=42): pass @@ -1388,7 +1386,7 @@ test case with self.assertRaises(self.failureException): self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, lambda: 0) # Failure when the function is None - with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning): + with self.assertRaises(TypeError): self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, None) # Failure when another warning is triggered with warnings.catch_warnings(): @@ -1433,8 +1431,7 @@ test case with self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, msg='foobar'): pass # Invalid keyword argument - with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \ - self.assertRaises(AssertionError): + with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'): with self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, foobar=42): pass # Failure when another warning is triggered @@ -1475,7 +1472,7 @@ test case self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, "o+", lambda: 0) # Failure when the function is None - with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning): + with self.assertRaises(TypeError): self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, "o+", None) # Failure when another warning is triggered with warnings.catch_warnings(): @@ -1518,8 +1515,7 @@ test case with self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, 'o+', msg='foobar'): pass # Invalid keyword argument - with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \ - self.assertRaises(AssertionError): + with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'): with self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, 'o+', foobar=42): pass # Failure when another warning is triggered diff --git a/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-08-02-14-43-42.bpo-34318.GneiXs.rst b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-08-02-14-43-42.bpo-34318.GneiXs.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4df4fe30b97 --- /dev/null +++ b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-08-02-14-43-42.bpo-34318.GneiXs.rst @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertRaises`, +:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertRaisesRegex`, +:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertWarns` and +:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertWarnsRegex` no longer success if the passed +callable is None. They no longer ignore unknown keyword arguments in the +context manager mode. A DeprecationWarning was raised in these cases +since Python 3.5.