Attributes which aren't used together in any single insn template can be
converted from individual booleans to a single enum, as was done for a few
other attributes before. This is more space efficient. Collect together
all attributes which express special operand constraints (and which fit
the criteria for folding).
On a testcase like
pla 8,foo@pcrel
disassembled with -Mpower10 results in
0: 00 00 10 06 pla r8,0 # 0
4: 00 00 00 39
0: R_PPC64_PCREL34 foo
but with -Mpower10 -Mraw
0: 00 00 10 06 .long 0x6100000
0: R_PPC64_PCREL34 foo
4: 00 00 00 39 addi r8,0,0
The instruction is unrecognised due to the hack we have in
extract_pcrel0 in order to disassemble paddi with RA0=0 and R=1 as
pla. I could have just added "&& !(dialect & PPC_OPCODE_RAW)" to the
condition in extract_pcrel0 under which *invalid is set, but went for
this larger patch that reorders the extended insn pla to the more
usual place before its underlying machine insn. (la is after addi
because we never disassemble to la.)
gas/
* testsuite/gas/ppc/raw.d,
* testsuite/gas/ppc/raw.s: Add pla.
opcodes/
* ppc-opc.c (extract_pcrel1): Rename from extract_pcrel0 and
invert *invalid logic.
(PCREL1): Rename from PCREL0.
(prefix_opcodes): Sort pla before paddi, adjusting R operand
for pla, paddi and psubi.
Although the encoding for scalar and fp registers is identical,
we should follow common pratice and use fp register names
when referencing fp registers.
The xtheadmemidx extension consists of indirect load/store instructions
which all load to or store from fp registers.
Let's use fp register names in this case and adjust the test cases
accordingly.
gas/
* testsuite/gas/riscv/x-thead-fmemidx-fail.l: Updated since rd need to
be float register.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/x-thead-fmemidx-fail.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/x-thead-fmemidx.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/x-thead-fmemidx.s: Likewise.
opcodes/
* riscv-opc.c (riscv_opcodes): Updated since rd need to be float register.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Hi all,
This wrong comment was introduced by previous AVX-VNNI-INT8 commit.
Committed as obvious fix.
BRs,
Haochen
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* i386-dis.c (VEX_W_0F3851): Corrected from
VEX_W_0F3851_P_0.
After this commit:
commit 6576bffe6c
Date: Thu Jul 7 13:43:45 2022 +0100
opcodes/arm: add disassembler styling for arm
Some people were seeing their builds failing with complaints about a
possible uninitialized variable usage. I previously fixed an instance
of this issue in this commit:
commit 2df82cd4b4
Date: Tue Nov 1 10:36:59 2022 +0000
opcodes/arm: silence compiler warning about uninitialized variable use
which did fix the build problems that the sourceware buildbot was
hitting, however, an additional instance of the same problem was
brought to my attention, and that is fixed in this commit.
Where commit 2df82cd4b4 fixed the uninitialized variable problem in
print_mve_unpredictable, this commit fixes the same problem in
print_mve_undefined.
As with the previous commit, I don't believe we could really ever get
an uninitialized variable usage, based on the current usage of the
function, so I have just initialized the reason variable to "??".
Prior to commit 1cb0ab18ad ("x86/Intel: restrict suffix derivation")
the Tbyte modifier on the FLDT and FSTPT templates was pointless, as
No_ldSuf would have prevented it being accepted. Due to the special
nature of LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX said commit, however, has led to these
insns being accepted in Intel syntax mode even when "tbyte ptr" was
present. Restore original behavior by dropping Tbyte there. (Note that
these insns in principle should by marked AT&T syntax only, but since
they haven't been so far we probably shouldn't change that.)
The earlier commit:
commit 6576bffe6c
Date: Thu Jul 7 13:43:45 2022 +0100
opcodes/arm: add disassembler styling for arm
introduced two places where a register name was passed as the format
string to the disassembler's fprintf_styled_func callback. This will
cause a warning from some compilers, like this:
../../binutils-gdb/opcodes/arm-dis.c: In function ‘print_mve_vld_str_addr’:
../../binutils-gdb/opcodes/arm-dis.c:6005:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
6005 | func (stream, dis_style_register, arm_regnames[gpr]);
| ^~~~
This commit fixes these by using "%s" as the format string.
