After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert
back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515205048.19561-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-172-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The suspend and resume callbacks in this driver appear to be safe
to call repeatedly, but why do so when we can use the
DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS() macro to supply callbacks that check if
we are already runtime suspended before doing unnecessary work.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220807190414.1039028-2-jic23@kernel.org
The devm_ handled runtime pm disable calls pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend()
which isn't balancing a matching get call. It isn't a bug as such,
because the runtime pm core doesn't decrement the reference count below
zero, but it is missleading so let's drop it.
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() new call makes it easy to handle
failures in resume as it doesn't hold a reference count if it exits
with an error.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210516162103.1332291-7-jic23@kernel.org
These prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-18-jic23@kernel.org
This patch applies the semantic patch:
@@
expression I, P, SP;
@@
I = devm_iio_device_alloc(P, SP);
...
- I->dev.parent = P;
It updates 302 files and does 307 deletions.
This semantic patch also removes some comments like
'/* Establish that the iio_dev is a child of the i2c device */'
But this is is only done in case where the block is left empty.
The patch does not seem to cover all cases. It looks like in some cases a
different variable is used in some cases to assign the parent, but it
points to the same reference.
In other cases, the block covered by ... may be just too big to be covered
by the semantic patch.
However, this looks pretty good as well, as it does cover a big bulk of the
drivers that should remove the parent assignment.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The ACCES 104-QUAD-8 series does active filtering on the quadrature
input signals via the PC/104 bus clock (OSC 14.318 MHz). This patch
exposes the filter clock prescaler available on each channel.
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
InvenSense ICP-101xx sensors are a family of barometric pressure
and temperature sensor.
These devices are I2C only and use a specific protocol of
commands/responses. Data transfer is secured by using crc8.
Driver provides processed pressure and raw temperature data.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
