pr20882 testcase

-gdwarf-sections doesn't work on targets that lack support to emit
address size relative relocs.  The testcase as it was avoided
-gdwarf-sections doing anything by providing a non-empty .debug_line.
It's better to not use -gdwarf-sections.  Also, the testcase failed
to match the output for 16-bit address targets like avr.

	PR ld/20882
	* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882.d: Don't pass -gdwarf-sections to gas.
	Allow for 16-bit address targets and match expected data fully.
	* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882a.s: Delete .debug_line section.
	* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882b.s: Likewise.
	* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882c.s: Likewise.
This commit is contained in:
Alan Modra 2017-05-18 14:28:17 +09:30
parent a406db9163
commit 087ea22225
5 changed files with 12 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2017-05-18 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
PR ld/20882
* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882.d: Don't pass -gdwarf-sections to gas.
Allow for 16-bit address targets and match expected data fully.
* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882a.s: Delete .debug_line section.
* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882b.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882c.s: Likewise.
2017-05-17 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR ld/20882

View File

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
#source: pr20882a.s
#source: pr20882b.s
#source: pr20882c.s
#as: -gdwarf-sections
#ld: --gc-sections -e main
#readelf: -x .debug_info
#...
+0x0+ [0-9a-f ]+ 28 +.+\(
0x0+ (0a000000 00000000 |00000000 0000000a |06000000 |00000006 |0400|0004)28 .*

View File

@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
.text
.globl main
.type main, %function
.globl main
.type main, %function
main:
.byte 0
.section .debug_info,"",%progbits
.dc.a t.c.4903c230+2
.section .debug_line,"",%progbits
.byte 0

View File

@ -3,6 +3,3 @@
.globl t.c.4903c230
t.c.4903c230:
.byte 0x28
.section .debug_line,"",%progbits
.byte 0

View File

@ -3,6 +3,3 @@
.globl t.c.4903c231
t.c.4903c231:
.byte 0x29
.section .debug_line,"",%progbits
.byte 0