gold: Make Ordering::operator() even more complex

GCC 9 generates the same function size for Ordering::operator() in
odr_violation1.cc and odr_violation2.cc on x32:

  134: 00000000    31 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT   64 _ZN8OrderingclEii
   40: 00000000    31 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   10 _ZN8OrderingclEii

This patch makes Ordering::operator() even more complex

   134: 00000000    31 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT   64 _ZN8OrderingclEii
    42: 00000000    35 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   11 _ZN8OrderingclEii

	* testsuite/odr_violation2.cc (Ordering::operator()): Make
	expression even more complex.
This commit is contained in:
H.J. Lu 2020-05-01 10:06:15 -07:00
parent de6d6067f5
commit e10cfd0633
2 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2020-05-01 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* testsuite/odr_violation2.cc (Ordering::operator()): Make
expression even more complex.
2020-05-01 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* testsuite/ver_test_pr16504.sh: Updated.

View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ class Ordering {
bool Ordering::operator()(int a, int b) {
// Optimization makes this operator() a different size than the one
// in odr_violation1.cc.
return a + 12345 > b / 67;
return (a * 30 + b + 12345) > b / 67;
}
void SortDescending(int array[], int size) {