gas uses ZSTD_compressStream2 which is only available with libzstd >=
1.4.0, leading to build errors when an older version is installed.
This patch updates the check libzstd presence to check its version is
>= 1.4.0. However, since gas seems to be the only component requiring
such a recent version this may imply that we disable ZSTD support for
all components although some would still benefit from an older
version.
I ran 'autoreconf -f' in all directories containing a configure.ac
file, using vanilla autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15.1. I noticed
several errors from autoheader in readline, as well as warnings in
intl, but they are unrelated to this patch.
This should fix some of the buildbots.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Christophe
Despite that the RISC-V ISA Manual version 2.2 prohibited "RV32EF", later
versions beginning with the version 20190608-Base-Ratified removed this
restriction. Because the 'E' extension is still a draft, the author chose
to *just* remove the conflict (not checking the ISA version).
Note that, because RV32E is only used with a soft-float calling convention,
there's no valid official ABI for RV32EF. It means, even if we can assemble
a program with -march=rv32ef -mabi=ilp32e, floating-point registers are kept
in an unmanaged state (outside ABI management).
The purpose of this commit is to suppress unnecessary errors while parsing
an ISA string and/or disassembling, not to allow hard-float with RVE.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_parse_check_conflicts): Accept RV32EF
because only older specifications disallowed it.
gas/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/gas/riscv/march-fail-rv32ef.d: Remove as not directly
prohibited.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/march-fail-rv32ef.l: Likewise.
This patch is based on MULTIPLE_FRAME_SECTIONS and EH_FRAME_LINKONCE,
it allows backend to enable this feature and use '--gc-sections' simply.
* gas/dw2gencfi.h (TARGET_MULTIPLE_EH_FRAME_SECTIONS): New.
(MULTIPLE_FRAME_SECTIONS): Add TARGET_MULTIPLE_EH_FRAME_SECTIONS.
* gas/dw2gencfi.c (EH_FRAME_LINKONCE): Add TARGET_MULTIPLE_EH_FRAME_SECTIONS.
(is_now_linkonce_segment): Likewise.
(get_cfi_seg): Create relocation info between .eh_frame.* and .text.* section.
* bfd/elf-bfd.h (elf_backend_can_make_multiple_eh_frame): New.
* bfd/elfxx-target.h (elf_backend_can_make_multiple_eh_frame): Likewise.
* bfd/elflink.c (_bfd_elf_default_action_discarded): Add checking for
elf_backend_can_make_multiple_eh_frame.
Comparing the sum of the relevant .imm<N> fields against a constant imo
makes more obvious what is actually meant. It allows dropping of two
static variables, with a 3rd drop requiring two more minor adjustments
elsewhere, utilizing that "i" is zeroed first thing in md_assemble().
This also increases the chances of the compiler doing the calculations
all in registers.
Consider the case,
.option arch, rv32i
.option norelax
.option arch, +c
.byte 1
.align 2
addi a0, zero, 1
Assembler adds $d for the odd .byte, and then adds $x+arch for the
alignment. Since norelax, riscv_add_odd_padding_symbol will add the
$d and $x for the odd alignment, but accidently remove the $x+arch because
it has the same address as $d. Therefore, we will get the unexpected result
before applying this patch,
.byte 1 # $d
.align 2 # odd alignment, $xrv32ic replaced by $d + $x
After this patch, the expected result should be,
.byte 1 # $d
.align 2 # odd alignment, $xrv32ic replaced by $d + $xrv32ic
gas/
* config/tc-riscv.c (make_mapping_symbol): If we are adding mapping symbol
for odd alignment, then we probably will remove the $x+arch by accidently
when it has the same address of $d. Try to add the removed $x+arch back
after the $d rather than just $x.
(riscv_mapping_state): Updated since parameters of make_mapping_symbol are
changed.
(riscv_add_odd_padding_symbol): Likewise.
(riscv_remove_mapping_symbol): Removed and moved the code into the
riscv_check_mapping_symbols.
(riscv_check_mapping_symbols): Updated.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-dis.d: Updated and added new testcase.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-symbols.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping.s: Likewise.
Looking at the ARM disassembler output, every comment seems to start
with a ';' character, so I assumed this was the correct character to
start an assembler comment.
I then spotted a couple of places where there was no ';', but instead,
just a '@' character. I thought that this was a case of a missing
';', and proposed a patch to add the missing ';' characters.
