mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-09-22 22:11:38 +08:00
1e9042b9c8
In some case C1% will be wrong value, when platform doesn't have MSR for C1 residency. For example: Core CPU CPU%c1 - - 100.00 0 0 100.00 0 2 100.00 1 1 100.00 1 3 100.00 But adding Busy% will fix this Core CPU Busy% CPU%c1 - - 99.77 0.23 0 0 99.77 0.23 0 2 99.77 0.23 1 1 99.77 0.23 1 3 99.77 0.23 This issue can be reproduced on most of the recent systems including Broadwell, Skylake and later. This is because if we don't select Busy% or Avg_MHz or Bzy_MHz then mperf value will not be read from MSR, so it will be 0. But this is required for C1% calculation when MSR for C1 residency is not present. Same is true for C3, C6 and C7 column selection. So add another define DO_BIC_READ(), which doesn't depend on user column selection and use for mperf, C3, C6 and C7 related counters. So when there is no platform support for C1 residency counters, we still read these counters, if the CPU has support and user selected display of CPU%c1. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acpi | ||
| cpupower | ||
| pm-graph | ||
| x86 | ||