cpython/Lib/sets.py

522 lines
17 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

"""Classes to represent arbitrary sets (including sets of sets).
This module implements sets using dictionaries whose values are
ignored. The usual operations (union, intersection, deletion, etc.)
are provided as both methods and operators.
Important: sets are not sequences! While they support 'x in s',
'len(s)', and 'for x in s', none of those operations are unique for
sequences; for example, mappings support all three as well. The
characteristic operation for sequences is subscripting with small
integers: s[i], for i in range(len(s)). Sets don't support
subscripting at all. Also, sequences allow multiple occurrences and
their elements have a definite order; sets on the other hand don't
record multiple occurrences and don't remember the order of element
insertion (which is why they don't support s[i]).
The following classes are provided:
BaseSet -- All the operations common to both mutable and immutable
sets. This is an abstract class, not meant to be directly
instantiated.
Set -- Mutable sets, subclass of BaseSet; not hashable.
ImmutableSet -- Immutable sets, subclass of BaseSet; hashable.
An iterable argument is mandatory to create an ImmutableSet.
_TemporarilyImmutableSet -- Not a subclass of BaseSet: just a wrapper
around a Set, hashable, giving the same hash value as the
immutable set equivalent would have. Do not use this class
directly.
Only hashable objects can be added to a Set. In particular, you cannot
really add a Set as an element to another Set; if you try, what is
2002-08-21 07:34:01 +08:00
actually added is an ImmutableSet built from it (it compares equal to
the one you tried adding).
When you ask if `x in y' where x is a Set and y is a Set or
ImmutableSet, x is wrapped into a _TemporarilyImmutableSet z, and
what's tested is actually `z in y'.
"""
# Code history:
#
# - Greg V. Wilson wrote the first version, using a different approach
# to the mutable/immutable problem, and inheriting from dict.
#
# - Alex Martelli modified Greg's version to implement the current
# Set/ImmutableSet approach, and make the data an attribute.
#
# - Guido van Rossum rewrote much of the code, made some API changes,
# and cleaned up the docstrings.
#
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
# - Raymond Hettinger added a number of speedups and other
# improvements.
__all__ = ['BaseSet', 'Set', 'ImmutableSet']
class BaseSet(object):
"""Common base class for mutable and immutable sets."""
__slots__ = ['_data']
# Constructor
def __init__(self):
"""This is an abstract class."""
# Don't call this from a concrete subclass!
if self.__class__ is BaseSet:
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
raise TypeError, ("BaseSet is an abstract class. "
"Use Set or ImmutableSet.")
# Standard protocols: __len__, __repr__, __str__, __iter__
def __len__(self):
"""Return the number of elements of a set."""
return len(self._data)
def __repr__(self):
"""Return string representation of a set.
This looks like 'Set([<list of elements>])'.
"""
return self._repr()
# __str__ is the same as __repr__
__str__ = __repr__
def _repr(self, sorted=False):
elements = self._data.keys()
if sorted:
elements.sort()
return '%s(%r)' % (self.__class__.__name__, elements)
def __iter__(self):
"""Return an iterator over the elements or a set.
This is the keys iterator for the underlying dict.
"""
return self._data.iterkeys()
# Equality comparisons using the underlying dicts
def __eq__(self, other):
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
return self._data == other._data
def __ne__(self, other):
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
return self._data != other._data
# Copying operations
def copy(self):
"""Return a shallow copy of a set."""
result = self.__class__()
result._data.update(self._data)
return result
__copy__ = copy # For the copy module
def __deepcopy__(self, memo):
"""Return a deep copy of a set; used by copy module."""
# This pre-creates the result and inserts it in the memo
# early, in case the deep copy recurses into another reference
# to this same set. A set can't be an element of itself, but
# it can certainly contain an object that has a reference to
# itself.
from copy import deepcopy
result = self.__class__()
memo[id(self)] = result
data = result._data
value = True
for elt in self:
data[deepcopy(elt, memo)] = value
return result
# Standard set operations: union, intersection, both differences.
# Each has an operator version (e.g. __or__, invoked with |) and a
# method version (e.g. union).
# Subtle: Each pair requires distinct code so that the outcome is
# correct when the type of other isn't suitable. For example, if
# we did "union = __or__" instead, then Set().union(3) would return
# NotImplemented instead of raising TypeError (albeit that *why* it
# raises TypeError as-is is also a bit subtle).
def __or__(self, other):
"""Return the union of two sets as a new set.
(I.e. all elements that are in either set.)
"""
if not isinstance(other, BaseSet):
return NotImplemented
2002-08-26 03:21:27 +08:00
result = self.__class__()
result._data = self._data.copy()
result._data.update(other._data)
return result
def union(self, other):
"""Return the union of two sets as a new set.
(I.e. all elements that are in either set.)
"""
return self | other
def __and__(self, other):
"""Return the intersection of two sets as a new set.
