Work around GCC 6.3.1 bug

This commit works around a GCC 6.3.1 bug several people are hitting:

  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-09/msg00270.html
  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-10/msg00418.html

It manifests like this:

  ../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/probe.c:68:12: error: types may not be defined in a for-range-declaration [-Werror]
	 for (struct probe *probe : probes)
	      ^~~~~~

Fix it by renaming the range-for named variables to something different
from their type's name.

gdb/ChangeLog:
2017-10-16  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* elfread.c (probe_key_free): Rename range-for variable.
	* probe.c (parse_probes_in_pspace, find_probes_in_objfile)
	(find_probe_by_pc, collect_probes): Rename range-for variable.
This commit is contained in:
Pedro Alves 2017-10-16 13:39:12 +01:00
parent 5c3261b0e8
commit 63f0e930d4
3 changed files with 26 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2017-10-16 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* elfread.c (probe_key_free): Rename range-for variable.
* probe.c (parse_probes_in_pspace, find_probes_in_objfile)
(find_probe_by_pc, collect_probes): Rename range-for variable.
2017-10-16 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* features/Makefile (XMLTOC): Remove tic6x-*.xml.

View File

@ -1340,8 +1340,8 @@ probe_key_free (bfd *abfd, void *d)
{
std::vector<probe *> *probes = (std::vector<probe *> *) d;
for (struct probe *probe : *probes)
probe->pops->destroy (probe);
for (probe *p : *probes)
p->pops->destroy (p);
delete probes;
}

View File

@ -65,23 +65,23 @@ parse_probes_in_pspace (const struct probe_ops *probe_ops,
const std::vector<probe *> &probes
= objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns->sym_get_probes (objfile);
for (struct probe *probe : probes)
for (probe *p : probes)
{
if (probe_ops != &probe_ops_any && probe->pops != probe_ops)
if (probe_ops != &probe_ops_any && p->pops != probe_ops)
continue;
if (provider && strcmp (probe->provider, provider) != 0)
if (provider && strcmp (p->provider, provider) != 0)
continue;
if (strcmp (probe->name, name) != 0)
if (strcmp (p->name, name) != 0)
continue;
symtab_and_line sal;
sal.pc = get_probe_address (probe, objfile);
sal.pc = get_probe_address (p, objfile);
sal.explicit_pc = 1;
sal.section = find_pc_overlay (sal.pc);
sal.pspace = search_pspace;
sal.probe = probe;
sal.probe = p;
sal.objfile = objfile;
result->push_back (std::move (sal));
@ -210,15 +210,15 @@ find_probes_in_objfile (struct objfile *objfile, const char *provider,
const std::vector<probe *> &probes
= objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns->sym_get_probes (objfile);
for (struct probe *probe : probes)
for (probe *p : probes)
{
if (strcmp (probe->provider, provider) != 0)
if (strcmp (p->provider, provider) != 0)
continue;
if (strcmp (probe->name, name) != 0)
if (strcmp (p->name, name) != 0)
continue;
VEC_safe_push (probe_p, result, probe);
VEC_safe_push (probe_p, result, p);
}
return result;
@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ find_probe_by_pc (CORE_ADDR pc)
/* If this proves too inefficient, we can replace with a hash. */
const std::vector<probe *> &probes
= objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns->sym_get_probes (objfile);
for (struct probe *probe : probes)
if (get_probe_address (probe, objfile) == pc)
for (probe *p : probes)
if (get_probe_address (p, objfile) == pc)
{
result.objfile = objfile;
result.probe = probe;
result.probe = p;
return result;
}
}
@ -294,20 +294,20 @@ collect_probes (const std::string &objname, const std::string &provider,
const std::vector<probe *> &probes
= objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns->sym_get_probes (objfile);
for (struct probe *probe : probes)
for (probe *p : probes)
{
if (pops != NULL && probe->pops != pops)
if (pops != NULL && p->pops != pops)
continue;
if (prov_pat
&& prov_pat->exec (probe->provider, 0, NULL, 0) != 0)
&& prov_pat->exec (p->provider, 0, NULL, 0) != 0)
continue;
if (probe_pat
&& probe_pat->exec (probe->name, 0, NULL, 0) != 0)
&& probe_pat->exec (p->name, 0, NULL, 0) != 0)
continue;
result.emplace_back (probe, objfile);
result.emplace_back (p, objfile);
}
}