* remote.c (remote_protocol_e, remote_protocol_E): Define.

(set_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd)
(set_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd)
(show_remote_protocol_e_packet_command)
(show_remote_protocol_E_packet_command): New functions.
(init_all_packet_configs): Initialize remote_protocol_e and
remote_protocol_E.
(remote_resume, remote_async_resume): Support e/E command
packets.
(show_remote_cmd): Show state of remote_protocol_e and
remote_protocol_E.
(_initialize_remote): Add "set remote step-over-range-packet"
and "set remote step-over-range-w-signal-packet" to CLI.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This commit is contained in:
J.T. Conklin 2001-04-03 01:42:17 +00:00
parent 358a550280
commit 44eaed12c5
2 changed files with 184 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
2001-04-02 J.T. Conklin <jtc@redback.com>
* remote.c (remote_protocol_e, remote_protocol_E): Define.
(set_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd)
(set_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd)
(show_remote_protocol_e_packet_command)
(show_remote_protocol_E_packet_command): New functions.
(init_all_packet_configs): Initialize remote_protocol_e and
remote_protocol_E.
(remote_resume, remote_async_resume): Support e/E command
packets.
(show_remote_cmd): Show state of remote_protocol_e and
remote_protocol_E.
(_initialize_remote): Add "set remote step-over-range-packet"
and "set remote step-over-range-w-signal-packet" to CLI.
2001-04-01 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Obsolete ns32k-*-mach3*, ns32k-umax-*, ns32k-utek-sysv* and