The earlier commit:
commit 6576bffe6c
Date: Thu Jul 7 13:43:45 2022 +0100
opcodes/arm: add disassembler styling for arm
was causing a compiler warning about a possible uninitialized variable
usage within opcodes/arm-dis.c.
The problem is in print_mve_unpredictable, and relates to the reason
variable, which is set by a switch table.
Currently the switch table does cover every valid value, though there
is no default case. The variable switched on is passed in as an
argument to the print_mve_unpredictable function.
Looking at how print_mve_unpredictable is used, there is only one use,
the second argument is the one that is used for the switch table,
looking at how this argument is set, I don't believe it is possible
for this argument to take an invalid value.
So, I think the compiler warning is a false positive. As such, my
proposed solution is to initialize the reason variable to the string
"??", this will silence the warning, and the "??" string should never
end up being printed.
This commit adds disassembler styling for the ARM architecture.
The ARM disassembler is driven by several instruction tables,
e.g. cde_opcodes, coprocessor_opcodes, neon_opcodes, etc
The type for elements in each table can vary, but they all have one
thing in common, a 'const char *assembler' field. This field
contains a string that describes the assembler syntax of the
instruction.
Embedded within that assembler syntax are various escape characters,
prefixed with a '%'. Here's an example of a very simple instruction
from the arm_opcodes table:
"pld\t%a"
The '%a' indicates a particular type of operand, the function
print_insn_arm processes the arm_opcodes table, and includes a switch
statement that handles the '%a' operand, and takes care of printing
the correct value for that instruction operand.
It is worth noting that there are many print_* functions, each
function handles a single *_opcodes table, and includes its own switch
statement for operand handling. As a result, every *_opcodes table
uses a different mapping for the operand escape sequences. This means
that '%a' might print an address for one *_opcodes table, but in a
different *_opcodes table '%a' might print a register operand.
Notice as well that in our example above, the instruction mnemonic
'pld' is embedded within the assembler string. Some instructions also
include comments within the assembler string, for example, also from
the arm_opcodes table:
"nop\t\t\t@ (mov r0, r0)"
here, everything after the '@' is a comment that is displayed at the
end of the instruction disassembly.
The next complexity is that the meaning of some escape sequences is
not necessarily fixed. Consider these two examples from arm_opcodes:
"ldrex%c\tr%12-15d, [%16-19R]"
"setpan\t#%9-9d"
Here, the '%d' escape is used with a bitfield modifier, '%12-15d' in
the first instruction, and '%9-9d' in the second instruction, but,
both of these are the '%d' escape.
However, in the first instruction, the '%d' is used to print a
register number, notice the 'r' immediately before the '%d'. In the
second instruction the '%d' is used to print an immediate, notice the
'#' just before the '%d'.
We have two problems here, first, the '%d' needs to know if it should
use register style or immediate style, and secondly, the 'r' and '#'
characters also need to be styled appropriately.
The final thing we must consider is that some escape codes result in
more than just a single operand being printed, for example, the '%q'
operand as used in arm_opcodes ends up calling arm_decode_shift, which
can print a register name, a shift type, and a shift amount, this
could end up using register, sub-mnemonic, and immediate styles, as
well as the text style for things like ',' between the different
parts.
I propose a three layer approach to adding styling:
(1) Basic state machine:
When we start printing an instruction we should maintain the idea
of a 'base_style'. Every character from the assembler string will
be printed using the base_style.
The base_style will start as mnemonic, as each instruction starts
with an instruction mnemonic. When we encounter the first '\t'
character, the base_style will change to text. When we encounter
the first '@' the base_style will change to comment_start.
This simple state machine ensures that for simple instructions the
basic parts, except for the operands themselves, will be printed in
the correct style.
