Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joel Brobecker
32d0add0a6 Update year range in copyright notice of all files owned by the GDB project.
gdb/ChangeLog:

        Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
2015-01-01 13:32:14 +04:00
Yao Qi
03388bb71c Tweak sss-bp-on-user-bp.exp
sss-bp-on-user-bp.c has an assumption that write to integer can be
compiled to a single instruction, which isn't true on some arch, such
as arm.  This test requires setting two breakpoints on two consecutive
instructions, so this patch is to get the address of the next
instruction via disassemble and set the 2nd breakpoint there.  This
approach is portable.

This patch fixes the fails in sss-bp-on-user-bp.exp on arm-none-abi
target.  There is no change in x86 test results.  I also revert the
patch to PR breakpoints/17000, and verified that the patched
sss-bp-on-user-bp.exp still trigger the fail on
x86-with-software-single-step.

gdb/testsuite:

2014-06-04  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* gdb.base/sss-bp-on-user-bp.c (main): Remove comments.
	* gdb.base/sss-bp-on-user-bp.exp: Don't set breakpoint on
	"set bar break here".  Get the next instruction address and
	set breakpoint there.  Remove "bar break" from the regexp
	patterns.
2014-06-04 20:53:47 +08:00
Pedro Alves
9ba6657a6b PR breakpoints/17000: user breakpoint not inserted if software-single-step at same location - test
GDB gets confused when removing a software single-step breakpoint that
is at the same address as another breakpoint.  Add a kfailed test.

gdb/testsuite/
2014-05-30  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR breakpoints/17000
	* gdb.base/sss-bp-on-user-bp.c: New file.
	* gdb.base/sss-bp-on-user-bp.exp: New file.
2014-05-30 17:21:02 +01:00