mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-01-24 00:44:14 +08:00
Support _Complex in hard-VFP abi
Hi, When we pass "-mfloat-abi=hard" flag in the GDB testing, we see the following fails, FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_float_complex_values(fc1, fc2) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_float_complex_many_args(fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_double_complex_values(dc1, dc2) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_double_complex_many_args(dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_long_double_complex_values(ldc1, ldc2) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_long_double_complex_many_args(ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4, ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4, ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4, ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: call inferior func with struct - returns float _Complex FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: call inferior func with struct - returns double _Complex The hard-VFP ABI was supported by GDB overal, done by this patch https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-07/msg00686.html but "vectors and complex types are not currently supported", mentioned in the patch. As a result, these tests fail. This patch is to support _Complex types in hard-VFP abi. As specified in "7.1.1, Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Arch", the layout of _Complex types is a struct, which is identical to the layout on amd64, so I copy Mark's comments to amd64 support. Regression tested on arm-none-eabi target. OK to apply? gdb: 2014-08-19 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> * arm-tdep.c (arm_vfp_cprc_sub_candidate): Handle _Complex types.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2974be626b
commit
817e0957a5
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
2014-08-19 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* arm-tdep.c (arm_vfp_cprc_sub_candidate): Handle _Complex
|
||||||
|
types.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2014-08-19 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
2014-08-19 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* acinclude.m4 (GDB_AC_CHECK_BFD): Don't add -ldl.
|
* acinclude.m4 (GDB_AC_CHECK_BFD): Don't add -ldl.
|
||||||
|
@ -3562,8 +3562,8 @@ arm_vfp_cprc_reg_char (enum arm_vfp_cprc_base_type b)
|
|||||||
classified from *BASE_TYPE, or two types differently classified
|
classified from *BASE_TYPE, or two types differently classified
|
||||||
from each other, return -1, otherwise return the total number of
|
from each other, return -1, otherwise return the total number of
|
||||||
base-type elements found (possibly 0 in an empty structure or
|
base-type elements found (possibly 0 in an empty structure or
|
||||||
array). Vectors and complex types are not currently supported,
|
array). Vector types are not currently supported, matching the
|
||||||
matching the generic AAPCS support. */
|
generic AAPCS support. */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int
|
static int
|
||||||
arm_vfp_cprc_sub_candidate (struct type *t,
|
arm_vfp_cprc_sub_candidate (struct type *t,
|
||||||
@ -3594,6 +3594,36 @@ arm_vfp_cprc_sub_candidate (struct type *t,
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
case TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX:
|
||||||
|
/* Arguments of complex T where T is one of the types float or
|
||||||
|
double get treated as if they are implemented as:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
struct complexT
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
T real;
|
||||||
|
T imag;
|
||||||
|
}; */
|
||||||
|
switch (TYPE_LENGTH (t))
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
case 8:
|
||||||
|
if (*base_type == VFP_CPRC_UNKNOWN)
|
||||||
|
*base_type = VFP_CPRC_SINGLE;
|
||||||
|
else if (*base_type != VFP_CPRC_SINGLE)
|
||||||
|
return -1;
|
||||||
|
return 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
case 16:
|
||||||
|
if (*base_type == VFP_CPRC_UNKNOWN)
|
||||||
|
*base_type = VFP_CPRC_DOUBLE;
|
||||||
|
else if (*base_type != VFP_CPRC_DOUBLE)
|
||||||
|
return -1;
|
||||||
|
return 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
default:
|
||||||
|
return -1;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
|
case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int count;
|
int count;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user