mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2025-01-02 11:54:36 +08:00
c0c362b60e
In libata, the non-EH code paths should always take and release
ap->lock explicitly when accessing hardware or shared data structures.
However, once EH is active, it's assumed that the port is owned by EH
and EH methods don't explicitly take ap->lock unless race from irq
handler or other code paths are expected. However, libata EH didn't
guarantee exclusion among EHs for ports of the same host. IOW,
multiple EHs may execute in parallel on multiple ports of the same
controller.
In many cases, especially in SATA, the ports are completely
independent of each other and this doesn't cause problems; however,
there are cases where different ports share the same resource, which
lead to obscure timing related bugs such as the one fixed by commit
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi | ||
asm-generic | ||
crypto | ||
drm | ||
keys | ||
linux | ||
math-emu | ||
media | ||
mtd | ||
net | ||
pcmcia | ||
rdma | ||
rxrpc | ||
scsi | ||
sound | ||
trace | ||
video | ||
xen | ||
Kbuild |