The test creates an extent io tree and sets several ranges with the
CHUNK_ALLOCATED and CHUNK_TRIMMED bits, resulting in the allocation of
several extent state structures. However the test never clears those
ranges, resulting in memory leaks of the extent state structures.
This is detected when CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is set once we remove the
btrfs module (rmmod btrfs):
[57399.787918] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.790155] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.791941] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.793753] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.795188] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.796453] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.797765] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.799049] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.800142] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.801126] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.802106] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.803119] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.804153] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.805196] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.806191] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
The start and end offsets reported correspond exactly to the ranges
used by the test.
So fix that by clearing all the ranges when the test finishes.
Fixes: 1eaebb341d ("btrfs: Don't trim returned range based on input value in find_first_clear_extent_bit")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
cdf52bd9fe