mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 13:34:38 +08:00
48e29f5535
On a previous iteration of this patch, I created an Execlists version of __i915_add_request and asbtracted it away as a vfunc. Daniel Vetter wondered then why that was needed: "with the clean split in command submission I expect every function to know wether it'll submit to an lrc (everything in intel_lrc.c) or wether it'll submit to a legacy ring (existing code), so I don't see a need for an add_request vfunc." The honest, hairy truth is that this patch is the glue keeping the whole logical ring puzzle together: - i915_add_request is used by intel_ring_idle, which in turn is used by i915_gpu_idle, which in turn is used in several places inside the eviction and gtt codes. - Also, it is used by i915_gem_check_olr, which is littered all over i915_gem.c - ... If I were to duplicate all the code that directly or indirectly uses __i915_add_request, I'll end up creating a separate driver. To show the differences between the existing legacy version and the new Execlists one, this time I have special-cased __i915_add_request instead of adding an add_request vfunc. I hope this helps to untangle this Gordian knot. Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> [danvet: Adjust to ringbuf->FIXME_lrc_ctx per the discussion with Thomas Daniel.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| drm | ||
| host1x | ||
| ipu-v3 | ||
| vga | ||
| Makefile | ||