mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 08:34:20 +08:00
d8238f9eb6
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
accounting | ||
arch | ||
bootconfig | ||
bpf | ||
build | ||
cgroup | ||
debugging | ||
edid | ||
firewire | ||
firmware | ||
gpio | ||
hv | ||
iio | ||
include | ||
io_uring | ||
kvm/kvm_stat | ||
laptop | ||
leds | ||
lib | ||
memory-model | ||
nfsd | ||
objtool | ||
pci | ||
pcmcia | ||
perf | ||
power | ||
scripts | ||
spi | ||
testing | ||
thermal/tmon | ||
time | ||
usb | ||
virtio | ||
vm | ||
wmi | ||
Makefile |