We have the following code paths:
Host FDB (unicast RX filtering):
dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_add() dsa_port_bridge_host_fdb_add()
| |
+--------------+ +------------+
| |
v v
dsa_port_host_fdb_add()
dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_del() dsa_port_bridge_host_fdb_del()
| |
+--------------+ +------------+
| |
v v
dsa_port_host_fdb_del()
Host MDB (multicast RX filtering):
dsa_port_standalone_host_mdb_add() dsa_port_bridge_host_mdb_add()
| |
+--------------+ +------------+
| |
v v
dsa_port_host_mdb_add()
dsa_port_standalone_host_mdb_del() dsa_port_bridge_host_mdb_del()
| |
+--------------+ +------------+
| |
v v
dsa_port_host_mdb_del()
The logic added by commit 5e8a1e03aa ("net: dsa: install secondary
unicast and multicast addresses as host FDB/MDB") zeroes out
db.bridge.num if the switch doesn't support ds->fdb_isolation
(the majority doesn't). This is done for a reason explained in commit
c26933639b ("net: dsa: request drivers to perform FDB isolation").
Taking a single code path as example - dsa_port_host_fdb_add() - the
others are similar - the problem is that this function handles:
- DSA_DB_PORT databases, when called from
dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_add()
- DSA_DB_BRIDGE databases, when called from
dsa_port_bridge_host_fdb_add()
So, if dsa_port_host_fdb_add() were to make any change on the
"bridge.num" attribute of the database, this would only be correct for a
DSA_DB_BRIDGE, and a type confusion for a DSA_DB_PORT bridge.
However, this bug is without consequences, for 2 reasons:
- dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_add() is only called from code which is
(in)directly guarded by dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering(ds), and that
function only returns true if ds->fdb_isolation is set. So, the code
only executed for DSA_DB_BRIDGE databases.
- Even if the code was not dead for DSA_DB_PORT, we have the following
memory layout:
struct dsa_bridge {
struct net_device *dev;
unsigned int num;
bool tx_fwd_offload;
refcount_t refcount;
};
struct dsa_db {
enum dsa_db_type type;
union {
const struct dsa_port *dp; // DSA_DB_PORT
struct dsa_lag lag;
struct dsa_bridge bridge; // DSA_DB_BRIDGE
};
};
So, the zeroization of dsa_db :: bridge :: num on a dsa_db structure of
type DSA_DB_PORT would access memory which is unused, because we only
use dsa_db :: dp for DSA_DB_PORT, and this is mapped at the same address
with dsa_db :: dev for DSA_DB_BRIDGE, thanks to the union definition.
It is correct to fix up dsa_db :: bridge :: num only from code paths
that come from the bridge / switchdev, so move these there.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329133819.697642-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
eb1ab7650d