View File

@ -663,6 +663,40 @@ packet_ok (const char *buf, struct packet_config *config)
}
}
/* Should we try the 'e' (step over range) request? */
static struct packet_config remote_protocol_e;
static void
set_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd (char *args, int from_tty,
struct cmd_list_element *c)
{
update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_e);
}
static void
show_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd (char *args, int from_tty)
{
show_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_e);
}
/* Should we try the 'E' (step over range / w signal #) request? */
static struct packet_config remote_protocol_E;
static void
set_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd (char *args, int from_tty,
struct cmd_list_element *c)
{
update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_E);
}
static void
show_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd (char *args, int from_tty)
{
show_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_E);
}
/* Should we try the 'P' (set register) request? */
static struct packet_config remote_protocol_P;
@ -2031,6 +2065,8 @@ static void
init_all_packet_configs (void)
{
int i;
update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_e);
update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_E);
update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_P);
for (i = 0; i < NR_Z_PACKET_TYPES; i++)
update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_Z[i]);
@ -2294,6 +2330,7 @@ static void
remote_resume (int pid, int step, enum target_signal siggnal)
{
char *buf = alloca (PBUFSIZ);
char *p;
if (pid == -1)
set_thread (0, 0); /* run any thread */
@ -2308,11 +2345,66 @@ remote_resume (int pid, int step, enum target_signal siggnal)
if (target_resume_hook)
(*target_resume_hook) ();
/* The s/S/c/C packets do not return status. So if the target does
not support the S or C packets, the debug agent returns an empty
string which is detected in remote_wait(). This protocol defect
is fixed in the e/E packets. */
if (step && step_range_end)
{
/* If the target does not support the 'E' packet, we try the 'S'
packet. Ideally we would fall back to the 'e' packet if that
too is not supported. But that would require another copy of
the code to issue the 'e' packet (and fall back to 's' if not
supported) in remote_wait(). */
if (siggnal != TARGET_SIGNAL_0)
{
if (remote_protocol_E.support != PACKET_DISABLE)
{
p = buf;
*p++ = 'E';
*p++ = tohex (((int) siggnal >> 4) & 0xf);
*p++ = tohex (((int) siggnal) & 0xf);
*p++ = ',';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_start);
*p++ = ',';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_end);
*p++ = 0;
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, PBUFSIZ, 0);
if (packet_ok(buf, &remote_protocol_E) == PACKET_OK)
return;
}
}
else
{
if (remote_protocol_e.support != PACKET_DISABLE)
{
p = buf;
*p++ = 'e';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_start);
*p++ = ',';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_end);
*p++ = 0;
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, PBUFSIZ, 0);
if (packet_ok(buf, &remote_protocol_e) == PACKET_OK)
return;
}
}
}
if (siggnal != TARGET_SIGNAL_0)
{
buf[0] = step ? 'S' : 'C';
buf[1] = tohex (((int) siggnal >> 4) & 0xf);
buf[2] = tohex ((int) siggnal & 0xf);
buf[2] = tohex (((int) siggnal) & 0xf);
buf[3] = '\0';
}
else
@ -2326,6 +2418,7 @@ static void
remote_async_resume (int pid, int step, enum target_signal siggnal)
{
char *buf = alloca (PBUFSIZ);
char *p;
if (pid == -1)
set_thread (0, 0); /* run any thread */
@ -2340,6 +2433,60 @@ remote_async_resume (int pid, int step, enum target_signal siggnal)
if (target_resume_hook)
(*target_resume_hook) ();
/* The s/S/c/C packets do not return status. So if the target does
not support the S or C packets, the debug agent returns an empty
string which is detected in remote_wait(). This protocol defect
is fixed in the e/E packets. */
if (step && step_range_end)
{
/* If the target does not support the 'E' packet, we try the 'S'
packet. Ideally we would fall back to the 'e' packet if that
too is not supported. But that would require another copy of
the code to issue the 'e' packet (and fall back to 's' if not
supported) in remote_wait(). */
if (siggnal != TARGET_SIGNAL_0)
{
if (remote_protocol_E.support != PACKET_DISABLE)
{
p = buf;
*p++ = 'E';
*p++ = tohex (((int) siggnal >> 4) & 0xf);
*p++ = tohex (((int) siggnal) & 0xf);
*p++ = ',';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_start);
*p++ = ',';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_end);
*p++ = 0;
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, PBUFSIZ, 0);
if (packet_ok(buf, &remote_protocol_E) == PACKET_OK)
goto register_event_loop;
}
}
else
{
if (remote_protocol_e.support != PACKET_DISABLE)
{
p = buf;
*p++ = 'e';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_start);
*p++ = ',';
p += hexnumstr (p, (ULONGEST) step_range_end);
*p++ = 0;
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, PBUFSIZ, 0);
if (packet_ok(buf, &remote_protocol_e) == PACKET_OK)
goto register_event_loop;
}
}
}
if (siggnal != TARGET_SIGNAL_0)
{
buf[0] = step ? 'S' : 'C';
@ -2349,7 +2496,10 @@ remote_async_resume (int pid, int step, enum target_signal siggnal)
}
else
strcpy (buf, step ? "s" : "c");
putpkt (buf);
register_event_loop:
/* We are about to start executing the inferior, let's register it
with the event loop. NOTE: this is the one place where all the
execution commands end up. We could alternatively do this in each
@ -2366,7 +2516,6 @@ remote_async_resume (int pid, int step, enum target_signal siggnal)
this information already found in the continuation block? */
if (target_is_async_p ())
target_executing = 1;
putpkt (buf);
}
@ -5504,7 +5653,10 @@ set_remote_cmd (char *args, int from_tty)
static void
show_remote_cmd (char *args, int from_tty)
{
show_remote_protocol_Z_packet_cmd (args, from_tty);
show_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd (args, from_tty);
show_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd (args, from_tty);
show_remote_protocol_P_packet_cmd (args, from_tty);
show_remote_protocol_binary_download_cmd (args, from_tty);
}
@ -5649,6 +5801,20 @@ in a memory packet.\n",
add_info ("remote-process", remote_info_process,
"Query the remote system for process info.");
add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_e,
"e", "step-over-range",
set_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd,
show_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd,
&remote_set_cmdlist, &remote_show_cmdlist,
0);
add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_E,
"E", "step-over-range-w-signal",
set_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd,
show_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd,
&remote_set_cmdlist, &remote_show_cmdlist,
0);
add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_P,
"P", "set-register",
set_remote_protocol_P_packet_cmd,