Sebastian reports that after commit ff296293b3 ("random: Support freezable
kthreads in add_hwgenerator_randomness()") we can call might_sleep() when the
task state is TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (state=1). This leads to the following warning.
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<00000000349d1489>] prepare_to_wait_event+0x5a/0x180
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 828 at kernel/sched/core.c:6741 __might_sleep+0x6f/0x80
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 828 Comm: hwrng Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7-next-20190903+ #46
RIP: 0010:__might_sleep+0x6f/0x80
Call Trace:
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x1b/0x60
add_hwgenerator_randomness+0xdd/0x130
hwrng_fillfn+0xbf/0x120
kthread+0x10c/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
We shouldn't call kthread_freezable_should_stop() from deep within the
wait_event code because the task state is still set as
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_RUNNING and
kthread_freezable_should_stop() will try to call into the freezer with
the task in the wrong state. Use wait_event_freezable() instead so that
it calls schedule() in the right place and tries to enter the freezer
when the task state is TASK_RUNNING instead.
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Fixes: ff296293b3 ("random: Support freezable kthreads in add_hwgenerator_randomness()")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
59b569480d