SF bug #1100368: Wrong "type()" syntax in docs

Docs were missing the name/bases/dict form of type().

(Much of the wording contributed by Steven Bethard.)

Doc/lib/libfuncs.tex

@@ -1057,26 +1057,30 @@ class C(B):
 
 \begin{funcdesc}{type}{object}
   Return the type of an \var{object}.  The return value is a
-  type\obindex{type} object.  The standard module
+  type\obindex{type} object.  The \function{isinstance()} built-in
-  \module{types}\refstmodindex{types} defines names for all built-in
+  function is recommended for testing the type of an object.
-  types that don't already have built-in names.
+
-  For instance:
+  With three arguments, \function{type} functions as a constructor
+  as detailed below.
+\end{funcdesc}
+
+\begin{funcdesc}{type}{name, bases, dict}
+  Return a new type object.  This is essentially a dynamic form of the
+  \keyword{class} statement. The \var{name} string is the class name
+  and becomes the \member{__name__} attribute; the \var{bases} tuple
+  itemizes the base classes and becomes the \member{__bases__}
+  attribute; and the \var{dict} dictionary is the namespace containing
+  definitions for class body and becomes the \member{__dict__}
+  attribute.  For example, the following two statements create
+  identical \class{type} objects:
 
 \begin{verbatim}
->>> import types
+  >>> class X(object):
->>> x = 'abc'
+  ...     a = 1
->>> if type(x) is str: print "It's a string"
+  ...     
-...
+  >>> X = type('X', (object,), dict(a=1))
-It's a string
->>> def f(): pass
-...
->>> if type(f) is types.FunctionType: print "It's a function"
-...
-It's a function
 \end{verbatim}
-
+\versionadded{2.2}          
-  The \function{isinstance()} built-in function is recommended for
-  testing the type of an object.
 \end{funcdesc}
 
 \begin{funcdesc}{unichr}{i}