Daniel Walker 89d0cf01c0 [PATCH] invert irq/migration.c brach prediction ... If you get to that point in the code it means that desc->move_irq is set, pending_irq_cpumask[irq] and cpu_online_map should have a value. Still pretty good chance anding those two you'll still have a value. So these two branch predictors should be inverted. Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>		2006-06-23 07:43:04 -07:00
..
autoprobe.c	[PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ	2005-06-28 21:20:29 -07:00
handle.c	Don't call a NULL ack function in the generic IRQ code.	2005-09-28 20:29:44 +10:00
internals.h	Linux-2.6.12-rc2	2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Makefile	[PATCH] build kernel/irq/migration.c only if CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ is set	2006-04-11 06:18:41 -07:00
manage.c	[PATCH] request_irq(): remove warnings from irq probing	2006-04-28 08:33:46 -07:00
migration.c	[PATCH] invert irq/migration.c brach prediction	2006-06-23 07:43:04 -07:00
proc.c	[PATCH] x86: kernel irq balance doesn't work	2006-06-23 07:42:57 -07:00
spurious.c	[PATCH] irqpoll	2005-06-28 21:20:35 -07:00