x86: rework of match_template()'s suffix checking

(Ab)using i386_opcode_modifier for this has been overkill, as the logic
doesn't really require the full structure. With the removal of
LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX and No_ldSuf there's no good reason at all
anymore to pull out such a loop invariant: We're dealing a check of a
bit in the loop for a simple comparison. Do the original compares inside
the loop, thus also making it easier to understand what is actually
being checked.
This commit is contained in:
Jan Beulich 2022-12-01 10:00:26 +01:00
parent f207f1c113
commit 7505bb034c

View File

@ -6461,7 +6461,6 @@ match_template (char mnem_suffix)
i386_operand_type overlap0, overlap1, overlap2, overlap3;
i386_operand_type overlap4;
unsigned int found_reverse_match;
i386_opcode_modifier suffix_check;
i386_operand_type operand_types [MAX_OPERANDS];
int addr_prefix_disp;
unsigned int j, size_match, check_register, errline = __LINE__;
@ -6475,27 +6474,6 @@ match_template (char mnem_suffix)
found_reverse_match = 0;
addr_prefix_disp = -1;
/* Prepare for mnemonic suffix check. */
memset (&suffix_check, 0, sizeof (suffix_check));
switch (mnem_suffix)
{
case BYTE_MNEM_SUFFIX:
suffix_check.no_bsuf = 1;
break;
case WORD_MNEM_SUFFIX:
suffix_check.no_wsuf = 1;
break;
case SHORT_MNEM_SUFFIX:
suffix_check.no_ssuf = 1;
break;
case LONG_MNEM_SUFFIX:
suffix_check.no_lsuf = 1;
break;
case QWORD_MNEM_SUFFIX:
suffix_check.no_qsuf = 1;
break;
}
for (t = current_templates->start; t < current_templates->end; t++)
{
addr_prefix_disp = -1;
@ -6543,11 +6521,11 @@ match_template (char mnem_suffix)
/* Check the suffix. */
specific_error = progress (invalid_instruction_suffix);
if ((t->opcode_modifier.no_bsuf && suffix_check.no_bsuf)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_wsuf && suffix_check.no_wsuf)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_lsuf && suffix_check.no_lsuf)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_ssuf && suffix_check.no_ssuf)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_qsuf && suffix_check.no_qsuf))
if ((t->opcode_modifier.no_bsuf && mnem_suffix == BYTE_MNEM_SUFFIX)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_wsuf && mnem_suffix == WORD_MNEM_SUFFIX)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_lsuf && mnem_suffix == LONG_MNEM_SUFFIX)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_ssuf && mnem_suffix == SHORT_MNEM_SUFFIX)
|| (t->opcode_modifier.no_qsuf && mnem_suffix == QWORD_MNEM_SUFFIX))
continue;
specific_error = progress (operand_size_mismatch);