mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-14 06:24:53 +08:00
d8924c0d76
- Introduce "software nodes", analogous to the DT and ACPI firmware nodes except that they can be created by kernel code, in order to complement fwnodes representing real firmware nodes when they are incomplete (for example missing device properties) and to supply the primary fwnode when the firmware lacks hardware description for a device completely, and replace the "property_set" struct fwnode_handle type with software nodes (Heikki Krogerus). - Clean up the just introduced software nodes support and fix a commet in the graph-handling code (Colin Ian King, Marco Felsch). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJcHMUXAAoJEILEb/54YlRxqJIP/2bDrVQphjXoZWC0/BAOjAMO 1WIaS+LI1VpvnnSxVQllfGHSI4voKiF1fcnKMui/VjCaH/BYhh98RJtCoZ72fHHt WlKlMhNm2nQ5XibZP1Ge9u2NDkfebgOLTHkAam/7dMwxKBzxbK1ytcuggMnL2HRY 9wv6N/y1iLmfFABE0WEV/a3715i5MmBxC5ApIBvjK4tRv+KpYaJ7i03+4qGxpnHY hGvQE0b49hJkBGwVeoEPz/3HpsJ1WYBj4Oi7UyVa8A/GyWaRdwLtUVmidBua4Dah 1eVjpjj6vreuHRwpQbMPkMecSsdon7EzsoyWklAGKPXuA5GKmvoDoLu66DORH93O a3h60vq5SqsVhqJhzJpN7SZLAeGdQymSW0aABpKotKIrNVZMkWTIyxvPSw3PKnF0 3dhgv1QUktKteuCLFfuLqp+vHbPEauOul4iPwElpno6LJ1xzVaf/sNXoHPJwBOs9 LYHUsB8G9L3Y7qvDn4RpR3zYChFE6/J53U8B4P0g+lqV1nxz28ov00VwZJihdpcz wzj+lF53Tzf4gMiaIdjSsrWMtx7lNcAowYsbdb8nyng555HMaW/ROzw1gv/GB5hp 2Iaru6+J4QGbwAaLlOVeGY0TenCJUuF+tF+ufVHujceehjAisDzF+zev0VivRv26 UwRSmhd/g1tPsoeJVhQN =Z3Zj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'devprop-4.21-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull device properties framework updates from Rafael Wysocki: "This introduces 'software nodes' that are analogous to the DT and ACPI firmware nodes except that they can be created by drivers themselves and do a couple of assorted cleanups. Specifics: - Introduce "software nodes", analogous to the DT and ACPI firmware nodes except that they can be created by kernel code, in order to complement fwnodes representing real firmware nodes when they are incomplete (for example missing device properties) and to supply the primary fwnode when the firmware lacks hardware description for a device completely, and replace the "property_set" struct fwnode_handle type with software nodes (Heikki Krogerus). - Clean up the just introduced software nodes support and fix a commet in the graph-handling code (Colin Ian King, Marco Felsch)" * tag 'devprop-4.21-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: device property: fix fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() documentation drivers: base: swnode: remove need for a temporary string for the node name device property: Remove struct property_set device property: Move device_add_properties() to swnode.c drivers: base: Introducing software nodes to the firmware node framework ACPI / glue: Add acpi_platform_notify() function drivers core: Prepare support for multiple platform notifications driver core: platform: Remove duplicated device_remove_properties() call |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
obsolete | ||
removed | ||
stable | ||
testing | ||
README |
This directory attempts to document the ABI between the Linux kernel and userspace, and the relative stability of these interfaces. Due to the everchanging nature of Linux, and the differing maturity levels, these interfaces should be used by userspace programs in different ways. We have four different levels of ABI stability, as shown by the four different subdirectories in this location. Interfaces may change levels of stability according to the rules described below. The different levels of stability are: stable/ This directory documents the interfaces that the developer has defined to be stable. Userspace programs are free to use these interfaces with no restrictions, and backward compatibility for them will be guaranteed for at least 2 years. Most interfaces (like syscalls) are expected to never change and always be available. testing/ This directory documents interfaces that are felt to be stable, as the main development of this interface has been completed. The interface can be changed to add new features, but the current interface will not break by doing this, unless grave errors or security problems are found in them. Userspace programs can start to rely on these interfaces, but they must be aware of changes that can occur before these interfaces move to be marked stable. Programs that use these interfaces are strongly encouraged to add their name to the description of these interfaces, so that the kernel developers can easily notify them if any changes occur (see the description of the layout of the files below for details on how to do this.) obsolete/ This directory documents interfaces that are still remaining in the kernel, but are marked to be removed at some later point in time. The description of the interface will document the reason why it is obsolete and when it can be expected to be removed. removed/ This directory contains a list of the old interfaces that have been removed from the kernel. Every file in these directories will contain the following information: What: Short description of the interface Date: Date created KernelVersion: Kernel version this feature first showed up in. Contact: Primary contact for this interface (may be a mailing list) Description: Long description of the interface and how to use it. Users: All users of this interface who wish to be notified when it changes. This is very important for interfaces in the "testing" stage, so that kernel developers can work with userspace developers to ensure that things do not break in ways that are unacceptable. It is also important to get feedback for these interfaces to make sure they are working in a proper way and do not need to be changed further. How things move between levels: Interfaces in stable may move to obsolete, as long as the proper notification is given. Interfaces may be removed from obsolete and the kernel as long as the documented amount of time has gone by. Interfaces in the testing state can move to the stable state when the developers feel they are finished. They cannot be removed from the kernel tree without going through the obsolete state first. It's up to the developer to place their interfaces in the category they wish for it to start out in. Notable bits of non-ABI, which should not under any circumstances be considered stable: - Kconfig. Userspace should not rely on the presence or absence of any particular Kconfig symbol, in /proc/config.gz, in the copy of .config commonly installed to /boot, or in any invocation of the kernel build process. - Kernel-internal symbols. Do not rely on the presence, absence, location, or type of any kernel symbol, either in System.map files or the kernel binary itself. See Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst.