mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 16:54:20 +08:00
235772da3e
In __mb_check_buddy(), look at the code below:
591 fstart = -1;
592 buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
593 for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
594 if (!mb_test_bit(i, buddy)) {
595 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(i >= e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free);
596 if (fstart == -1) {
597 fragments++;
598 fstart = i;
599 }
600 continue;
601 }
602 fstart = -1;
603 /* check used bits only */
604 for (j = 0; j < e4b->bd_blkbits + 1; j++) {
605 buddy2 = mb_find_buddy(e4b, j, &max2);
606 k = i >> j;
607 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(k < max2);
608 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(mb_test_bit(k, buddy2));
609 }
610 }
611 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(!EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(e4b->bd_info));
612 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments == fragments);
613
614 grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, e4b->bd_group);
615 buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
On line 592, buddy is fetched by mb_find_buddy() with order 0, between
line 593 to line 615, buddy is not changed, therefore there is
no need to fetch buddy again from mb_find_buddy() with order 0 again.
We can safely remove the second mb_find_buddy() on line 615.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <bosong.ly@taobao.com>
Cc: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acl.c | ||
| acl.h | ||
| balloc.c | ||
| bitmap.c | ||
| block_validity.c | ||
| dir.c | ||
| ext4_extents.h | ||
| ext4_jbd2.c | ||
| ext4_jbd2.h | ||
| ext4.h | ||
| extents.c | ||
| file.c | ||
| fsync.c | ||
| hash.c | ||
| ialloc.c | ||
| inode.c | ||
| ioctl.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mballoc.c | ||
| mballoc.h | ||
| migrate.c | ||
| move_extent.c | ||
| namei.c | ||
| page-io.c | ||
| resize.c | ||
| super.c | ||
| symlink.c | ||
| xattr_security.c | ||
| xattr_trusted.c | ||
| xattr_user.c | ||
| xattr.c | ||
| xattr.h | ||