(2) Simple operand styling:
For operands that only have a single meaning, or which expand to
multiple parts, all of which have a consistent meaning, then I
will simply update the operand printing code to print the operand
with the correct style. This will cover a large number of the
operands, and is the most consistent with how styling has been
added to previous architectures.
(3) New styling syntax in assembler strings:
For cases like the '%d' that I describe above, I propose adding a
new extension to the assembler syntax. This extension will allow
me to temporarily change the base_style. Operands like '%d', will
then print using the base_style rather than using a fixed style.
Here are the two examples from above that use '%d', updated with
the new syntax extension:
"ldrex%c\t%{R:r%12-15d%}, [%16-19R]"
"setpan\t%{I:#%9-9d%}"
The syntax has the general form '%{X:....%}' where the 'X'
character changes to indicate a different style. In the first
instruction I use '%{R:...%}' to change base_style to the register
style, and in the second '%{I:...%}' changes base_style to
immediate style.
Notice that the 'r' and '#' characters are included within the new
style group, this ensures that these characters are printed with
the correct style rather than as text.
The function decode_base_style maps from character to style. I've
included a character for each style for completeness, though only
a small number of styles are currently used.
I have updated arm-dis.c to the above scheme, and checked all of the
tests in gas/testsuite/gas/arm/, and the styling looks reasonable.
There are no regressions on the ARM gas/binutils/ld tests that I can
see, so I don't believe I've changed the output layout at all. There
were two binutils tests for which I needed to force the disassembler
styling off.
I can't guarantee that I've not missed some untested corners of the
disassembler, or that I might have just missed some incorrectly styled
output when reviewing the test results, but I don't believe I've
introduced any changes that could break the disassembler - the worst
should be some aspect is not styled correctly.
Looking at the ARM disassembler output, every comment seems to start
with a ';' character, so I assumed this was the correct character to
start an assembler comment.
I then spotted a couple of places where there was no ';', but instead,
just a '@' character. I thought that this was a case of a missing
';', and proposed a patch to add the missing ';' characters.
Turns out I was wrong, '@' is actually the ARM assembler comment
character, while ';' is the statement separator. Thus this:
nop ;@ comment
is two statements, the first is the 'nop' instruction, while the
second contains no instructions, just the '@ comment' comment text.
This:
nop @ comment
is a single 'nop' instruction followed by a comment. And finally,
this:
nop ; comment
is two statements, the first contains the 'nop' instruction, while the
second contains the instruction 'comment', which obviously isn't
actually an instruction at all.
Why this matters is that, in the next commit, I would like to add
libopcodes syntax styling support for ARM.
The question then is how should the disassembler style the three cases
above?
As '@' is the actual comment start character then clearly the '@' and
anything after it can be styled as a comment. But what about ';' in
the second example? Style as text? Style as a comment?
And the third example is even harder, what about the 'comment' text?
Style as an instruction mnemonic? Style as text? Style as a comment?
I think the only sensible answer is to move the disassembler to use
'@' consistently as its comment character, and remove all the uses of
';'.
Then, in the next commit, it's obvious what to do.
There's obviously a *lot* of tests that get updated by this commit,
the only actual code changes are in opcodes/arm-dis.c.
Earlier tidying still missed an opportunity: There's no need for the
"anyimm" static variable. Instead of using it in the loop to mask
"allowed" (which is necessary to satisfy operand_type_or()'s assertions)
simply use "mask", requiring it to be calculated first. That way the
post-loop masking by "mask" ahead of the operand_type_all_zero() can be
dropped.
RISC-V Psabi pr196,
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/196
bfd/
* elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_release_subset_list): Free arch_str if needed.
(riscv_copy_subset_list): Copy arch_str as well.
* elfxx-riscv.h (riscv_subset_list_t): Store arch_str for each subset list.
gas/
* config/tc-riscv.c (riscv_reset_subsets_list_arch_str): Update the
architecture string in the subset_list.
(riscv_set_arch): Call riscv_reset_subsets_list_arch_str after parsing new
architecture string.
(s_riscv_option): Likewise.
(need_arch_map_symbol): New boolean, used to indicate if .option
directives do affect instructions.
(make_mapping_symbol): New boolean parameter reset_seg_arch_str. Need to
generate $x+arch for MAP_INSN, and then store it into tc_segment_info_data
if reset_seg_arch_str is true.
(riscv_mapping_state): Decide if we need to add $x+arch for MAP_INSN. For
now, only add $x+arch if the architecture strings in subset list and segment
are different. Besides, always add $x+arch at the start of section, and do
not add $x+arch for code alignment, since rvc for alignment can be judged
from addend of R_RISCV_ALIGN.
(riscv_remove_mapping_symbol): If current and previous mapping symbol have
same value, then remove the current $x only if the previous is $x+arch;
Otherwise, always remove previous.
(riscv_add_odd_padding_symbol): Updated.
(riscv_check_mapping_symbols): Don't need to add any $x+arch if
need_arch_map_symbol is false, so changed them to $x.
(riscv_frag_align_code): Updated since riscv_mapping_state is changed.
(riscv_init_frag): Likewise.
(s_riscv_insn): Likewise.
(riscv_elf_final_processing): Call riscv_release_subset_list to release
subset_list of riscv_rps_as, rather than only release arch_str in the
riscv_write_out_attrs.
(riscv_write_out_attrs): No need to call riscv_arch_str, just get arch_str
from subset_list of riscv_rps_as.
* config/tc-riscv.h (riscv_segment_info_type): Record current $x+arch mapping
symbol of each segment.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-0*: Merged and replaced by mapping.s.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping.s: New testcase, to test most of the cases in
one file.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-symbols.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-dis.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-non-arch.s: New testcase for the case that
does need any $x+arch.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-non-arch.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/option-arch-01a.d: Updated.
opcodes/
* riscv-dis.c (riscv_disassemble_insn): Set riscv_fpr_names back to
riscv_fpr_names_abi or riscv_fpr_names_numeric when zfinx is disabled
for some specfic code region.
(riscv_get_map_state): Recognized mapping symbols $x+arch, and then reset
the architecture string once the ISA is different.
When no AVX512-specific functionality is in use, the disassembly of
AVX512VL insns is indistinguishable from their AVX counterparts (if such
exist). Emit the {evex} pseudo-prefix in such cases.
Where applicable drop stray uses of PREFIX_OPCODE from table entries.
By putting the templates after their AVX512 counterparts, the AVX512
flavors will be picked by default. That way the need to always use {vex}
ceases to exist once respective CPU features (AVX512-VNNI or AVX512VL as
a whole) have been disabled. This way the need for the PseudoVexPrefix
attribute also disappears.
AMX-TILE is a prereq to these, as already correctly expressed by
CPU_ANY_AMX_TILE_FLAGS. Express the dependency also in the reverse
("positive") direction.
Omitting predicate size specifier in vector form of {sq, uq, }{decp, incp} is deprecated and will be prohibited in a future release of the aarch64,
see https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0602/2021-09/SVE-Instructions/DECP--vector---Decrement-vector-by-count-of-true-predicate-elements-.
This allows explicit size specifier, e.g. `decp z0.h, p0.h`, for predicate operand of these SVE instructions.
The existing behaviour of not requiring the specifier is preserved.
And the disasembly is with the specifier with this patch.
The GAS tests passed under our local tests.
opcodes/
* aarch64-asm.c: Modify `sve_size_hsd` encoding.
* aarch64-tbl.h (aarch64_opcode_table): Add QUALS's type OP_SVE_Vv_HSD
for decp, incp, sqdecp, sqincp, uqdecp and uqincp.
gas/
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.s: Update movprfx_23 testcase's
test_sametwo macro, where take the predicate size specifier.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.d: Update movprfx_23 testcase's
expected disassembly.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.l: Update movprfx_23 testcase's
expected assembler messages.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve.s: Add sve testcase's instructions for
decp, incp, sqdecp, sqincp, uqdecp and uqincp, which take the
predicate size specifier.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve.d: Update sve testcase's expected
disassembly.