(I.e. all elements that are in both sets.)
"""
if not isinstance(other, BaseSet):
return NotImplemented
if len(self) <= len(other):
little, big = self, other
else:
little, big = other, self
2002-10-05 04:01:48 +08:00
common = filter(big._data.has_key, little._data)
return self.__class__(common)
def intersection(self, other):
"""Return the intersection of two sets as a new set.
(I.e. all elements that are in both sets.)
"""
return self & other
def __xor__(self, other):
"""Return the symmetric difference of two sets as a new set.
(I.e. all elements that are in exactly one of the sets.)
"""
if not isinstance(other, BaseSet):
return NotImplemented
result = self.__class__()
data = result._data
value = True
selfdata = self._data
otherdata = other._data
for elt in selfdata:
if elt not in otherdata:
data[elt] = value
for elt in otherdata:
if elt not in selfdata:
data[elt] = value
return result
def symmetric_difference(self, other):
"""Return the symmetric difference of two sets as a new set.
(I.e. all elements that are in exactly one of the sets.)
"""
return self ^ other
def __sub__(self, other):
"""Return the difference of two sets as a new Set.
(I.e. all elements that are in this set and not in the other.)
"""
if not isinstance(other, BaseSet):
return NotImplemented
result = self.__class__()
data = result._data
otherdata = other._data
value = True
for elt in self:
if elt not in otherdata:
data[elt] = value
return result
def difference(self, other):
"""Return the difference of two sets as a new Set.
(I.e. all elements that are in this set and not in the other.)
"""
return self - other
# Membership test
def __contains__(self, element):
"""Report whether an element is a member of a set.
(Called in response to the expression `element in self'.)
"""
try:
return element in self._data
except TypeError:
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
transform = getattr(element, "_as_temporarily_immutable", None)
if transform is None:
raise # re-raise the TypeError exception we caught
return transform() in self._data
# Subset and superset test
def issubset(self, other):
"""Report whether another set contains this set."""
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
if len(self) > len(other): # Fast check for obvious cases
return False
otherdata = other._data
for elt in self:
if elt not in otherdata:
return False
return True
def issuperset(self, other):
"""Report whether this set contains another set."""
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
if len(self) < len(other): # Fast check for obvious cases
return False
selfdata = self._data
for elt in other:
if elt not in selfdata:
return False
return True
# Inequality comparisons using the is-subset relation.
__le__ = issubset
__ge__ = issuperset
def __lt__(self, other):
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
return len(self) < len(other) and self.issubset(other)
def __gt__(self, other):
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
return len(self) > len(other) and self.issuperset(other)
# Assorted helpers
def _binary_sanity_check(self, other):
# Check that the other argument to a binary operation is also
# a set, raising a TypeError otherwise.
if not isinstance(other, BaseSet):
raise TypeError, "Binary operation only permitted between sets"
def _compute_hash(self):
# Calculate hash code for a set by xor'ing the hash codes of
2002-08-24 04:06:42 +08:00
# the elements. This ensures that the hash code does not depend
# on the order in which elements are added to the set. This is
# not called __hash__ because a BaseSet should not be hashable;
# only an ImmutableSet is hashable.
result = 0
for elt in self:
result ^= hash(elt)
return result
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
def _update(self, iterable):
# The main loop for update() and the subclass __init__() methods.
data = self._data
# Use the fast update() method when a dictionary is available.
if isinstance(iterable, BaseSet):
data.update(iterable._data)
return
value = True
if type(iterable) in (list, tuple, xrange):
# Optimized: we know that __iter__() and next() can't
# raise TypeError, so we can move 'try:' out of the loop.
it = iter(iterable)
while True:
try:
for element in it:
data[element] = value
return
except TypeError:
transform = getattr(element, "_as_immutable", None)
if transform is None:
raise # re-raise the TypeError exception we caught
data[transform()] = value
else:
# Safe: only catch TypeError where intended
for element in iterable:
try:
data[element] = value
except TypeError:
transform = getattr(element, "_as_immutable", None)
if transform is None:
raise # re-raise the TypeError exception we caught
data[transform()] = value
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
class ImmutableSet(BaseSet):
"""Immutable set class."""
2002-08-20 00:29:58 +08:00
__slots__ = ['_hashcode']
# BaseSet + hashing
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
def __init__(self, iterable=None):
"""Construct an immutable set from an optional iterable."""
self._hashcode = None
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
self._data = {}
if iterable is not None:
self._update(iterable)
def __hash__(self):
if self._hashcode is None:
self._hashcode = self._compute_hash()
return self._hashcode
def __getstate__(self):
return self._data, self._hashcode
def __setstate__(self, state):
self._data, self._hashcode = state
class Set(BaseSet):
""" Mutable set class."""
