mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2024-11-25 02:53:48 +08:00
* mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum): New function.
(mn10300_gdbarch_init): Register mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum().
This commit is contained in:
parent
2247615a0e
commit
336c28c5f7
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2005-09-02 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum): New function.
|
||||
(mn10300_gdbarch_init): Register mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum().
|
||||
|
||||
2005-09-02 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* mn10300-tdep.c (is_my_frame_in_sp, is_my_frame_in_fp)
|
||||
|
@ -937,6 +937,37 @@ mn10300_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
||||
return sp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If DWARF2 is a register number appearing in Dwarf2 debug info, then
|
||||
mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (DWARF2) is the corresponding GDB
|
||||
register number. Why don't Dwarf2 and GDB use the same numbering?
|
||||
Who knows? But since people have object files lying around with
|
||||
the existing Dwarf2 numbering, and other people have written stubs
|
||||
to work with the existing GDB, neither of them can change. So we
|
||||
just have to cope. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (int dwarf2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* This table is supposed to be shaped like the REGISTER_NAMES
|
||||
initializer in gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.h. Registers which
|
||||
appear in GCC's numbering, but have no counterpart in GDB's
|
||||
world, are marked with a -1. */
|
||||
static int dwarf2_to_gdb[] = {
|
||||
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, -1, 8,
|
||||
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
|
||||
32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,
|
||||
40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
|
||||
48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,
|
||||
56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if (dwarf2 < 0
|
||||
|| dwarf2 >= (sizeof (dwarf2_to_gdb) / sizeof (dwarf2_to_gdb[0]))
|
||||
|| dwarf2_to_gdb[dwarf2] == -1)
|
||||
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
|
||||
"bogus register number in debug info: %d", dwarf2);
|
||||
|
||||
return dwarf2_to_gdb[dwarf2];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct gdbarch *
|
||||
mn10300_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
|
||||
@ -977,6 +1008,7 @@ mn10300_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
|
||||
set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch, mn10300_write_pc);
|
||||
set_gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch, E_PC_REGNUM);
|
||||
set_gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch, E_SP_REGNUM);
|
||||
set_gdbarch_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Stack unwinding. */
|
||||
set_gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, core_addr_lessthan);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user