Signed-off-by: CaiJingtao <caijingtao@huawei.com>
Current F_STRICT qualifier checking is enforced after the fact
rather than as part of the match. This makes it impossible to
have, e.g.:
QLF2(S_D, S_D)
QLF2(S_D, NIL)
in the same list.
opcodes/
* aarch64-opc.c (aarch64_find_best_match): Handle F_STRICT here
rather than...
(match_operands_qualifier): ...here.
These require EVEX.W=0. Use %XS to facilitate the checking, even if for
the AVX512_4VNNIW ones this is kind of an abuse (as 's' there stands for
"signed", not "single").
While there also correct the 3rd operand for the AVX512_4VNNIW entries:
Only the memory form is allowed (just like for AVX512_4FMAPS, where the
correct type is already in use).
Make %XV also print the separating blank in the VEX case, while making
it do nothing for EVEX-encoded insns. This way the AVX-VNNI entries
can be re-used for AVX512-VNNI, at the same time fixing the lack of
EVEX.W decoding.
For the AVX-VNNI ones further make sure only VEX.66 forms are actually
decoded.
I noticed recently that se_rfmci, a VLE mode instruction, was being
accepted by non-VLE cpus, and also that se_rfmci by itself in a
section did not cause SHF_PPC_VLE to be set. ie. both testcases added
by this patch fail without the changes to tc-ppc.c here.
Also, VLE, SPE2 and LSP insns were not accepted by the assembler with
-many nor were SPE2 and LSP being disassembled with -Many.
gas/
* config/tc-ppc.c (ppc_setup_opcodes): Wrap long lines. Add
vle_opcodes when PPC_OPCODE_VLE or PPC_OPCODE_ANY. Simplify
disassembler index segment checks. Add LSP and SPE2 opcodes
when PPC_OPCODE_ANY too.
(md_assemble): Correct logic adding PPC_APUINFO_VLE and
SHF_PPC_VLE.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/se_rfmci.s
* testsuite/gas/ppc/se_rfmci.d,
* testsuite/gas/ppc/se_rfmci_bad.d: New tests.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/ppc.exp: Run them.
opcodes/
* ppc-dis.c (print_insn_powerpc): Disassemble SPE2 and LSP insn
when -Many.
* ppc-opc.c (vle_opcodes <se_rfmci>): Comment.
Where sub and subf forms of an instruction exist we generally
disassemble to the extended insn sub form rather than the underlying
machine subf instruction. Do so for SPE evsubw and evsubiw too.
spe_ambiguous.d always was a bit too optimistic. There is no sensible
way to disassemble identical bytes back to different and original
source. Instead change the test to check -Mraw results.
gas/
* testsuite/gas/ppc/ppc.exp: Run spe_ambiguous test.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/spe.d: Expect evsubw and evsubiw rather than
evsubfw and evsubifw.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/spe_ambiguous.s: Test evnor form equivalent
to evnot.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/spe_ambiguous.d: Test Mraw.
opcodes/
* ppc-opc.c (powerpc_opcodes): Move evsubw before evsubfw and
evsubiw before evsubifw and mark EXT.
It has bothered me for a long time that we have disabled LSP (and SPE)
tests. Also the LSP test comment indicating there is something wrong
with get_powerpc_dialect. I don't think there is. Decoding of a VLE
instruction depends on whether the processor is in VLE mode (some
processors support both VLE and standard PPC) which we flag per
section with SHF_PPC_VLE for decoding when disassembling.
Background: Some versions of powerpc e200 have "Lightweight Signal
Processing" support, examples being e200z215 and e200z425. As far as
I can tell, LSP and SPE are mutually exclusive. This seems to be
borne out by insn encoding, for example LSP "zvaddih" and SPE "evaddw"
have the same encoding. So none of the processor descriptions in
ppc_opts ought to have both PPC_OPCODE_LSP and PPC_OPCODE_SPE/2, if we
want disassembly to work. I also could not find anything to suggest
that the LSP insns are enabled only in VLE mode, which means the LSP
insns should not be in vle_opcodes.
