mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-26 12:34:41 +08:00
65b80179f9
Direct data placement is not allowed when using flavors that guarantee integrity or privacy. When such security flavors are in effect, don't allow the use of Read and Write chunks for moving individual data items. All messages larger than the inline threshold are sent via Long Call or Long Reply. On my systems (CX-3 Pro on FDR), for small I/O operations, the use of Long messages adds only around 5 usecs of latency in each direction. Note that when integrity or encryption is used, the host CPU touches every byte in these messages. Even if it could be used, data movement offload doesn't buy much in this case. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auth_gss.c | ||
| gss_generic_token.c | ||
| gss_krb5_crypto.c | ||
| gss_krb5_keys.c | ||
| gss_krb5_mech.c | ||
| gss_krb5_seal.c | ||
| gss_krb5_seqnum.c | ||
| gss_krb5_unseal.c | ||
| gss_krb5_wrap.c | ||
| gss_mech_switch.c | ||
| gss_rpc_upcall.c | ||
| gss_rpc_upcall.h | ||
| gss_rpc_xdr.c | ||
| gss_rpc_xdr.h | ||
| Makefile | ||
| svcauth_gss.c | ||