mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-15 15:04:27 +08:00
7407054209
Tetsuo has reported the following potential oom_killer_disable vs.
oom_reaper race:
(1) freeze_processes() starts freezing user space threads.
(2) Somebody (maybe a kenrel thread) calls out_of_memory().
(3) The OOM killer calls mark_oom_victim() on a user space thread
P1 which is already in __refrigerator().
(4) oom_killer_disable() sets oom_killer_disabled = true.
(5) P1 leaves __refrigerator() and enters do_exit().
(6) The OOM reaper calls exit_oom_victim(P1) before P1 can call
exit_oom_victim(P1).
(7) oom_killer_disable() returns while P1 not yet finished
(8) P1 perform IO/interfere with the freezer.
This situation is unfortunate. We cannot move oom_killer_disable after
all the freezable kernel threads are frozen because the oom victim might
depend on some of those kthreads to make a forward progress to exit so
we could deadlock. It is also far from trivial to teach the oom_reaper
to not call exit_oom_victim() because then we would lose a guarantee of
the OOM killer and oom_killer_disable forward progress because
exit_mm->mmput might block and never call exit_oom_victim.
It seems the easiest way forward is to workaround this race by calling
try_to_freeze_tasks again after oom_killer_disable. This will make sure
that all the tasks are frozen or it bails out.
Fixes:
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| autosleep.c | ||
| console.c | ||
| hibernate.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| main.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| power.h | ||
| poweroff.c | ||
| process.c | ||
| qos.c | ||
| snapshot.c | ||
| suspend_test.c | ||
| suspend.c | ||
| swap.c | ||
| user.c | ||
| wakelock.c | ||