Turns out I was wrong, '@' is actually the ARM assembler comment
character, while ';' is the statement separator. Thus this:
nop ;@ comment
is two statements, the first is the 'nop' instruction, while the
second contains no instructions, just the '@ comment' comment text.
This:
nop @ comment
is a single 'nop' instruction followed by a comment. And finally,
this:
nop ; comment
is two statements, the first contains the 'nop' instruction, while the
second contains the instruction 'comment', which obviously isn't
actually an instruction at all.
Why this matters is that, in the next commit, I would like to add
libopcodes syntax styling support for ARM.
The question then is how should the disassembler style the three cases
above?
As '@' is the actual comment start character then clearly the '@' and
anything after it can be styled as a comment. But what about ';' in
the second example? Style as text? Style as a comment?
And the third example is even harder, what about the 'comment' text?
Style as an instruction mnemonic? Style as text? Style as a comment?
I think the only sensible answer is to move the disassembler to use
'@' consistently as its comment character, and remove all the uses of
';'.
Then, in the next commit, it's obvious what to do.
There's obviously a *lot* of tests that get updated by this commit,
the only actual code changes are in opcodes/arm-dis.c.
Earlier tidying still missed an opportunity: There's no need for the
"anyimm" static variable. Instead of using it in the loop to mask
"allowed" (which is necessary to satisfy operand_type_or()'s assertions)
simply use "mask", requiring it to be calculated first. That way the
post-loop masking by "mask" ahead of the operand_type_all_zero() can be
dropped.
Silence GCC 12 warning on tc-i386.c:
gas/config/tc-i386.c: In function ‘md_assemble’:
gas/config/tc-i386.c:5039:16: error: too many arguments for format [-Werror=format-extra-args]
5039 | as_warn (_("only support RIP-relative address"), i.tm.name);
* config/tc-i386.c (md_assemble): Print mnemonic in RIP-relative
warning.
* estsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-prefetchi-warn.l: Updated.
Before figuring out the suppress rule of mapping symbol with architecture
(changed back to $x), always generate them at the start of the sections.
gas/
* config/tc-riscv.c (need_arch_map_symbol): Removed.
(riscv_mapping_state): Updated.
(riscv_check_mapping_symbols): Updated.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-non-arch.d: Removed.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-non-arch.s: Likewise.
We don't support instructions longer than 64-bits yet. Still, we can
modify validate_riscv_insn function to prevent unexpected behavior by
limiting the "length" of an instruction to 64-bit (or less).
gas/ChangeLog:
* config/tc-riscv.c (validate_riscv_insn): Fix function
description comment based on current spec. Limit instruction
length up to 64-bit for now. Make sure that required_bits does
not corrupt even if unsigned long long is longer than 64-bit.
Some versions of gcc warn by default about shadowed outer-scope
declarations. This affects frag_align_code, which is declared in
frags.h. Rename the offending function parameter. While there also
switch to using true/false at the function call sites.
Commit 40f1a1a456 ("RISC-V: Output mapping symbols with ISA string.")
caused a build failure on GCC 12 as follows:
make[3]: Entering directory '$(builddir)/gas'
CC config/tc-riscv.o
In file included from $(srcdir)/gas/config/tc-riscv.c:23:
$(srcdir)/gas/as.h: In function ‘make_mapping_symbol’:
$(srcdir)/gas/as.h:123:15: error: ‘buff’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
123 | #define xfree free
| ^~~~
$(srcdir)/gas/config/tc-riscv.c:487:9: note: ‘buff’ was declared here
487 | char *buff;
| ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [Makefile:1425: config/tc-riscv.o] Error 1
This is caused by a false positive of "maybe uninitialized" variable
detection (-Wmaybe-uninitialized). To avoid this error, this commit
initializes the local variable buff to NULL first in all cases.
gas/ChangeLog:
* config/tc-riscv.c (make_mapping_symbol): Initialize variable
buff with NULL to avoid build failure caused by a GCC's false
positive of maybe uninitialized variable detection.
RISC-V Psabi pr196,
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/196
bfd/
* elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_release_subset_list): Free arch_str if needed.
(riscv_copy_subset_list): Copy arch_str as well.
