mirrors/buildroot
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.busybox.net/buildroot.git synced 2024-11-24 14:03:29 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

manual: contributing: move section on patch reviews up and change intro

Browse Source 
This patch moves the section about patch reviews and the
Tested-by/Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags upwards. Additionally, the first
paragraph is removed and replaced by another one. There are no other changes
in the text.

Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Acked-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas De Schampheleire 2014-03-06 11:07:30 +01:00 committed by Thomas Petazzoni
parent f7d5d97173
commit aeae2356b1
1 changed files with 68 additions and 62 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

130
docs/manual/contribute.txt
View File

@ -79,6 +79,74 @@ basically two things that can be done:
Fixes http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/51000a9d4656afe9e0ea6f07b9f8ed374c2e4069
---------------------
Reviewing and testing patches
-----------------------------
With the amount of patches sent to the mailing list each day, the
maintainer has a very hard job to judge which patches are ready to apply
and which ones aren't. Contributors can greatly help here by reviewing
and testing these patches.
In the review process, do not hesitate to respond to patch submissions
for remarks, suggestions or anything that will help everyone to
understand the patches and make them better. Please use internet
style replies in plain text emails when responding to patch
submissions.
To indicate approval of a patch, there are three formal tags that keep
track of this approval. To add your tag to a patch, reply to it with the
approval tag below the original author's Signed-off-by line. These tags
will be picked up automatically by patchwork (see
ref:apply-patches-patchwork[]) and will be part of the commit log when
the patch is accepted.
Tested-by:: Indicates that the patch has been tested successfully.
You are encouraged to specify what kind of testing you performed
(compile-test on architecture X and Y, runtime test on target A,
...). This additional information helps other testers and the
maintainer.
Reviewed-by:: Indicates that you code-reviewed the patch and did your
best in spotting problems, but you are not sufficiently familiar with
the area touched to provide an Acked-by tag. This means that there
may be remaining problems in the patch that would be spotted by
someone with more experience in that area. Should such problems be
detected, your Reviewed-by tag remains appropriate and you cannot
be blamed.
Acked-by:: Indicates that you code-reviewed the patch and you are
familiar enough with the area touched to feel that the patch can be
committed as-is (no additional changes required). In case it later
turns out that something is wrong with the patch, your Acked-by could
be considered inappropriate. The difference between Acked-by and
Reviewed-by is thus mainly that you are prepared to take the blame on
Acked patches, but not on Reviewed ones.
If you reviewed a patch and have comments on it, you should simply reply
to the patch stating these comments, without providing a Reviewed-by or
Acked-by tag. These tags should only be provided if you judge the patch
to be good as it is.
It is important to note that neither Reviewed-by nor Acked-by imply
that testing has been performed. To indicate that you both reviewed and
tested the patch, provide two separate tags (Reviewed/Acked-by and
Tested-by).
Note also that _any developer_ can provide Tested/Reviewed/Acked-by
tags, without exception, and we encourage everyone to do this. Buildroot
does not have a defined group of _core_ developers, it just so happens
that some developers are more active than others. The maintainer will
value tags according to the track record of their submitter. Tags
provided by a regular contributor will naturally be trusted more than
tags provided by a newcomer. As you provide tags more regularly, your
'trustworthiness' (in the eyes of the maintainer) will go up, but _any_
tag provided is valuable.
Buildroot's Patchwork website can be used to pull in patches for testing
purposes. Please see xref:apply-patches-patchwork[] for more
information on using Buildroot's Patchwork website to apply patches.
[[submitting-patches]]
Submitting patches
------------------
@ -194,68 +262,6 @@ $ git format-patch --subject-prefix "PATCH v4" \
-M -o outgoing origin/master
---------------------
Reviewing/Testing patches
-------------------------
The review process for new patches is done over the mailing list. Once
a patch is submitted to the mailing list, other developers will provide
feedback to the patch via emails sent through the mailing list.
In the review process, do not hesitate to respond to patch submissions
for remarks, suggestions or anything that will help everyone to
understand the patches and make them better. Please use internet
style replies in plain text emails when responding to patch
submissions.
Some tags are used to help following the state of any patch posted on
the mailing-list:
Tested-by:: Indicates that the patch has been tested in one way or
another. You are encouraged to specify what kind of testing you
performed (compile-test on architecture X and Y, runtime test on
target A, ...). This additional information helps other testers and
the maintainer.
Reviewed-by:: Indicates that you code-reviewed the patch and did your
best in spotting problems, but you are not sufficiently familiar with
the area touched to provide an Acked-by tag. This means that there
may be remaining problems in the patch that would be spotted by
someone with more experience in that area. Should such problems be
detected, your Reviewed-by tag remains appropriate and you cannot
be blamed.
Acked-by:: Indicates that you code-reviewed the patch and you are
familiar enough with the area touched to feel that the patch can be
committed as-is (no additional changes required). In case it later turns
out that something is wrong with the patch, your Acked-by could be
considered inappropriate. The difference between Acked-by and
Reviewed-by is thus mainly that you are prepared to take the blame on
Acked patches, but not on Reviewed ones.
If you reviewed a patch and have comments on it, you should simply reply
to the patch stating these comments, without providing a Reviewed-by or
Acked-by tag. These tags should only be provided if you judge the patch
to be good as it is.
It is important to note that neither Reviewed-by nor Acked-by imply
that testing has been performed. To indicate that you both reviewed and
tested the patch, provide two separate tags (Reviewed/Acked-by and
Tested-by).
Note also that _any developer_ can provide Tested/Reviewed/Acked-by
tags, without exception, and we encourage everyone to do this. Buildroot
does not have a defined group of _core_ developers, it just so happens
that some developers are more active than others. The maintainer will
value tags according to the track record of their submitter. Tags
provided by a regular contributor will naturally be trusted more than
tags provided by a newcomer. As you provide tags more regularly, your
'trustworthiness' (in the eyes of the maintainer) will go up, but _any_
tag provided is valuable.
Buildroot's Patchwork website can be used to pull in patches for testing
purposes. Please see xref:apply-patches-patchwork[] for more
information on using Buildroot's Patchwork website to apply patches.
[[reporting-bugs]]
Reporting issues/bugs, get help
-------------------------------