Fix all this by moving the LSP insns to their own table, and add a new
e200z2 cpu entry with LSP support, removing LSP from -me200z4 and from
-mvle. (Yes, I know, as I said above some of the e200z4 processors
have LSP. Others have SPE. It's hard to choose good options. Think
of z2 as meaning earlier, z4 as later.) Also add -mlsp to allow
adding the LSP insn set.
include/
* opcode/ppc.h (lsp_opcodes, lsp_num_opcodes): Declare.
(LSP_OP_TO_SEG): Define.
binutils/
* doc/binutils.texi: Update ppc docs.
gas/
* config/tc-ppc.c (ppc_setup_opcodes): Add lsp opcodes to ppc_hash.
* doc/c-ppc.texi: Document e200 and lsp.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/lsp-checks.d: Assemble with -me200z2.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/lsp.d: Likewise, disassembly too.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/ppc.exp: Don't xfail lsp test.
opcodes/
* ppc-dis.c (ppc_opts): Add e200z2 and lsp. Don't set
PPC_OPCODE_LSP for e200z4 or vle.
(ppc_parse_cpu): Mutually exclude LSP and SPE.
(LSP_OPCD_SEGS): Define.
(lsp_opcd_indices): New array.
(disassemble_init_powerpc): Init lsp_opcd_indices.
(lookup_lsp): New function.
(print_insn_powerpc): Call it.
* ppc-opc.c: Include libiberty.h for ARRAY_SIZE and use throughout.
(vle_opcodes): Move LSP opcodes to..
(lsp_opcodes): ..here, and sort.
(lsp_num_opcodes): New.
Before changing the core disassembler, we take care of minor code clarity
issues and improve readability.
This commit removes unused variable last_map_state (set by the
print_insn_riscv function but not read anywhere else).
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-dis.c (last_map_state): Remove.
(print_insn_riscv): Remove setting last_map_state.
Before changing the core disassembler, we take care of minor code clarity
issues and improve readability.
Since xlen variable is not (and should not) used outside riscv-dis.c,
this commit makes this variable static.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-dis.c (xlen): Make this variable static.
Before changing the core disassembler, we take care of minor code clarity
issues and improve readability.
This commit replaces uses of int with bool whenever possible.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-dis.c (no_aliases) Change type to bool.
(set_default_riscv_dis_options): Use boolean.
(parse_riscv_dis_option_without_args): Likewise.
(riscv_disassemble_insn): Use boolean keywords.
Before changing the core disassembler, we take care of minor code clarity
issues and improve readability.
This commit takes care of improper spacing for code clarity.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-dis.c (riscv_disassemble_insn): Tidying with spacing.
Before changing the core disassembler, we take care of minor code clarity
issues and improve readability.
First, we need to clarify the roles of variables and code portions.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-dis.c (xlen): Move before default_isa_spec. Add comment.
(default_isa_spec, default_priv_spec): Add comment.
(riscv_gpr_names, riscv_fpr_names): Likewise.
(parse_riscv_dis_option_without_args): Likewise.
(parse_riscv_dis_option, parse_riscv_dis_options): Likewise.
(maybe_print_address): Likewise.
(riscv_disassemble_insn): Fix comment about the Zfinx "extension".
Add comment about the riscv_multi_subset_supports call.
Because all standard hints must be placed before corresponding instruction
for the disassembler, they may taint basic RVI instruction section.
This commit moves all standard hints before all basic RVI instructions
to improve maintainability.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-opc.c (riscv_opcodes): Move all standard hints before all
standard instructions.
This is a part of small tidying (declare tables in riscv-opc.c).
include/ChangeLog:
* opcode/riscv.h (riscv_rm, riscv_pred_succ): Move declarations to
opcodes/riscv-opc.c. New non-static definitions.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-opc.c (riscv_rm, riscv_pred_succ): Move from
include/opcode/riscv.h. Add description.
The operand type "Xl(...)" denotes that (...) is a literal. Specifically,
they are intended to be a constant immediate value.
This commit prints "Xl(...)" operand with dis_style_immediate style,
not dis_style_text.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* riscv-dis.c (print_insn_args): Use dis_style_immediate on
the constant literal of the "Xl..." operand.