* elfxx-riscv.h (riscv_subset_list_t): Store arch_str for each subset list.
gas/
* config/tc-riscv.c (riscv_reset_subsets_list_arch_str): Update the
architecture string in the subset_list.
(riscv_set_arch): Call riscv_reset_subsets_list_arch_str after parsing new
architecture string.
(s_riscv_option): Likewise.
(need_arch_map_symbol): New boolean, used to indicate if .option
directives do affect instructions.
(make_mapping_symbol): New boolean parameter reset_seg_arch_str. Need to
generate $x+arch for MAP_INSN, and then store it into tc_segment_info_data
if reset_seg_arch_str is true.
(riscv_mapping_state): Decide if we need to add $x+arch for MAP_INSN. For
now, only add $x+arch if the architecture strings in subset list and segment
are different. Besides, always add $x+arch at the start of section, and do
not add $x+arch for code alignment, since rvc for alignment can be judged
from addend of R_RISCV_ALIGN.
(riscv_remove_mapping_symbol): If current and previous mapping symbol have
same value, then remove the current $x only if the previous is $x+arch;
Otherwise, always remove previous.
(riscv_add_odd_padding_symbol): Updated.
(riscv_check_mapping_symbols): Don't need to add any $x+arch if
need_arch_map_symbol is false, so changed them to $x.
(riscv_frag_align_code): Updated since riscv_mapping_state is changed.
(riscv_init_frag): Likewise.
(s_riscv_insn): Likewise.
(riscv_elf_final_processing): Call riscv_release_subset_list to release
subset_list of riscv_rps_as, rather than only release arch_str in the
riscv_write_out_attrs.
(riscv_write_out_attrs): No need to call riscv_arch_str, just get arch_str
from subset_list of riscv_rps_as.
* config/tc-riscv.h (riscv_segment_info_type): Record current $x+arch mapping
symbol of each segment.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-0*: Merged and replaced by mapping.s.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping.s: New testcase, to test most of the cases in
one file.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-symbols.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-dis.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-non-arch.s: New testcase for the case that
does need any $x+arch.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/mapping-non-arch.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/riscv/option-arch-01a.d: Updated.
opcodes/
* riscv-dis.c (riscv_disassemble_insn): Set riscv_fpr_names back to
riscv_fpr_names_abi or riscv_fpr_names_numeric when zfinx is disabled
for some specfic code region.
(riscv_get_map_state): Recognized mapping symbols $x+arch, and then reset
the architecture string once the ISA is different.
There's little point in having Intel syntax disassembler tests when the
purpose of a test is assembler functionality: Drop all
*avx512*_vpclmulqdq-wig1-intel.
For *avx512*_vpclmulqdq-wig1 share source with *avx512*_vpclmulqdq.
Finally put in place similar tests for -mvexwig=1.
There's little point in having Intel syntax disassembler tests when the
purpose of a test is assembler functionality: Drop all
*avx512*_vaes-wig1-intel.
For *avx512*_vaes-wig1 share source with *avx512*_vaes. This in
particular makes sure that the 32-bit VL test actually tests any EVEX
encodings in the first place.
Finally put in place similar tests for -mvexwig=1.
When no AVX512-specific functionality is in use, the disassembly of
AVX512VL insns is indistinguishable from their AVX counterparts (if such
exist). Emit the {evex} pseudo-prefix in such cases.
Where applicable drop stray uses of PREFIX_OPCODE from table entries.
Since
commit 837e225ba1
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Thu Oct 20 10:01:12 2022 +0200
x86: re-work AVX-VNNI support
moved AVX-VNNI after AVX512-VNNI, vector Disp8 is applied even when VEX
encoding is selected. Check VEX/EVEX encoding before checking vector
operands to avoid vector Disp8 with VEX encoding.
PR gas/29708
* config/tc-i386.c (match_template): Check VEX/EVEX encoding
before checking vector operands.
* testsuite/gas/i386/avx-vnni.d: Updated.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-avx-vnni.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/avx-vnni.s: Add a Disp32 test.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-avx-vnni.s: Likewise.
By putting the templates after their AVX512 counterparts, the AVX512
flavors will be picked by default. That way the need to always use {vex}
ceases to exist once respective CPU features (AVX512-VNNI or AVX512VL as
a whole) have been disabled. This way the need for the PseudoVexPrefix
attribute also disappears.
