mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-06 02:24:14 +08:00
4506c531f1
Add a document describing high-level system-wide suspend code flows in Linux. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
271 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
271 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
.. include:: <isonum.txt>
|
|
|
|
=========================
|
|
System Suspend Code Flows
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
:Copyright: |copy| 2020 Intel Corporation
|
|
|
|
:Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
At least one global system-wide transition needs to be carried out for the
|
|
system to get from the working state into one of the supported
|
|
:doc:`sleep states <sleep-states>`. Hibernation requires more than one
|
|
transition to occur for this purpose, but the other sleep states, commonly
|
|
referred to as *system-wide suspend* (or simply *system suspend*) states, need
|
|
only one.
|
|
|
|
For those sleep states, the transition from the working state of the system into
|
|
the target sleep state is referred to as *system suspend* too (in the majority
|
|
of cases, whether this means a transition or a sleep state of the system should
|
|
be clear from the context) and the transition back from the sleep state into the
|
|
working state is referred to as *system resume*.
|
|
|
|
The kernel code flows associated with the suspend and resume transitions for
|
|
different sleep states of the system are quite similar, but there are some
|
|
significant differences between the :ref:`suspend-to-idle <s2idle>` code flows
|
|
and the code flows related to the :ref:`suspend-to-RAM <s2ram>` and
|
|
:ref:`standby <standby>` sleep states.
|
|
|
|
The :ref:`suspend-to-RAM <s2ram>` and :ref:`standby <standby>` sleep states
|
|
cannot be implemented without platform support and the difference between them
|
|
boils down to the platform-specific actions carried out by the suspend and
|
|
resume hooks that need to be provided by the platform driver to make them
|
|
available. Apart from that, the suspend and resume code flows for these sleep
|
|
states are mostly identical, so they both together will be referred to as
|
|
*platform-dependent suspend* states in what follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _s2idle_suspend:
|
|
|
|
Suspend-to-idle Suspend Code Flow
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from the working
|
|
state to the :ref:`suspend-to-idle <s2idle>` sleep state:
|
|
|
|
1. Invoking system-wide suspend notifiers.
|
|
|
|
Kernel subsystems can register callbacks to be invoked when the suspend
|
|
transition is about to occur and when the resume transition has finished.
|
|
|
|
That allows them to prepare for the change of the system state and to clean
|
|
up after getting back to the working state.
|
|
|
|
2. Freezing tasks.
|
|
|
|
Tasks are frozen primarily in order to avoid unchecked hardware accesses
|
|
from user space through MMIO regions or I/O registers exposed directly to
|
|
it and to prevent user space from entering the kernel while the next step
|
|
of the transition is in progress (which might have been problematic for
|
|
various reasons).
|
|
|
|
All user space tasks are intercepted as though they were sent a signal and
|
|
put into uninterruptible sleep until the end of the subsequent system resume
|
|
transition.
|
|
|
|
The kernel threads that choose to be frozen during system suspend for
|
|
specific reasons are frozen subsequently, but they are not intercepted.
|
|
Instead, they are expected to periodically check whether or not they need
|
|
to be frozen and to put themselves into uninterruptible sleep if so. [Note,
|
|
however, that kernel threads can use locking and other concurrency controls
|
|
available in kernel space to synchronize themselves with system suspend and
|
|
resume, which can be much more precise than the freezing, so the latter is
|
|
not a recommended option for kernel threads.]
|
|
|
|
3. Suspending devices and reconfiguring IRQs.
|
|
|
|
Devices are suspended in four phases called *prepare*, *suspend*,
|
|
*late suspend* and *noirq suspend* (see :ref:`driverapi_pm_devices` for more
|
|
information on what exactly happens in each phase).
|
|
|
|
Every device is visited in each phase, but typically it is not physically
|
|
accessed in more than two of them.
|
|
|
|
The runtime PM API is disabled for every device during the *late* suspend
|
|
phase and high-level ("action") interrupt handlers are prevented from being
|
|
invoked before the *noirq* suspend phase.
|
|
|
|
Interrupts are still handled after that, but they are only acknowledged to
|
|
interrupt controllers without performing any device-specific actions that
|
|
would be triggered in the working state of the system (those actions are
|
|
deferred till the subsequent system resume transition as described
|
|
`below <s2idle_resume_>`_).
|
|
|
|
IRQs associated with system wakeup devices are "armed" so that the resume
|
|
transition of the system is started when one of them signals an event.
|
|
|
|
4. Freezing the scheduler tick and suspending timekeeping.
|
|
|
|
When all devices have been suspended, CPUs enter the idle loop and are put
|
|
into the deepest available idle state. While doing that, each of them
|
|
"freezes" its own scheduler tick so that the timer events associated with
|
|
the tick do not occur until the CPU is woken up by another interrupt source.
|
|
|
|
The last CPU to enter the idle state also stops the timekeeping which
|
|
(among other things) prevents high resolution timers from triggering going
|
|
forward until the first CPU that is woken up restarts the timekeeping.
|
|
That allows the CPUs to stay in the deep idle state relatively long in one
|
|
go.
|
|
|
|
From this point on, the CPUs can only be woken up by non-timer hardware
|
|
interrupts. If that happens, they go back to the idle state unless the
|
|
interrupt that woke up one of them comes from an IRQ that has been armed for
|
|
system wakeup, in which case the system resume transition is started.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _s2idle_resume:
|
|
|
|
Suspend-to-idle Resume Code Flow
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from the
|
|
:ref:`suspend-to-idle <s2idle>` sleep state into the working state:
|
|
|
|
1. Resuming timekeeping and unfreezing the scheduler tick.
|
|
|
|
When one of the CPUs is woken up (by a non-timer hardware interrupt), it
|
|
leaves the idle state entered in the last step of the preceding suspend
|
|
transition, restarts the timekeeping (unless it has been restarted already
|
|
by another CPU that woke up earlier) and the scheduler tick on that CPU is
|
|
unfrozen.
