mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 16:24:13 +08:00
65ada547d6
There are control flow that sh_cmt_set_next() does double spin-lock. The callers sh_cmt_{start,stop}() already have lock. But another callers sh_cmt_clock_event_{start,next}() does not. Now sh_cmt_set_next() does not lock by itself. All the callers should hold spin-lock before calling it. [damm@opensource.se: use __sh_cmt_set_next() to simplify code] [damm@opensource.se: added stable, suitable for v2.6.35 + v2.6.36] Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Takashi YOSHII <takashi.yoshii.zj@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi_pm.c | ||
cs5535-clockevt.c | ||
cyclone.c | ||
Makefile | ||
scx200_hrt.c | ||
sh_cmt.c | ||
sh_mtu2.c | ||
sh_tmu.c | ||
tcb_clksrc.c |