coreutils/tests/selinux
Jim Meyering 0fb836f179 Adapt to new SELinux behavior: "?" vs. new "unlabeled"
* src/ls.c (gobble_file): Interpret the new "unlabeled" indicator
from getfilecon/lgetfilecon the same way we interpret a negative
return value: no security context.  So we don't print the "+".
* tests/selinux: Recognize that "unlabeled" means insufficient
support for SELinux, just like "?".
2007-09-05 10:58:45 +02:00

24 lines
953 B
Plaintext

# Skip this test if there is insufficient SELinux support.
# Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
case `ls -Zd .` in
'? .'|'unlabeled .')
echo "$0: skipping this test; this system (or maybe just" 1>&2
echo " the current file system) lacks SELinux support" 1>&2
(exit 77); exit 77
;;
esac