mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-15 06:55:13 +08:00
304ec1b050
Quoting Linus: I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends, but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_ accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache. __uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: alan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
boot | ||
configs | ||
crypto | ||
entry | ||
events | ||
hyperv | ||
ia32 | ||
include | ||
kernel | ||
kvm | ||
lib | ||
math-emu | ||
mm | ||
net | ||
oprofile | ||
pci | ||
platform | ||
power | ||
purgatory | ||
ras | ||
realmode | ||
tools | ||
um | ||
video | ||
xen | ||
.gitignore | ||
Kbuild | ||
Kconfig | ||
Kconfig.cpu | ||
Kconfig.debug | ||
Makefile | ||
Makefile_32.cpu | ||
Makefile.um |