mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-24 11:34:50 +08:00
c8e5a0d0e9
Look for a !leaf=>leaf conversion instead of a PFN change when checking if a SPTE change removed a TDP MMU shadow page. Convert the PFN check into a WARN, as KVM should never change the PFN of a shadow page (except when its being zapped or replaced). From a purely theoretical perspective, it's not illegal to replace a SP with a hugepage pointing at the same PFN. In practice, it's impossible as that would require mapping guest memory overtop a kernel-allocated SP. Either way, the check is odd. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-8-seanjc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
mmu_internal.h | ||
mmu.c | ||
mmutrace.h | ||
page_track.c | ||
paging_tmpl.h | ||
paging.h | ||
spte.c | ||
spte.h | ||
tdp_iter.c | ||
tdp_iter.h | ||
tdp_mmu.c | ||
tdp_mmu.h |