Problem
=========
After commit 67f6951347 ("ipv6: Move setting default metric for routes"),
we noticed that the logic of assigning the default value of fc_metirc
changed in the ioctl process. That is, when users use ioctl(fd, SIOCADDRT,
rt) with a non-zero metric to add a route, then they may fail to delete a
route with passing in a metric value of 0 to the kernel by ioctl(fd,
SIOCDELRT, rt). But iproute can succeed in deleting it.
As a reference, when using iproute tools by netlink to delete routes with
a metric parameter equals 0, like the command as follows:
ip -6 route del fe80::/64 via fe81::5054:ff:fe11:3451 dev eth0 metric 0
the user can still succeed in deleting the route entry with the smallest
metric.
Root Reason
===========
After commit 67f6951347 ("ipv6: Move setting default metric for routes"),
When ioctl() pass in SIOCDELRT with a zero metric, rtmsg_to_fib6_config()
will set a defalut value (1024) to cfg->fc_metric in kernel, and in
ip6_route_del() and the line 4074 at net/ipv3/route.c, it will check by
if (cfg->fc_metric && cfg->fc_metric != rt->fib6_metric)
continue;
and the condition is true and skip the later procedure (deleting route)
because cfg->fc_metric != rt->fib6_metric. But before that commit,
cfg->fc_metric is still zero there, so the condition is false and it
will do the following procedure (deleting).
Solution
========
In order to keep a consistent behaviour across netlink() and ioctl(), we
should allow to delete a route with a metric value of 0. So we only do
the default setting of fc_metric in route adding.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Fixes: 67f6951347 ("ipv6: Move setting default metric for routes")
Co-developed-by: Fan Yu <fan.yu9@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Fan Yu <fan.yu9@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240514201102055dD2Ba45qKbLlUMxu_DTHP@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
bb48727238