Allows aarch64-pe to be targeted natively, not having to use objcopy to convert it from ELF to PE.
Based on initial work by Jedidiah Thompson
Co-authored-by: Jedidiah Thompson <wej22007@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Zac Walker <zac.walker@linaro.org>
As of commit ae89daecb1 ("x86: generalize disabling of sub-
architectures") there's no arbitrary subset of ISAs which can also be
disabled. This should have been reflected in documentation right away.
Since I failed to do so, correct this now.
Omitting predicate size specifier in vector form of {sq, uq, }{decp, incp} is deprecated and will be prohibited in a future release of the aarch64,
see https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0602/2021-09/SVE-Instructions/DECP--vector---Decrement-vector-by-count-of-true-predicate-elements-.
This allows explicit size specifier, e.g. `decp z0.h, p0.h`, for predicate operand of these SVE instructions.
The existing behaviour of not requiring the specifier is preserved.
And the disasembly is with the specifier with this patch.
The GAS tests passed under our local tests.
opcodes/
* aarch64-asm.c: Modify `sve_size_hsd` encoding.
* aarch64-tbl.h (aarch64_opcode_table): Add QUALS's type OP_SVE_Vv_HSD
for decp, incp, sqdecp, sqincp, uqdecp and uqincp.
gas/
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.s: Update movprfx_23 testcase's
test_sametwo macro, where take the predicate size specifier.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.d: Update movprfx_23 testcase's
expected disassembly.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.l: Update movprfx_23 testcase's
expected assembler messages.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve.s: Add sve testcase's instructions for
decp, incp, sqdecp, sqincp, uqdecp and uqincp, which take the
predicate size specifier.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve.d: Update sve testcase's expected
disassembly.
Signed-off-by: CaiJingtao <caijingtao@huawei.com>
I noticed recently that se_rfmci, a VLE mode instruction, was being
accepted by non-VLE cpus, and also that se_rfmci by itself in a
section did not cause SHF_PPC_VLE to be set. ie. both testcases added
by this patch fail without the changes to tc-ppc.c here.
Also, VLE, SPE2 and LSP insns were not accepted by the assembler with
-many nor were SPE2 and LSP being disassembled with -Many.
gas/
* config/tc-ppc.c (ppc_setup_opcodes): Wrap long lines. Add
vle_opcodes when PPC_OPCODE_VLE or PPC_OPCODE_ANY. Simplify
disassembler index segment checks. Add LSP and SPE2 opcodes
when PPC_OPCODE_ANY too.
(md_assemble): Correct logic adding PPC_APUINFO_VLE and
SHF_PPC_VLE.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/se_rfmci.s
* testsuite/gas/ppc/se_rfmci.d,
* testsuite/gas/ppc/se_rfmci_bad.d: New tests.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/ppc.exp: Run them.
opcodes/
* ppc-dis.c (print_insn_powerpc): Disassemble SPE2 and LSP insn
when -Many.
* ppc-opc.c (vle_opcodes <se_rfmci>): Comment.
Where sub and subf forms of an instruction exist we generally
disassemble to the extended insn sub form rather than the underlying
machine subf instruction. Do so for SPE evsubw and evsubiw too.
spe_ambiguous.d always was a bit too optimistic. There is no sensible
way to disassemble identical bytes back to different and original
source. Instead change the test to check -Mraw results.
gas/
* testsuite/gas/ppc/ppc.exp: Run spe_ambiguous test.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/spe.d: Expect evsubw and evsubiw rather than
evsubfw and evsubifw.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/spe_ambiguous.s: Test evnor form equivalent
to evnot.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/spe_ambiguous.d: Test Mraw.
opcodes/
* ppc-opc.c (powerpc_opcodes): Move evsubw before evsubfw and
evsubiw before evsubifw and mark EXT.
It has bothered me for a long time that we have disabled LSP (and SPE)
tests. Also the LSP test comment indicating there is something wrong
with get_powerpc_dialect. I don't think there is. Decoding of a VLE
instruction depends on whether the processor is in VLE mode (some
processors support both VLE and standard PPC) which we flag per
section with SHF_PPC_VLE for decoding when disassembling.
