binutils-gdb/gdb/complaints.c

322 lines
9.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* Support for complaint handling during symbol reading in GDB.
Copyright 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002 Free
Software Foundation, Inc.
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
This file is part of GDB.
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
#include "defs.h"
#include "complaints.h"
#include "gdb_assert.h"
#include "command.h"
#include "gdbcmd.h"
2000-05-28 09:12:42 +08:00
extern void _initialize_complaints (void);
1999-05-26 02:09:09 +08:00
/* Should each complaint message be self explanatory, or should we assume that
a series of complaints is being produced? */
/* case 1: First message of a series that must
start off with explanation. case 2: Subsequent message of a series
that needs no explanation (the user already knows we have a problem
so we can just state our piece). */
enum complaint_series {
/* Isolated self explanatory message. */
ISOLATED_MESSAGE,
/* First message of a series, includes an explanation. */
FIRST_MESSAGE,
/* First message of a series, but does not need to include any sort
of explanation. */
SHORT_FIRST_MESSAGE,
/* Subsequent message of a series that needs no explanation (the
user already knows we have a problem so we can just state our
piece). */
SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE
};
/* Structure to manage complaints about symbol file contents. */
struct complain
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
{
const char *file;
int line;
const char *fmt;
int counter;
struct complain *next;
};
/* The explanatory message that should accompany the complaint. The
message is in two parts - pre and post - that are printed around
the complaint text. */
struct explanation
{
const char *prefix;
const char *postfix;
};
struct complaints
{
struct complain *root;
/* Should each complaint be self explanatory, or should we assume
that a series of complaints is being produced? case 0: Isolated
self explanatory message. case 1: First message of a series that
must start off with explanation. case 2: Subsequent message of a
series that needs no explanation (the user already knows we have
a problem so we can just state our piece). */
int series;
/* The explanatory messages that should accompany the complaint.
NOTE: cagney/2002-08-14: In a desperate attempt at being vaguely
i18n friendly, this is an array of two messages. When present,
the PRE and POST EXPLANATION[SERIES] are used to wrap the
message. */
const struct explanation *explanation;
};
static struct complain complaint_sentinel;
/* The symbol table complaint table. */
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
static struct explanation symfile_explanations[] = {
{ "During symbol reading, ", "." },
{ "During symbol reading...", "..."},
{ "", "..."},
{ "", "..."},
{ NULL, NULL }
};
static struct complaints symfile_complaint_book = {
&complaint_sentinel,
0,
symfile_explanations
};
struct complaints *symfile_complaints = &symfile_complaint_book;
/* Wrapper function to, on-demand, fill in a complaints object. */
static struct complaints *
get_complaints (struct complaints **c)
{
if ((*c) != NULL)
return (*c);
(*c) = XMALLOC (struct complaints);
(*c)->root = &complaint_sentinel;
(*c)->series = ISOLATED_MESSAGE;
(*c)->explanation = NULL;
return (*c);
}
static struct complain *
find_complaint (struct complaints *complaints, const char *file,
int line, const char *fmt)
{
struct complain *complaint;
/* Find the complaint in the table. A more efficient search
algorithm (based on hash table or something) could be used. But
that can wait until someone shows evidence that this lookup is
a real bottle neck. */
for (complaint = complaints->root;
complaint != NULL;
complaint = complaint->next)
{
if (complaint->fmt == fmt
&& complaint->file == file
&& complaint->line == line)
return complaint;
}
/* Oops not seen before, fill in a new complaint. */
complaint = XMALLOC (struct complain);
complaint->fmt = fmt;
complaint->file = file;
complaint->line = line;
complaint->counter = 0;
complaint->next = NULL;
/* File it, return it. */
complaint->next = complaints->root;
complaints->root = complaint;
return complaint;
}
/* How many complaints about a particular thing should be printed
before we stop whining about it? Default is no whining at all,
since so many systems have ill-constructed symbol files. */
static unsigned int stop_whining = 0;
/* Print a complaint, and link the complaint block into a chain for
