linux/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
Sean Young 7170d3beaf pwm: Make it possible to apply PWM changes in atomic context
Some PWM devices require sleeping, for example if the pwm device is
connected over I2C. However, many PWM devices could be used from atomic
context, e.g. memory mapped PWM. This is useful for, for example, the
pwm-ir-tx driver which requires precise timing. Sleeping causes havoc
with the generated IR signal.

Since not all PWM devices can support atomic context, we also add a
pwm_might_sleep() function to check if is not supported.

Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2023-12-20 16:07:06 +01:00

186 lines
7.5 KiB
ReStructuredText

======================================
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) interface
======================================
This provides an overview about the Linux PWM interface
PWMs are commonly used for controlling LEDs, fans or vibrators in
cell phones. PWMs with a fixed purpose have no need implementing
the Linux PWM API (although they could). However, PWMs are often
found as discrete devices on SoCs which have no fixed purpose. It's
up to the board designer to connect them to LEDs or fans. To provide
this kind of flexibility the generic PWM API exists.
Identifying PWMs
----------------
Users of the legacy PWM API use unique IDs to refer to PWM devices.
Instead of referring to a PWM device via its unique ID, board setup code
should instead register a static mapping that can be used to match PWM
consumers to providers, as given in the following example::
static struct pwm_lookup board_pwm_lookup[] = {
PWM_LOOKUP("tegra-pwm", 0, "pwm-backlight", NULL,
50000, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL),
};
static void __init board_init(void)
{
...
pwm_add_table(board_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(board_pwm_lookup));
...
}
Using PWMs
----------
Consumers use the pwm_get() function and pass to it the consumer device or a
consumer name. pwm_put() is used to free the PWM device. Managed variants of
the getter, devm_pwm_get() and devm_fwnode_pwm_get(), also exist.
After being requested, a PWM has to be configured using::
int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state);
This API controls both the PWM period/duty_cycle config and the
enable/disable state.
PWM devices can be used from atomic context, if the PWM does not sleep. You
can check if this the case with::
bool pwm_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm);
If false, the PWM can also be configured from atomic context with::
int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state);
As a consumer, don't rely on the output's state for a disabled PWM. If it's
easily possible, drivers are supposed to emit the inactive state, but some
drivers cannot. If you rely on getting the inactive state, use .duty_cycle=0,
.enabled=true.
There is also a usage_power setting: If set, the PWM driver is only required to
maintain the power output but has more freedom regarding signal form.
If supported by the driver, the signal can be optimized, for example to improve
EMI by phase shifting the individual channels of a chip.
The pwm_config(), pwm_enable() and pwm_disable() functions are just wrappers
around pwm_apply_might_sleep() and should not be used if the user wants to change
several parameter at once. For example, if you see pwm_config() and
pwm_{enable,disable}() calls in the same function, this probably means you
should switch to pwm_apply_might_sleep().
The PWM user API also allows one to query the PWM state that was passed to the
last invocation of pwm_apply_might_sleep() using pwm_get_state(). Note this is
different to what the driver has actually implemented if the request cannot be
satisfied exactly with the hardware in use. There is currently no way for
consumers to get the actually implemented settings.
In addition to the PWM state, the PWM API also exposes PWM arguments, which
are the reference PWM config one should use on this PWM.
PWM arguments are usually platform-specific and allows the PWM user to only
care about dutycycle relatively to the full period (like, duty = 50% of the
period). struct pwm_args contains 2 fields (period and polarity) and should
be used to set the initial PWM config (usually done in the probe function
of the PWM user). PWM arguments are retrieved with pwm_get_args().
All consumers should really be reconfiguring the PWM upon resume as
appropriate. This is the only way to ensure that everything is resumed in
the proper order.
Using PWMs with the sysfs interface
-----------------------------------
If CONFIG_SYSFS is enabled in your kernel configuration a simple sysfs
interface is provided to use the PWMs from userspace. It is exposed at
/sys/class/pwm/. Each probed PWM controller/chip will be exported as
pwmchipN, where N is the base of the PWM chip. Inside the directory you
will find:
npwm
The number of PWM channels this chip supports (read-only).
export
Exports a PWM channel for use with sysfs (write-only).
unexport
Unexports a PWM channel from sysfs (write-only).
The PWM channels are numbered using a per-chip index from 0 to npwm-1.
When a PWM channel is exported a pwmX directory will be created in the
pwmchipN directory it is associated with, where X is the number of the
channel that was exported. The following properties will then be available:
period
The total period of the PWM signal (read/write).
Value is in nanoseconds and is the sum of the active and inactive
time of the PWM.
duty_cycle
The active time of the PWM signal (read/write).
Value is in nanoseconds and must be less than or equal to the period.
polarity
Changes the polarity of the PWM signal (read/write).
Writes to this property only work if the PWM chip supports changing
the polarity.
Value is the string "normal" or "inversed".
enable
Enable/disable the PWM signal (read/write).
- 0 - disabled
- 1 - enabled
Implementing a PWM driver
-------------------------
Currently there are two ways to implement pwm drivers. Traditionally
there only has been the barebone API meaning that each driver has
to implement the pwm_*() functions itself. This means that it's impossible
to have multiple PWM drivers in the system. For this reason it's mandatory
for new drivers to use the generic PWM framework.
A new PWM controller/chip can be added using pwmchip_add() and removed
again with pwmchip_remove(). pwmchip_add() takes a filled in struct
pwm_chip as argument which provides a description of the PWM chip, the
number of PWM devices provided by the chip and the chip-specific
implementation of the supported PWM operations to the framework.
When implementing polarity support in a PWM driver, make sure to respect the
signal conventions in the PWM framework. By definition, normal polarity
characterizes a signal starts high for the duration of the duty cycle and
goes low for the remainder of the period. Conversely, a signal with inversed
polarity starts low for the duration of the duty cycle and goes high for the
remainder of the period.
Drivers are encouraged to implement ->apply() instead of the legacy
->enable(), ->disable() and ->config() methods. Doing that should provide
atomicity in the PWM config workflow, which is required when the PWM controls
a critical device (like a regulator).
The implementation of ->get_state() (a method used to retrieve initial PWM
state) is also encouraged for the same reason: letting the PWM user know
about the current PWM state would allow him to avoid glitches.
Drivers should not implement any power management. In other words,
consumers should implement it as described in the "Using PWMs" section.
Locking
-------
The PWM core list manipulations are protected by a mutex, so pwm_get()
and pwm_put() may not be called from an atomic context. Currently the
PWM core does not enforce any locking to pwm_enable(), pwm_disable() and
pwm_config(), so the calling context is currently driver specific. This
is an issue derived from the former barebone API and should be fixed soon.
Helpers
-------
Currently a PWM can only be configured with period_ns and duty_ns. For several
use cases freq_hz and duty_percent might be better. Instead of calculating
this in your driver please consider adding appropriate helpers to the framework.