In commit 9a69e2b385 ("bpf: Make remote_port field in struct
bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide") ->remote_port field changed from __u32 to
__be16.
However, narrow load tests which exercise 1-byte sized loads from
offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port) were not adopted to reflect the
change.
As a result, on little-endian we continue testing loads from addresses:
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port + 3
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port + 4
which map to the zero padding following the remote_port field, and don't
break the tests because there is no observable change.
While on big-endian, we observe breakage because tests expect to see zeros
for values loaded from:
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port - 1
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port - 2
Above addresses map to ->remote_ip6 field, which precedes ->remote_port,
and are populated during the bpf_sk_lookup IPv6 tests.
Unsurprisingly, on s390x we observe:
#136/38 sk_lookup/narrow access to ctx v4:OK
#136/39 sk_lookup/narrow access to ctx v6:FAIL
Fix it by removing the checks for 1-byte loads from offsets outside of the
->remote_port field.
Fixes: 9a69e2b385 ("bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide")
Suggested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220319183356.233666-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
3c69611b89