|
|
|
|
If the interrupt that has woken up the CPU was armed for system wakeup,
|
|
the system resume transition begins.
|
|
|
|
2. Resuming devices and restoring the working-state configuration of IRQs.
|
|
|
|
Devices are resumed in four phases called *noirq resume*, *early resume*,
|
|
*resume* and *complete* (see :ref:`driverapi_pm_devices` for more
|
|
information on what exactly happens in each phase).
|
|
|
|
Every device is visited in each phase, but typically it is not physically
|
|
accessed in more than two of them.
|
|
|
|
The working-state configuration of IRQs is restored after the *noirq* resume
|
|
phase and the runtime PM API is re-enabled for every device whose driver
|
|
supports it during the *early* resume phase.
|
|
|
|
3. Thawing tasks.
|
|
|
|
Tasks frozen in step 2 of the preceding `suspend <s2idle_suspend_>`_
|
|
transition are "thawed", which means that they are woken up from the
|
|
uninterruptible sleep that they went into at that time and user space tasks
|
|
are allowed to exit the kernel.
|
|
|
|
4. Invoking system-wide resume notifiers.
|
|
|
|
This is analogous to step 1 of the `suspend <s2idle_suspend_>`_ transition
|
|
and the same set of callbacks is invoked at this point, but a different
|
|
"notification type" parameter value is passed to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platform-dependent Suspend Code Flow
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from the working
|
|
state to platform-dependent suspend state:
|
|
|
|
1. Invoking system-wide suspend notifiers.
|
|
|
|
This step is the same as step 1 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition
|
|
described `above <s2idle_suspend_>`_.
|
|
|
|
2. Freezing tasks.
|
|
|
|
This step is the same as step 2 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition
|
|
described `above <s2idle_suspend_>`_.
|
|
|
|
3. Suspending devices and reconfiguring IRQs.
|
|
|
|
This step is analogous to step 3 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition
|
|
described `above <s2idle_suspend_>`_, but the arming of IRQs for system
|
|
wakeup generally does not have any effect on the platform.
|
|
|
|
There are platforms that can go into a very deep low-power state internally
|
|
when all CPUs in them are in sufficiently deep idle states and all I/O
|
|
devices have been put into low-power states. On those platforms,
|
|
suspend-to-idle can reduce system power very effectively.
|
|
|
|
On the other platforms, however, low-level components (like interrupt
|
|
controllers) need to be turned off in a platform-specific way (implemented
|
|
in the hooks provided by the platform driver) to achieve comparable power
|
|
reduction.
|
|
|
|
That usually prevents in-band hardware interrupts from waking up the system,
|
|
which must be done in a special platform-dependent way. Then, the
|
|
configuration of system wakeup sources usually starts when system wakeup
|
|
devices are suspended and is finalized by the platform suspend hooks later
|
|
on.
|
|
|
|
4. Disabling non-boot CPUs.
|
|
|
|
On some platforms the suspend hooks mentioned above must run in a one-CPU
|
|
configuration of the system (in particular, the hardware cannot be accessed
|
|
by any code running in parallel with the platform suspend hooks that may,
|
|
and often do, trap into the platform firmware in order to finalize the
|
|
suspend transition).
|
|
|
|
For this reason, the CPU offline/online (CPU hotplug) framework is used
|
|
to take all of the CPUs in the system, except for one (the boot CPU),
|
|
offline (typically, the CPUs that have been taken offline go into deep idle
|
|
states).
|
|
|
|
This means that all tasks are migrated away from those CPUs and all IRQs are
|
|
rerouted to the only CPU that remains online.
|
|
|
|
5. Suspending core system components.
|
|
|
|
This prepares the core system components for (possibly) losing power going
|
|
forward and suspends the timekeeping.
|
|
|
|
6. Platform-specific power removal.
|
|
|
|
This is expected to remove power from all of the system components except
|
|
for the memory controller and RAM (in order to preserve the contents of the
|
|
latter) and some devices designated for system wakeup.
|
|
|
|
In many cases control is passed to the platform firmware which is expected
|
|
to finalize the suspend transition as needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platform-dependent Resume Code Flow
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from a
|
|
platform-dependent suspend state into the working state:
|
|
|
|
1. Platform-specific system wakeup.
|
|
|
|
The platform is woken up by a signal from one of the designated system
|
|
wakeup devices (which need not be an in-band hardware interrupt) and
|
|
control is passed back to the kernel (the working configuration of the
|
|
platform may need to be restored by the platform firmware before the
|
|
kernel gets control again).
|
|
|
|
2. Resuming core system components.
|
|
|
|
The suspend-time configuration of the core system components is restored and
|
|
the timekeeping is resumed.
|
|
|
|
3. Re-enabling non-boot CPUs.
|
|
|
|
The CPUs disabled in step 4 of the preceding suspend transition are taken
|
|
back online and their suspend-time configuration is restored.
|
|
|
|
4. Resuming devices and restoring the working-state configuration of IRQs.
|
|
|
|
This step is the same as step 2 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition
|
|
described `above <s2idle_resume_>`_.
|
|
|
|
5. Thawing tasks.
|
|
|
|
This step is the same as step 3 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition
|
|
described `above <s2idle_resume_>`_.
|
|
|
|
6. Invoking system-wide resume notifiers.
|
|
|
|
This step is the same as step 4 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition
|
|
described `above <s2idle_resume_>`_.
|