__slots__ = []
# BaseSet + operations requiring mutability; no hashing
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
def __init__(self, iterable=None):
"""Construct a set from an optional iterable."""
self._data = {}
if iterable is not None:
self._update(iterable)
def __getstate__(self):
# getstate's results are ignored if it is not
return self._data,
def __setstate__(self, data):
self._data, = data
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
def __hash__(self):
"""A Set cannot be hashed."""
# We inherit object.__hash__, so we must deny this explicitly
raise TypeError, "Can't hash a Set, only an ImmutableSet."
# In-place union, intersection, differences.
# Subtle: The xyz_update() functions deliberately return None,
# as do all mutating operations on built-in container types.
# The __xyz__ spellings have to return self, though.
def __ior__(self, other):
"""Update a set with the union of itself and another."""
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
self._data.update(other._data)
return self
def union_update(self, other):
"""Update a set with the union of itself and another."""
self |= other
def __iand__(self, other):
"""Update a set with the intersection of itself and another."""
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
self._data = (self & other)._data
return self
def intersection_update(self, other):
"""Update a set with the intersection of itself and another."""
self &= other
def __ixor__(self, other):
"""Update a set with the symmetric difference of itself and another."""
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
data = self._data
value = True
for elt in other:
if elt in data:
del data[elt]
else:
data[elt] = value
return self
def symmetric_difference_update(self, other):
"""Update a set with the symmetric difference of itself and another."""
self ^= other
def __isub__(self, other):
"""Remove all elements of another set from this set."""
self._binary_sanity_check(other)
data = self._data
for elt in other:
if elt in data:
del data[elt]
return self
def difference_update(self, other):
"""Remove all elements of another set from this set."""
self -= other
# Python dict-like mass mutations: update, clear
def update(self, iterable):
"""Add all values from an iterable (such as a list or file)."""
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
self._update(iterable)
def clear(self):
"""Remove all elements from this set."""
self._data.clear()
# Single-element mutations: add, remove, discard
def add(self, element):
"""Add an element to a set.
This has no effect if the element is already present.
"""
try:
self._data[element] = True
except TypeError:
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
transform = getattr(element, "_as_immutable", None)
if transform is None:
raise # re-raise the TypeError exception we caught
self._data[transform()] = True
def remove(self, element):
"""Remove an element from a set; it must be a member.
If the element is not a member, raise a KeyError.
"""
try:
del self._data[element]
except TypeError:
Ouch. The test suite *really* needs work!!!!! There were several superficial errors and one deep one that aren't currently caught. I'm headed for bed after this checkin. - Fixed several typos introduced by Raymond Hettinger (through cut-n-paste from my template): it's _as_temporarily_immutable, not _as_temporary_immutable, and moreover when the element is added, we should use _as_immutable. - Made the seq argument to ImmutableSet.__init__ optional, so we can write ImmutableSet() to create an immutable empty set. - Rename the seq argument to Set and ImmutableSet to iterable. - Add a Set.__hash__ method that raises a TypeError. We inherit a default __hash__ implementation from object, and we don't want that. We can then catch this in update(), so that e.g. s.update([Set([1])]) will transform the Set([1]) to ImmutableSet([1]). - Added the dance to catch TypeError and try _as_immutable in the constructors too (by calling _update()). This is needed so that Set([Set([1])]) is correctly interpreted as Set([ImmutableSet([1])]). (I was puzzled by a side effect of this and the inherited __hash__ when comparing two sets of sets while testing different powerset implementations: the Set element passed to a Set constructor wasn't transformed to an ImmutableSet, and then the dictionary didn't believe the Set found in one dict it was the same as ImmutableSet in the other, because the hashes were different.) - Refactored Set.update() and both __init__() methods; moved the body of update() into BaseSet as _update(), and call this from __init__() and update(). - Changed the NotImplementedError in BaseSet.__init__ to TypeError, both for consistency with basestring() and because we have to use TypeError when denying Set.__hash__. Together those provide sufficient evidence that an unimplemented method needs to raise TypeError.
2002-08-21 11:20:44 +08:00
transform = getattr(element, "_as_temporarily_immutable", None)
if transform is None:
raise # re-raise the TypeError exception we caught
del self._data[transform()]
def discard(self, element):
"""Remove an element from a set if it is a member.
If the element is not a member, do nothing.
"""
try:
self.remove(element)
except KeyError:
pass
def pop(self):
"""Remove and return an arbitrary set element."""
return self._data.popitem()[0]
def _as_immutable(self):
# Return a copy of self as an immutable set
return ImmutableSet(self)
def _as_temporarily_immutable(self):
# Return self wrapped in a temporarily immutable set
return _TemporarilyImmutableSet(self)
class _TemporarilyImmutableSet(BaseSet):
# Wrap a mutable set as if it was temporarily immutable.
# This only supplies hashing and equality comparisons.
def __init__(self, set):
self._set = set
self._data = set._data # Needed by ImmutableSet.__eq__()
def __hash__(self):
return self._set._compute_hash()