later handling. */
static void
vcomplaint (struct complaints **c, const char *file, int line, const char *fmt,
va_list args)
{
struct complaints *complaints = get_complaints (c);
struct complain *complaint = find_complaint (complaints, file, line, fmt);
enum complaint_series series;
gdb_assert (complaints != NULL);
complaint->counter++;
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
if (complaint->counter > stop_whining)
return;
if (info_verbose)
series = SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE;
else
series = complaints->series;
if (complaint->file != NULL)
internal_vwarning (complaint->file, complaint->line, complaint->fmt, args);
else if (warning_hook)
(*warning_hook) (complaint->fmt, args);
else
{
if (complaints->explanation == NULL)
/* A [v]warning() call always appends a newline. */
vwarning (complaint->fmt, args);
else
{
char *msg;
struct cleanup *cleanups;
xvasprintf (&msg, complaint->fmt, args);
cleanups = make_cleanup (xfree, msg);
wrap_here ("");
if (series != SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE)
begin_line ();
fprintf_filtered (gdb_stderr, "%s%s%s",
complaints->explanation[series].prefix, msg,
complaints->explanation[series].postfix);
/* Force a line-break after any isolated message. For the
other cases, clear_complaints() takes care of any missing
trailing newline, the wrap_here() is just a hint. */
if (series == ISOLATED_MESSAGE)
/* It would be really nice to use begin_line() here.
Unfortunatly that function doesn't track GDB_STDERR and
consequently will sometimes supress a line when it
shouldn't. */
fputs_filtered ("\n", gdb_stderr);
else
wrap_here ("");
do_cleanups (cleanups);
}
}
switch (series)
{
case ISOLATED_MESSAGE:
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
break;
case FIRST_MESSAGE:
complaints->series = SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE;
break;
case SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE:
case SHORT_FIRST_MESSAGE:
complaints->series = SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE;
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
break;
}
/* If GDB dumps core, we'd like to see the complaints first.
Presumably GDB will not be sending so many complaints that this
becomes a performance hog. */
1999-09-29 05:55:21 +08:00
gdb_flush (gdb_stderr);
}
void
complaint (struct complaints **complaints, const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list args;
va_start (args, fmt);
vcomplaint (complaints, NULL/*file*/, 0/*line*/, fmt, args);
va_end (args);
}
void
internal_complaint (struct complaints **complaints, const char *file,
int line, const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list args;
va_start (args, fmt);
vcomplaint (complaints, file, line, fmt, args);
va_end (args);
}
/* Clear out / initialize all complaint counters that have ever been
incremented. If LESS_VERBOSE is 1, be less verbose about
successive complaints, since the messages are appearing all
together during a command that is reporting a contiguous block of
complaints (rather than being interleaved with other messages). If
noisy is 1, we are in a noisy command, and our caller will print
enough context for the user to figure it out. */
void
clear_complaints (struct complaints **c, int less_verbose, int noisy)
{
struct complaints *complaints = get_complaints (c);
struct complain *p;
for (p = complaints->root; p != NULL; p = p->next)
{
1999-07-08 04:19:36 +08:00
p->counter = 0;
}
switch (complaints->series)
{
case FIRST_MESSAGE:
/* Haven't yet printed anything. */
break;
case SHORT_FIRST_MESSAGE:
/* Haven't yet printed anything. */
break;
case ISOLATED_MESSAGE:
/* The code above, always forces a line-break. No need to do it
here. */
break;
case SUBSEQUENT_MESSAGE:
/* It would be really nice to use begin_line() here.
Unfortunatly that function doesn't track GDB_STDERR and
consequently will sometimes supress a line when it shouldn't. */
fputs_unfiltered ("\n", gdb_stderr);
break;
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "bad switch");
}
if (!less_verbose)
complaints->series = ISOLATED_MESSAGE;
else if (!noisy)
complaints->series = FIRST_MESSAGE;
else
complaints->series = SHORT_FIRST_MESSAGE;
}
void
2000-07-30 09:48:28 +08:00
_initialize_complaints (void)
{
add_setshow_cmd ("complaints", class_support, var_zinteger,
&stop_whining,
"Set max number of complaints about incorrect symbols.",
"Show max number of complaints about incorrect symbols.",
NULL, NULL,
&setlist, &showlist);
}