Background: Some versions of powerpc e200 have "Lightweight Signal
Processing" support, examples being e200z215 and e200z425. As far as
I can tell, LSP and SPE are mutually exclusive. This seems to be
borne out by insn encoding, for example LSP "zvaddih" and SPE "evaddw"
have the same encoding. So none of the processor descriptions in
ppc_opts ought to have both PPC_OPCODE_LSP and PPC_OPCODE_SPE/2, if we
want disassembly to work. I also could not find anything to suggest
that the LSP insns are enabled only in VLE mode, which means the LSP
insns should not be in vle_opcodes.
Fix all this by moving the LSP insns to their own table, and add a new
e200z2 cpu entry with LSP support, removing LSP from -me200z4 and from
-mvle. (Yes, I know, as I said above some of the e200z4 processors
have LSP. Others have SPE. It's hard to choose good options. Think
of z2 as meaning earlier, z4 as later.) Also add -mlsp to allow
adding the LSP insn set.
include/
* opcode/ppc.h (lsp_opcodes, lsp_num_opcodes): Declare.
(LSP_OP_TO_SEG): Define.
binutils/
* doc/binutils.texi: Update ppc docs.
gas/
* config/tc-ppc.c (ppc_setup_opcodes): Add lsp opcodes to ppc_hash.
* doc/c-ppc.texi: Document e200 and lsp.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/lsp-checks.d: Assemble with -me200z2.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/lsp.d: Likewise, disassembly too.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/ppc.exp: Don't xfail lsp test.
opcodes/
* ppc-dis.c (ppc_opts): Add e200z2 and lsp. Don't set
PPC_OPCODE_LSP for e200z4 or vle.
(ppc_parse_cpu): Mutually exclude LSP and SPE.
(LSP_OPCD_SEGS): Define.
(lsp_opcd_indices): New array.
(disassemble_init_powerpc): Init lsp_opcd_indices.
(lookup_lsp): New function.
(print_insn_powerpc): Call it.
* ppc-opc.c: Include libiberty.h for ARRAY_SIZE and use throughout.
(vle_opcodes): Move LSP opcodes to..
(lsp_opcodes): ..here, and sort.
(lsp_num_opcodes): New.
'H', 'Smstateen', 'Sscofpmf' and 'Sstc' are four privileged extensions with
their CSR definitions and 'Smepmp' is a privileged extension with additional
CSR bits.
Volume II: Privileged Architecture of the RISC-V ISA Manual states that the
privileged architecture requires the 'Zicsr' extension. However, current
GNU Binutils has no direct way whether the program has dependency to the
privileged architecture itself.
As a workaround, we should add implications from privileged extensions that
either add new CSRs, extend existing CSRs or depends on using CSRs.
This commit adds such implications for existing privileged extensions that
satisfy this condition.
gas/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/gas/riscv/march-imply-h.d: New test, at least for 'H'.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_implicit_subsets): Add 'Zicsr'
implicications for privileged extensions 'H', 'Smstateen',
'Sscofpmf', 'Sstc' and 'Smepmp'.
* symbols.c (S_GET_VALUE): If the unresolved symbol is the fake
label provide a more helpful error message to the user.
(S_GET_VALUE_WHERE): Like S_GET_VALUE, but includes a file/line
number for error reporting purposes.
* symbols.h (S_GET_VALUE_WHERE): Prototype.
* write.c (fixup_segment): Use S_GET_VALUE_WHERE.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* bfd-in.h (bfd_hash_set_default_size): Add COMPRESS_UNKNOWN
enum value.
(struct compressed_type_tuple): New.
* bfd-in2.h (bfd_hash_set_default_size): Regenerate.
(struct compressed_type_tuple): Likewise.
* libbfd.c (ARRAY_SIZE): New macro.
(bfd_get_compression_algorithm): New function.
(bfd_get_compression_algorithm_name): Likewise.
gas/ChangeLog:
* as.c: Do not special-case, use the new functions.
ld/ChangeLog:
* emultempl/elf.em: Do not special-case, use the new functions.
* lexsup.c (elf_static_list_options): Likewise.
An earlier attempt (e68c3d59ac ["x86: better respect quotes in
parse_operands()"]) needed undoing (cc0f96357e ["x86: permit
parenthesized expressions again as addressing scale factor"]) as far its
effect here went. As indicated back then, the issue is the backwards
scanning of the operand string to find the matching opening parenthesis.
Switch to forward scanning, finding the last outermost unquoted opening
parenthesis (which is the one matching the trailing closing one).
