mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-01-26 18:03:33 +08:00
Update MAINTAINERS file with details about accepting DCO signed contributions.
* MAINTAINERS: Add section on patches, copyright and DCO.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ac37f0643
commit
f2ba47d69e
@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
|
||||
2022-10-19 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* MAINTAINERS: Add section on patches, copyright and DCO.
|
||||
|
||||
2022-10-12 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR 29665
|
||||
* objcopy.c (copy_object): Use the input filename when
|
||||
* objcopy.c (copy_object): Use the input filename when
|
||||
reporting that a .gnu_debuglink section already exists.
|
||||
|
||||
2022-10-03 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
@ -212,6 +212,35 @@ also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
|
||||
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
|
||||
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
|
||||
|
||||
Obvious fixes should not be "legally significant", as defined here:
|
||||
|
||||
https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Legally-Significant
|
||||
|
||||
-------- Patches and Copyright ---------
|
||||
|
||||
If a patch is non-obvious, its copyright must be considered. There
|
||||
are two ways to handle this. The first is to assign the copyright
|
||||
of the FSF. This ensures that if problems with the authorship of the
|
||||
patch arise, the FSF will be able to deal with them.
|
||||
|
||||
The list of already assigned copyrights can be obtained from
|
||||
fencepost.gnu.org in the file: /gd/gnuorg/copyright.list.
|
||||
|
||||
New copyright assignments can be obtained by completing one of the
|
||||
forms found here and sending it off to the FSF:
|
||||
|
||||
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=tree;f=doc/Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
The alternative is to sign off the contribution by agreeing to the
|
||||
Developer's Certificate of Origin (version 1.1 or later) and adding a
|
||||
line to the end of the contribution that looks something like this:
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
|
||||
|
||||
The details of the Developer's Certificate or Origin can be found here:
|
||||
|
||||
https://developercertificate.org/
|
||||
|
||||
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
|
||||
|
||||
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user